CLIMATE CHANGE CRAP: NATS NUKING NZ

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). 

John Key's come out of the closet; he's chummed up with China

Forget Batshit Bonkers Britain (pace, Katie Hopkins); we need to talk about Nats Nuking New Zealand. And not so much Nats as in national but international. As in global. As in Davos, WEF, UN, WHO and all the criminal cronies fixated on Climate Change who've recruited Christopher Luxon just the same way they recruited Jacinda Ardern who collected a Damehood for services rendered.

So New Zealand's now signed up to the Green New Scam Net Zero nonsense that will drive our farmers to the wall and cost the country up to $24 BILLION. While Trump who calls it a hoax seems to have God on his side, dodging bullets and fixing global warming with massive snowfalls in Florida and the 'Gulf of America'. Oops sorry, since the earth stopped warming in the 2000s it's called climate change, to keep Carbon $Taxes coming. And it's not even as if it'll do anything to reduce the dreaded emissions.

While the US Dept of Ag is scrubbing climate change and the Trump withdraws from the Paris Climate Accord, New Zealand which depends on agriculture licks the globalist boots with enough taxpayer dollars to pay for a dozen Dunedin hospitals. And there's Luxon throwing millions we don't have at that little crook Kelenskyy. Te Pati Maori complains about debate deterioration in the circus they and the Greens have made of Parliament and say caring more for children's safety than their ancestry is 'abhorrent' while the Greens complain about complaints made about migrants while wanting to kill off our native unborn.  

Which bring to mind the NZ Catholic Bishops Conference. While New Zealand 'doctors' and 'nurses' legally murder the unborn by the thousand the bishops busy themselves with yet another new lectionary - in a Church which must not change because the truth cannot change. And Luxon V for Very Ltd simply replaces our homegrown citizens with aliens. 

Luxon talks about 'human-induced climate change'. We're talking about  human-induced divine retribution. 

NB: Greens co-leader Chloe Swarbrick (top l), unmasked

 

A decision announced late Thursday night by the Climate Change Minister is nothing short of economic sabotage. In terms of our kids and grandkids enjoying first-world living standards, it's quite literally worse than any decision taken by Jacinda Ardern or James Shaw. 

 

It took everyone by surprise. My heart sank.

 

I appreciate that reasonable minds can differ on the urgency of climate change – but I think you'll agree that sacrificing New Zealand's economy for no material effect in emissions is the ultimate own goal.

 

In short the Government has just locked in the Ardern/Shaw anti-farming legacy, and signed New Zealand up for a brand new (2035) commitment that will see thousands of dollars for every man, woman, and child sent overseas for climate credits.

In 2021  James Shaw and Jacinda Ardern signed New Zealand up to a climate change/emissions target of a net reduction in emissions of 50 percent (compared to 2005) by 2030.

 

At the time, no meaningful economic analysis, public consultation, or debate occurred. 

 

 In fact, the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment voiced their concerns saying “we are concerned that insufficient analysis has been undertaken to understand the fiscal and social impacts” of a 45 percent reduction target, let alone the 50 percent that Ardern and Shaw secretly agreed...

 

The politicians just took this decision because, in their gut, they just felt it was the right thing to do. 

 

And what caused particular angst was that the targets NZ signed up to include agricultural emissions (i.e. methane, or cow farts). Short of culling cows (and tanking New Zealand's largest export industry), those emissions are impossible to avoid.

 

No other developed country faces the same problem. Because of our small population and disproportionate reliance on agriculture, New Zealand's emissions makeup is more akin to a developing country, which, under the UN Paris Agreement, doesn't have to cut emissions in the same way as we have signed up to.

 

Even if we could cut agricultural emissions, it would be pointless in terms of improving global warming: New Zealand's agricultural sector is the most emissions-efficient in the world. Any calories/meat/milk-powder New Zealand doesn't produce will be done elsewhere, and likely result in an overall increase in emissions.

 

These were the points made by the 'groundswell' farming protests, Federated Farmers, and even the National Party when they were in opposition!

 

To put the 50 percent net reduction target into perspective, half of New Zealand's emissions relate to agriculture!

 

So that leaves non-agricultural emissions.

 

Thanks to Covid, in 2020 New Zealand shut down most of the economy to lockdown for months. Despite the Covid shutdown, official data^† shows that emissions declined by only three percent that year!

 

"So what's it all about, Alfie?"

So the idea New Zealand can or will get to a 50 percent reduction by 2030 is absolutely fanciful. To hit the 2030 target emissions would have to fall by five percent per year!

How much is the 2030 target going to cost households? There are lots of variables that go into forecasting where New Zealand's emissions are going to be in five year's time (e.g. the strength of the economy, how many trees are planted, whether we get wet winters and hydro lakes get rain etc). But what Ardern/Shaw signed us up for means that missing the target (and there is absolutely no doubt we will miss it) determines how much New Zealand is going to have to cough up and pay for international emission units. Last year Treasury worked out what New Zealand is on the hook for.  Up to $24 billion is the latest official estimate for the 2030 deadline. To put that into perspective, $24 billion is more than the current cost of NZ Super. $12,000 per household! And that's not even counting the cost of lost economic growth, higher energy costs, and lost exports. These numbers are unbelievable. It's a dozen Dunedin Hospitals. Or 34 times larger than the total new spending allowance Nicola Willis has set for this year's Government budget. Because the payment isn't due until 2030, it's just outside the Treasury's "forecast horizon" so doesn't yet appear on any of the Government's fiscals.  I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that it's Ardern and Shaw's ticking time fiscal time bomb. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced that he is committing New Zealand to even harder targets for 2035! Simon Watts is set to sign NZ up for a second eye-watering bill for 2035. Once signed-up, it means New Zealand will have to pay a second time for a target that Christopher Luxon / the National Party have previously said is totally achievable! It's bad enough that New Zealand is hopelessly off track when it comes to meeting the existing 2030 target, and the $24 billion bill left by Ardern and Shaw, but to do it all over again is nothing short of economic sabotage. Why haven't the media covered this? Newsrooms are a fraction of the size they used to be, and those who are left are probably so young they either don't understand the economics or are so committed to extreme views of 'climate change mitigation at any cost' that they just don't care. And, I'm sorry to be so blunt, but the only reason Simon Watts' office would wait until 8:30 pm on a Thursday night is so that the morning radio shows are already planned and there won't be 'breaking news' style coverage. It speaks volumes that Watts waited until after Parliament rose for the week, and with Parliament in recess next week, by the time political journos get back to work, the news will have moved on. As far as I can see, with the exception of the Taxpayers' Union, Federated Farmers, and other watchdog and industry groups, this announcement has been totally missed! If there is any chance for the economy to get back on track, we must ensure Christopher Luxon, Winston Peters, and David Seymour, overrule Simon Watts and set a realistic target.  While the USA has pulled out, and other countries hedge their bets, why is Luxon's Government doubling down?  Last week, the US pulled out of the Paris Agreement, and with the UK’s ‘net zero’ intentions in question (their Labour Government is 'going for growth' too!),  it makes no sense for the New Zealand government to sign up for a second round of ‘ambitious’, sorry, 'impossible' targets if they are serious about growing the economy. Simon Watts has got this one wrong. Introducing more ambitious targets to smash the economy harpoons Christopher Luxon's attempts to 'Go for Growth'.  Luxon was an advisor to Ardern and tried to join Labour before National But something needs to be done about climate change, right? New Zealand is already one of the most emissions-efficient countries in the world. More than 80 percent of our electricity comes from renewable sources. Our farmers are the most emissions-efficient at what they do. We already have an emissions trading scheme that covers more greenhouse gas emissions than any other country in the world. Of course, we need to keep up the momentum, but it's not right to say we're not already 'doing our bit'. Paying the rest of the world billions of dollars serves to make New Zealand poor – it doesn't serve to solve global warming when the US, China, and Russia are not part of the same agreement/commitment. Christopher Luxon gets this – well he did when he was Opposition Leader anyway. The $24 billion dollar cheque could buy 12 Dunedin Hospitals. It could build 16 Transmission Gully Motorways. It could build 40,000 new school classrooms. It could even be used to fund more in-country climate initiatives! Climate Change Minister Watts (two horns on his forehead edited out) Simon Watts just turned the $24 billion liability into a potential $48 billion liability. It's economic sabotage on a grand scale.  In a country cancelling infrastructure, health, and education investment due to the fiscal crisis can we really afford to burn billions on an unobtainable climate target?  If this decision stands, Mr Luxon (and the country) is destined to fail. Peter Williams <team@taxpayers.org.nz>

Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee (Rembrandt van Rijn)

"Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith?"

- Gospel, Fourth Sunday after Epiphany