EXPECT MAORI BULLIES TO GRAB NZ'S FRESHWATER

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.

For the Maori Party the sky 's the limit. It seems nothing beneath the sky isn't theirs already. They're claiming our water, next they'll want our air. And if Te Pati Maori turn out the kingmaker this election, they just might get it. 

Tuku Morgan got it wrong with the underpants which cost the taxpayer $89 but he's right when he says "ownership of water is probably the most important issue of our time". In the terrible years ahead, humanity will cry out as Christ did on the cross, "I thirst". Clean water will be New Zealand's greatest asset.

How could the Maori Party come by this coup? New Zealand is reaping what it sowed by patronising Maori, by treating Maori as second-class, handicapped citizens who somehow needed handouts and leg-ups. We took away their dignity and now the bullies among them are retaliating by asserting their "rights" to Just About Everything. 

Debbie Ngawera-Packer, Rawiri Waititi: kingmakers?

Last week, Waatea News talkback host John Tamihere interviewed the Chairman of the Waikato-based Tainui iwi, former MP Tuku Morgan, about the future of freshwater.

It was clear from their on-air ‘chat’, that as far as iwi leaders are concerned, Labour’s Three Waters reforms are just a stepping-stone towards Maori ‘ownership’ of freshwater.

John Tamihere: “We own the water.”

Tuku Morgan: “Clearly, that’s the next issue to be addressed… The ownership of water is probably the most important issue of our time… There are two ways we can do it. Litigate in the courts or go head-to-head in a set of negotiations in terms of the Crown and its Treaty partners – iwi and hapu around the country. We are preparing right now for that…

"As we settle Three Waters and work with the Crown to manage waterways and get certainly and confidence going forward, then we’ll push on with the most important issue to face Maoridom – the ownership of water.”

They plan to go after the electricity companies, with John Tamihere questioning the timing: “To what extent do you have a conversation with the generators on the Waikato to say, ‘times up, there’s got to be a levy here’?”

Tuku Morgan acknowledged that time was coming – and he went on to mention meeting the Chair of Ngai Tahu and discussing their legal claim for freshwater ownership: “So they are in the Courts now… We will get there, there is no doubt about that… If one of the iwi make up the ground we are pushing then all of us will benefit.”

In other words, a win for one iwi over freshwater rights will become a precedent for all iwi.

Ngai Tahu lodged their High Court action against the Labour Government for ownership of South Island freshwater just after the 2020 election. According to their website, the ultimate objective of the case is to establish “Ngai Tahu title” over South Island freshwater, along with “regulatory authority”, and “Ngai Tahu fiscal authority”.

This week’s NZCPR Guest Commentator retired Judge and Law Lecturer Anthony Willy has been examining the case – which he describes as a prime example of Maori tribes seeking common law remedies for cases which are written partly in English and partly in Maori – and explains:

“In it the plaintiff the Ngai Tahu tribe seeks a declaration ‘as to their rights in relation to wai maori (freshwater) that are grounded in tikanga – or in the Ngai Tahu dialect tikaka – specifically their rangatiratanga and their entitlement to exercise such rights pursuant to putake-mauka / rangatiratanga entitlements’.”  

Ngai Tahu have no such "rights". The Treaty did not grant them rangatiratanga (sovereignty). All Maori ceded sovereignty to the Queen, completely and forever. The Waitangi Tribunal's statements to the contrary are baseless, in fact lies.  

TL Buick, doyen of Treaty writers said in 1914: “Britain’s sovereignty was incontestable before the world” and Sir Apirana Ngata said much the same in 1922. Then on 16th November 1840 by Royal Charter New Zealand was established as a separate British colony with Hobson as its first governor, this being ratified on 3rd May 1841. That is, in reality, our true founding document.https://www.democracyaction.org.nz/free_speech_bruce_moon_speaks_out_in_nelson

(Judge Willy) believes the case is baseless: “This spurious claim is based on a fictional reinvention of the terms of the Treaty of Waitangi. Those seeking in effect to own our economy now rely on rights they say were guaranteed to them in 1840. This is patent nonsense, and leaving aside that, any constitutional status the document might have once had has been fully performed. That said it is being increasingly relied on by a small group of greedy tribalists to secure ownership of assets which are crucial to the survival of our democracy, our market economy and the Rule of Law.”

Nevertheless, the case, which became bogged down in preliminary matters, appears to have been parked, no doubt awaiting the outcome of the election.

In effect, Three Waters delivers much of what the iwi is seeking through the Courts, especially as the territory of the Southern Water Entity was drawn along Ngai Tahu boundaries, and tribal control of freshwater will be delivered through co-governance and Te Mana o te Wai Statements.

Furthermore, in order to better influence water allocation decisions, Ngai Tahu persuaded the Labour Government to legislate two permanent seats on the regulator – the Canterbury Regional Council – in addition to two existing Council advisory positions. In their oral submission on the Canterbury Regional Council (Ngai Tahu Representation) Bill, they admitted that the two seats were just a first step towards securing greater influence in the future.

John Tamihere concluded the interview with speculation about October’s election.

According to Tuku Morgan, “The Maori Party are in a very powerful position in terms of determining the face of the next Parliament and how Maori issues are to be addressed… This is probably the most competitive election this country will see…  Once the Maori Party becomes the kingmaker of the next government you will see a more favourable climate for Maori… The Maori Party will be at the vanguard of change in this country.”

And he warned, “If we get a right leaning government we’ll get killed.”

If the Maori Party is positioned as kingmaker on election night, there are no two ways about it, Maori will gain ownership of New Zealand’s freshwater.

The Maori Party: the fox in the Parliamentary henhouse

 

This is not the first time, of course, that iwi have tried to seize control of freshwater. Back in 2001 they approached Helen Clark’s Labour Government demanding ownership and control of water. To her credit, Helen Clark resisted their advances explaining that water is a public good that is owned by nobody but controlled and managed by the Crown on behalf of all New Zealanders. And that’s how it would stay under her watch.

But Helen Clark paved the way for Jacinda Ardern, graduate of the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders, a protege of the evil Grimms' fairytale-type character, Klaus Schwab, and New Zealand was delivered into the hands of the global cabal. 

Iwi leaders tried again in 2014. Assisted by the Maori Party, with its confidence and supply agreement with John Key’s National Government, iwi leaders put together a long list of demands. They included:

• title to freshwater 
• vesting of all Crown-owned lake and river beds along with the water column in local hapu or iwi
• free water infrastructure for all marae and marae housing, along with a guaranteed allocation of freshwater
• tribal participation at all levels of freshwater decision-making including tribal representation on councils, joint management agreements, and co-management of waterways
• and a $1-billion fund of public money to build the capacity of tribal groups to implement freshwater management and control.
  
  
  
  

• 

  Tempting for drivers exasperated by Te Reo - don't stand in the middle of the road, guys

  
  
• 
  

While they did not achieve these ownership goals, they nevertheless persuaded National to “give effect to iwi and hapu values” in the management of freshwater through the inclusion of the highly problematic concept of ‘Te Mana o te Wai’ in a National Policy Statement on freshwater.

The 2014 NPS stated: “Te Mana o te Wai is the integrated and holistic well-being of a freshwater body. Upholding Te Mana o te Wai acknowledges and protects the mauri of the water. This requires that in using water you must also provide for Te Hauora o te Taiao (the health of the environment), Te Hauora o te Wai (the health of the waterbody) and Te Hauora o te Tangata (the health of the people). Te Mana o te Wai incorporates the values of tangata whenua and the wider community in relation to each water body.”

So having opened the door to evil with the WEF's Herr Schwab and Jacinda Ardern, we now wander into the darkness of paganism. Mauri is spiritualism. It's completely opposed to the light of Christ and the principles of Christianity on which this nation was founded.   

The danger of including spiritualism and culture in water quality controls can be seen in a saga that has unfolded in the Bay of Plenty, where a local iwi in 2018 opposed a resource consent issued by the Regional Council to a water bottling company to expand its operation on the basis that it would significantly damage the mauri, or life force, of the water.

Although the planned expansion would create 50 local jobs and provide the iwi with a shared-governance role to enable them to undertake their ‘cultural guardianship’ activities, Ngati Awa wants their consent revoked. Since they have been unsuccessful in three courts, they are now heading to a fourth – the Supreme Court.

But in a recent article in the Herald referring to the case, journalist John Roughan wonders whether the ‘Te Mana o te Wai Statements’ in the Three Waters reforms – which he describes as ‘revolutionary’ – will be able to be used by the iwi to stop the project: “So far the runanga has failed to convince the Environment Court, the High Court and Court of Appeal that putting water into recyclable plastic bottles damages anything but under ‘Affordable Water Reform’ it might not need to contest resource consents, it could simply state the case to its water entity.”

Yes, Roughan's right - like Tracy Chapman, "we're talking about the revolution" here, as per the Labour/Greens/Maori Marxist playbook. 

Is that going to be our future? Will Te Mana o te Wai Statements give tribal groups veto rights over all water-based activities? Will iwi and hapu have the power to effectively hold the country to ransom over any proposed use of water?

Similar concerns were expressed in an opinion piece by the former Minister of Finance Stephen Joyce, who wondered whether Te Mana o te Wai Statements could be used to block Auckland’s access to water from the Waikato River: “The current reforms are a recipe for discord and disharmony. When more people work out that their access to water is effectively controlled by one part of society who have the right whakapapa, then the proverbial will truly hit the fan.

How long does it take people to work that out? Seriously. But as a nation we are now blind to the truth. We saw that in the Covid plandemic. 

Also, nobody knows how a water services organisation will be required to respond when the first mana whenua group declares, for example, that Auckland should take no more water from the Waikato River.”

Both columnists accuse the Government and the media of deliberately keeping the public in the dark over the extent of the power over freshwater that’s being given to iwi.

It's in the It's in the Government's interest to keep us in the dark and because they pay the media it's in the media's interest too.  

John Roughan blames Chris Hipkins for doing his utmost “to keep the public poorly informed, never acknowledging the directive power of these statements”, and “denying” co-governance: “The public remains unaware, for example, that the empowerment of Maori in water reform goes further than ‘co-governance’… iwi and hapu under the legislation passed last year will be able to issue ‘Te Mana o te Wai Statements’ to which the entity must ‘give effect’. The Government never mentions this — not a word of it appeared in its recent announcement of minor changes to the unpopular reforms — and not a word appeared in the news coverage I received.”

So, who exactly are these groups that are attempting to seize ownership and control of New Zealand’s freshwater?

They are mega-rich iwi business conglomerates that appear to hide behind charitable status to pay little or no tax.

A TDB Advisory report that assessed the 2022 wealth of the country’s largest Maori businesses puts Ngai Tahu at the top of the iwi rich list with a value of $2.3 billion. Tainui comes a close second with $2 billion. So, when Tuku Morgan speaks out, it’s on behalf of a multi-billion-dollar business development corporation – one of the richest private business operations in the country.

Third on the rich list is Auckland’s Ngati Whatua, which is worth $1.7 billion, followed by Ngati Toa on $811 million. Tuhoe, the iwi involved in the disastrous co-governance of the former Urewera National Park is worth $441 million. Then there’s Ngati Porou on $280 million, Ruakawa on $228 million, and Ngati Awa, the iwi that’s trying to stop the water bottling company, on $174 million. Ngati Pahauwera is worth $113 million, and the northern iwi Ngapuhi, which hasn’t yet negotiated their treaty settlement, is worth $86 million.

Securing ownership and control of freshwater will clearly bring significant rewards.

Back in 2016, the Ministry for the Environment valued freshwater at almost $35 billion a year.  Clipping the ticket would provide already wealthy iwi with a perpetual income stream of immense proportions.

Last year, Victoria University’s Dr Bryce Edwards described Labour’s co-governance arrangements for iwi as ‘privatisation’: “The co-governance model is a form of privatisation. The new companies will be half controlled by private organisations – iwi, which are increasingly highly corporate in their business operations.”

 

 

Let’s make no mistake – Three Waters will deliver control of freshwater to Maori if Labour is returned to power in October.

But that will not be the end of the matter for Maori.

Tuku Morgan and John Tamihere have made it very clear that if the Maori Party is the kingmaker after the election, they will not settle for anything less than full ownership of New Zealand’s freshwater. DR MURIEL NEWMAN: HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT – THE REAL AGENDA (bassettbrashandhide.com)

 

 "You shall be made sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy"

- Gospel, Third Sunday after Easter

PERSECUTION AT ST PATRICK'S NAPIER

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.

Stigmatist (St) Padre Pio receives Communion  

The priests at St Patrick's Napier - a Marist preserve - still refuse to give Communion on the tongue. Why? Why are they persecuting good Catholics?  

Supposing that a priest loves his Eucharistic Lord, and believes what the Church teaches - that He is present in the Host, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. What's he thinking, as he proffers Our Lord and then when the communicant kneels and humbly puts out their tongue, refuses to hand Him over? What does he think Our Lord is thinking? 

If he has faith he knows Our Lord loves that communicant passionately. That He died on the Cross so that He could give Himself to His beloved in Communion. "No, Lord," says Father, "I'm not giving You on the tongue. It's got to be on the hand." Even though the tongue was the only way to receive Our Lord right up to Vatican II. 

Do the Marists perhaps still believe Communion on the tongue is endangering their health, or their parishioners'? Would they in self-defence perhaps cite "the common good of the Church" etc (canon 223)?  

They might, but it wouldn't wash. Because the common good of the Church has arguably suffered more, since Vatican II, from the practice of Communion in the hand than from any other single cause. Free-fall in Mass attendance. Drastic drop in priestly and religious vocations (one NZ seminarian, and imported at that). 80% US Catholics disbelieving the Real Presence. Just look around St Patrick's, at their pitiful weekday Mass attendance. The Council Fathers never wanted Communion in the hand, never mentioned it. For good reason, as Lucifer knows.

Lucifer's sin was disobedience born of pride, and it was and is pride that gave birth to the indult for Communion in the hand. Permission for this horrible practice, introduced partly to please the Protestants and promoted in the US by the equally horrible Cardinal Bernardin, was granted only unwillingly, after disobedient bishops - firstly in the Netherlands - allowed it. But the indult was an exercise in shutting the gate after the horse of pride had bolted. 

It's said that the devil has no knees.

"According to Abba Apollo, a desert father who lived about 1,700 years ago, the devil has no knees; he cannot kneel; he cannot adore; he cannot pray; he can only look down his nose in contempt. Knees symbolize both strength and humility. 

"Athletes use strong knees to run for touchdowns in football and to block shots and to slam-dunk in basketball. Knees also bend in adoration of the Eucharistic King and in recognition of the grandeur and majesty of the Most High God" - Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted.  

Can. 223 §1. In exercising their rights, the Christian faithful, both as individuals and gathered together in associations, must take into account the common good of the Church, the rights of others, and their own duties toward others.

§2. In view of the common good, ecclesiastical authority can direct the exercise of rights which are proper to the Christian faithful.

Note that it's not only ecclesiastical authority (priests and bishops) who "must take into account the common good of the Church (and) the rights of others, and their own duties toward others" but also "the Christian faithful", i.e. the laity. Lay people have a duty to look to the common good of the Church etc, and that good is served best by the universal practice of the Church for centuries of the Body and Blood in the Eucharist being dispensed only by the anointed hands of her sacred ministers, directly on to the tongues of communicants.

“This ... Dicastery observes that the Instruction Redemptionis Sacramentum (25 March 2004) clearly stipulates that ‘each of the faithful always has the right to receive Holy Communion on the tongue’ (n. 92), nor is it licit to deny Holy Communion to any of Christ’s faithful who are not impeded by law from receiving the Holy Eucharist (cf. n. 91)”.

Any questions, Father Anonymous? Is there something not quite clear about the statement quoted above from the Congregation of Divine Worship? It would seem that in denying the faithful Communion on the tongue you are acting illicitly. That you are in fact disobeying Holy Mother Church in her universal norms. 

As to the tired old argument that Communion on the tongue is as bad for you as fudge, that's fudge. The Marists need to wake up. They should do some research and discover the dreadful truths exposed by the excess deaths world-wide in the wake of all their Covid-19 "health measures" - above all Pope Francis' "act of love" in submitting to the Jab. As simple common sense would have told you, had you not presumably been scared witless by an evil prime minister's threats of "tens of thousands" of deaths from Covid, your parishioners were never more at risk from Communion on the tongue than in the hand. They were in fact, all along, far more at risk from that experimental gene serum you promoted which is now killing and maiming millions.

(T)he  the bishops should be made aware that the reception of Holy Communion on the tongue is as safe as reception on the hand (according to the Catholic Medical Association: “either method should be safe from transmitting the virus”), or safer (according to the F.I.A.M.C, or the World Federation of Catholic Medical Associations: “the FIAMC perfectly agrees [that Communion on the tongue is safer than hand Communion.]”). 

Contrary to the prevailing consensus among Catholic bishops, receiving Communion on the tongue and in the kneeling position is scientifically the safest and most hygienic method, which is "unlikely to incur a high risk of infection transmission," the new research shows. Titled "Safety and Reverence: How Roman Catholic Liturgy Can Respond to the COVID‐19 Pandemic," the paper published  by academic Sergey Budaev.

"(B)ishops misunderstood the WHO citation of existing practice in certain churches of Communion-in-hand as an endorsement. "Apparently, this blindly follows the generic recommendations without adapting them to the Roman Catholic Church," he writes, blasting the imposition of Communion-in-hand as "explained by vague hygiene without scientific evidence"https://stpaultheapostleal.archtoronto.org/siteassets/media/files/study-shatters-myth-of-safe-host-in-hand.pdf

"Concerned Catholics, including the Latin Mass Society, repeatedly asked bishops to show us the evidence upon which they based their attempts to ban the practice — something, in fact, which they lacked the authority to do. It was never provided, and this study confirms that it does not exist," stated Dr Joseph Shaw, an academic at the University of Oxford.https://stpaultheapostleal.archtoronto.org/siteassets/media/files/study-shatters-myth-of-safe-host-in-hand.pdf

Pope Benedict XVI gives Communion

You've probably been told that the Church originally allowed Communion in the hand. Well yes, but only until lack of reverence and Particles dropped from the Host became obvious - and even then Communion had been given only into hands covered with a veil, with the head  lowered to receive It on the tongue.

One of the two processes is bad practice and the other is what the Church desires. You choose. You can decide to begin receiving on the tongue. Just kneel in front of the priest, not too close, tilt your head back slightly and put out your tongue. Practise with a bit of bread, with a friend or someone in your family. Yes, some people will think you're drawing attention to yourself. Some will look at you sideways. You have to decide who's most important - some people, or your Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ?

And if you're a "Minister of the Eucharist" (you're actually not, not unless you're a priest), just resign. There's not a lot we lay people can do (apart from stopping our planned giving) to resist the Modernists and the mayhem they're making of our beloved Church, but the little we can do we must do or we'll answer for it before the Lord at our particular judgment.

St Teresa of Jesus (Avila) was granted a vision of hell where priests and bishops were recognisable by their hands, the palms of which burned more fiercely than the rest of their body. Just saying. 

The Doctrine of the Church Tells Us ....

Communion on the Tongue

Is an Apostolic Tradition

Statements from Popes, Saints and Church Councils:

St. Sixtus 1 (circa 115): "The Sacred Vessels are not to be handled by others than those consecrated to the Lord."

St. Basil the Great considered Communion in the hand so irregular that he did not hesitate to consider it a grave fault.

The Council of Saragossa (380): Excommunicated anyone who dared continue receiving Holy Communion by hand. This was confirmed by the Synod of Toledo.

The Synod of Rouen (650): Condemned Communion in the hand to halt widespread abuses that occurred from this practice, and as a safeguard against sacrilege.

6th Ecumenical Council, at Constantinople (680-681): Forbade the faithful to take the Sacred Host in their hand, threatening transgressors with excommunication.

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274): "Out of reverence towards this Sacrament [the Holy Eucharist], nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands, for touching this Sacrament." (Summa Theologica, Part III, Q. 82, Art. 3, Rep. Obj. 8.)

The Council of Trent (1545-1565): "The fact that only the priest gives Holy Communion with his consecrated hands is an Apostolic Tradition."

Pope Paul VI (1963-1978): "This method [on the tongue] must be retained." (Memoriale Domini)

Pope John Paul II: "To touch the sacred species and to distribute them with their own hands is a privilege of the ordained." (Dominicae Cenae, 11)

Pope John II violated the Apostolic Tradition which must not be altered when he did not stop the practice of Communion in the Hand distributed by the non-ordained. Interestingly he and the other Popes of Vatican II never gave permission for self-administration by the non-ordained, but did not stop to think in their blind spot that Communion in the Hand is self-administration because until the Host enters the mouth which invariably involves the tongue by physical necessity, any action involving the hands is administration not receiving. The only part of the human body that is capable of receiving the Host for consummation is the tongue, since all food must pass over and on the tongue to be swallowed, otherwisethere is no other way to avoid choking.---Pauly Fongemie, Web Master

Pope St. Leo the Great is less well known for something very important to liturgical studies. He is one of the most ancient witnesses to the practice of Communion on the tongue. Notably, Saint Leo the Great read the sixth chapter of Saint John's Gospel as referring to the Eucharist (as all the Church Fathers did). 

In a preserved sermon on John 6 (Sermon 9), Saint Leo says: "Hoc enim ore sumitur quod fide creditur" (Serm. 91.3). This is translated strictly as: “This indeed is received by means of the mouth which we believe by means of faith. "Ore" is here in the ablative and in the context it denotes instrumentation. So then, the mouth is the means by which the Holy Eucharist is received.

The Council of Rouen (650):

“Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layman or laywoman but only in their mouths.”

St Paul of the Cross



"The Cross is the way to Paradise, but only when it is borne willingly"

St Paul of the Cross, on your feastday please pray for the Church

PFIZER'S MENGELE WAR AGAINST WOMEN GIVING BIRTH

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address FB Messenger or Twitter.

Monsters incriminated: Pfizer's Albert Bourla and Vatican's Jorge Mario Bergoglio

Yes, the horror story of Covid-19 is and always was, a nightmare. It's cruel beyond belief. And it's way past time to wake up and discover it's reality. 

And start praying. If you're a Catholic, pray the Mass and the Rosary. There are no prayers that can compare with these so if you're not a Catholic, become one. Ask a priest - a traditional Catholic priest, not a Novus Ordo priest unless he comes personally recommended - to be received into the Church. You can pray the Bronze Serpent Prayer while you're waiting. 

Yes, even though as Christ's Vicar on earth and the world's chief moral authority, 'Pope Francis' bears a greater burden of guilt than anyone including Bourla, Gates, Fauci and Co, and lack of the knowledge that is essential to serious (mortal) sin is scarcely credible, his crime of coercing Catholics everywhere to take the pricker does not impute guilt to the Church, who as the Body of Christ is indefectible. 

Although abortion has killed millions - billions? - the evil of babykilling pales into insignificance compared with the effect on humanity of the Covid Conspiracy which primarily targets reproduction, in what will prove a stunningly successful attempt at global depopulation. 

Now read Dr Naomi Wolf's testimony and call her a conspiracy theorist if you dare. 

In an extraordinary speech synthesizing several “headline” discoveries from analyses of thousands of Pfizer documents, Dr. Naomi Wolf presented how the COVID injectables enterprise intentionally sought to not only “disrupt and impair human reproduction” but “attack” and “kill” large numbers of people, particularly in the West.

 

Twitter banned Dr Wolf for - guess what? - conspiracy theories 

Wolf, a lifelong Democrat, addressed the conservative citadel of Hillsdale College in March, confessing that events over the last three years “truly imploded” her former world view and that what matters most now is “the Constitution, liberty and freedom.”

What matters most now is God. If He'd always mattered most Covid wouldn't have happened.os 

The author and journalist who is also a co-founder and CEO of the Daily Clout explained how she and Steve Bannon of the War Room recruited 3,500 science and medical experts to help analyze tens of thousands of documents that Pfizer submitted to the FDA for use in evaluating the safety and effectiveness of their COVID injectables.

The FDA had originally argued against their release in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking to stall publication of the crucial safety data for up to 75 years, but this request was rejected by a Texas court and the first drop of documents was released on March 2, 2022.

These 3,500 recruited experts were divided into six working groups with committees at the head to analyze the documents and create reports that would be accessible, and understandable, to the general public.

And regarding these dozens of reports, Wolf apologized in advance for having to share that these Pfizer documents “contain evidence of the greatest crime against humanity in the history of our species.”

Providing a summary of just “some of the things that came to light,” she highlighted the following 11 points:

#1: Pfizer knew their gene-based injections had negative efficacy as early as November 2020

At least as early as May 2021, five months after the rollout of the Pfizer gene-based injections, reports began to emerge of many “breakthrough cases” where fully jabbed celebrities and then the public at large were being inflicted with cases of COVID-19. By October, studies began to confirm the ineffectiveness of the shots, and then later, by January 2022, that those who were injected against COVID-19 were more likely to catch it.

These findings continued to be confirmed in July 2022, December 2022, and then in January as well.

Yet, according to the analysis of the data, Wolf stated that Pfizer knew this was the case with regard to their own product in November 2020 before being broadly introduced and marketed as a remedy for COVID-19.

“Pfizer knew, for instance, one month after rollout, so that’s November of 2020, that the inijectables didn’t work to stop COVID!” she exclaimed.

She recalled how during this period the full marketing of the product was in swing, with the celebrity spokespeople encouraging all to get the shot. “The ads are in social media, the ads are on television” and “a month after rollout, Pfizer’s internal documents identify that its medication has failure of immunisation and failure of efficacy. And they identify that the third most common side effect of the Pfizer injectable is… COVID!”

#2: Shortly after release of the COVID injections on the market, Pfizer moved to hire 2,400 full-time employees to process the paperwork of the injured

In a January 2021 white paper analyzing the new COVID injectables,” America’s Frontline Doctors observed how and why the safety of such an intervention had to be assured before its being used, especially on a global population.

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes an (unmentionable - FB is watching) is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the unmentionable. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, medication safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened,” they observed at the time.

In her group’s examination of the Pfizer documents, Wolf declared that what was “stunning” is that around this same time, “within a month or two [of injectable rollout], Pfizer was getting so many reports of adverse events [AEs] – meaning bad things happening to people who had been injected – that they understood they needed to hire 2,400 full-time staffers in order simply to process the paperwork” of these injuries. They also knew this was necessary “to prepare for the flood of adverse events that they knew they would get in the near future.”

Of course, many months later, evidence reveals correlations of the shot mandates with enormous increases in younger excess deaths and disabled workers, which in the United States equates to those under age 50 who took the shots having a 49 percent higher mortality rate, including all categories of the (inflicted) suffering a 26 percent increase. All of this results in about 600,000 excess deaths per year and an historic decline in life expectancy.

#3: Pfizer and the FDA withheld information that the shots cause heart damage in youth for four months while an aggressive propaganda campaign drove many thousands to get injected

“Pfizer knew in May of 2021 that the (unmentionables) had caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week after the injection,” Wolf explained. This information was known by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as well, as the documents were in their possession.

“But the government of the United States – and I’m embarrassed to say I voted for these people – didn’t tell parents until August of 2021 that there was an elevated risk of heart damage in healthy young adults. Four months later!” she exclaimed.

“And in those four months, what did the young adults of America receive? A constant battering with propaganda on social media, on television, in news outlets bought up by money in the CARES Act, as well as from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,” Wolf explained. “They did not tell the young adults, the healthy young adults of the United States, your generation, that this was elevating a risk of heart damage till four months later.”

 

 

#4: Rather than staying in the injection site, Pfizer knew the shot’s dangerous lipid nanoparticles quickly distribute throughout the body. And there is no evidence they ever leave

“You may recall that the CDC said that the materials of the injection stay in the injection site,” the journalist said. “And the materials are lipid nanoparticles, they are mRNA,” which means they are “industrial fat which is covered in polyethylene glycol, which is a petroleum byproduct… and spike protein.”

Yet, while it was broadly propagated that these dangerous substances stay in the injection site, “that’s not what happens to these materials! And Pfizer knew that! These materials ‘biodistribute’ – this is Pfizer’s language – throughout your body in 48 hours!” Wolf exclaimed.

First describing how “lipid nanoparticles [LNPs] are designed to cross every membrane in the human body,” which has been known for at least a decade, Wolf asked, “So where do these ingredients go?”

“They go to the brain (some of you have noticed changes in the personalities of loved ones who have taken these injections). They biodistribute to the liver, the adrenals, the spleen. And if you’re a woman, they accumulate in your ovaries,” she lamented.

“Now, these are industrial fats coated with polyethylene glycol in your ovaries,” Wolf warned. “And what’s incredibly scary for a woman is that there’s no mechanism that we’ve found by which the body gets rid of the lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries… And Pfizer knew [this].”

#5: ‘I don’t say it lightly, but it’s mass murder’: Side effects in Pfizer documents far more severe than CDC and doctors told patients

The Pfizer documents acknowledge more than 42,000 adverse events, including 1,200 deaths, in just the first three months due to what Wolf describes as “catastrophic categories” of side effects that go far beyond typical warnings given by public health authorities.

“These are not the same side effects that the CDC tells you about or your doctor tells you about,” Wolf recalled. While the CDC has often typically said recipients will have fatigue, chills and perhaps swelling at the injection site, “that’s not what’s in the Pfizer documents.”

In New Zealand of course it's Medsafe (hah! what a misnomer!) that prevaricates. 

Rather, “there’s industrial scale strokes, hemorrhages, blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, neurological disorders, dementia-type disorders. Guillain-Barré, Bell’s Palsy [and more].”

“The number one side effect is joint pain,” she said. “Did the CDC tell you about joint pain?” And another “surprising side effect is myalgia, muscle pain,” of which Wolf said she has friends now enduring, despite their prior excellent health. And this side effect is indicated “at industrial scale in the Pfizer documents.”

“I don’t say it lightly, but it’s mass murder,” she grieved. “There are 61 deaths from stroke, for example. Half of the stroke adverse events took place within 48 hours of the injection. There are five deaths from liver damage and half of the liver damage adverse events took place within 48 hours of the injection.”

#6: Prior to it being legal, more than 1,000 children were injected, and Pfizer’s documents indicate a high rate of serious injury

In early 2021, before any Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for children, Wolf reported that Pfizer injected “62 kids, some of them as young as two months old,” with their gene-based product, 28 of whom there were no records of the results available. “We don’t know if they survived,” she said.

“Among the 34 whose records are still in the Pfizer documents, there’s a seven-year-old British girl who sustained a stroke, and there’s a two-month-old baby with liver damage,” she lamented.

“And so this is such a chilling report because it’s clear – and we did additional investigation of this – there were a thousand kids in the United States in different university hospitals, including Rochester Medical Center, that were experimented on prior to it being legal to inject children with this material,” the author lamented.

“And I can promise you, these are what society calls ‘throwaway kids.’ These are not kids whose parents have lawyers. These are not kids whose parents have a voice. We’re going to find that these are kids who are institutionalized, who are orphaned or discarded in some way,” she grieved.

#7: Pfizer documents reveal a ‘Mengele-type experiment… on how to disrupt and impair human reproduction.’ Available records of study participants who conceived children show 80% lost their babies

Children at Auschwitz where Dr Josef Mengele carried out his barbaric experiments

Highlighting what she calls “the centerpiece of what we found in the Pfizer documents,” Wolf explained that she doesn’t make reference to Nazi medical experimentation lightly, but contained in the documents is “literally [a] Mengele-type experiment at a grand scale on human reproduction, [a] 360-degree experiment on how to disrupt and impair human reproduction.”

“So, for example, in the Pfizer documents, women study participants were told not to get pregnant, which is interesting,” she observed. “It’s a respiratory disease. Why would you tell women not to get pregnant?”

Nevertheless, 270 women did conceive children of whom Pfizer reportedly “lost the records” of 234, which Wolf said is a violation of the law.

“Of the 36 [remaining] women whose pregnancies came to term, over 80 percent of them lost their babies [by] spontaneous abortion or miscarriage,” she reported.

#8: Pfizer knew there was a danger to fertility. Lipid Nanoparticles damage the placenta during pregnancy, causing early deliveries. Lots of chromosomal abnormalities as well

In addition, the Pfizer documents indicate that “shedding is real,” Wolf reported. “Pfizer defines exposure to the (unmentionable) as skin contact, inhalation and sexual intercourse, especially [at the time of] conception.”

Since Pfizer also warned male trial participants against having sexual intercourse with childbearing-aged women and to use two forms of birth control if they did, “there was clearly something about conceiving with a (jabbed) male that Pfizer was guarding against,” she said.

“So, we know now that there’s horrific damages to conception from this injection” which include the lipid nanoparticles traversing the placenta and causing children to be born prematurely, Wolf said.

She also reported that maternal fetal medicine specialist Dr. Jim Thorpe is “seeing, on a great scale, chromosomal abnormalities in newborns of vaccinated mothers.”

These results were foreseen by some, including former Pfizer vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory Dr. Michael Yeadon, who, on December 1, 2020, petitioned the European Medicines Agency to halt all studies due to safety concerns, including possible damage to placentas during pregnancy. His warnings went unheeded. And having been vilified he is now, unfortunately for all, vindicated.

#9: Pfizer docs show that lipid nanoparticles also enter breast milk, stunting, injuring and sometimes killing babies

Since these dangerous LNPs circulate throughout the body, especially in the recipient’s blood, Wolf explained that they make their way into breast milk.

“And nursing babies, in the Pfizer [trial] documents, sustained seizures and one baby died in the E.R. after nursing from a jabbed mother, from multi-organ system failure,” she said. “Four of the moms, who were lactating… had breast milk that turned blue green.”

After the release of these injections into the general population, incidents of these adverse events began to publicly emerge.

One VAERS report from February 2021 describes the death of a five-month-old breast-fed infant whose mother received a second dose of Pfizer’s injectable. The following day, the baby refused to nurse, developed a fever, and was later hospitalized with a rare blood disorder in which blood clots form in small blood vessels throughout the body before dying.

And in June 2021, a six-week-old breastfeeding baby became inexplicably ill with a high fever after his mother received a COVID-19 (unmentionable) and he died weeks later with blood clots in his “severely inflamed arteries.”

Wolf went on to explain that even the National Institutes of Health (NIH) completed a separate study that found “babies nursing from jabbed moms were having failure to thrive, not putting on weight. They were agitated and restless and sleepless.”

She believes that these dynamics have provide an indication as to why “nursing mothers have gone, in the last two years, from 34 percent of all moms to 16 percent of moms,” which indicates “something’s wrong.”

“Not only are babies in the next generation not getting that primal experience of total love, total nurture, total safety, which is so important, but there’s something that is leading moms to not be able to nurse those babies. And I think we have a clue here in the contamination of jabbed moms’ breast milk,” Wolf opined.

“I also want to note that Bill Gates rolled out lab-grown breast milk right at the moment that women were suffering these harms to their own ability to sustain their children,” the feminist author said (more here).

#10: ‘Nazi medicine,’ a war on women’s fertility: Pfizer docs show 3 to 1 of AEs sustained by women, 16% ‘reproductive disorders.’ ‘What kind of monsters look at 16% reproductive disorders and keep going?’ Results: ‘13% to 20% drop in live births.’

In examining the thrust of the Pfizer documents, Dr. Wolf concluded that an overall motive behind this enormous enterprise includes “a war against women’s ability to reproduce.”

Her team “found that of the adverse events, 72 percent of them were sustained by women. And this is constant throughout. It’s a constant 3 to 1 [ratio]” she said while also acknowledging the real harms done to men (Report 38).

“And of the 72 percent of adverse events” in women, Pfizer defines 16% of them as, “[in] their words, ‘reproductive disorders,’” while men also suffer a terrible rate but far less at 0.49 percent.

“What kind of monsters look at 16 percent reproductive disorders [in their trials] and keep going?” the longtime feminist charged.

She goes on to call the Pfizer records reminiscent of “Nazi medicine” due to how detailed their records were regarding the hundreds of thousands of adverse attacks against the reproductive organs of women. For example, the records reflect “20 different scientific names for ruining women’s menstrual cycles” she said.

“Not surprisingly, in 2022, around the world, nine months after the rollout in most of Western Europe, there’s a 13 percent to 20 percent drop in live births all over Western Europe, in North America, [in] Singapore and Australia,” she explained.

New Zealand might be too small to count, but we're betting it's the same here, and that the damage inflicted on this country will be too large to calculate.

This includes “double the number of stillbirths in Scotland, a highly jabbed country, [and] 89 stillbirths in Canada in one province when usually they have two or three,” Wolf grieved.

Calling this phenomenon an “absolute baby die-off,” the journalist went on to cite the experience of Dr. James Thorp saying how he was now experiencing “five or six miscarriages a week when before they would have two a month.”

This phenomenon is “not universal,” Wolf shared. “This drop, this murder of the next generation, is not global. It’s [focused in] Western Europe and North America.”

Permit us to hazard that this is God's chastisement for the abandonment by Western Europe and North America of the Catholic and Christian faith and for their high rates of abortion, a crime which "cries out to heaven for vengeance". "Revenge is mine, I will repay," saith the Lord. (Rom 12:19).

#11: LNPs degraded the basic factories of masculinity in boys’ testes in utero when their mother had been injected. ‘So, these are monsters, and there’s no way to avoid concluding that they’re focused on disrupting human reproduction’

Furthermore, Report 37 reveals the damage done to the reproductive capacities of baby boys in their vaccinated mothers’ wombs.

Wolf explained how the Pfizer documents reveal that LNPs “degrade baby boys in utero” by traversing “the testes of fetal baby boys” and damaging “the Sertoli cells and the Leydig cells, which are basically the factories of masculinity.”

These cells “are responsible for the male hormonal balance that create things like deep voices, hair on their bodies, broad shoulders, all of the things that we associate with normal masculinity. And that is being degraded.”

“So, we don’t know if these little baby boys of jabbed moms are going to be able to grow up to be sexually functioning adult men,” she warned.

Additionally, “Why this focus on reproduction?” Wolf asked. Why did Pfizer examine and document the impact of their injectable on the “sexual cells of the sexual organs of the rats, right? It’s a respiratory virus!”

“So, these [people] are monsters, and there’s no way to avoid concluding that they’re focused on disrupting human reproduction,” she concluded.

‘We are under attack’ with a ‘bioweapon,’ it’s ‘a mass murder situation, a war, a war crime, [and] crimes against humanity’

Wolf goes on to give her personal judgments as to why this is happening, particularly in the West, and advances a conclusion similar to former pharmaceutical executive and researcher Sasha Latypova and paralegal journalist Katherine Watt, asserting that these COVID (unmentionables) are “a bioweapon and we are under attack.”

Wolf neglects to mention Catholic commentators such as the brilliant, fearless, incisive Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò. 

Pope Francis had secret meetings with corrupt Pfizer's CEO Bourla at the height of the Covid crisis and "Francis and Bourla also have close links to the World Economic Forum — the elite Davos club of transnational globalists pushing the "Great Reset" that seeks to "subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations," according to whistleblower Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò.  https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pope-held-hush-hush-talks-with-pfizer-chief. 

Over the last six months, Latypova has determined through extensive documentation that U.S. government agencies, particularly the Department of Defense, along with the pharmaceutical companies and Chinese Communist Party (CCP), are involved in “a conspiracy to commit mass murder through bioterrorism and informational warfare operations worldwide.”

Echoing their findings, Wolf explained how CCP-affiliated Fosun Pharmaceutical plays a significant role in developing and distributing the Pfizer/BioNTech biological warfare agents that are marketed as “COVID-19" (unmentionables).

She explained that the CCP owns the manufacturing plants “producing the injection that goes into the bodies of schoolchildren here in the United States of America,” and further how studies overseen by the CCP reveal they knew full well that LNPs damage fertility and cause myocarditis.

“To me, it is obvious,” she said, that these investigative studies were intended “to show the Chinese Communist Party how you kill Westerners without leaving fingerprints.”

Speaking of the American government’s culpability, Wolf asserted that “this is a captured [Biden] administration and captured institutions that are allowing the CCP and their allies, the World Economic Forum, [and the] Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to cripple our country.”

Emphasizing how the CCP prefers “asymmetric warfare” tactics that “kind of degrade and demoralize the [enemy] population rather than having a hot war with shooting,” the author showed how the vast majority of approximately 42,000 adverse events recorded in the Pfizer documents occurred in the Western nations.

“That’s targeting North America and Western Europe,” she emphasized.

And New Zealand, of course.  

“I believe we’re looking at a mass murder situation, a war, a war crime, [and] crimes against humanity,” Wolf assessed. And with regard to “all of these evil doers” who are responsible, “friendly as they look in their little outfits, talking to the cameras,” the author disclosed, “I hope they will all face justice in this lifetime.”

Possible treason charges; Canadian doctor: ‘It’s a time to put these bastards in jail’

In service to this end, Watt has produced what she calls a “[r]esearch and organizing tool” providing evidence for the stated goal “to prosecute members of Congress, presidents, HHS and DOD secretaries and federal judges for treason under 18 USC 2381.”

Let's hope and pray that New Zealand's evil Jacinda Ardern, currently strutting her loathsome stuff at Harvard (more fool they), will face charges of treason too. Now someone will say that treason is no longer an indictable offence in New Zealand. 

Late last year, prominent Canadian medical doctor Roger Hodkinson exclaimed he was “full of vengeance” against these culprits and “it’s a time to put these bastards in jail.”

“We’ve seen the biggest kill ever in medicine’s history directly because of the intervention of these idiots into health care. And it’s the physicians, it’s not just the politicians, it’s the physicians themselves who are principally culpable because they have allowed [the] government’s jackboots to influence how they manage their patients, which has never, ever happened before,” he said.

“How can you look into the eyes of a pregnant woman and tell her that this experimental product is safe? How can you do that as a physician?!” the biotech CEO exclaimed. “Any physician that has done that should be in jail!”

‘If my people… will humble themselves and pray and seek my face… I will forgive their sin and heal their land’

Facing what she described as “this abyss of human evil every single day” over the last few years, Wolf also shared how the experience has forced her to take the reality of God much more seriously.

That's God drawing good out of evil. Let's pray for her conversion, and for the conversion of millions more as they wake up and find this nightmare is reality.

“I know that sounds paradoxical, but I felt like this evil overtook the world in lockstep, in perfect unison in a way that I could not explain using my critical thinking,” she assessed. There was “something metaphysical about” what happened.

Feeling the world is facing “a biblical moment where humanity is being asked to choose,” Wolf, who is Jewish, has taken up reading the Bible “a lot these days,” and ended her presentation reminding her Christian audience of the promise God gave to Solomon in 2 Chronicles 7:14:

"If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and heal their land." 

‘The greatest crime against humanity’ in history: Naomi Wolf's 11 revelations from Pfizer vaccine documents - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

 

St. Cletus was Roman by birth. He was ordained by St. Peter the Apostle. He served as the third bishop of Rome, succeeding St. Linus who followed St. Peter.  He served as pope for twelve years before he was martyred in the year 92 during the persecutions of Domitian. 

Pope St Cletus, on your feast day please pray for all who suffer in the Covid persecution