Saturday, 4 April 2026

"YOU CAN'T GET (VALUABLE) ORGANS FROM A CORPSE"


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.







In most of the world it's Holy Saturday. Christians mourn the death of their Saviour, Jesus Christ. Churches are empty; the red glow at the tabernacle, symbolising the Light of the world, is extinguished. Christians know for certain that to save them all from eternal death, on Good Friday Christ died on His Cross.



But in hospitals around the world patients declared to be dead - like Christ, when the centurion thrust a lance into His heart - are still alive when their organs are removed for transplant. Often with paralysing agents instead of anaesthesia. Patients with severe brain injury are diagnosed as 'dead' after only partial loss of brain function, but a poor prognosis of neurological injury is not the same thing as 'dead': 'brain death' is not death. Millions of kind-hearted people intending to donate their organs deserve to be told they'd still be alive if their organs were removed.

 

The terrible plight of Noelia Castillo Ramos (https://juliadufresne.blogspot.com/2026/03/doctors-law-police-govt-church-all.html) electrified the world and galvanised even the Catholic Church (moribund in Spain) to denounce it as “crossing a moral line no society should dare to cross."  According to Castillo's attorney, Polonia Castellanos, the euthanasia was not delayed, even as the family continued to object, because Noelia’s organs had already been designated for donation. 


"You CAN'T get organs from a cadaver— they're stealing them from living kids & young adults 16-30 while they're still breathing on ventilators!" Dr Paul Byrne, President of the Life Guardian Foundation, states that Narcan is pushed on overdose victims just to rush them into the ER for fresh organs. So don't put it on your (driver’s) license ...And the things I'm telling you, you are not allowed to hear. Because if you hear it, you will be upset — and you should be upset, because whose organs do they want? They want the organs from the, certainly from all children, but especially the people who are 16 to 30.


“Their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're going to get their organs. And they do everything to get their organs. And once the organs are taken, you can't bring them back to life.”


The radical left started desensitizing us to death through abortion. Then they introduced voluntary euthanasia. What have we done???






 The story of Noelia Castillo Ramos is one of the most heartbreaking and unsettling assisted suicide and organ donation cases in recent years, and it forces us to take a closer look at death as an answer to suffering.

 

Noelia was only 25 years old. She had endured repeated sexual assaults, and the trauma from those experiences haunted her for years. She struggled with severe depression, had been admitted to psychiatric facilities more than once, and had previously attempted to take her own life.

 

By her own words, she felt completely overwhelmed. In an interview on Antena 3, she described feeling empty, alone, and without purpose. She said she had no goals, no motivation, and no desire to keep going. Her world, as she put it, felt “very dark.”

Noelia was kept isolated prior to her MURDER (that’s what is was).

 


 

They kept her family & friends from her & she never saw the world trying to reach her to show our love & offers of support to save her life.

 

At the same time, she made something else very clear. Although she had impairment from a spinal injury, she was not bedridden. She was able to get up, shower, and take care of herself. This was not a case of someone in the final stages of a terminal illness. This was a young woman in deep emotional and psychological pain—pain that can be treated and healed with the right care and support.

 

God brings peace and healing to the brokenhearted. Even after unimaginable trauma, healing and a full life are still possible through Him. There are churches, nonprofits, and counseling centers ready to walk alongside people in these painful situations, offering the care, support, and hope they need. That way, women don’t have to numb the pain; they can live fully free.

 

“He heals the brokenhearted and binds up their wounds.” Psalm 147:3

 

In April 2024, Noelia requested euthanasia under Spanish law. Her request was approved, setting off a long legal battle led by her father, who strongly opposed the decision. He pleaded for more time, believing his daughter needed help, not death. With the support of the Christian Lawyers, he fought to stop the procedure and took the case as far as the European Court of Human Rights. For nearly two years, the family tried to intervene.

 

But on March 24, the court declined to stop the euthanasia. With that decision, the final barrier was removed. Within days, the process moved forward.

 

What happened next has left many people shaken. In a video shared online, Noelia’s best friend can be seen arriving in tears, begging for the chance to see her one last time. She pleads with staff, clearly desperate and heartbroken. She is turned away. There is no final goodbye, no moment of comfort—just a closed door in what would be the last hours of a young woman’s life.

 

https://twitter.com/i/status/2037296104115499404

 

Another detail makes the situation even more troubling. According to her attorney, Polonia Castellanos, the euthanasia was not delayed, even as the family continued to object, because Noelia’s organs had already been designated for donation. 

 

From the 2025 Milliman report on transplant charges


This raises serious concerns about whether outside factors may have influenced the timing of her death. When a decision as final as this is connected to something else—especially something as sensitive as organ donation—it leaves many wondering if the system is truly focused on the person in front of them.

 

According to Noelia’s lawyer, she could not cancel her euthanasia because “her organs were already committed”.Spain placed more value on her organs than on her life, had her murdered, and essentially sold her for parts.

 

Noelia herself knew her family did not agree with her choice. She acknowledged that they would be left behind with pain, but said she wanted her own suffering to end. Her words reveal just how alone and hopeless she felt. But they also highlight the core issue in this case. She was not saying there was absolutely no help left. She was saying she felt there was no way out.

 

That is what makes this story so difficult to ignore. A 25-year-old woman, who was physically capable of living her daily life, who had a family fighting for her, and who had a history of mental health struggles, was ultimately approved for assisted suicide. Instead of being surrounded with more care, more time, and more support, her life was brought to an end.

 

Although this took place in Spain, these pressures exist in Texas too. Some hospitals and organ donation businesses push families to “pull the plug” not out of concern for the patient, but from financial gain.

 

 


 

This case raises a painful but necessary question. When someone is suffering deeply—especially from emotional and psychological wounds—should the answer be to end their life, or should it be to help them cope with that pain?

Her lawyer highlights the hospital’s conflict of interest in this case, because Noelia’s organs are worth millions in billable charges.

Euthanasia was supposed to be for terminally ill people that were suffering horrific pain & now young people are being killed for their organs.

https://texasrighttolife.com/her-life-ended-at-25-as-assisted-suicide-and-organ-donation-collide/

 

 

In 1975 Dr Byrne treated Joseph, a premature baby declared brain dead but eventually made a full recovery. Joseph motivated Dr Byrne to oppose brain death as a definition of death in the US 

 

Dr Paul Byrne, founder of the Life Guardian Foundation, refused to sign the

-backed brain death document supported by 150+ Catholics. He says while much of it is "commendable it is insufficient to protect life," as brain death is "a misnomer."

simple: the soul is a non-corporeal, spiritual life-principle which cannot be observed or measured or weighed using the tools of empirical science. The presence or absence of the "You can't get organs from a cadaver— they're stealing them from living kids & young adults 16-30 while they're still breathing on ventilators!"

Dr. Paul Byrne reveals they push Narcan on overdose victims just to rush them into the ER for fresh organs... then lie to grieving families: "Your daughter Sally would want to 'do something good.'"
"See, you cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ, and you can only get healthy organs from living persons. You cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver.”
“So you don't put it on your (driver’s) license?”
soul can be ascertained only by observing certain biological signs that indirectly attest to

The criteria (for brain death) included no response to stimuli, no breathing, no reflexes, no brainwaves, and replication after 24 hours. Though rapidly adopted, it was immediately contested by doctors who felt harvesting organs from someone with a heartbeat was unethical, worried about diagnostic errors, and suspected the primary motivation was avoiding long-term care costs and obtaining organs.

 

“And the things I'm telling you is that you are not allowed to hear. And because if you hear it, you will be upset — and rightly so, you should be upset, because whose organs do they want? They want the organs from the, certainly from all children, but especially the people who are sixteen to thirty.

“And their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're going to get their organs. And they do everything to get their organs. And once the organs are taken, you can't bring them back to life.”

“And so what they do is they tell the relatives, 'Well, your daughter Sally would really like to do something good, and this is a way to make something good out of this tragedy,' or your son.

“While they have been getting organs from accidents and gunshot wounds, they now get more organs from overdose of drugs than they do from accidents and gunshot wounds combined. There are eight deaths a day from overdose in Ohio, and they get their organs — that's what they want.”

 

“And so what are they doing? They're giving the policemen the Narcan to counteract the drug, which gets them into the emergency room, but it doesn't save their life. It gets them in the emergency room, and they still get their organs. It's so diabolically disgusting. Oh, it really is. See, it's so bad."


https://x.com/i/status/2038056102546301113 - interview with Dr Paul Byrne.

 


 
'Pope Leo' prostrates himself on Good Friday in St Peter's (where he sponsored the LGBTQ pilgrimage through the Holy Doors. Note the plush carpet) 





Pope Leo XIV on Thursday said organ donation is a noble act that should be governed by fair and transparent criteria, avoiding “any form of commodification of the human body.”

 

He also encouraged the safeguarding of the well-being of patients in his comments to participants of an event organized by the Italian National Transplant Network at the Vatican on March 26.

 

 Pope Pius XII offered early moral guidance, “recognizing the legitimacy of removal for therapeutic purposes, respecting the dignity of the human body and the rights of the people involved.

Leo emphasized that since then, the Church’s reflection has accompanied the development of transplant medicine, “recognizing its value and at the same time setting out the necessary ethical criteria.”

The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms that “organ donation after death is a noble and meritorious act and is to be encouraged as an expression of generous solidarity.”

 

For this reason, he warned that “vigilance is always necessary to avoid any form of commodification of the human body and ensure that transplants are governed by fair and transparent criteria.

Leo also stressed that transplantation medicine highlights how “the relationship of care, trust, and mutual responsibility constitutes an essential condition for a transplant to take place.”https://ewtnvatican.com/articles/pope-leo-xiv-organ-donation-body-commodification







Lord Jesus Christ, dead and buried in the tomb for me, have mercy on us 


Thursday, 2 April 2026

MAORI GODS, MAORI MYSTICISM, MAORI FATIGUE


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 



 

 Is global commmunism pushing for Maori reversion? 






Holy Thursday, the day Jesus Christ was delivered into the hands of His enemies, is a good moment to examine the betrayal of our fair country, New Zealand, by treacherous, godless neo-Marxists and their mob of useful idiots, armed not with swords and staves, as at Gethsemane (not yet), but with indoctrination and propaganda.



You thought New Zealand's wokery was bad. It's not. It's worse. Or even the worst in the world. New Zealand was an over-ripe plum dangling, just waiting to fall for communism, primed by 3 generations of Kiwis spoiled silly by their natural advantages: a beautiful land, a rich Christian tradition. And when spoiled children grow up, they rebel. Flinging off their inherited religious belief, soaked in socialist education, Kiwis fell for feminism's effeminate empathy and the Maori elitists. Embracing Wokery with its 'Neo Te Reo' of the Ministry of Made up Māori Words (MoMuM), New Zealand got taken for the ride of its life.


We complain about 'Maorification' but it's not really their fault. It's ours. We elected a Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, who says one day that he's adamantly opposed to co-governance, and the next, that the government can form a partnership with iwi. In 1986 a government commission said if MMP were introduced Maori seats should go. MMP came and the Maori seats, the main driver for division in our nation, stayed. So that now we see the steady implementation of co-governance frameworks.



But the worst of the wokery is the sneaky substitution of Christianity by Maori paganism and animism, especially as inflicted on school children. By whose authority? What sinister force is pulling New Zealand's strings? An educated guess says global communism but do Kiwis care? Or are we afraid of being called racist? With her Covid scam Jacinda Ardern taught the nation to be afraid - not of losing only our lives, but also human respect.


To regain our self-respect and dare we say, our aroha, New Zealanders must remember the God Who delivered up His Son to be crucified. For us.









First, from Rhys Hurley, NZ Taxpayers Union, for Brash and Mitchell:






At their swanky Wellington offices, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) the Ministry supposedly responsible for helping businesses has been spending our money on Workplace Waiata – i.e. staff singing sessions in their Wellington offices.  30 minute sessions every work day, every week!


MBIE employs 5,892 bureaucrats (it's grown from 4,676 in 2020), literally being paid to sing, clap, poi, and recite Māori proverbs and hymns. https://www.brashandmitchell.com/post/rhys-hurley-mbie-paying-staff-for-daily-waiata-sessions




Second, from  Ivan Barnett,  an 82 year-old  retired farmer: 
THE CORE LEGAL TRUTH: IWI HAVE NO REGULATORY AUTHORITY OVER PRIVATE LAND https://nominister.wordpress.com/.../the-core-legal.../ 

Third, from John McLean, a fed-up senior Auckland lawyer,  at Bassett and Mitchell (formerly Bassett Brash and Hide):

I’ve written screeds on how Woke/Critical Social Justice/Identitarianism/Neo-arxism/Post-Modernism – call “it” what you will - has been entrenched in New Zealand society. 
New Zealand’s only indigenous strain of Wokery is Māorification. All the rest - Trans activism, biological sex denialism, the hierarchy of victimhood and oppression and all other Woke Slop – has been mindlessly imported from foreign Western universities. 
The Woke Māorification of New Zealand comes in various forms. There’s the incoherent and divisive Critical Race Theory narrative that anyone with any Māori ancestry, no matter how fractional, is (and forever will be) oppressed by a system devised by humans without such ancestry.  
There’s the historically false notion that Māori, as an invented collective, have not accepted a unitary central government for all New Zealanders, such that a nascent Māori nation is about to bloom. 
Sensible New Zealanders are forced to suffer the amorphous and entirely fabricated Treaty of Waitangi “Principles”. We see the supplanting of New Zealand’s Christian heritage by strident Māori mysticism as NZ’s new State religion. Then there’s all the Māorific forced conformity, self-censorship and cultural safety. And so on, and so forth.

Sir Brian Roche, who’d just love to “disappear” the assault on NZ democracy


I’ve explored at length the main mechanisms by which New Zealand is being Māorified. We have the Public Service Commissioner, Sir Brian Roche, running interference, protecting the public service from any attempts by the elected Government to de-Māorify public agencies and shielding Māori Mafia from scrutiny and accountability. See The Cock Roche and the Heron.


We have Woke educational and judicial systems, powerfully immune from governmental efforts to tone down the racialization of New Zealand. The current Government appears to have simply given up on removing “Treaty Principles” references from legislation, an express commitment under the National/NZ First coalition agreement.

 

Even ACT Party leader David Seymour, previously a staunch opponent of co-governance, has thrown in the towel, defending local authorities’ rights to enter into co-governance arrangements with Māori groups. Speaking with The Platform’s Sean Plunket on 26 March, Seymour said that local governments should be entitled to enter into co-governance arrangements with Māori groups; entitled to do so without endorsing referenda from local constituents and free from democratic legislative constraint on such racialized co-governance.


 



 

The mechanisms of Māorification are deep and pervasive. Turn over almost any rock and you’ll find entrenched hope for an eternal race-based New Zealand. Take, as just one example, incorporated societies.


In 2022, the departed Labour Government passed a new Incorporated Societies Act. The 2022 Act replaced incorporated societies legislation dating back to 1908. So far, so good. But embedded in the new incorporated societies legislation are explosive sleeper cells for Māorification.

 

The new Incorporated Societies Act enables incorporated societies to include in their constitutions expressions of their “tikanga” (customs, value and practices that guide behaviour and decision-making in accordance with Māori cultural principles) and “kawa” (Māori protocol and etiquette). All incorporated societies are required to be re-registered, with a new, compliant constitution, before the close of 5 April 2026.


Wokesters, race hustlers and critical race theorists have latched onto the “tikanga” and “kawa” permissions to impregnate incorporated societies’ constitutions with all sorts of Māorification. And New Zealand incorporated societies, numbering about 24,000, are ubiquitous.

 

Let’s take, as just one example, the incorporated society known as the New Zealand Association of Counsellors Incorporated. NZAC is the body to which most New Zealand counsellors belong. Its President is a woman named Huhana Pene.

 

Huhana Pene

 

All ten of NZAC’s national office staff are biological women. Coincidence? I think not. Feminization of Western societies is a powerful force behind Wokery. NZAC’s Executive Director is Tess Casey.


NZAC’s new constitution, which you can find on the online Incorporated Societies Register, is totally Māorified.

 

Under NZAC’s constitution, “NZAC’s purpose is to improve and enhance the mental health and wellbeing of all New Zealanders by supporting and growing the counselling profession”. So far so good. But then things immediately get Woke Weird.


The constitution then states:


This [NZAC’s purpose] will be achieved by:


a. Te Roopu Kaiwhiriwhiri o Aotearoa / the New Zealand Association of Counsellors (NZAC) is committed to honouring our responsibilities under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and acknowledging Tino Rangatiratanga of tangata whenua.

b. Te Roopu Kaiwhiriwhiri o Aotearoa / the New Zealand Association of Counsellors (NZAC) is committed to contributing to the healing of the ongoing injustices of colonization and the intergenerational effects that many of our communities continue to suffer.

 

In other words, NZAC’s constitution expressly provides that it will somehow fulfill its purpose by honoring responsibilities under the Treaty of Waitangi, acknowledging Māori self-determination/sovereignty and committing itself to healing ongoing injustices of colonization and its ongoing effects. How doing those things could possibly contribute to “supporting and growing the counselling profession” is a deep and dark mystery.


NZAC’s constitution then states NZAC’s “KAWA”, which I repeat in full:

 

KAWA


This Constitution shall be interpreted in regard to the foundational guiding principles and philosophy of Ngā Pou.


Mana Whakahaere


Our governance and management systems are ethical, uphold tikanga and value indigenous knowledge. They are underpinned by a commitment to partnership.

 

Mana Motuhake

 

We uphold self- determination and our responsibility for exercising critical thinking and taking action against racism and discrimination.


Mana Tangata


We uphold the sanctity and dignity of a person’s right to be. We respect the diversity of humanity inherent in all people, expressed as Tapu i te Tangata. All members are welcomed and included in NZAC.


Mana Māori


We uphold, value and honour te reo me ōna tikanga me nga Matauranga Māori katoa.


Mana Mauri

 

We nurture and protect the essence of Te Taiao, inherent in the environment.

 

Mana Moana


We acknowledge the place of Aotearoa in Te Moana Nui A Kiwa (the Pacific Ocean) and that this pre-dates Te Tiriti. We respect and value our shared history and connections with the peoples of the Pacific.


Equity


We acknowledge our responsibilities to social justice and recognise that different levels of advantage require different approaches and resourcing.


Active Protection

 

We actively work towards protecting the rights of individuals and communities, including tangata whenua.

 

 

But NZAC’s spanking new constitution doesn’t stop there. NZAC’s constitution creates a separate category of membership for individuals with Māori ancestry (Ngā Tumutumu), with their own forum (Te Rōpū Māori) and Māori co-chair of NZAC (Te Ahi Kaa) and supporting officer (Te Kaitumutumu) for the Māori co-chair.


All of this is under the umbrella of NZAC’s guiding principles -“Ngā Pou”, exhaustively described on NZAC’s website, including the following: 

 

Counsellors affiliated with NZAC must undertake continuing professional development, including this Critical Race Theory indoctrination:


What can we make of this? First, none of NZAC’s pervasive Māorification can possibly be raising the standard of counselling in New Zealand. Skilled counsellors ought to take all “counsellees” as they come, with all their unique facets, foibles and backgrounds, and without racial stereotyping.

 

NZAC Māorification is just misguided, performative piffle. NZAC’s constitution entreats all counsellors not to counsel but, rather, to indoctrinate vulnerable and suggestible people who need counselling with Māori Critical Race Theory.


More generally, we can safely say that NZAC’s constitutional Māorification is far from aberrant. Expressly encouraged by the new incorporated societies’ legislation to include tikanga and kawa, a multitude of New Zealand’s 24,000 societies have included radical Māorification in their constitutions. And the legislated Māorification invitation wasn’t accidental. It was yet another deliberate ploy to permanently raceify New Zealand and New Zealanders.

 



Lastly, statutory Māorification of incorporated societies is set to endure. With appropriate political will and concerted action, legislative references to Treaty Principles and suchlike can be removed.

 

Māorification, once entrenched in constitutions, is far harder to expunge. The neo-Marxist March through New Zealand’s institutions marches on. The Post-Modernist Wreckers may win in the end, but that’s no reason to stop fighting.


John McLean is a senior lawyer who writes at John's Substack

https://www.brashandmitchell.com/post/john-mclean-woke-entrenchment


 





 Lord Jesus Christ, betrayed by Judas, betrayed by your Church, have mercy on us