Is there no end to the idiocy? My joy at dipping my
hand into holy water yesterday afternoon was short-lived. Lo and behold, this
morning holy water and fonts had vanished again.
This
would appear to be Father's response to a letter to priests (not forgetting
those 'lay pastoral leaders') of the Palmerston North Diocese dated June 11,
from Cardinal John Dew who as we still lack a bishop remains the Apostolic
Administrator.
His instructions are for no holy water for at least a month - so no
protection as we enter church from evil spirits, just hand sanitiser to protect
us from imaginary Covid spooks and, infinitely worse for those faithful to whom
Communion in the hand is an insult to our Eucharistic Lord, no Communion on the
tongue either. On the Feast of the Body and Blood of Christ.
Just how
do Cardinal Dew's notions sit with the NZ Conference of Catholic Bishops who
announced the very next day that "Level 1 matters" are "rightly
for local people to decide"? How Mickey Mouse.
The
bishops "discussed how Level 1 was working in
their respective dioceses. They noted there were differences between some
dioceses and even between some churches – for example, some churches allowed
Communion from the Chalice, others did not. But they decided that such matters
were rightly for local people to decide."
Oh, fine. Pass the buck. So if "Communion from the Chalice"
can be decided by 'local people' then Communion on the tongue can be decided by
local people too. Or so you'd think.
But wait a minute. Just who are these 'local people'? The Parish Council? But that might not be meeting for another month yet. Which means in the interim, such decisions will be made by Father - vide the removal and then the next day the re-establishment of holy water fonts in my local church.
And what if the Parish Council is chaired by a
control freak, or a health professional who firmly believes that were it not
for Ardern's Lockdown 'tens of thousands' of Kiwis could have died of Covid -
and might still, given the PM's dreaded 'second wave'?
“You can do what you are comfortable with at a local level,” says the
NZBCB. Oh, that's so nice. What we're comfy with.
Whatever happened to "He that taketh not up his cross, and followeth me, is not worthy of me (Mt 10:38)? Since when has the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, the Body of Christ who was crucified for us, been about comfort?
I'm sorry to say that a friend, a lovely woman who'd come in to clean the church, copped it from me today. I mentioned that the holy water fonts which had been there yesterday were gone today.
She said, "Well, I suppose we have to do what we're told". I'm afraid I vented on her, along lines which will be familiar to readers of this blog, like if we're told to do something morally wrong, we actually must not do it. It doesn't matter who tells us to do it, we must not. "We ought to obey God rather than men (Acts 5:29).
And although our bishops and priests haven't told their people they must receive Communion in the hand, to say they are forbidden the Bread of Life - the Bread by which we live spiritually - on the tongue (which is the norm prescribed by the Church) is tantamount to telling them to receive in the hand, a practice condemned by the Church right up until Vatican II. Nothing which is wrong for nearly 2000 years can become right simply because bishops prefer it.
A correspondent asks, "Who takes precedence, +Dew or the NZCBC? So
does +Dew need to rescind his letter of 11 June?
Is the NZCBC now saying the Church is now a democracy down to the
individual parish? Can the parish now decide on Communion on the tongue,
the Chalice? Does the parish now override Church documented norms on
communion on the tongue etc? How does the parish decide, by the priest,
by vote of laity, the Parish Council, or some parishioner who shouts the
loudest about their virus anxiety?
This governance chaos is typical, right to the top. Amoris
Laetitia is a prime example.
God Bless and save our Church from demons who prowl though the world
seeking the ruin of souls."
On a more optimistic note, my friend who copped it today obviously
forgave me because she went on to express doubts about the Lockdown and whether
New Zealand actually needed it. Sounds like light may be breaking through the
fog of panic whipped up by Ardern and her media lap dogs.
Corpus Christi Procession in Seville, Spain
|
"Lord Jesus Christ, eternal high Priest, you
have committed to your priests the ministration of your sacraments; help them
to do their part in your work with the unfailing gladness of genuine
charity"
- intercession, Evening
Prayer 1, Divine Office for the Feast of the Body and Blood of Christ.
ReplyDeleteStella McLeod says:
I can only assume our bishops differ on this issue. This is a quote from my local parish newsletter:
“Bishop Steve is happy for us to return to normal. Holy Communion under both kinds, the Sign of Peace and the return of Holy Water to bless yourselves as we enter the church. The Bishop also asks, however, that people not to receive Holy Communion on the tongue or from the chalice if they are unwell and likewise the sign of peace. We will start having Communion under both kinds after this weekend.”
Bob Gill says:
The bishops appear to differ on a number of issues. Daily Masses at my local church have been fairly enjoyable this past week, with an old-school priest again sharing his every day Mass with us Monday to Saturday; including his interesting homilies and his Communion on the tongue given to those who wanted it. Then on Thursday our parish priest stood in for Father McVerry and I declined his usual offer of Communion on the tongue AFTER Mass, simply because I couldn’t get away from feeling like a leper.
Receiving Cardinal Dew’s Communion downer news via a Palmerston North newsletter on Friday further spoiled my week because I knew what to expect today (Sunday).
After our Saturday Mass, I advised our parish coordinator that the Bishops Conference later on Friday had reached a different and more favourable Communion decision. Of course, nobody had been informed of that decision in my parish, thus I knew what would be happening today at the Mass being celebrated by my parish priest, Father Onesi – Communion on the tongue AFTER Mass, if lucky as he would more likely follow the latest Palmerston North instruction.
So, I won’t be feeling like a leper today as I will be attending the Traditional Mass at Ashhurst.
I say:
It's a shambles. So Mickey Mouse. Having played the organ this a m at St Joseph's (and endured another homily about negative people who want to receive Communion from priests, not 'ministers of the Eucharist' and on the tongue, not in the hand) I went to Napier on a Voice For Life errand this arvo. It turned out a wild goose chase,- a ruse of our Eucharistic Lord to get me to Mass at Sacred Heart Hastings where the new 'baby priest of the Diocese' (his description) Fr Trung, gave me and my daughter Communion on the tongue.
He gave a thoroughly orthodox sermon. And he can sing!
How long will it take him to get the tabernacle into that awful, protestant church? 'Dominus est.'
Paul Collits says:
The coming of the Susans. Worse than mere Karens.
ReplyDelete
Teresa Coles says:
We did all this, this morning Stella (in Taupo) as per normal and the Mons gave a great homily on the real presence of our Blessed Lord in the Sacred Host..
Bob Gill says:
I find it interesting you were able to receive on the tongue in a Palmerston North church. I know the Bishops Conference said "You can do what you are comfortable with at a local level" but I assumed local level meant 'diocese'. Looks like I was wrong, especially as they still thought at my church this morning that the earlier Friday instruction from (just call me John) Dew was set in concrete.
But I didn't have to run away from this morning's Mass, though, because I knew beforehand a true minister of Christ would be in attendance, so could look forward to receiving on the tongue.
We got to first base and ICEL went out of business.
ReplyDelete