Saturday, 4 June 2022

WELCOME TO NEW ZIMBABWELAND

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB or Messenger. 

Zimbabwean who emigrated to New Zealand as her best hope, she thought, of a good life, confirms the image above to be perilously close to the mark. Jacinda Ardern, she says, is a dead ringer for Robert Mugabe. Only not quite so good-looking.

Labour has fallen 2 points in the polls, so Ardern's skiting and strutting the world stage at Harvard, and her chat with poor Joe Biden and his teleprompter has done her no good as preferred Prime  Minister -  but who else is there?  "Roll-on" Luxon?

Richard Prebble gives us the low-down on her Harvard high.

Prime Ministerial international travel is necessary, addictive and dangerous.

It is necessary for New Zealand Prime Ministers to travel. The US President is never going to meet our foreign minister. An interview on the Tonight Show is worth more than tourism’s total budget.   

Prime Ministerial travel is addictive because it’s a heady experience. The PM is suddenly free from 24/7 scrutiny. The Opposition rarely criticizes a Prime Ministerial trip. Journalists who accompany the trip are totally reliant on the PM for their stories. The foreign press knows zip about New Zealand. When Auckland is experiencing nightly drive-by shootings, the Prime Minister can leave the impression that her government has solved the problem of gun violence.  

It's dangerous because the trips isolate Prime Ministers from domestic reality. Mt Albert constituents don't care that their MP has received an honorary doctorate. Their concern last week was that the police have cautioned that their electorate is not safe to walk in at night.

It's hard to remember how ordinary households are struggling to fill their grocery bags or their car’s fuel tank when you are visiting the White House.

 


 

Overseas Prime Ministerial travel does not even let Jacinda experience how difficult that is for ordinary people. 

If Jacinda had to fill out her own Covid immigration forms, she'd discover how hard the forms are to fill out. The information sought has almost no value. You can't say you've had a Pfizer vaccination. You need to state the type. Who knew there are so many? 

The forms have to be filled out on-line. It is very challenging when you are on a Pacific island with intermittent Internet access. No matter Pacific travelers are in much greater danger of catching covid in Auckland.  

Jacinda boasted to the American students that she does her own social media. If she was not busy with social media she could have ensured the covid forms are user friendly. It would have been of more assistance to tourism than any number of appearances on the Tonight Show.  

Vanity speeches to international audiences by NewZealand Prime Ministers rarely turn out well. David Lange’s speech to Yale University where, to the astonishment of the cabinet, he declared the ANZUS alliance a dead letter, poisoned relations with America for twenty years. 

Jacinda Ardern’s Harvard University commencement address is a good speech, delivered well. It is the content that is concerning. 

Ah - how can it be a "good speech" if the content is "concerning"? Mr Prebble means she's a good communicator. But what she communicates is bad. 

Jacinda’s claimed this is the “era of disinformation”. “Fragile” democracy is under threat from social media platforms algorithms that “before we even know” take us to sites where “facts are turned into fiction, and fiction turned into fact”. 

Does Jacinda know the difference? Isn't she a pathological liar? 

“The foundation of a strong democracy includes trust in institutions, experts and government”. We must, she says “act to firm up their foundations”. 

Uh-oh. She's found another way of saying "we are the single source of truth". The foundation of a strong democracy is, in fact, Jesus Christ and Ardern, who got her degree in comms from the Freemasons and is a communist, is white-anting the Catholic Church which is His Mystical Body flat out by subverting its hierarchy.

She then uses the finding that the Christchurch terrorist was radicalized on-line to claim we are “at a precipice.”  

Her solution is “a shared approach to responsible algorithms”.  

Let us be clear about where Jacinda is at. Her “shared approach” is having the government control social media algorithms in order to control what we can see.  

It is Jacinda who is talking fiction and claiming it is fact. 

Citing Pakistan does not prove democracy is fragile. It is because democracy is such a powerful idea that authoritarian regimes want to censor what we can see. Regimes that seek to crush democracy always start by curtailing free speech.  

The Internet did not invent terrorism. Long before the Internet fanatics were being radicalized and running amok.  

Countries can have “trust in institutions, experts and government” and be a dictatorship but no country can be a democracy without free speech.  

This is the information age. There may be more misinformation but I doubt it. What is true is never in human history has the public had access to so much scientific and factual information. Never before have we been able to fact-check our rulers. 

It is the fact-checking by “keyboard warriors’ (whom Jacinda dismisses as misfits dressed in super hero outfits) that Jacinda finds challenging.  

Curiously, it's also the Catholic Church - at least in New Zealand - that is challenged by "keyboard warriors". Vide the fuss the NZ Conference of Catholic Bishops made during the 2020 election campaign about a blog's optimistic assertion that they were supporting the New Conservative Party. And just this week, the Marist Brother Kevin Dobbyn characterising traditional Catholics' fairly anodyne comments at his teach-in at Palmerston North's cathedral about "Being Catholic in the 21st Century" as "toxic", "vitriol" and "evil". What Brother Dobbyn meant was that the Trads didn't agree with his idea of "Being Catholic".

The ability to access information the authorities know to be false is essential. As Mark Twain famously observed “It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” 

Fact checking reveals that much of what our government knows to be true just ain’t so.

There is nothing unusual about this. 

Through most of human history most of what governments thought to be true has been false. Authorities knew the sun turned around the earth. Earlier the authorities knew the sun was the god Ra. This list of gods authorities knew to exist and required millions to worship is long. 

We only have freedom when we are able to view and decide for ourselves.

President Putin could not invade the Ukraine if he did not first censor what Russians can see, hear and say. The world’s authoritarian regimes must love Jacinda’s Christchurch call.  

Democracy and freedom would have been safer if Jacinda had stayed at home. 

Nah. Would have been safer for New Zealand if she'd stayed at Harvard. 

Richard Prebble CBE is a former member of the New Zealand Parliament. Initially a member of the Labour Party, he joined the newly formed ACT New Zealand party under Roger Douglas in 1996, becoming its leader from 1996 to 2004.


 


9 comments:

  1. Was clearly exposed by the late Ned Haliburton who attended the Hui Whanau in PN Diocese back in around 1988. Fr Drane and others advocated for Maori Sovreignity with all other races to be manuhiri or guests. Mass included a Treaty reading. The conclusion is Iwi to govern or Co govern state assets with Treaty settlements used to set up enterprises but subsidised from budget vote Maori Affairs. Maori Language Commission to make bilingualism compulsory. Shift to a Republic eventually with President elected by Iwi. Will be given stronger powers to vetoe bills not Treaty focused.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hardly surprising. Willy Jackson stated on TV a few weeks ago, 'Democracy has changed.' Spooky!

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's cross-party. Hekia Parata from National, before entering Parliament, had a great job selling government departments on the bicultural thing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Plenty of planes leaving New Zealand if you don't like living here anymore

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I say: God willed that I be born here and until He indicates otherwise I assume it's His will that I stay. New Zealand might be a sinking ship but I'm no rat.

      Delete
    2. Thinking more of those who chose to come here, I'd rather live here than almost anywhere else

      Delete
    3. If someone immigrated here and doesn't like it, they could always lea ve, no one forcing them to stay, I'm a proud Kiwi and I will continue to be

      Delete
  5. I'm not being driven out of this, my native land.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No one said that's happening clearly you didn't comprehend the bit about moving to New Zealand then complaining

    ReplyDelete