Thursday 30 January 2014

DEAD MEN AND WOMEN TELL NO TALES (Letter to Dom Post, Jan 29)

We’re all suckers for a sob story (My dear friend’s lonely death, Jan 29) and Joe Bennett tells it well. Trouble is, medical research shows media coverage such as this can influence suicide rates. And I suspect there are many more sob stories to be told already, in countries like the Netherlands where euthanasia is legal, and many more to be told here in New Zealand were euthanasia to be legalised, by the terminally ill and disabled who have been or will be pressured to end their lives. But dead men and women tell no tales.

 

Julia du Fresne

Wednesday 29 January 2014

YES YOU, A SAINT (First published in 'NZ Catholic' Jan 26)


Google, email, smartphones, Facebook, Twitter: look how we humans communicate now, compared with at the time of Christ. We can contact millions in an instant. So you’d think the 21st century must also know better ways of contacting God.   

The wish being father to the thought, technology now has methodology to match. Techniques. Procedures. Mantras. Prayer words. It’s all about how we pray – isn’t it?

Ah. ‘So are my ways exalted above your ways, and my thoughts above your thoughts’ (Isaiah 55, 9). It seems to me that it’s more about why we pray and how we live, and Isaiah sheds more light on contact with God than any current writer. As the Douay’s epigraph to that chapter puts it, ‘God promises abundance of spiritual graces to the faithful, that shall believe in Christ out of all nations, and sincerely serve him.’ There you have it in a nutshell.

Oh, but the Bible’s old hat. Specially the Douay, specially the Old Testament. Isaiah, for heaven’s sake. Surely we’ve moved on from there. Well yes, we have – to our great and tragic loss. For all the thousands, maybe millions of Catholics in the West who since the 1980s have embraced methodologies oriental as well as occidental, discursive and centering, what are the fruits? Where are the churches full on Sundays? Where are the weekday Massgoers, queues at confessionals and large Catholic families? Where are the vocations to priesthood and religious life?

Someone recently asked me the perennial question, what’s the difference between meditation and contemplation? I’m no expert, but as well as praying I can read. Because I want to pray only for God’s sake, to serve God, I read only Scripture and the saints and writers who accord with both, informing my conscience with study of Catholic doctrine.

 But about a year ago, distracted by travel and exotic surroundings I forgot my self-imposed rule, and meandering into the morass of modern spiritual writing found myself, prayer-wise, up a gum tree. And the reason I climbed down again before too long was, someone was praying for me.

Meditation is up to us; contemplation is down to God: essentially, that’s the difference. Although methods can be useful for meditation as a necessary  introduction to contemplation, that grace is won only by the fruit of such meditation: love of God proven by doing his will - generously.

And before you say, ‘Oh, no wonder I’m not a contemplative, that’s okay for priests and nuns but you try doing God’s will when you’ve got what I have to put up with’, the fact is that God gives or allows whatever you have to put up with precisely to make you a saint.

Me, a saint? Yes you, a saint. St Paul insists (1 Thes, 4:3); Vatican II insists (Constitution on Divine Revelation). And you can’t become a saint without prayer.

In this new year, let’s turn to Dom John Chapman OSB, in Spiritual Letters : ‘The way to pray well is to pray much’.

Tuesday 28 January 2014

PIGEONS REACT TO THE CAT (Letters to 'NZ Catholic' re my critique of Christian Meditation)

ALTHOUGH THERE WERE NO COMMENTS on my November NZ Catholic column on Christian Meditation on this blog, with NZC readers it would seem something of a cat set among pigeons. To receive seven letters on the same topic (all taking exception) is to say the least, unusual for NZC and I’m told there was a eighth – unpublished - describing me as ‘superior and mocking’.

If the cap fits, I have to wear it, and my thanks go to all these correspondents. Here are their contributions:

MEDITATION

As a member of a Christian Meditation group, I respond to Julia du Fresne's article title 'Avoid the meaningless' (NZ Catholic, Nov 17-30).

First, we do not regard the mantra we are encouraged to say as 'meaningless'. It is from Corinthians 1, 16-22. St Paul used Jesus' language, Aramaic, meaning 'Come O Lord', or 'Come Lord Jesus'.

Second, Julia's concern that CM is Carmelite spirituality without the hard bits: that is, you get to experience the incredible sweetness of the Love of God without the 'hard yards' of earning it; that you need to acquire attributes and virtues before the rewards of being loved by God. I am not a theologian or an expert on Church history. Perhaps others more knowledgeable will respond to Julia on these issues. However I know the love of God can never be earned but is pure gift.

The group I belong to is made up of, what some would say, traditional Catholics. Most of us attend Mass daily. We meditate together once a week after Mass, and have done so for a few years. We do not 'measure' our progress any more than Julia would dig up new plants to see how the roots are getting on. We trust the Lord is working in and through us.

We all felt the need for a deeper prayer life and feel blessed that such a need is being met in our parish through CM.

Yolande MacLeod,
Papakura


I was distressed to read Julia du Fresne’s somewhat acerbic dismissal of the practice of Christian Meditation (NZ Catholic, Nov 17). 
Certainly, the Carmelite tradition is ancient and praiseworthy, but it does not appeal to everyone, myself included. Personally, I prefer the more simple approach of the Benedictine tradition, into which the current practice, which is promoted by Benedictine priest Laurence Freeman, fits. 
The point is that anything that helps a person open his/her heart and life to God is laudable and to be encouraged. In terms of our relationship with God, every person is an individual. 
                                                                                Kilian V de Lacy, 
Waitangirua, Wellington.
 
How sad that Julia du Fresne, one of your regular contributors, joined meditation ‘to support people wanting deeper prayer’. 
Had she gone along to let God within her, have the time to change her and bring her to her total potential, she might still be meditating and encouraging others to give it a go. 
Jacqui Driscoll, 
Orewa
 
AND  IN THE DECEMBER ISSUE:
 
I read Julia du Fresne’s critical description of Christian meditation with disappointment, mostly because she seems to have missed the point of the discipline altogether.
 
Meditation is not about the repetition of a word. Rather, the repetition of a word is a tool to help the human mind avoid distraction so that attentiveness to God’s presence within can be achieved. 
Months before I’d even heard of CM, I had discerned that wordy prayers were somewhat pointlless, given that God already knew my every thought, word and deed. Thankfully, my desire for a way to attend in prayer was answered by the introduction of CM into my parish. I have no expectations at all – it’s not about me. That is the point. It’s not about getting God’s attention but giving God my attention.
If the rather fanciful concept of Hindu monks developing meditation alongside the Desert Fathers and Mothers is just too bizarre, I suggest Julia goes back in the Christian tradition to a man named Jesus, who is frequently reported to have withdrawn to ramain alert and in prayer.

It would be a terrible shame if Julia’s opinion turned even one person away from a form of prayer that focuses solely upon our Creator God, heals wounded souls and brings Jesus’ own brand of love into homes and communities. 
Damian Robertson,
Manurewa, Auckland


How sad that Julia du Fresne, one of your regular contributors, joined meditation ‘to support people wanting deeper prayer’. 
Had she gone along to let God within her, have the time to change her and bring her to her total potential, she might still be meditating and encouraging others to give it a go. 
Jacqui Driscoll, 
Orewa.
Julia du Fresne might like to choose a word which is sacred to her, and when sitting quietly just allow that word to gently draw her thoughts back from their roaming into her past, or leaping forward in plans and ideas for her future. 
Nothing more than that simple and gentle returning to her chosen prayer word is needed to assist her in ‘leaving self behind’. If she has some beautiful experience during meditation, by all means enjoy it, but don’t try to grasp and possess it.  
In giving herself to God in this way morning and evening for 30 minutes she will find it is not during meditation that she receives the fruits of this discipline but, in time, this way of prayer will enrich her whole life. (A deepening understanding and joy in other ways of prayer; for example, praying the Scriptures, is just one of the many fruits you will discover.) 
And should Julia choose to attend a meditation group, she will find that it is the shared silent prayer that strengthens fidelity to this daily prayer practice. 
This is an ancient Christian way of prayer. It is Christ centred. 
May the love and peace of Christ be with Julia always. 
Raewyn Blair, 
Athenree, Katikati.

Damian Robertson's letter about John Main's mantra method of meditation (NZ Catholic, Dec 2013) cites the Gospel where Jesus 'withdrew to remain alert and to pray'. But that passage (Luke 5:16) makes no reference to Jesus using a mantra, which rather spoils her point.

Let people use whatever prayer method helps their spiritual life, but the repetition of a mantra is not, in itself, prayer.

Further, Teresa of Avila teaches that distraction is not the main enemy of prayer, and if it is unwanted, distraction does not impair prayer in any way. The claimed function of the mantra is to eliminate distractions so that prayer can begin.

Main's theory (from his book 'The Moment of Christ') is that repetition of the mantra frees the person to function in the 'realm of infinity', but Christians do not need to 'strive to enter the realm of infinity' because through the indwelling of the Holy Trinity, we are already in the immediate presence of God.

'Any one who loves me will keep my word, and my Father will love him and we shall come to him and make our home with him' (John 14;23).

Patrick Cronin
Nelson








 
 
 
 





























 
 
 

Sunday 26 January 2014

DR ROSY FENWICKE IN LA-LA LAND (Letter to Dom Post, Jan 24)

‘Long may it continue,’ coos Dr Rosy Fenwicke (Letters, Jan 24) ‘that every pregnancy in New Zealand is a wanted and planned pregnancy’. Dr Fenwicke lives in Kelburn, which in this context might be called La-La Land. Since when has every pregnancy been ‘wanted and planned’? Has constant repetition of this tired old mantra dulled her mind to the reality to which both I and my daughter can attest, that an unwanted pregnancy doesn’t necessarily mean an unwanted baby? How many women are appalled to find they’re pregnant, but overjoyed when their child is placed in their arms? Conversely, how many pregnancies which are wanted and meticulously planned result in a child which failing to live up to its parents’ exalted expectations becomes a subject of verbal, if not physical, abuse? 

Julia du Fresne

Thursday 2 January 2014

POPE'S EYE FOR A HEADLINE (Printed in 'Points', Dom Post Jan 2)

When Pope Francis famously said, regarding gay rights, ‘Who am I to judge?’ he was saying nothing new, and he knew exactly what he was saying: that Christians must learn to judge the deed (otherwise, how can they tell right from wrong?) but never the doer. Des Darroch (Points, Dec 31) is absolutely right to urge encouragement for a pope with such an eye for a headline.  

Julia du Fresne