Friday, 22 November 2024

NZ NEEDS PRAYER; BISHOPS INFLICT 'LITANY OF LAMENT'

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). Protestant rants will not be posted on this page.




Francis "pours scorn on all forms of contemplative prayer"




Last Sunday, New Zealand's Novus Ordo Massgoers (a captive audience) were strong-armed by NZ's Bishops into a 'Litany of Lament', coerced into beating their breasts for abuses committed not by lay people but by the clergy and hierarchy. That is, by the bishops themselves - who suggested that Kiwi congregations should 'rekindle our thirst for justice in an unjust world.' 


Ironically (and tragically so), the world is unjust more because the Church has neglected Scripture and Sacred Tradition than for any other reason. So much so that now, priests and bishops who preach the truth of Christ and His Magisterium are sacked for doing so; sanctioned for the crime of schism, dismissed from the clerical state. To be precise, for pointing out what everyone knows: that 'Pope Francis' has "fallen into various heresies". https://cruxnow.com/church-in-europe/2024/11/two-more-italian-priests-sanctioned-for-claiming-francis-is-anti-pope



In short, The Emperor Has No Clothes. As the Italian laicised priests Fernando Maria Cornet, Giorgio Maria Faré, Alessandro Minutella and Ramon Guidetti all assert, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is an Antipope. The Church now has no head save Jesus Christ. And if Donald Trump and Elon Musk fail in their not-so-secret negotiations to end war in Ukraine, and WWIII starts, where does that leave faithful Catholics?


They can find their real selves in the 'chamber' of their soul with Him Who loves them more dearly than they can know, until they abandon themselves to Him in the prayer of the heart, in that meditation which matures by grace into contemplation and the true love of God, which renders everything else unnecessary and beside the point. 


Over to David Torkington, who knows a thing or two about contemplative prayer. Such a shame though, that he's still calling Bergoglio 'Pope Francis'. He writes for Crisis Magazine so perhaps we should put that down to editorial policy. Crisis needs to get real.



The little shepherds in prayer with the Angel of Fatima, immortalised in stone

 

When most Catholics hear of revelations, they are understandably skeptical. After all, they say, do we not already have the teaching of Christ, the inspired word of God in the Scriptures, and the dogmatic teaching of the Church? What need do we have of revelations? They are, of course, right. But what happens when the teaching of Christ that may still be alive in the mind goes dead in the heart, as did the love of God when Jansenism was rife in the Church? \

 

Christ Himself appeared to St. Margaret Mary not to give us a new teaching but to set us afire once more with the teaching of the Sacred Heart that restated the love of Christ poured out on the first Pentecost Day. 

 

The same happened in the last century, when hearts that once practised loving God became hardened and turned to self-love instead. It was then that Our Lady of Fatima appeared to call people to practice loving God again, by repenting, praying, and making sacrifices. This was not a new teaching, for it was the teaching that her Beloved Son had taught; but her children had forgotten it—at least forgotten to practise it. 

 

 

Pope John XXIII, who decided not to obey Our Lady, wearing the tiara later given away by Pope Paul VI 



However, when, in 1959, Pope John called a meeting of cardinals to discuss the third Fatima secret, which he had prematurely opened, he decided to shelve the contents and call a council instead. Although we do not know the actual date of Doomsday, we know that it took place in 1959, thanks to Cardinal Bea who told his friend and colleague Fr. Malachi Martin about it immediately after he left the meeting.

 

The meeting had been called to decide whether or not to do what Our Lady had told the pope to do. According to Fr. Malachi, Cardinal Bea said, “Those fools have just condemned millions of people to death.” In hindsight, he would realize that far greater damage was done.

 

Our Lord, the head of the Church, did not ask His mother, the Mother of the Church, to deliver His message to the pope for him to decide whether or not to proclaim it to the world in 1960 but to do it.

 

Let us be clear about this: the Church herself has declared that Our Lady’s appearances at Fatima were authentic and that her message was authentic too. The message came from the head of the Church, through His Mother to His Vicar on earth, and His Vicar decided to disobey Him, with the diabolical consequences that we can now see for ourselves. These consequences could have been avoided because the most important part of the message of Our Lady was that the whole Church should have been called to repentance, prayer, and sacrifice in 1960.  

 

If he had called an ecumenical council to decide how best this could be implemented in every diocese and every parish in the world, then we would not be in the dire spiritual straits in which we find ourselves today, nor would we be in fear of the consequences that Our Lady promised would afflict those who would not heed her message. In 1959, it would seem that these consequences were only conditional; now it would seem they are inevitable. Indeed, they have long since begun—and in the highest places in the Church. 

 


The Vatican's new 'Mayan Mass' - next, 'Maori Mass'?https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/vatican-approves-mayan-rite/


  

Let me review the historical events that led up to the terrible moral malaise that, without realizing it, the Church found herself in on the eve of the Second Vatican Council, although they became more pronounced after the Council.  

 

The Modernism that was born at the Renaissance—whose creed began with the words, “I believe in Man”—did not of course exclude God at first but paid homage to the masterwork of God’s creation, who would shortly come of age at the Enlightenment and finally rise above himself to rule where God ruled before.


But the decline of the God-centered spirituality that prevailed before the Renaissance and the rise of the man-centered spirituality that began to prevail after the Renaissance received a decisive “shot in the arm”after the condemnation of Quietism. It was then that the deep prayer called contemplation, which leads to union with God, was extracted from Catholic Spirituality for all but a remnant. 

 

Long before a person can tangibly experience God’s love, something has to happen within prayer that is the key to everything. That something is that we must be weaned from the cupboard love that has infected us from the very beginning of the spiritual  life. Far from experiencing spiritual delights at the outset of prayer, a beginner has to experience darkness, dryness, and aridity, not to mention battalions of distractions and temptations that make the believer think they are on the wrong path.

 

It has been the teaching of Catholic Spirituality from the beginning that it is in continually turning away from distractions and temptations that a person is making acts of love that eventually lead to a habit of selfless loving. 

 

The mystic St. Angela of Foligno calls this loving “divine loving” because it is the same sort of selfless, unconditional loving with which Christ loves us—and it is the only form of loving that, when learned in years rather than months, can unite us with Christ.

 

Then—in, with, and through Him—we can contemplate God the Father and receive in return what St. Thomas Aquinas calls the fruits of contemplation—namely, the infused theological, cardinal, and moral virtues and the gifts of the Holy Spirit—to share with others.

 

After the Second Vatican Council, the self-centered, man-centered spirituality that had preceded the Council went viral. This was the result of an entirely new and diabolical movement that began among a small but ever-expanding group of Catholic intellectuals.

 

In the 1930s, many Catholic intellectuals, like their non-Catholic peers, flirted with left-wing ideologies as the only bulwark against the fascism that was rising in Europe. In the secular world, many left-wing intellectuals not only repudiated the secular culture in which they had grown up but they became traitors and defected to an alien culture. A similar thing happened in the Church, where many left-wing intellectuals not only repudiated the spiritual culture in which they had grown up but became traitors and defected to an alien culture too. 

  

Among them were Catholic theologians who found their way to the Vatican Council as periti, or experts, to advise their bishops. This was the perfect opportunity for a sizeable group of them to come together under the leadership of Archbishop Hélder Câmara and pledge to lead the Church into a new future in which Marxist principles developed in South America were to be adopted.

 

What came to be called liberation theology was also being adopted by the Jesuits under the leadership of Fr. Arrupe at their chapter held in Rome during the Council in 1963, as you can read in Fr. Malachi Martin’s book The Jesuits

 

In the seventy years that followed the Council, the ideas contained in liberation theology gradually began to develop into something little short of satanic, as they have progressively become porous to evil. Like a pernicious and poisonous fungus that grows underground, these ideas and the corrupt idealists who spawned them finally surfaced under the papacy of Pope Francis, who has surrounded himself with a sycophantic oligarchy who have now enthroned their new god—an unpurified, unstable, unruly, and unredeemed Moloch called Man. 



Francis greets arch-sodomist Cardinal Theodore McCarrick

 

Just as previous theocentric religions gave to God what they thought He wanted—like the physical offerings made in the Temple in the Old Testament, or the offering of oneself in the New Testament, in what Christ called the New Worship in Spirit and in Truth—the new, postmodern, self-ridden Moloch is offered all they think that he wants.

 

If their “Old God” has any part in this new religion, then it is only as little more than an outward sign of unity. He has become rather like the British Monarchy, a sign of national unity, surrounded by all the pomp and circumstance that can be mustered, to keep the plebs together and on side. But the Monarch has no power whatsoever over the people, nor do the people have any real relationship with him other than that of a sort of imaginative emotional obeisance.

 

The power that comes from the new postmodern religion that now rules from Rome is held by a new Moloch, which is man himself. His high priests not only determine what he wants and needs but interpret for us mere underlings what he considers to be right or wrong in a new man-made morality. This new morality is always relative to what man’s unredeemed, self-centered selfishness wants. That is why this new moralism is called relativism. It is what man decrees not what the God of so-called rigidity once decreed; and it is sought by what is called discernment. 

 

 



A group of Catholic boys in the youth club were using a Ouija board as a means of enabling the Holy Spirit to answer their questions. They were astounded at the answers they received, until I blindfolded them and those answers turned to gibberish.

 

A similar self-deception takes place in the discernment process, which always seems to deify decisions that were decided by at least one “big brother” or “big sister” before the process began. A perfunctory prayer to the Holy Spirit before the process proceeds and a feeling of peace at the end of the process is used to deceive the unwary and the naïve into believing that the resulting decisions have been sanctioned, if not positively inspired, by God. 

 

So God help those who think otherwise! For the truth is not a dainty dish to set before the most dangerous animals on earth, particularly if they have religious or political pretentions. They prefer ambrosia to eat and nectar to drink and have little stomach for humble pie. If you feed it to them often enough and in large enough portions, they can become very cross; and when they become very cross, they can crucify. 

 

In the Catholic Church, major decisions at any level were traditionally made not after a perfunctory prayer just before the process begins but after serious debate and discussion informed by the infused virtue of wisdom received after years of the deep personal prayer of those seeking the divine truth; that has no place in the “pseudo religiosity” of the new order.

 

St. Thomas Aquinas insists that true wisdom that comes from the Holy Spirit is one of the infused virtues, which are the fruits of the mystical contemplation that has long since been outlawed by those who see discernment as the guaranteed way that Synodalitists seek and find God’s will. 

 

For years now, hardly noticed by the faithful, the present regime has been closing down contemplative religious houses and pouring scorn on all forms of contemplative prayer apart from what they call “contemplation in action”—that, in fact, means action without contemplation.

 

It is this sort of purely human action that is closed to the Holy Spirit which has been responsible for flooding the Church with an unprecedented tsunami of sexual depravity, to which the highest authorities turn a blind eye. Marx, their mentor, once said that if you want to destroy an institution, first saturate it with sex. 

 

The only hope for the Church is to return immediately to imitate the Christ who was the inspiration of my youth, who still inspires me and all who turn to Him—to receive the only Love that can change us and the world that He has chosen to redeem through us.

https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/from-doomsday-1959-to-dire-straits-2024?utm_source=Crisis+Magazine&utm_campaign=219d880478-Crisis_DAILYRSS_EMAIL&utm_



 

St Cecilia and an Angel (Orazio Genteleschi and Giovanni Lanfranco)



St Cecilia, Virgin and Martyr, please pray for us



Wednesday, 20 November 2024

HIKOI OF HYSTERIA WHIPPED UP BY NZ'S LEFT


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). Protestant rants will not be published on this page.



"Cuzzie would struggle to eat a boil-up"



Says it all: a 98lb weakling who got bullied in the playground and sucked up to the biggest bully joins Te Pati Maori's hikoi, latching on to Maoridom's historic and most heinous bullying in the hope of scaring someone. 


But New Zealand is not scared of Te Pati Maori. Or of Labour or the Greens, who've cottoned on to this latest excuse for protest and formed a coalition of fellow-travellers to oppose the Treaty Principles Bill and democracy. It smells to high heaven of a back-room deal to give TPM 'sovereignty' if ever our nation is silly enough to vote them in again. 


New Zealand's population is 5.2 million. Maybe 1 million say they're Maori. The MSM claim the protestors in Wellington were 35,000. So that's 3.5% of Maori protesting: 0.67% of the population - a minority of the minority. The rest either don't care or support David Seymour's Treaty Principles Bill. The hikoi was mass hysteria whipped up by Marxists, just like the Kiwis who were manipulated by Ardern with the same motivation: totalitarianism.   


The mob is always on the side of wrong, as were the Jews who bayed for Christ's blood in Jerusalem. But they were eventually overcome by just eleven men who had truth on their side. David Seymour and Winston Peters are hardly Apostles, but they are leaders who speak truth against the apartheid now demanded by New Zealand's left.



remember when the left were anti-apartheid?




Winston Peters has given a speech in Parliament you can watch here. 


Yesterday’s hikoi wasn’t grassroots – it was a Māori Party astroturf.

 

What most in the mainstream media are not reporting is that the organiser of the hikoi is the son of the current sitting Māori Party MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, is employed by the Māori Party, and stood as a candidate for the Māori Party. 

 

 Kapa-Kingi,  says Jordan Williams of the Taxpayers' Union, is also on the Parliamentary payroll as a full-time taxpayer funded staffer.


The company that fundraised and coordinated the hikoi called “Toitu Te Tiriti” was incorporated in September by the wife of Rawiri Waititi and the daughter of the Māori Party president John Tamahere.

 

Driving and flying to Parliament in their car-koi was nothing but a recruitment and fundraising tool for the Māori Party – and the Labour Party ignorantly joined in.

 


 

The Māori Party just used and manipulated thousands of Māori yesterday for their own pointless political stunt. They staged a protest against a piece of legislation that they already knew is not going to pass into law.

 

The faux outrage is obvious for all who see it for what it was. Their aim was to gather anyone and everyone no matter what their cause - including patched gang members.

 

It’s the same reason they conducted a sham haka in the House last week. It was a disgraceful pre-planned and coordinated stunt that served only to intimidate and undermine the running of the House and grab as many headlines as they could.

 

They are a bunch of extremists and middle New Zealand has had enough.

 

New Zealand is a democracy whether the Māori Party like it or not. And using ‘Māori culture’ as an excuse for their disgraceful behaviour is an insult to Māoridom.


 

A protestor expecting a happy event?

 

No ordinary kiwi, Māori or non-Māori, should accept the behaviour and intent of this Party of Extremists.

 

They don’t want democracy, they want anarchy.


And they don't want the Treaty gravy train to stop.

  

They don’t want one country, one people, one law - they want separatism, division, and laws based on race. They state it specifically.

 

In other words, they want APARTHEID.







And the Labour Party have fallen over themselves to try and join them in their race to the bottom. There are some more conservative Labour MPs who know they are coming close to a point of no return.

 

Their Party has already left middle New Zealand a long time ago, and their Party is going to leave them hanging in the wind soon too.

 

They must wake up at night in cold sweats thinking about how much Labour is now fighting for the space on the woke far-left instead of fighting for middle New Zealand.

 

Since 1867 Māori have been elected to Parliament with just four winning a general seat until the introduction of MMP when we saw the exponential growth of the number of Māori MPs.

 

Right now, we have the record number of Māori in Cabinet of any government - more than all the Māori Party MPs combined.

 

 

Why weren't they protesting about 70 Maori children murdered since 2017?

 

All the Party of Extremists want to do is act with utter contempt and ignorance of the progress that has been accomplished. They are trying to tear that all down for their own ignorant misguided political gain.

 

They are trying to tear down our country along with them.

 

We are not going to concede or yield to these separatists, these people who spew an anthem of hate against other people.

 

We will not be bullied by these cultural elitist extremists.

 

We stand for one people, one country, one flag, united as one – Māori and non-Māori.

 

It is the only way our country will ever succeed – and we will never give up fighting for that.





 


Monday, 18 November 2024

TRANS PROSTITUTES HONOURED GUESTS OF 'POPE FRANCIS'


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). Protestant rants will get no oxygen on this page.



 Nicole Matson, transgender activist ‘diocesan hermit Brother Christian Matson,’ at the Vatican after 'sex change’ surgery in violation of Catholic teaching.




Catholic prelates, priests and publications' persistent styling of Jorge Mario Bergoglio as the "Holy Father" is an appalling scandal. 'Pope Francis' is bad enough but 'Holy Father' is galling in the extreme. It invites derision and ridicule, especially from good Protestants.


Yesterday he hosted the Torvaianica transvestites & prostitutes group at a #Vatican lunch for the poor. Sodomists - men living as women or vice versa - are regular guests of the 'pope' and say #PopeFrancis' invites are a “fantastic opportunity for us transsexuals”. We are indebted to one MLJHaynes on X for this instance of indulging the heretical, non-Catholic papal pretender but OnePeterFive, Crisis Magazine and Lifesitenews - traditional Catholic websites who constantly call Bergoglio out - all do it too. Can they not see their inconsistency?



In defence of 'His Holiness' Novus Ordo-ites may say oh, but, Christ dined with publicans and sinners. Yes, and He called them sinners and He called them to repentance. Oh, but, these people qualified for that #Vatican lunch as being poor in spirit. No. To be poor in spirit means to be humble, to know oneself. Whereas a trans who 'identifies' as a man (who doesn't even know her own sex) typically told Lifesitenews, "I am proud of myself for telling him that I am transgender [sic] in his native language, and equally proud that the Catholic Church has a pope who responds so warmly and pastorally to the [so-called] transgender members of his flock."


In the meantime the sheep are led to hell but eventually the Judas goat's life will not be spared 





 In the same vein of scandal, there's this story from Lifesitenews about one of the unfortunate individuals hosted by Bergoglio at the Vatican:



Following an audience last month, Pope Francis met with the controversial gender-confused “diocesan hermit” known as “Brother Christian Cole Matson” (see pic above).

 

Despite creating an international furor and raising profound canonical questions over her claims of being “transgender,” a woman who currently lives as a male hermit was recently received by Pope Francis as an honored guest at the Vatican.

 

At the conclusion of the weekly general audience, October 23, Pope Francis made his customary way around. The Pontiff first greeted the cardinals or bishops present before greeting newly-married couples and special guests.

 

Among those guests were a group of self-professed “transgender” individuals, who were present in Rome courtesy of Father James Martin SJ’s pro-LGBT Outreach group. Outreach had held a closed-door event on the sidelines of the Synod on Synodality some days before, which was closely followed by a private papal audience for “transgender” individuals and others organized by New Ways Ministry.

 

“Maxwell” Kuzma, a woman who presents herself as a “transgender man,” provided an account of the October 23 meeting with Francis – an encounter orchestrated by Father Andrea Conocchia, who has a longstanding arrangement in bringing gender-confused individuals to meet Francis.

 

In the party was “Christian Matson,” a woman born as Nicole who now identifies as a man and lives as a diocesan hermit in Bishop John Stowe’s Diocese of Lexington. Matson became the subject of international Catholic media controversy when she announced her transgender self-identification earlier this year.

 

As for Kuzma, she introduced herself to Francis saying, “I am a transgender man” and noting that she was a friend of Fr. Martin. “Francis beamed,” Kuzma wrote, adding that the meeting confirmed her in her “transgender identity”:

 

After years of suppressing my identity, I am now free: free to be exactly who God made me… I am proud of myself for telling him that I am transgender [sic] in his native language, and equally proud that the Catholic Church has a pope who responds so warmly and pastorally to the [so-called] transgender members of his flock.

 

The Catholic Church teaches that God creates every individual male or female at the moment of his or her conception, and sex is an immutable trait that “characterizes man and woman not only on the physical level, but also on the psychological and spiritual, making its mark on each of their expressions.”

 

Catholic teaching also condemns mutilation and sterilization as “against the moral law” and denounces gender ideology. 

 


Bergoglio's idea of a good time



Francis’ signal of approval in US controversy

 

Matson’s public meeting with, and welcome by, Francis is seen as a confirmation of her life choices that fundamentally reject Catholic teaching.

 

Raised Presbyterian, Matson previously explained hat she converted to Catholicism four years after her “sex change” in college.

 

Matson was welcomed by Stowe into the Diocese of Lexington as a “transgender hermit,” despite the bishop having full knowledge of Matson’s “sex change” surgery.

 

After Matson’s spring revelation of being a professed “transgender,” Stowe publicly supported her in the face of Catholic consternation. He defended Matson’s life and identity as a “transgender man” and said he was “grateful to Brother Christian [Nicole] for his [her] witness of discipleship.”

 

Novus Ordo-ites, please note that +Stowe is still Bishop of Lexington while Bergoglio sacked Bishop Joseph Strickland, who consistently and courageously upholds Church teaching.

 

Matson has since become a more public figure linked with events in the American LGBT activist circle, such as Fr. Martin’s 2024 Outreach conference. Attending the event this summer, Matson opined that the Catholic Church has need of “transgender” individuals in religious life. Reports documented that the conference “underscored the urgency” for Matson to complete her book, “which presents a theological argument for the inclusion of [so-called] trans people in consecrated life.”

 

Matson protested that women living as “transgender men” were being refused admission to religious life.

 

“These are great men who fully should be in religious communities,” she claimed. “They’re excellent candidates. The only reason that they’re not admitted is because of their medical history, their trans status.”

 

Demonstrating her commitment to this cause, Matson was accompanied at the Outreach conference by “five young transgender men,” who joined her in a “private retreat” in addition to partaking in the weekend program.


 

 Bergoglio gives trans and 'intersex'  'Catholics' and LGBTQ+ allies and a doctor specializing in transgender healthcare  a 90-minute audience

 

Speaking to LifeSite’s Emily Mangiaracina in May, canon lawyer Mother Therese Ivers stated that  “a transexual is ineligible for any ecclesial vocation” due to “the fact that they are not acting in accordance with the biological sex with which they are gifted by God upon their conception.”

 

Though Matson claims to live the counsels of poverty, chastity, and obedience, Mother Ivers stated that her very life as a transgender-identifying individual is a “very grave violation” against chastity, not in the sense that chastity is normally understood, but in reference to transsexuals’ “act against biological reality” and “against the type of human person that God intended that person to be.”

 

Ivers added that “a violation against the vow of chastity can include bodily mutilation and encouraging others to do the same. Such a sin would be morally grave in nature – we are not judging the soul – and would also incur sacrilege because it goes against the promise made to God (virtue of religion).”

 

Francis’ mixed record

 

The Pope – though decrying transgender ideology in some comments and texts – has nevertheless appeared to support the movement by his actions. He has repeatedly warmly welcomed LGBT or transgender groups to the Vatican, without appearing to outline the Church’s teaching on human sexuality or call them to a conversion of life.

 

Some members of the local gender-confused group linked to Fr. Conocchia now make a monthly trip to Pope Francis’ weekly general audience, at which they are given seats of honor. Nor are they the only pro-transgender or LGBT groups welcomed by the Pope: numerous such groups document and praise their meetings with Francis at the audiences.

 

READ: Pope Francis hosts members of local trans group at papal table for annual Vatican lunch

 

Last year, during the annual Vatican lunch for the poor, Francis astonished the international media when he picked a “transgender” member of the local group to sit opposite him at table.

 

In contrast to the Pope’s affirmation of the transgender group’s way of life, Catholic teaching on transgender issues remains unchanged. The Catechism states: “Everyone, man and woman, should acknowledge and accept his sexual identity,” referring to one’s sex. (CCC # 2333)

 

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s 1975 documentPersona Humana, stated: “There can be no true promotion of man’s dignity unless the essential order of his nature is respected.”

 

Indeed, under the leadership of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in 1986, the CDF issued a document instructing bishops on the pastoral care of professed homosexual persons. The CDF admonished bishops to ensure they, and any “pastoral programme” in the diocese are “clearly stating that homosexual activity is immoral.”

 

More recently, Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider, together with several other bishops, wrote in their 2019 Declaration of Truths that “gender reassignment” surgery is a “grave sin” and a “rebellion” against divine and natural law.

Officially supported by Bishop Stowe, and now fresh from receiving a papal blessing, Matson appears to be unlikely to conform to Catholic teaching on human sexuality and cease living as if she were a man. (Redacted.)https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/pope-francis-welcomes-transgender-activist-hermit-brother-christian-matson-at-vatican-audience/

 


St Alphonsus Liguori




 “If ever a Pope, as a private person, should fall into heresy, he should at once fall from the Pontificate. If, however, God were to permit a pope to become a notorious and contumacious heretic, he would by such fact cease to be pope, and the apostolic chair would be vacant.”

-St Alphonsus Liguori