HAMAS AT ST PATRICK'S , +FRANCIS AT ST PETER'S

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).

Francis kisses a Muslim's feet but doesn't say Mass 

Cardinal Timothy Dolan's celebration of Holy Saturday's Easter Vigil Mass at St Patrick's Cathedral, New York was invaded and interrupted by Extinction Rebellion protestors chanting "Free, free Palestine". 

Revenge is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord (Rom 12,19). God had reacted pretty swiftly: it's only 6 weeks since NY's icon of Catholicity was splashed all over the world's media as the venue for the funeral of  'Cecilia' Gentili. Born a male, brought up Catholic in Argentina (incidentally, during Jorge Bergoglio's bishopric), turning prostitute and atheist, Gentili was feted as a 'trans activist' who agitated for Palestine in the anti-Zionist Jewish Voice for Peace, and farewelled in a blasphemous ceremony with +Dolan's implicit permission.

The demonic were very much in evidence at St Patrick's that day and an official exorcism is imperative. Eminence, please see to it!

Catholic clergy who nod and wink at demons can only expect divine retribution; Cardinal Vincent Fernandez' Fiducia Supplicans positively begs for retributive justice - and the usurper Francis is  accelerating the process by his neglect of the Mass in recent months. Even on Easter Sunday at St Peter's Basilica he was present only as 'presider', not as the priest who offers thanks, praise, reparation and petition to Almighty God. The Catholic world should now prepare for the worst.

Easter Vigil at St Patrick's Cathedral New York

From veteran journalist Phil Lawler, writing for Catholic Culture:

Pope Francis has not been the principal celebrant at a public Mass for several months.

Since about this time last year, the Pope has “presided” at the Vatican’s major liturgical celebrations. That is, he sits to the side, while another prelate, at the altar, actually celebrates the Mass. The Pope may deliver a homily, impart his blessing to the congregation, and offer some remarks after the conclusion of the Mass. But he is not the celebrant, nor even a concelebrant.

Non-Catholics might not notice the distinction. After all the Pope is at the front of the Vatican basilica (or St. Peter’s Square), wearing liturgical vestments, and if he is wearing a cope rather than a chasuble, very few reporters will comment on the difference. If he preaches, someone unfamiliar with Catholic worship assumes that the Pope is the key figure in the Eucharistic liturgy. (One wire-service report on the Palm Sunday Mass said that the Pope “said the prayers” of the Mass: an awkward formulation as well as an inaccurate one.)

 

 

 

There are good reasons why Pope Francis is no longer standing at the altar to celebrate Mass. His health is slipping, his knees are painful, he travels around the Vatican in a wheelchair, he needs assistance to move even a few steps. Yet he still has enough strength and stamina to preach, to hold two public audiences every week, and to schedule dozens of meetings and private audiences every week.

Until recently, at most of these meetings he would speak, sometimes at length, often standing. (During the past month he has more frequently asked an aide to read his prepared remarks.) He remains strong enough and ambitious enough to plan international travel, with a visit to Belgium “certain” for this year and voyages to Polynesia and Argentina reportedly under active discussion.

In his newly published autobiography Pope Francis says that he has no physical problems serious enough to impede his ministry. Isn’t the public celebration of the Eucharistic liturgy a central part of that ministry— the priestly ministry of the Pontifex Maximus? If the Pope is healthy enough to carry out the other aspects of his work, isn’t he able to lead the celebration of the Eucharist, the source and summit of Catholic spiritual life?

 

 

In his old age and chronic illness, Pope John Paul II still said Mass

 

Yes, the Pope’s medical problems would probably require some concessions: a stool, perhaps, or a walker, or some other assistance with his movements around the altar.

But any Catholic old enough to recall the last days of Pope John Paul II recalls how that saintly Pontiff, tormented and crippled by disease, still found the strength to celebrate the Mass, even when he could barely move or speak. Because to him, nothing was more important. https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/why-doesnt-pope-francis-celebrate-mass/

*South Sudan's President Salva Kiir (2019).

And now, from an angry, impassioned Michael Matt at The Remnant:

Christ is really and truly King, and the Daily Wire’s decision to fire conservative pundit, Candace Owens, for proclaiming Christ is King has revealed a level of ignorance on the doctrine of the Social Kingship of Jesus Christ that I had not anticipated. And that ignorance is profound not only among Candace's critics but also and especially among most of her defenders.

Turns out, most Catholics today have no idea what “Long live Christ the King” actually means. They think it’s merely a pious devotion. It is not! This is ironic since there were essentially two battle cries associated with the traditional Catholic counter-revolution: "It's the Mass that matters" and "Long live Christ the King!".

If you don't know why they uncrowned Him – or what that uncrowning actually means to every man, woman, and child on the face of the earth – then you won't understand what must be done to survive the global war on God, country, and family.

In the new Underground, I provide the doctrinal foundations of the Social Kingship of Christ in order to help the viewer understand how the rejection of Christ the King is responsible for rampant abortion, same-sex so-called "marriage," the mass castration of children, global apostasy, and ultimately the coming lockdowns of humanity.

No, Christ before Pilate did NOT reject His temporal sovereignty when He said, "My kingdom is not of this world."  In fact, He was doubling down on it, which is why in this video I take the time explain to Lila Rose – a pro-life warrior – why her position on this question is so dangerous. It's not her fault, of course, as she's just a kid and a recent convert. The fault must be laid at the feet of the Modernists inside the Church who have uncrowned Him.The Remnant Newspaper - CHRIST is KING: Candace Owens Is Right

 

Christ and St Mary Magdalene at the Tomb (Rembrandt van Rijn)

 

 "Woman, why weepest thou?"