LEO, HOW DARE YOU SAY 'WAR IS NEVER HOLY'?

 

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 

"How dare you?" The noxious Greta Thunberg said it famously, to the United Nations, but she couldn't have said it with more feeling than Catholics would now, to Robert Prevost, papal pretender, and his socialist, globalist fellow-travellers in Rome. 

How dare 'Pope Leo XIV' say that "war is never holy"? To add as he did that "only peace is holy, because it is willed by God" doesn't improve on his foot-in-mouth blasphemy. God Himself wages war. God is the "Lord of Hosts". He is Jehovah, Who protected the armies of Israel, the God Who is Captain of the celestial army of spiritual warfare. How dare Leo say that "this is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, Who does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them”?

June 10, 1944. Normandy. Those US soldiers were there fighting Nazi occupiers. Did God not hear their prayers

Presumably Leo can make such a blasphemous assertion because the Crusades, the Battle of Lepanto and D Day (to name just a few wars waged) were pre-Vatican II. You know, when the Church was Militant. Before God got around to revealing His truth and His love fully, in the limp-wristed, effeminate Synodal religion which Leo now plainly tells us is shilling for communist globalism. First Jorge Bergoglio/Francis, and now Robert Prevost/Leo XIV, were and are woke activist puppets of the Globalist-Islamist-Woke Alliance (Klaus Schwab’s WEF).

How dare his Secretary General of the Synod of Bishops, Cardinal Mario Grech, say “Our Church is synodal by nature"? He's clearly referring to Leo's Ape of the Church, a new church, not the Church who is our Mother and is Catholic by nature. Grech then has the infernal cheek to add, "That means there’s room for everyone,” and, “No one should feel excluded.”

Oh, we SEE, your Eminence. So its all OUR fault then if, as traditional Catholics denied the TLM and relegated by their bishops to funeral parlours and garages to attend Mass with the Society of St Pius X (SSPX), we feel 'excluded'. 

How dare Leo's synodal sect cite, in the final document of the synod, “Nihil sine consensu plebis — nothing without the consensus of the people." This entails, following the synod’s document, that when pastors reach a decision that differs from the opinion expressed by the community, they should not simply impose their will. They should explain the reasons for their decision and remain accountable to the people they serve.” https://radicalfidelity.substack.com/p/a-harsh-question-for-those-who-still

Oh, is that so, your Holiness? Priests in your synodal sect must be accountable not to Our Lord Jesus Christ but to miserable mankind. In short, to sinners. Oh well, that's all right then. Are you sure?

“The patience of the Church people is exhausted. It is not enough to invoke synodality and at the same time to push concrete reforms to the long bench" (Austrian Catholic feminists)

And how dare Leo XIV exclude the Roman Canon (Eucharistic Prayer 1) - the most ancient and venerable of the Roman rite, the only one of the Latin Church for fourteen centuries -from all three papal Masses during his upcoming visit to France? 

Instead he's going for the anaphora composed in 1968. Oh, we get it, your Holiness. Eucharistic Prayer III is so much shorter. Quicker. More modern. Post-Vatican II. So, like the illegitimate Novus Ordo itself, it will appeal more to French Protestants, as it does to Proddies everywhere and that's why Proddies wrote it. For Proddies.

How dare Leo XIVLeo advocate for the Islamic invasion of the West under the guise of refugee settlement? How dare he support pro abortion politicians?

How dare he host leaders of Islam at the Vatican? Most Muslims believe in Jihad with non-believers. They have shed much Jewish and Christian blood because they believe their God requires it.

How dare he suppress the Mass of Ages and continue to promote the Lavender Mafia to places of power in what he calls the Church? Faithful Catholics must pray daily for Antipope Leo's repentance, healing and reversion to the Mystical Body of Christ.

From Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano:

"I wrote three simple things to Leo: I asked him for an audience; I asked him to repent and to confirm me in the Faith, as Christ commanded Peter; and I asked him to tell me in what way I contradict the *Depositum Fidei*, because I would have shown it to him point by point, and I would have told him how I intend to continue.

 

I received no sign of a response. And the reason is neither distraction nor too much work: it is that responding would have cost him saying what the synodal church believes, and thus confessing in what way it differs from what the Catholic Church has always believed.

Silence serves him to preserve ambiguity; excommunication exempts him from refuting. But silence is itself a response, and the most eloquent one. A pope who receives James Martin and does not receive an Archbishop who asks him to be confirmed in the Faith has already said which side he is on. https://x.com/CarloMVigano/status/2102772191200698559

LEO AND NOSTRA AETATE DISASTERS FOR THE CHURCH

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.

 Funny. Here we Catholics were, thinking that the redeeming Sacrifice of the Son of God on Calvary had fulfilled the Old Testament covenants with the Jews. That the Catholic Church is the New Covenant. That we Catholics are the new Israel. Turns out we were wrong - 'the Pope' says so. 

On the 60th anniversary of Nostra Aetate, in Vatican II’s Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions, "A Journey of Hope", Leo XIV announced that "God’s covenant with the Jewish people is irrevocable".

Er, how can that be, your Holiness? According to the Council of Florence (1438-1445), "after the promulgation of the Gospel [the legal prescriptions of the Old Covenant] cannot be observed without loss of eternal salvation." It sounds very much, Holiness, that your Vatican II sect is a different religion from that of the Catholic Church which has always, and will always, pray for the conversion of the Jews who otherwise will not enjoy eternal life.

Council of Florence (1438-1445)

How can the Synodal church 'dialogue' its way out of this impasse? Why is the Vatican II sect banging the 'dialogue' drum instead of evangelising, which is now positively frowned upon with the pejorative term 'proselytising'? A red-blooded traditional Catholic male, fed up with the vice of effeminism rife in the Vatican II sect, has angrily inveighed against 'dialogue' as 'faggotry'. (The word 'dialogue', Catholic State says, occurs 164 times in "A Journey of Hope" (see below).

ttps://thecatholicstate.podbean.com/e/christ-the-king-podcast-episode-235-a-journey-of-hope-the-vatican-s-emb

In a crammed garage on a vineyard in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand yesterday, the congregation forgot the cold, the wobbly seats and concrete floor as a priest of the Society of St Pius X (SSPX) preached "as one having power" (with authority" (Mt 7:29) on the greatest commandment in the law, viz:"And thou shalt love the Lord thy God, with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind, and with thy whole strength. This is the first commandment. And the second is like to it: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself"(Mk 30:31).

Yet Leo preaches that we shouldn't try to convert Jews to Christ. Catholics now should 'dialogue' with them instead. In other words, stop preaching Christ Crucified, because that offends the Jews. Abandon Jews (and adherents to all other religions) to eternity in hell. That's not loving Jews - and it's not loving God, Whom the Jews crucified, either.

June 10, 1944. Normandy. Those US soldiers were there fighting Nazi occupiers. Did God not hear their prayers?
?

Adding insult to injury to Catholics and non-Catholics alike, Leo is now saying that “Jesus doesn’t hear the prayers of those who wage war.” He has forgotten the popes who called the Church to holy wars against Islam and barbarism; he has forgotten the rosaries prayed on ship decks at Lepanto. He and his 'faggot' hierarchy are an embarrassment; the Catholic Church has sunk to an all-time nadir.

But it must be like this before the Antichrist can come, as Christ assures us he will. The temporal and spiritual power of the Church dwindles in inverse proportion to the growing power of Jewry, and from that race the Antichrist must come: the Antichrist will be a Jew.

"Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God"(2 Thess:3). 

This is not to say, of course, that Robert Prevost (whom the world and spiritually blinded Catholics call Pope Leo XIV) is the Antichrist prophesied by Christ. For one thing, the Antichrist is supposed to be charismatic ... But Leo's shaping up well to win that anti-title. He's a comparatively young man. He has time on his and Satan's side. 

On the very day of his election as Pope Leo XIV, he made a commitment to the World Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Committee ‘to continue and strengthen the Church's dialogue and cooperation with the Jews in the spirit of Nostra Aetate. Recall also that the sage Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano has stated that "the restraint on the Antichrist loosened at Vatican II". And with his statements on Nostra Aetate Leo looks like letting any restraint rip.

Historically, Catholics have been taught by Mother Church that Christ's atoning death, among other things, released Jews from the curses of the old covenant. Leo is assuring his flock now that Christ changed nothing in this regard. If God’s covenant with the Jews is irrevocable as Leo now says, then so is His threat of a curse on Jews who are unfaithful to the covenant, which raised the stakes of their sin and disobedience (not to mention the Mosaic Law itself functioning as a punishment, according to St. Paul). Which only renders the perfidious Jews more in need of conversion than ever.

The Church owes no apology to the Synagogue for 'antisemitism'. The Church is not to blame for Auschwitz. It is the Synagogue that owes God true repentance for having crucified His Son and for spitting, to this day, on His holy Cross. "The Jews do not know the Father, they crucified the Son and resist the Holy Spirit. In sum, the Jews do not worship God; the synagogue is nothing more than a dwelling place of demons" - Saint John Chrysostom.

But Leo speaks of “Catholic solidarity with Jews [which] requires actively opposing antisemitism ... This solidarity with the Jewish people also includes the shared struggle against antisemitism.” Leo makes no mention of struggle against Antichrist, anti-Christian, anti-Goyimism endemic to Jewish religio-culture, neither from Jews or Rome.

The Jews have broken the covenant by condemning the Redeemer Whom God sent in fulfilment of the covenant. God kept His side of the covenant. The Jews broke it. And to this point in time they still pray three times daily for the destruction of Christians.

Confirming Jews in their error is the highest form of “Jew Hate”, since it will damn them to hell. Nostra Aetate is a disaster for the Church. As is Pope Leo XIV who confirms it.

“But we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles; but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God” (1 Cor 1:23–24).

Christ on the Cross, 1853. Artist: Delacroix, Eugène