Monday, 2 March 2026

LEO MAKES INFAMOUS PENA PARRA A NUNCIO


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 



 Leo with his new Apostolic Nuncio to Italy,  Archbishop Edgar Archbishop Peña Parra






Catholics seem eager to talk about the Epstein files, to join in salacious enjoyment of "Randy Andy" and his downfall. But isn't a Catholic supposed to say "there but for the grace of God go I"?  


Talk about the tip of the proverbial. An entire political class is keeping Epstein Files' redactions secret because their release could bring down the globalist elite - and an entire clerical class are hiding their intel on the Lavender Mafia, to prevent exposure of the conciliar, synodal, Novus Ordo edifice now pretending to be the Catholic Church.  


It's not as if the Vatican isn't already discredited - by decades of deliberate infiltration by corrupt fifth columnists liable to blackmail, with the craven complicity of the hierarchy; by billions of lay Catholics' moneys spent in settlements for clergy sex abuse; by grave accusations that Francis/Bergoglio personally protected a string of vile sex criminals which in the context of any other church leader would certainly have forced a resignation. 


And with the appointment of Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra as Apostolic Nuncio to Italy, Leo/Prevost is following the Francis trajectory. The conciliar hierarchy is now a lobby of perverted heretics. They took decades to get the predator McCarrick, and barely a month to excommunicate Archbishop Vigano for calling them out.


Sodomy is a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance, especially when it preys on the young. As such, it should be hated: Christian charity demands that we hate wickedness just as we love goodness.


 

Fr. Grassi, Fr Inzoli, Bishop Zanchetta, Cardinal McCarrick, Fr. Marko Rupnik


From excommunicated whistleblower Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano:


The rumored [now confirmed - ed] appointment of Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, currently Substitute for General Affairs at the Secretarat of State, as the new Apostolic Nuncio to Italy is disconcerting and scandalous. 


At a time when the network of crime and corruption revealed by Jeffrey Epstein’s files shows the constant presence of abusers who can be blackmailed for their heinous crimes, Prevost’s Vatican has no intention of deviating from Bergoglio’s line, based precisely on the cover-up and blackmailability of his corrupt collaborators.



 

Since 2002, in my capacity as Delegate for Pontifical Representations, I have reported to the Superiors of the Secretariat of State the crimes in which Edgar Peña Parra was involved, in particular the abuse of two minor seminarians and the violent death of two homosexuals.

 

The abuse of the two young seminarians was confirmed following my further investigations by the then rector of the Major Seminary of Maracaibo, Rev. Enrique Perez, and by a committee of lay people who sent a substantial dossier on the matter to the Secretariat of State.

 

My urgent reports multiplied in the following years but went unheeded. In 2011, Peña Parra was ordained bishop, promoted to archbishop and apostolic nuncio, when the current Secretary of State Pietro Parolin was the nuncio right there in Venezuela.

 

Throughout all these years, both Parolin and the various Substitutes have been responsible for covering up the dossier on Peña Parra, which is kept in the archives of the Nunciature in Caracas and in those of the Secretariat of State.

 

In my Memorial of August 22, 2018, I once again reported in detail the whole story of Peña Parra, who in the meantime had been promoted by Bergoglio to the high office of Substitute of the Secretariat of State.

 

Promoting him now to Apostolic Nuncio in Italy would mean ratifying the protection that this shameful character has enjoyed so far, renewing the outrage to his victims who are still waiting for justice.

 

How does Leo intend to proceed?

 

What message will he send to the perverts and corrupt individuals inside and outside the Roman Curia if he decides to promote Peña Parra, after dozens of similar promotions by his predecessor Bergoglio? Peña Parra must be tried, removed from all positions, and sentenced to the most severe punishment, in order to send a true signal of change that is not limited to empty words.

 

The Italian government, for its part, must unequivocally reject this appointment by refusing to agree. Accepting Peña Parra’s nomination as Apostolic Nuncio would make the Italian government complicit with those who shamefully continue to cover up his crimes with an unworthy promotion.Viganò on Scandalous Rumored Appointment of Peña Parra

 




From #UnmaskTheEmpire, on X:

The dossier never sleeps.
It thickens in the Vatican vaults while the wolves promote their own. McCarrick was no lone predator. He was the permitted rot, the living blackmail key handed from Benedict's quiet cell straight into Francis's open palm. Viganò spoke the words in 2013: “a dossier this thick.” The Holy Father smiled, nodded, then elevated the very network that shielded the monster.
Coincidence? No.
Protocol.
The same protocol now anoints Peña Parra accused since 2002 of seminary abuses and darker ends to Nuncio in Italy. A promotion not despite the files, but because of them.

 

Blackmailable men make loyal lieutenants when the Empire needs the Church to kneel before Davos, Agenda 2030, and the transhuman creed.
Viganò saw the fusion: deep church mirroring deep state. Not accident. Design.
Epstein's island was the profane altar; Rome's corridors the sacred one. Same masters, dual levers: sex, money, silence to bend the Bride into serving Antichrist's blueprint.
They excommunicated the whistleblower in 2024 to silence the last Athanasius.
Exsurge Domine.






 

 

From Gene Thomas Gomulka: 



EPSTEIN & HIS COLLABORATORS: COULD LEO & THE CATHOLIC HIERARCHY BE WORSE?


Why Pope Leo continues to cover up abuse



In order to understand the reason behind the failure of Church officials to correct the problem of sexual abuse and their subsequent cover-ups of that abuse, one has to realize that the genesis of the problem lies within the infiltrated structures of the Catholic Church.

 

That is to say, most of the predator priests who abused, raped, and sodomized countless children, the majority of whom were teenage boys, were themselves victims of prior predation. In my decades of work with clerical sexual abuse cases, I have yet to meet and interview one predator priest who had not been sexually abused himself in his former days in priestly formation.

 

This explains both why they in turn abuse young people, and why Church officials have consistently covered up that abuse.


Let’s take the example of one priest whom we will call “Bill,” and one bishop whom we will call “Leo.”

 

 

Bill went to a high school seminary when he was 13 years old, where he was groomed and introduced to gay sex by a faculty member who purported to be a caring mentor. Like most such victims, Bill did not want to tell his parents how he had developed a homosexual orientation, which often happens to boys who are abused during their period of psychosexual development and prior to their ever having had an emotional or physical relationship with a woman.

 

Instead of returning home, by staying in the seminary and getting ordained, Bill’s family and friends would never discover that he, like many abuse victims, suffers from same-sex attraction.

 

Because Bill looked upon his 12 years of seminary sexual experiences with priests and seminarians as forms of love and friendship, he later, as a priest, engaged in the same behavior with boys in his parish.

 

When one of those boys reported his predations to Father Bill’s bishop, Bishop Leo, the bishop sent Bill away for “treatment” and arranged for an out-of-court settlement with the victim. Later, Bishop Leo assigned Father Bill to another parish, just like countless homosexual priests are reassigned after getting caught using the gay Grindr hook-up app.


While this may explain why many priests abuse teenage boys, like they themselves were abused as teenagers, why is it that most bishops, like our Bishop Leo in the case above, cover up abuse instead of removing predators permanently from the priesthood?

 

The answer is that insofar as over 80% of U.S. bishops, like the pope and Vatican officials, are thought to be closeted homosexuals, they can empathize with priests like Father Bill because they themselves not only suffer from same-sex attraction, but almost all of them engaged in homosexual acts before and after their ordination.

 

 

Pope Francis notified, put on trial, and excommunicated Abp. Vigano in less than 30 days. But the nun-raping artist Fr Rupnik SJ gets years of tolerance and his art commissioned for Vatican projects



One can’t help but notice that the excommunication decree of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò was suspiciously timed, occurring shortly after the Archbishop accused Pope Francis of having abused novices when he was the Master of Novices at the Jesuit novitiate in Argentina.


 



 

What is the likelihood, for instance, that Robert Prevost, who left his family in Chicago and went to study at an Augustinian high school seminary in Michigan, may have been groomed and abused like Bill? It is worth noting that the Catholic seminary Prevost attended had housed a notorious predatory priest faculty member, Father Nelson Daniel Rupp.

 

And if in fact Prevost was groomed, might it explain why he continues to cover up the reported satanic abuse of Lisa Roers by Omaha Father Dennis Hanneman, plus over 160 bishops credibly accused of abusing children and vulnerable adults?

 

Most sex abuse victims’ advocates, like the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) who filed a Vos Estis complaint against Pope Leo before his election, believe that Pope Leo is a part of the problem and not the solution when it comes to clerical sexual predation and homosexual misconduct in the Catholic Church.

 

Consider, most recently, how the Holy See has scandalously asked Italy to approve Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, the current Substitute for General Affairs at the Secretariat of State (i.e., the number two authority in the Secretariat), as the new Apostolic Nuncio to Italy.


 

John Paul II promoted McCarrick despite knowing the abuse allegations

 

In 2002, Peña Parra was reported in Venezuela for abusing two minor seminarians and being involved in the violent death of two homosexuals. This abuse was confirmed by the then rector of the Major Seminary of Maracaibo, Rev. Enrique Perez, where the abuse allegedly took place, and by a committee of lay people who sent a substantial dossier on the matter to the Secretariat of State.

 

The fact that Leo is promoting a number of prelates accused of engaging in and covering up abuse would lead one to believe that he himself was abused during his 12 years of formation in the Augustinian Order.

 

With respect to the case of Lisa Roers, about which I have written frequently, I urge the good laity of the Archdiocese of Omaha to follow the example of Catholics in the Buffalo Diocese who protested in front of the Chancery Office calling for the resignation of Bishop Richard Malone for covering up abuse, and the Catholics of the Richmond Diocese who protested before the Cathedral and in front of the Vatican Embassy in Washington, D.C. calling for Bishop Barry Knestout’s removal for his unjust suspension of Father Mark White - a priest who bravely spoke out against Church officials who were covering up clerical sexual predation. There is a video documenting Lisa Roers’ case entitled, The Prayer of the Prey, which I urge the Omaha faithful to watch.

 

With respect to what I firmly believe is the number one problem facing the Catholic Church today, the following remark of the great Saint Catherine of Siena, which has been making the rounds recently in the awakened part of the Catholic media, is more than timely and speaks for itself:

 

“We have had enough exhortations to be silent. Cry out with a thousand tongues. I see the world is rotten because of silence….Speak the truth in a million voices. It is silence that kills.”


 




St Catherine of Siena, please pray for the Church  



Saturday, 28 February 2026

PAGANISM AT 'CATHOLIC ETHOS' CHARTER SCHOOL


To comment please open your gmail account, or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.


















Consider this. If you please. A new charter school in Auckland with a 'Catholic ethos' gives new entrants text books disguised as 'Maths' and an 'Activity Book'. Hidden inside the covers is seditious and paganist material.


At this school three 'Flags of New Zealand-Aotearoa' are taught to five year-olds as having equal value. They don't know which flag to call their own. They don't even know the name of their own country. Is it New Zealand or is it 'Aotearoa'?




The principal of the school claims that "school staff were not previously aware of the specific inside-cover content. It was not selected or intended by the school to convey any religious doctrine nor to endorse any political position or activism." Tell that to the Marines. It's hard to believe.


Challenged by a new entrant's mother - a refugee from Waiheke Island, where the first school she'd sent her child is utterly Maorified - the chaplain, a Catholic priest, said if they'd shown an LGBTQ flag he'd have asked for its removal. He wasn't bothered about Maori gods being taught to children in a school with a 'Catholic ethos'.







New Zealand is gripped by the Marxist malaise afflicting Western 'civilisation' everywhere. New Zealand suffers a hardcore of radicals & racists embedded in academia, the justice system, civil service and the legacy media, together with the green & radical Maori who continually push Marxist ideology onto our kids & into our lives.



The racism, religious zealotry, paganism and de facto apartheid exhibited in NZ schools illustrate what Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò (former Nuncio to the US excommunicated by the Vatican for speaking the truth) has called "a criminal global plan, implemented by a dangerous subversive elite which has infiltrated the highest levels of Western institutions".



New Zealand's Canterbury University heralds the introduction of compulsory ‘Tikanga’ for law students. It will be ‘woven’ throughout the curriculum to ensure lawyers see law through ‘a Māori lens’ or Te Ao Māori. The changes were put into effect by NZ Council of Legal Education, an independent body statutory body. In New Zealand, Parliament is sovereign, not the judiciary.




NZ Medical Council ethos


The NZ Medical Council is consulting on a new statement requiring practitioners to advance 'hauora Māori' and address 'unfair systems and power imbalances' within the health sector. Surgeons must give “priority to Māori and Pacific Island patients - on the specious grounds that 'they have historically had unequal access to healthcare.' https://centrist.nz/medical-council-draft-tells-doctors-to-advance-maori-equity-dismantle-power-imbalanc


The Medical Council’s draft statement explicitly claims that "historical and ongoing colonisation" prevents Māori from accessing health resources, and requires doctors to use their "position and power" to support specific political aspirations. Our doctors are being told 
to “recognise that mātauranga Māori is diverse." 
Similarly, the Nursing Council’s proposal dictates that "Te Tiriti o Waitangi provides a framework for nursing practice" and requires nurses to engage in "sustained critical self-refeflection" regarding "the dynamics of power" and "structural conditions".Don Brash @ Hobson's Pledge <hello@hobsonspledge.nz>


Entry into NZ Medical School: 90% average for normies vs 65.7% for Māori/PI/Rural. So best not to consult Maori doctors. And Maori Registered Nurses can have a significant portion of credits from tikanga/matuaranga, yet attain the same certification as someone conventionally trained in science-based practice.



Your local chemist must n
ow be 'confident to perform 'waiata tautoko,' (a song of Māori support), and advocate for 'giving effect to te Tiriti at all levels,' 'prioritising Māori voices and trusting Māori intelligence.'
Pharmacists must be familiar with Māori health models such as Te Pae Mahutonga, which, according to the Health Ministry, refers to the Southern Cross constellation.







  • Maori staff at Oranga Tamariki get unlimited 'discretionary' paid leave to attend hapū meetings or kapa haka competitions while other NZers have only annual or unpaid leave.
  • You buy a block of land, you get resource consent to build on it, then you’re told you can’t because the land is sacred to a local Maori tribe

  • Pounamu (greenstone): Maori can collect it anywhere. Non-Maori can take it only from beaches. Those are differences by race in law.
  • New Zealanders are routinely forced to take part in karakia (Maori prayers) at work and school. Most are tolerant of belief in Māori spirituality but don't want it forced on them.
  • Teachers in one Auckland school are required to say karakia before every lesson. There are 10 Māori pupils in the entire school.
  • Refusing to attend a meeting held on a marae, Hastings city councillor Steve Gibson took 'a principled stand against “enforced conformity in totalitarian states - or in liberal democracies.' He objected to extended speeches delivered in te reo Māori without translation. He said he would have no issue if speeches were translated, but without that, he questioned the point of attending. 

  • Pressure to engage with Te Reo is often justified by the revisionist view that the Treaty established a ‘partnership’ between iwi and the Crown, which apparently extends to everyone being obliged to be conversant with Māoris’ ancestral tongue. The fallback justification is that te reo is an official language, although that argument is never made for learning sign language despite it having the same legal status.”

    Gibson cited discomfort with the spiritual elements embedded in marae proceedings, which he says conflict with his beliefs. The four-and-a-half hour session cost ratepayers $2,570 in venue hire and catering, which Gibson said was unnecessary when council chambers were available at no cost.https://centrist.nz/councillor-refuses-marae-meeting-citing-language-faith-and-cost/

  • NZ Principals' Federation wants to lower the bar so Māori & Pacifica students leave school with NCEA qualifications.


But hold on: prior to 1974 you had to be more than half Maori to legally claim to be Maori. In 1974 Labour's Maori Affairs Amendment Act re-defined a Maori as 'a person of the Maori race, and any descendant'". From 1995 you could self-identify as Maori. Literally anyone can be Maori now.  So what's it all about, Alfie? Subversion, that's what. 



Cui bono? Extra funding (now canned) for enrolling Maori/Pacifika would explain how NZ schools became Maorified 


The sobering truth in regard to this school's 'Catholic ethos' is that the conciliar Vatican (not to be confused with the Catholic Church) is complicit, if not a prime mover, in this scenario. Instead of defending the West and Christianity, Leo's globalist Vatican is a force opposing it. New Zealand's so-called Catholic Bishops have resorted to the Marxist liberation theology ploy of divisive racism in Catholic schools, directing staff to ignore their democratically-elected government by "embedding Te Tiriti in Catholic schools".  


These wolves in sheep's clothing, these traitors to nation and religion, have incorporated "Māori wairua/spirituality ... and karakia/prayer into the daily life of the school". For God's sake! Literally! NZ's Catholic Bishops are teaching paganism to Catholic children.