NZ'S HEAD NOW IN THE NOOSE OF DIGITAL ID

 

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). 

And they will if we let them 

Once bitten, twice shy. If only that were true. But today, July 1, Kiwis woke up to find their collective head in the noose of The Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Act 2023, just like most reacted like babes in arms to the arrival of covid in 2020. 

Jacinda Ardern's fascist regime was just warming us up for this. And Antipope Francis is in on it big time, with his crackdown on those naughty Catholics who insist on worshipping God the same way as they did for 2000 years, even to the extent of his excommunicating an archbishop (+Carlo Maria Vigano).

The ambitious, ultimate outcome intended by the globalists for the covid vaccine, the abolition of the Traditional Latin Mass which breeds large families, and for Digital Identity Services is - make no mistake - global depopulation; and they're achieving their goal already. 

Look, our Uniparty Coalition Government is a bunch of numbskulls who don't know which way is up. Really. They're no match for the likes of Noah Harari and Davos and their nightmarish vision for humanity. It's up to ordinary Kiwis to enlighten them. Sign the petition below. Please.

Will New Zealand wear this ball and chain?

Digital ID is being sold as an essential change to modern society via public-private partnerships as global as the World Economic Forum to as local as Digital Identity New Zealand. The stated vision of Digital Identity NZ, whose members include large corporations such as Google, Meta, BNZ and ASB (probably all on Family First's list of WOKE businesses - ed), as well as government departments such as Te Whatu Ora and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, is to ensure that everyone can “fully participate in a digital economy and society“. This corresponds with the World Economic Forum vision of inclusivity, meaning that every aspect of human existence is intended to be digitally monitored. Digital identity differs from digital identification. It builds a “footprint” of your activities, with the capacity to monitor the services you use, where you go, your savings and spendings, interactions, and more. Once central bank digital currency (CBDC) is in place, as planned by the Reserve Bank of NZ, your financial activities can be controlled by the bankers involved in establishing and promoting digital identity. The connection between CBDCs and digital identity is explained well by financier Catherine Austin-Fitts, for example in this 2022 interview, where she describes plans for the average person to have much smaller command on resources and assets, and to be subject to complete central control. According to their 2020 report, Roadmap for Digital Cooperation, the United Nations intend to be the “convener and platform” of the implementation of “digitally enabled services”, which they claim is in line with their Sustainable Development Goals. As we have written about before, these goals originated from the 1987 Brundtland Report “Our Common Future” which laid the foundation for Agenda 21 & Agenda 2030: plans for a collectivist existence under totalitarian rule. Learn more from these presentations and interviews with English researcher Sandi Adams, Australian researcher Kate Mason and New Zealand researcher Ross Hebblethwaite. Euphemistic language is used proclaiming catastrophic outcomes unless “strong and sustained international cooperation” is achieved, requiring meaningful transformation to global governance. We have written about this extensively in relation to the World Health Organization plans for global governance in health. Thanks to the WHO Similar legislative implementations are occurring at the overarching United Nations level. In September 2024 global leaders will convene in New York for their “Summit of the Future: Our Common Future“, to adopt the Pact for the Future, which will include a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations. These documents tie in with the World Health Organization’s Global Health Initiative to transform health care towards digital surveillance and control. Local implementation of these global goals is occurring through our own national and local governments and councils. ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability and the Smart Cities Council are two examples of public-private partnerships established to implement Agenda 2030 at local level. Every town council in New Zealand is signed up to the Smart Cities Council of Australia and New Zealand, claiming to deliver “positive, self-sustaining social, environmental, and economic outcomes for people, place and planet” via corporate control of public life. In these Smart Cities envisioned for our imprisoned future, even our street lights will be used for monitoring as in this article referring to Tauranga.  The system is “upgradable ‘over the air’ providing future proofing for technological advancements, it is scalable and can be adapted for various IoT (Internet of Things) applications, such as water resource management, remote metering and Smart City sensors.” As we experienced through the covid era, this will empower and enrich those implementing the rules and regulations, whilst disempowering and impoverishing everyone else. This has enormous implications for society, including for population health outcomes which have already diminished due to senseless and harmful pandemic related responses. In New Zealand the Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Act 2023, proposed without opposition in October 2021, will come into force on Monday 1 July 2024.  Predictably avoided by legacy media in order to remain largely unknown to the general public who might otherwise resist, this legislation sets the stage for implementing digital identity for transactions between individuals and organisations in New Zealand. Call to Action: Oppose Digital ID Now If you think this is part of the ongoing imposition of authoritarian rule, and you don’t want it, then please read and consider signing the Petition of Tracey Coxhead: Repeal the Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Act 2023 before 31 July 2024. Spread the word by sharing this article. Signatures will be accepted until July 31, 2024. Dr Mike Yeadon advises the best action regarding digital ID and CBDCs. Decline it. Use cash at every possible opportunity. Refuse to do business with those who won’t accept cash. https://rumble.com/v3873ak-dr.-mike-yeadon-why-digital-id-and-cbdcs-must-be-rejected-at-all-costs-augu.html https://nzdsos.com/2024/06/30/digital-identity/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3l7fPOP3r70dTwocz-WzprSq0xYzfsRuoLbqApXg5DEU As Olivia Pierson asked in 2021: Remember what we were told about the experimental Covid-vaccinations by our Prime-Minister? That there would be no forced vaccinations and no penalties if citizens opted out. That was a lie.  We have seen nothing but outright coercion via lockdowns, threats, job-losses and millions of Kiwis feeling pressured into it on the basis that they would be excluded from work, from free society: travel, social events and venues (funerals, weddings, birthday parties, the passing of a loved one, babies born). That is NOT penalty-free living.  It is simply despicable to treat free  free citizens in a democracy this way. As citizens in this moment of history, we are all out of trust in the claims our government makes, so prudence would dictate that in these murky waters, you as representatives do not enact further, binding legislation upon our lives, livelihoods, privacy and economic system. We need to see you make a bold, public and unequivocal recommitment to our Bill of Rights Act, which you all seem to have shelved.  What also stands out about this legislation is that most of you as representatives do not understand it, while others of you understand its authoritative setting so well that you clearly see its potential for even more restrictions on free citizens and even an opportunity to take our voting online (God forbid!).  If any of you are still able to read a room, let alone a country, you’ll notice that our trust in government 's providing beneficial, liberty-respecting legislation in keeping with our Bill of Rights is now in the toilet and I recommend that you scrap this massive authoritarian, financial, digital abomination.  That government is best which governs least.https://thebfd.co.nz/2021/11/05/the-great-resets-digital-id-for-new-zealand/

The Visitation (Jacopo da Pontormo)

And she entered into the house of Zachary and saluted Elizabeth (Lk 1, 39).

 

+VIGANO SAYS FRANCIS IS AN ANTIPOPE

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). 

Today, on the feast of the Apostles Peter and Paul, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano accused Francis, whom the world calls Pope, of being an Antipope.

We might ask why the accusation did not come a long time ago from cardinals who believe that to be true, and also consider themselves loyal to the Church. Maybe they thought the Mystical Bride of Christ would be torn apart by the schism that would likely follow such a declaration by princes of the Church, and thought it better to sit tight and wait for Francis' demise and a holy pope to succeed him.

But are cardinals, like all priests and bishops, not called by St Paul whose feast we celebrate today to "Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine" (2 Tim:4.2)? Christ called them to the priesthood, not to politics, and any suspicion that the cardinals might be hanging on to their red hats, fearful of meeting the fate of excommunication that awaits Archbishop Vigano, they ought surely to find intolerable.

The Church is enduring her passion, just as Christ her Head has done in order to bring her to birth. But +Vigano could take heart from the results of the persecution of Antipope Francis already evident in the resurgence of the Traditional Latin Mass, especially among young people.

In Melbourne, for example, in this story of two Latin Mass communities, we see the attraction to Truth and Beauty exerted on young Catholics and converts to Catholicism, of the "Mass of Ages".

27-year-old Catholic convert Zachary Dennis leads the procession during Latin mass at St Aloysius church in Caulfield

It's a freezing Sunday morning, and 23-year-old Catholic convert Llewellyn Beer has travelled nearly 35 kilometres across Melbourne to attend mass at St Aloysius Church in Caulfield.

He says it's worth the trip to attend the only Catholic church in Melbourne that exclusively holds services in Latin.

And he's not alone: by 10:30 am, every pew is occupied, many by young parishioners like him.

"Zoomers want authenticity more than anything, and I think you'll find it at a Latin Mass," Beer told triple j Hack.

Another young Catholic, 22-year-old Jacob Goicoa, agreed; he's also travelled for over an hour to be here.

"Definitely over half [are younger than 30]," he estimated.

 

Jacob Goicoa

"I don't think it really mattered how far it was, if it was an hour or two hours," he said.

"As long as it was Latin Mass – that's all that matters."

Pope 'out of touch'

The Traditional Latin Mass (TLM), also called the Tridentine Mass, was codified in 1570, and it's starkly different to the standard Catholic mass conducted in English.

Priests face away from their congregation,

... that is to say, priests face toward God ... 

chanting in Latin and burning incense, while during communion the congregants kneel and receive the hosts directly into their mouths.

"It's divine and so uncompromising – you're witnessing something that's beyond your own feeble existence," 21-year-old Elisha Andres said.

"You can tell this Mass is not about you, it's not about entertainment, it's really about the Lord."

Until the Vatican changed its policy in the 1960s to favour the new Mass 

...  The Novus Ordo Missae (NOM or NO), written by the Freemason Monsignor Annibale Bugnini with the assistance of Protestant clerics ....

the Latin Mass was the standard across the Catholic faith, but its celebration has been discouraged to a greater or lesser extent by successive church leaders since.

That is to say, since the Second Vatican Council. 

In 2021, Pope Francis imposed new restrictions on which churches could celebrate Latin Mass, ultimately leading Melbourne Archbishop Peter Comensoli to seek permission from the Vatican to continue the weekly Latin service at St Patrick's Cathedral, which was denied.

The cathedral celebrated its final Latin mass last week, and predictably, the news wasn't welcomed by the parishioners at St Aloysius.

"Everyone has a right to feel sad," 20-year-old Izabella Sensi said.

"It actually makes me want to continue and share this Mass more because it is being attacked, basically."

Young people's idealism and sense of fair play comes into play.  

Fr Glen Tattersall (right) leads the Parish of St John Henry Newman, the only Catholic parish in Melbourne to exclusively celebrate Mass the TLM

Father Glen Tattersall, who led the Latin Mass at St Patrick's

... Father Glen would likely say that he "celebrated" or "said" the Latin Mass, rather than  'led' it ... 

and continues to do so at St Aloysius, was more blunt in his assessment of the Pope.

"I think he's out of touch," Fr Tattersall said of the Pope.

"I think he's kind of typical of his age and background – he doesn't understand that we're not stuck in the 1960s any more."

"He's talking a lot about 'everyone is welcome in the church', but I'm sorry to say that a lot of Catholics don't feel very welcome at the moment in this pontificate."

Fr Tattersall is known as an outspoken conservative in Australia's Catholic clergy.

In 2017, he was quoted in The Australian newspaper saying "it's really the liberal-minded and their fellow travellers who have been wrecking the church over a number of years", and "there are many railing against sexual abuse – that's sexual abuse, isn't it?"

Speaking to Hack in 2024, Fr Tattersall declined to elaborate on his views about Pope Francis' other reforms to Catholic doctrine, which include allowing blessings for same-sex couples and allowing transgender people to be baptised and become godparents.

Notice how "the world" sees these moves on the part of this pontificate: as "reforms to Catholic doctrine". But hello! Catholic doctrine cannot be 'reformed' because Catholic doctrine is the truth which is unchanging and unchangeable. If it were not, it would not be the truth.

'Keep morals separate'

Speaking after the Mass at St Aloysius, Elisha Andres said her preference for Latin wasn't related to her political or moral beliefs.

 

21-year-old journalism student Elisha Andres attends the Latin Mass in Caulfield

Elisha is young, and a presumably a refugee from the Novus Ordo, which is to say she is poorly catechised.  

"I do tend to keep morals, not divorced, but I guess separate," she explained.

"I think morals are shaped by my culture, you know, being Filipino as well, that's a different set of morals in itself."

Perhaps not so different in morals as different from religious practice; Filipinos, at least in New Zealand, tend to be more devout. 

Other young Catholics at St Aloysius expressed similar sentiments, saying they preferred the 'sincerity' and 'authenticity' of the Latin language and the ancient ceremony.

"Growing up, I didn't really feel it as much going to the English (i.e. NO) Mass," Jacob Goicoa said.

"And then once [I attended] the Latin Mass, it just blows you away. Once you get there, you just can't get back."

Nonetheless, the irony of rejecting Pope Francis' modernising reforms, which are intended to broaden the appeal of the church, wasn't lost on these young Catholics.

"I suppose from the outside looking in, it wouldn't make much sense," 27-year-old Catholic convert Zachary Dennis said of his preference for Latin.

"But once I had resolved to become Catholic, this to me was the only logical choice and I'm assuming those around me would also agree."

 

The choir at St John Henry Newman sings Latin hymns and Gregorian chant

Harmless trend or brewing schism?

The number of Catholics attending Latin Mass still remains small, especially compared to the hundreds of thousands of Australians who attend a vernacular Catholic Mass every week.

Given time, they'll wake up to the NO and its consequences. Just as the secular world is waking up to the Jab and its concomitant injuries and deaths - inflicted, of course, according to Antipope Francis, as 'an act of love'. 

Data from the National Centre for Pastoral Research, an agency of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference, suggests around 3,400 Australian Catholics attended Latin Mass each week in May 2021, a number that was likely affected by COVID-19 lockdowns.

Associate professor Joel Hodge leads the School of Theology at the Australian Catholic University. He said there are a handful of parishes in each major Australian city that celebrate it weekly, but it remains a fringe group within the broader church.

'A fringe group'  is, sadly, the sort of description of Latin Mass communities one has come to expect from theologians at Catholic universities.  

"In Melbourne or Brisbane, where there are a couple of parishes that are more more focused on the Tridentine, we're talking about maybe a thousand people on a weekend," he said.

Father Shawn Murphy, the priest who leads St Aloysius' Young Adults group, said the parish regularly attracted "about 750" parishioners on a Sunday.

"Certainly, this has been recognised as one of the fastest-growing [parishes] by the Archbishop of Melbourne," he said.

 

Father Shawn Murphy was ordained just one year ago. Now, at 34, he is the youngest priest at the Parish of St John Henry Newman in Caulfield.

That growth sets the Latin Mass community apart from most Catholic churches in Australia.

Census data shows that while Catholicism is still Australia's largest single Christian denomination, the proportion of Catholics in the population has been falling steadily for decades, and the median age of an Australian Catholic rose from 33 in 1996, to 43 in the 2021 census.

Dr Hodge said there are a handful of theories for why young people might be attracted to the Latin Mass.

 "Young people are forming forms of belief in the modern context which has become very individualised, very fragmented, very difficult to know right from wrong," he explained.

 

Clouds of incense catch the light during Latin Mass at St Aloysius church in Caulfield.

"I think that's the key context: that secular, postmodern fragmenting, and young people are looking for ways to orientate their lives in the midst of that."

"You see it in these forms of traditional Catholic practice which have increased and you'll also see it in forms of Pentecostalism, evangelicalism, and, in its most extreme form, within certain forms of religious extremism or fundamentalism and jihadism."

Note how the theologian brackets traditional Catholic practice with 'fundamentalism and jihadism'. The theologian has his career to think about, under a modernist pontificate which punishes and persecutes traditionalism and ignores or promotes heretics and sex abusers. 

 

Dr Hodge said this trend was causing friction within the Church, particularly as Pope Francis advanced efforts to unify Catholics around the new mass.

Perhaps it's more correct to say that Francis has caused friction within the Church, a friction which if it existed went pretty well unnoticed until he advanced efforts not so much 'to unify Catholics around the new mass (sic)' but to ban Catholics from the "Mass of Ages" (the TLM). 

 

"I think that the real challenge is: how does the Church engage with these communities in a meaningful way that's going to satisfy what they're looking for and without alienating them?" he asked.Young Catholics defy Pope, choose Latin as rift grows in Australia's biggest church - ABC News

 These Latin Mass communities are looking for the Lord, and they will find Him in the Traditional Latin Mass; but Francis and his Prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship, Cardinal Arthur Roche (sounds like 'roach) are determined to alienate them from the God they pretend to serve. 

“To the Catholic faithful, who today are scandalized and disoriented by the winds of novelty and the false doctrines that are promoted and imposed by a Hierarchy rebellious against the Divine Master, I ask you to pray and offer your sacrifices and fasts pro libertate et exaltatione Sanctæ Matris Ecclesiæ, so that Holy Mother Church may find Her freedom and triumph with Christ, after this time of passion. May those who have had the Grace of being incorporated into Her in Baptism not abandon their Mother who is today lying prostrate and suffering: tempora bona veniant, pax Christi veniat, regnum Christi veniat”: His Excellency Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano.

Ss Peter and Paul (El Greco)


Saints Peter and Paul, please pray for the Church

ASSANGE WAS USED TO SILENCE TRUTH-TELLERS

 

To comment please open your  gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).

"O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!" So sang Lewis Carroll in 'The Jaberwocky' and that was how thousands of rightminded people around the world felt, when they heard that Julian Assange had been set free. 

The famous founder of Wikileaks had committed no crime. He was a journalist doing his job. He published millions of classified documents that were extremely damaging to the United States Government and very much in the public interest. He was forced to plead guilty to a charge of felony as a deal for his release after nearly 15 years, more than five in a 2×3 metre cell in solitary confinement where he had been placed on suicide watch. 

Nils Melzer, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture, has stated: "Assange is being persecuted and abused for exposing the dirty secrets of the powerful, including war crimes, torture and corruption in Western democracies that are otherwise keen to present themselves as exemplary in the area of human rights."

Assange's persecution by the US - and by the UK where he was imprisoned - was intended as a terrible deterrent to truth-tellers; to whistleblowers, journalists and activists. His only crime was to tell the truth to a world that has forgotten God and His justice. 

 

Assange waves as he arrives in Canberra

 WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been released from prison after agreeing to a plea deal with the U.S. Justice Department.

On Monday, the high-profile journalist was released from prison after agreeing to a deal in which he plead guilty for his involvement in publishing classified information received from a whistleblower working inside the U.S. government.

 

As CNN reported, Assange will receive a 62-month prison sentence according to the terms of the agreements. The sentence equals the time he spent in the high-security prison Belmarsh near London. The time served will be credited toward his sentence, allowing Assange to leave prison immediately and return to his native Australia.

 

“Julian Assange is free,” WikiLeaks announced in its statement posted on X, formerly Twitter. “He left Belmarsh maximum security prison on the morning of 24 June, after having spent 1901 days there. He was granted bail by the High Court in London and was released at Stansted airport during the afternoon, where he boarded a plane and departed the UK.”

 

“This is the result of a global campaign that spanned grass-roots organisers, press freedom campaigners, legislators and leaders from across the political spectrum, all the way to the United Nations. This created the space for a long period of negotiations with the US Department of Justice, leading to a deal that has not yet been formally finalised. We will provide more information as soon as possible.”

 

“After more than five years in a 2×3 metre cell, isolated 23 hours a day, he will soon reunite with his wife Stella Assange, and their children, who have only known their father from behind bars,” the statement continued, adding that “WikiLeaks published groundbreaking stories of government corruption and human rights abuses, holding the powerful accountable for their actions. As editor-in-chief, Julian paid severely for these principles, and for the people’s right to know.”

 

Assange greets his wife, Stella, whom he married while in prison

Assange pleaded guilty in a court in the Northern Mariana Islands on Wednesday, a U.S. territory located in the Pacific Ocean relatively close to Assange’s native Australia.

 

Assange faced life in prison in the U.S. for 17 counts of espionage and one charge of computer misuse related to the publication of millions of classified documents by WikiLeaks.

 

Assange’s legal battle began in 2010 when WikiLeaks published classified documents regarding the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, including a video that showed a U.S. military helicopter killing several civilians, including two Reuters journalists, in Baghdad, Iraq. The information was provided by former Army intelligence analyst “Chelsea” Manning, a gender-confused man previously named Bradley. 

 

From 2012 to 2019, Assange lived in the Ecuadorian embassy in London under asylum status. After he was arrested by Metropolitan police in 2019 under an extradition warrant from the U.S. government, Assange was imprisoned at Belmarsh, a high-security prison close to London, where he has been held in solitary confinement up until Monday.

 

READ: Julian Assange’s extradition to the US postponed again by UK court

 

Stella, with her children, her mother Teresa Devant and Julian's father John Shipton, says the sense of dread hanging over her and her husband felt like he was on death row.

 

According to sources cited by CNN, officials at the Justice Department and the FBI opposed any deal that did not include a guilty plea to a felony by Assange.

 

Journalist Glenn Greenwald warned of the danger of Assange pleading guilty to a felony for publishing classified information, which, in the eyes of many, was not a crime but a service to society, namely providing information showing that governments are deceiving their citizens.

“I never believed that the Biden administration actually wanted to bring Julian Assange onto American soil to stand trial,” Greenwald said. “Imagine the spectacle that it would have created as Biden heads into an election.”

 

It would put on Joe Biden’s record that he would be the first American president in history to preside over the imprisonment, not of a source who leaked information, but of someone who published classified information, which every newspaper in the United States does on a regular basis…

The goal of… keeping him in prison was to crush Julian Assange physically and mentally, and they succeeded in doing that…

They wanted to break Assange and simultaneously send a message to any future Assanges that ‘We will ruin your life if you publish our secrets.’

 

Drawing parallels to NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden not being allowed to return to the U.S., Greenwald said, “It is a deterrent message to keep the ability to hide their own crimes through secrecy, immune from the one vulnerability that they have which is that brave people inside the government leak that information to the public or through the media and reveal what it is they are doing.”

READ: Julian Assange’s show trial could determine the future of press freedom in the Westhttps://www.lifesitenews.com/news/julian-assange-released-from-prison-after-agreeing-to-plea-deal-with-us-government/

Do you get the feeling that Julian Assange might be under threat? 

Assange has been threatened with a “drone strike” by Hillary Clinton, having laid the blame in 2015 for the creation of ISIS by “American destabilization” of the Middle East – including Hillary Clinton’s role in the destruction of Libya.

 

A montage available on the Internet Archive compiles a series of U.S. politicians calling for the assassination of Julian Assange – and describing WikiLeaks as a “terrorist organization.”Reports of the CIA plot to kill Assange under Trump were first published by The Grayzone in 2020. Following this, a number of exposes appeared.

 

Fairness In Accuracy and Reporting (FAIR) published news in October 2021 of the CIA plot to kill Assange, noting “the deathly silence of journalists who mocked Assange who have nothing to say about CIA plans to kill him.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/julian-assanges-show-trial-could-determine-the-future-of-press-freedom-in-the-west/

Do you think we should pray for him? 

 

Praying Hands (Albrecht Durer)

Deliver me, O Lord, from the evil man: rescue me from the unjust man.

Who have devised iniquities in their hearts: all the day long they designed battles.

They have sharpened their tongues like a serpent: the venom of asps is under their lips.

Keep me, O Lord, from the hand of the wicked: and from unjust men deliver me  (Ps 140, 1-5).