LIES FROM LOUISE, LIES FROM ALRANZ, TRUTH FROM AMBER

 

Not her body, not her choice

A Bill ostensibly banning 'protest and harassment' outside abortion mills passed its first reading last night, 100 to 15. Why are we not surprised? Because at root (pun intended), it's about protecting men's 'rights' to sex without consequences. Will the women of New Zealand please wake up?

Left, Louisa Wall MP and right, the scene of the crime - not of murder but of 'harassment'

Women have been perverted by years of male exploitation and pill-popping and when that fails, by coercion to kill the by-product of sexual gratification, into swapping 'female' for 'feminist'. Women have been victimised by men; subconsciously they retaliate by victimising their own children so they can beat men at their own game - and beating the guys is not that hard, because women are created by God for the most important role in society: nurturing the coming generation. 

It's driven society mad. Insane. Men say women love sex so much they'll kill for it. Women say it's better to kill their own child than to nurture it. Many women condemn themselves to life-long regret, physical and mental impairment so that men - sometimes strangers - can carry on having sex with them. 

So our hospitals have been turned into abortion mills. Instead of healing patients they deliberately kill them. The crime committed at hospitals is no longer the murder of babies, but 'harassment' by people who try to provide alternatives to murder and are vilified as 'bullies'. I ask you, who are the bullies here?

Parliament has long since turned hospitals into killing fields and is now in the process of turning the footpaths outside into 'safe zones' which if Wall's bill is passed will be more perilous than ever for babies scheduled for murder by elective abortion.

Bellamak has something to look smug about: she survived the womb
but her own child did not

"Even here in Aotearoa," rants Terry Bellamak of the Abortion Law Reform Association NZ (ALRANZ), “pro-life” extremists have committed violent acts."

 https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/08-03-2021/why-we-need-safe-areas-outside-abortion-clinics/ 

A former executive at Goldman Sachs in the US, Bellamak is now a New Zealand citizen. We note that she is not an 'Aotearoa' citizen - but the te reo gives her political game away, does it not? 

So she describes these last-ditch attempts to save lives as 'street theatre' and the people in the ditch, on the street, patiently awaiting some indication of receptiveness in passersby, Bellamak calls 'bullies'.  I ask you, who are the bullies here?

Young, part-Māori, 'gay', and a former champion netballer and rugby player, Louisa Wall was a dream ticket for Labour. She's now 'married'  to lawyer Prue Kapua. Wall also worked for three years on legislation to modernise surrogacy laws, but the party wouldn’t allow her to sponsor it. It’s in the ballot in MP Tāmati Coffey’s name. “More appropriate, I guess, because he and his 'husband' had gone through the [surrogacy] process.”

She aimed to score high, right from the time of her election to Parliament, and is now trying for a replay of the the botch-up Ardern&Little Inc, Dealers in Death, made of their attempt last March in the Abortion Legislation Act, to cancel anyone wanting to save unborn babies outside their abortion mills (politely known as 'facilities'). This is what Wall has written to a woman who will not be so easily cancelled:

   "Kia ora Sandy

A bit rude to assume that Sandy speaks te reo, but hey, it reminds her that Wall's on the right side.

This is my members’ bill -

Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion (Safe Areas) Amendment Bill:

All New Zealanders deserve to have the right to access health services ...

But in honesty, Ms Wall, we're not talking about a 'health service', are we? Abortion is a death and sickness service.

... with their safety, privacy, and dignity protected. ...Protests ...

 They're not 'protests', they're protectionist.

... at abortion clinics are common place in New Zealand. These protests amount to targeted harassment of those people who choose to access essential health services. ...

 They're not 'essential', they're elective. 

No other group is subjected to protest simply for going to their doctor, nor should these people be.

They're not going to 'their doctor', they're going to unknown professional killers. 

This bill isn’t about abortion, the 52nd parliament voted on that. And this isn’t about freedom of expression - if you don’t believe in abortion you can still communicate this, just not within 150m of an abortion facility.

It's a public footpath. The public have a right to use it.

This is about -

The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code) which establishes the rights of consumers, and the obligations and duties of providers to comply with the Code.

For example -

Right 1 - Right to be treated with respect

In my experience and to my knowledge, in New Zealand those keeping vigil in prayer outside abortion mills treat everyone with the utmost respect. 

Right 2 - Right to freedom from discrimination, coercion, harassment, and exploitation

None of which in my experience and to my knowledge happens at prayer vigils or 'pro-life outreaches' as some prefer to call them. 

Right 3 - Right to dignity and independence

People at prayer vigils are defending the right of the child to dignity and independence, as well as the mother's. There's no dignity in murder, no independence in coercion or keeping up with the Joneses.

The High Court in Victoria noted:

The High Court in Victoria has been proven corrupt, and what's more it's the High Court in Victoria not in New Zealand, thank God. 

... to force a political message upon another person is inconsistent with the human dignity of that person. While there is an interest to be protected in fostering free expression and political comment by members of the community, the Court argued that this is not to be interpreted as putting an obligation on anyone else in the community to receive such messages. Moreover, the Court ruled, a safe zone does not unfairly and unequally put at a disadvantage the views of the anti-abortion movement. In terms of content, the Court pointed out, the safe zone is completely viewpoint neutral. No views about abortion (pro or con) can be expressed within them.

So the para above is all completely irrelevant. 

And it is also about preventing Violence at Work.

Such as, for instance, the ultimate in Violence Anywhere which is murder. What about preventing hospital staff from Violence at Work? They wouldn't take that very kindly; they're paid handsomely to do Violence at Work.

Violence can take many forms – ranging from physical assault and verbal abuse to intimidation and low-level threatening behaviour. Violence or threats of violence are never acceptable.

https://www.worksafe.govt.nz/.../violence-at-work.../

That's pretty much exactly what the prayer vigil people are all about. Preventing violence. 

Just as there is no obligation for Women and their families to receive anti-abortion messages when accessing abortion facility services, there is no obligation for staff of these abortion facilities to receive anti-abortion messages in any form either.

The prayer vigil people are not obliging anyone to receive anything. They're just offering. 

Abortion is no longer a crime.

Oh yes it is, Ms Wall, in the eyes of God. As you will certainly find out, sooner or later. Better sooner, dear. And didn't you say this is not about abortion? 

These abusive and traumatizing behaviors ...

Can you please itemize said 'abusive and traumatizing behaviours'? 

... that interfere with the choices Women and their families and any pregnant person makes in accessing the health service of abortion is unacceptable and should no longer be tolerated.

Finally, I agree with the Victorian Solicitor-General:

whose opinions are entirely irrelevant. 

"It is unreasonable for anti-abortion groups to target women at the very time and place when they are seeking to access a health service, or to target health service staff. The impact of such actions on these women must be understood within the context of their personal circumstances. Many are already feeling distressed, anxious and fearful about an unplanned pregnancy, or a procedure that they are about to undergo. To be confronted by anti-abortion groups at this time is likely to exacerbate these feelings. It is intimidating and demeaning for women to have to run the gauntlet of anti-abortion groups outside health services."

Louisa

WORKSAFE.GOVT.NZ

Violence at work: customer service areas

 Is the 'Worksafe' link not hideously ironic, in this context? How safe are the 'customer service areas' in abortion mills, where for every customer who is killed, another is maimed for life?

And poor Ms Wall never got around to addressing her correspondent Sandy's point - for which she thanks the redoubtable Ken Orr of Right to Life NZ - that the Law Commission in NEW ZEALAND - as opposed to Victoria, Australia, does not see any particular reason for safe zones to be instituted at this time.

Amber and her son, a year ago 

So in the interests of sanity, and to demonstrate that it's still alive and kicking in New Zealand, we'll listen to Brendan and Katie Malone (Christchurch) and Amber Lambert's perspective on those 'bullies' who stand outside abortion mills and so-called hospitals on their killing days.First, the Malones:

"Watching our Parliament debate Labour MP Louisa Wall’s so-called ‘Safe Areas’ Bill tonight paints a very frightening picture about the current state of governance in this country.

This Bill is seeking to make it a criminal act to peacefully and silently express a pro-life view in any public space or private property that is within 150 metres of a NZ abortion clinic. Christians were targeted as the enemy of the public good in speeches tonight, as was the singing of “hymns” and “praying” in public (I kid you not). The sponsor of the Bill made the obscene claim that peaceful pro-life vigils are a form of torture (the kind banned internationally as a war crime). Not one single MP voting for this Bill maintained a consistent, logical or principled position in their speeches. It would be easy to sit back and lazily ridicule the spectacle that happened in our Parliament tonight, but every person of goodwill really needs to see this as a call to action to renew our efforts to build the culture of goodness, truth and beauty in this country. It is dying, and it needs us more than ever before. Tonight was a powerful reminder for me as to why I founded the Lifenet Charitable Trust with the primary mission of “planting and nurturing the seeds of leadership, virtue and ethical concern” through education, formation and public engagement. Katie and I have made a lot of sacrifices in taking on this challenging cultural missionary endeavour, but this Parliamentary session has reminded me once again of why our ministry exists, and why we must be prepared to keep making those sacrifices in order to doing this work."

And now, Amber: 

After hearing about this safe zone around hospitals or where ever abortions are performed. Many painting a negative picture about those who stand outside those places. I'd like to say they are the most beautiful people.

"I remember Dawn Bedingfield when I'd have nowhere to go, kicked out with a newborn baby would pick us up didn't matter the time or day and find me and my son a safe place to stay the night.

"And then moving to Veronica's Place who were also pro life and having those who loved us and showed me how a family should look like. They never gave up on me even when I'd give them reasons too.

"They loved me and my son and taught me so much even things I wasn't so enthusiastic about like cleaning . When I reflect back on Veronicas Place it's where I saw God's love in motion . . And always a testimony I hold on to and remember when I feel a situation is impossible to overcome.

"Because back when I was 16 and chose life for my son I didn't know that God had gone ahead of me and prepared the way. That all my fears about how I would raise this child on my own God had already prepared the right people who would walk in to my life.

"I look back and am amazed by how many Christians he gathered around me to support me in my journey I don't believe it's just a coincidence they were all Christian either. Not only by saying yes to life for my son did I gain such a beautiful boy but through this journey all along God was leading me to Him.

"I just love how God can turn what we think is a bad situation in to such a blessing that has a testimony of His goodness."