Wednesday 6 September 2023

PM HIPKINS' LATEST LIE: J*B WASN'T MANDATED


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.








It's beyond embarrassing. It's criminal. New Zealand's Prime Minister has declared in front of television cameras, hand metaphorically on heart, that Covid v*ccin*tions were not compulsory. Not mandated.

PM Chris Hipkins, with his innocent choirboy looks, flat-out lied to New Zealand and didn't even have the grace to blush about it. 

"There was no, there was no compulsory vaccination." "I acknowledge it was a challenging time for people, but they ultimately made their own choices. There was no compulsory vaccination."

We have Mike Hosking to thank for prising the falsehood out of him, and BFD writer Coronavirus Plushie for splicing his stuttering fibs with clips of the Ardern/Hipkins Nightly Covid Show Tv - most tellingly, with Hipkins' threat to come door-to-door after anyone who dared disobey the Government's mandates.https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/09/06/no-i-do-not-wish-chippy-a-happy-birthday/

In his story below, Michael Bassett ever-so-politely points a finger at the 'Public Interest Journalism Fund' established by Labour "purportedly to assist media outlets adversely affected by Covid". Hah. It was designed to turn journalists into government flunkies, paid to put Labour in a good light, and it encouraged Labour politicians to think they could get away with murder.

And by means of the Covid v*x, that's exactly what Labour/Greens did.

This election campaign has degenerated into a media circus with endless trivial claims and counter claims, many of them driven by the media. As a result, we, the long-suffering voters find ourselves dependent more and more on the integrity of the journalists who are reporting the parties’ policies.

Sadly, many aren’t doing the job. We know the Herald’s Simon Wilson of old. On Tuesday Professor Robert McCulloch in his Down to Earth Kiwi blog showed Wilson up once more, this time because of his attack on National’s tax figures. Wilson claimed Chris Luxon’s figures regarding the 15% levy on foreigners purchasing houses didn’t add up, when the real problem turned out to be Wilson’s own shaky sources. I hope Robert McCulloch doesn’t stop here: little of what Wilson thinks is journalism ever seems to pass muster.

 


Several other Herald journalists also peddle their personal politics, although not as blatantly as Wilson. The others dress their stories up as reporting. Claire Trevett, Audrey Young, Michael Neilson and a couple of others slant their reporting towards the left. This isn’t surprising: a majority of reporters from time immemorial have been Labour supporters. Some, like Newsroom’s Jo Moir, just can’t help themselves. But they need to remember that in a tight campaign, slanted journalism can damage a perpetrator’s reputation for life.

 


 

The owners of the Herald, NZME, also need to exercise more care. They should have thought twice before letting the Council of Trade Unions, in the middle of a campaign, take over the front cover last Monday for a personal attack on a major political party’s leader.

The Council of Trade Unions has a shady past, going back to the days of Fintan Patrick Walsh. Starting 83 years ago, the then FOL and its affiliates began playing games with the Labour Party, sending union bosses to its conferences armed with card votes and voting up or down on issues they’d never bothered to consult their membership about. The current Labour Government has over-empowered the unions once more, and until this is rectified the CTU are indulging in what resembles corrupt practices in defence of their newly-found privileges.

The one thing we can be absolutely certain about is that the wider membership of trade unions, whom the CTU purports to represent, weren’t consulted before those front-page adverts. Shayne Currie and Murray Kirkness at the editorial level ought to have known that, and blown the whistle.

These days, of course, we get more of the news from television and radio than newspapers. Varying levels of professionalism are evident on the two main TV channels. Mike McRoberts and Simon Dallow are reliable performers, but TV3’s Amelia Wade shows her colours more than she should. Jack Tame does his job, but is more interested in avenues of attack than discovering the background to the issue. Despite its excessive, untranslated Maori verbiage, RNZ succeeds most of the time in straight reporting.

Of course, blogs like this one, are a different matter. We don’t pretend to be unbiased, and nor do we charge for our stories. We don’t get money from the Public Interest Journalism Fund that Labour established in 2020, purportedly to assist media outlets adversely affected by Covid, but in reality, to exercise more control over the media.

At the time the fund was created, many commentators smelled a rat and criticised newspapers for accepting what looked like a government bribe to journalists paid for by the taxpayer. The Herald’s editors haughtily dismissed those fears, but right now, in an election campaign, those assurances can be carefully scrutinised and, in several cases, have already been found wanting.

 

 

In a free country, journalists and the media in general need to be trusted to “speak truth to power” on their readers’ and viewers’ behalf. Prostrating themselves before Mammon, in the form of the Public Interest Journalism Fund, should be beneath them. Television and radio editors and communicators have considerable influence. They should use that power honestly.

When interviewing, it isn’t necessary always to find fault with the interviewee. Teasing out a policy, its origin and its possible effect can be revealing. Constant negativity is the way our media succeed in blighting all politicians, giving the triennial election process in our lives a bad name.

Why not leave trolling to social media?MICHAEL BASSETT: BOGUS ELECTION MEDIA COVERAGE (bassettbrashandhide.com)


 

St Maximilian Kolbe, patron saint of journalists



“The most deadly poison of our times is indifference. And this happens, although the praise of God should know no limits. Let us strive, therefore, to praise Him to the greatest extent of our powers”

- St Maximilian Kolbe


26 comments:

  1. You couldn't work for the Govt without the vax tho'

    ReplyDelete
  2. Julia, yea but the Nats wouldn't be any different, this whole red/ blue game is just that, to make the people THINK they have control, they don't, they have owners.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. we need a new broom to clear them all out,
      Check out NZ Loyal the best of the new parties I reckon

      Delete
  3. Criminals on the take.

    ReplyDelete
  4. He was correct no one was forced to have a vaccination. Many were coerced though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. didn't have choice if you wanted to keep your job, so basically it was compulsory

      Delete
    2. but you did. This is how you slide out of any responsibility here. You had a choice literally.

      Delete
    3. you have a choice too in s situation of physical force, you physically fight back with whatever weapon you have armed yourself with. Oh you don't want to do that because there are consequences? Bit like losing your job and friends eh.

      Delete
    4. I'm not quite sure what the difference is between being held down and being threatened with no livelihood and the effect it would have on your family as well as being ostracized from society. Physical force would at least have been honest.

      Delete
    5. yes but you could get a benefit, you werent forced to starve in the streets. And again this negates their responsibility.

      Delete
  5. Audrey Ellen Johnston7 September 2023 at 22:55

    Winston Peter's was not in parliament during this time ,so how could he sign anything?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oops. I thought that sounded tinny. My apologies.

      Delete

  6. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=294746623168378&set=a.143436954966013&__cft__[0]=AZXz7_fjhtOpYwpCWSIVn7_-3ckiMzaXk-9FZHZDUGfbwyNo_y5HmmHKOc-TheoNck58MHFMmPyZrr2zygBSk2j2Vbpxyr32aDDFQl0dWtSwJ-QD3e2qyb_2Fea1uZLZcuEUShTaGTxJoo1k9L_XqzhqqM6yAUnLLdmvREkqbZIYvA&__tn__=EH-R

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fyi. Credit for the brilliantly spliced clips mentioned in your article actually goes to Coronavirus Plushie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Egg all over my face! I've edited the post, thank you.

      Delete
    2. Although he’s been a politician for so long how did he miss what they were doing that would worry me more.

      Delete
    3. Audrey Ellen Johnston9 September 2023 at 23:11

      Was he there at the time?

      Delete
    4. Yes he was in the beehive and only when he saw the incredible mass of people
      Did he finally go to speak to the protestors. Bottom line he’s a politician and he’s going to do what works best for him first.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. At the end of the day he was in government with Jacinda Ardern when she started her plans - please do not tell me he didn’t know anything, that he’s been in politics for decades. He didn’t know that they were up to something? And if he didn’t, then he’s got a serious problem after being a politician for so long.

      Delete
    7. Yes please remember that they are all in favour of Vax and mandates.. these people who want control of our lives.

      Delete
    8. And Act!!
      https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=294746623168378&set=a.143436954966013&__cft__[0]=AZXz7_fjhtOpYwpCWSIVn7_-3ckiMzaXk-9FZHZDUGfbwyNo_y5HmmHKOc-TheoNck58MHFMmPyZrr2zygBSk2j2Vbpxyr32aDDFQl0dWtSwJ-QD3e2qyb_2Fea1uZLZcuEUShTaGTxJoo1k9L_XqzhqqM6… See more

      Delete
  8. Nick van der Westhuizen9 September 2023 at 23:04

    We have all the evidence and they will pay, in this life or the next.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Its only gonna take 1 person with nuthin left 2 lose. That day can't arrive soon enough.

    ReplyDelete

  10. https://rumble.com/v3ehk9f-there-was-no-compulsory...

    ReplyDelete