To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).
"Bergoglio is instituting a new false religion - a counterfeit 'synodal church' " (Fr Paul Kramer) |
You won't hear about this at your parish Novus Ordo church this Sunday. Not likely even at your Traditional Latin Mass. Last Sunday, October 13, famous Italian priest Father Giorgio Maria Faré said in his sermon - which now has over 38,000 views - that “for over eleven years, a man recognized as Pope has been sitting on the Chair of Peter, but he is not, however, the legitimate Pope”. He believes Francis is not a true pope because Pope Benedict XVI did not fully resign his office.
Readers of this blog have heard this before. Several times. But now it's being said by a renowned priest who holds a doctorate in canon law from the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome. This insignificant lay Carmelite blogger has difficulty refraining from saying "I told you so".
That Jorge Bergoglio is an imposter is also the fixed position of Fr Paul Kramer, a close collaborator with the world famous “Fatima Priest”, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, from 1986 until the latter’s untimely death in April 2015. October 13 - the date of Fr Faré's sermon - was the anniversary of Our Lady's Miracle of the Sun at Fatima, Portugal, in 1917 and also of her apparition at Akita, Japan in 1973.
"Most Catholics", says Fr Kramer, are so woefully ignorant that they are like the runt of the litter sucking on the hind tit with unopened eyes." And that is precisely why Vatican II wheeled out the Novus Ordo - to reduce Catholics to the state described by the Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians: "Therefore are there many infirm and weak among you, and many sleep."
"A heretic, even if elected and universally obeyed," adds Fr Kramer, "is INCAPABLE OF BEING A VALID POPE - as I have repeatedly explained in my books and articles."
Fr. Giorgio Maria Faré |
Famous Italian priest Father Giorgio Maria Faré said in an October 13 sermon, which now has over 38,000 views, that he believes Francis is not a true pope because Pope Benedict XVI did not fully resign his office.
Faré claimed Benedict didn’t properly resign from the papacy and remained pope until his death in 2022. The priest also charged that Pope Francis was doubtfully elected and Benedict intentionally didn’t resign.
Francis is not the pope
Faré opened his sermon by explaining that in recent years, he has spent a great amount of time discerning the state of the Church and after much prayer and reflection, he has come to an uncomfortable conclusion.
“[A] priest must choose whether to preach what Sacred Scripture and the Church have always taught or to adhere to what the so-called Pope Francis teaches in his ordinary magisterium. Yes, you understood correctly. I said the so-called Pope Francis. What I am telling you today… is that for over eleven years, a man recognized as Pope by the majority has been sitting on the Chair of Peter, but he is not, however, the legitimate Pope,” Faré said.
Benedict’s resignation was invalid
Faré then dove into why he believed Pope Benedict’s resignation was invalid, namely that it was a declaration, not a formal abdication, and it lacked the act of resignation.
“The formula: ‘I declare to renounce,’ in legal terms, is not the same as saying, ‘I renounce.’ The Pope [Benedict] should have said, ‘I declare to renounce, as in fact, I renounce,’ or a similar formula. As it was pronounced, Benedict XVI’s declaration is, in fact, only a declaration, not a legally valid act, nor was it followed by any ratification.”
The priest then underscored that Benedict chose the title Declaratio, or “Declaration,” for his official resignation instead of “resignation” or “abdication.”
Faré added that Benedict’s resignation lacked the will to renounce the papacy. The priest highlighted that in his original Latin declaration, Benedict used the term ministerium, which refers to the visible execution of the papal office. But, citing Canon 332 §2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, Faré claims that for the resignation to be valid, he would have needed to resign from the munus, the “office” of the papacy.
Francis is a heretic whose election is doubtful
Circling back to Francis, Faré claimed his 2013 election is doubtful because a coalition of four radically liberal Cardinals, who are allegedly members of the St. Gallen Mafia: Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, Walter Kasper, Godfried Danneels, and Karl Lehmann, conspired for years to make Francis the pope in order to start a revolution in the Church. The priest added that this alleged conspiracy would violate articles 79-82 of Pope John Paul II’s motu proprio on electing a new pontiff, Universi Dominici Gregis.
The priest also stressed that he believes Pope Francis is a heretic and cited several heretical statements and promulgations, such as in Amoris Laetitia, in which Francis opened the door to allowing couples in adulterous relationships to receive Holy Communion, the Abu Dhabi Declaration, in which Francis said that the “diversity of religions” is “willed by God,” and Francis’s recent statement to an inter-religious meeting in Singapore that “every religion is a way to arrive at God.”
But Faré emphasized that he believes Francis is an antipope first because Benedict’s resignation was invalid, not because he is a heretic. Francis’s heresies instead serve as evidence that Benedict did not resign from the papacy, according to Faré.
“This legal fact has theological repercussions: without a valid election, the consequent lack of divine investiture means that Bergoglio lacks the assistance of the Holy Spirit. If he were the Pope, he would be assisted by the Holy Spirit, like every Roman Pontiff, not only when pronouncing ex-cathedra but also in the ordinary magisterium.”
Benedict knew his resignation was invalid
Faré further posited that Benedict planned on making his resignation invalid, which is why, in his declaratio, he wrote, “I renounce,” instead of “I declare to renounce,” and resigned from the ministerium and not the munus. The priest noted that Benedict likely took this action because he knew of the St. Gallen Mafia’s plans.
“The Pope thus found himself at a crossroads: either allow an antipope to be secretly elected upon his death or attempt a strategy to foil the enemies of the Church by issuing a declaration with no legal effect.
Incidentally, I point out that — even after the Declaratio — an invalid Conclave could have been avoided. The Cardinals who noticed the anomalies in the Declaratio… could have immediately raised the issue and prevented a Conclave from being convened.
This did not happen, so it is important to note that the actual responsibility for what happened should not be placed on Benedict XVI but, rather, primarily on those who understood and remained silent in bad faith.”
The priest then suggested that Benedict left several more clues that he retained the papal office after the conclave for the Church’s prelates to pick up on and take appropriate action, such as using the title “Pope Emeritus,” continuing to wear his white cassock, and retaining his papal coat of arms.
self-explanatory |
Other theories on whether Francis is the pope
Over the years, several other Catholic prelates and thinkers have suggested that Francis is not the pope, including Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, who has posited that Francis lacked the necessary intention to become pope. Viganò has also called for an official investigation into Pope Benedict’s resignation and the 2013 conclave due to apparent irregularities.
Others, too, have said Francis’ past statements and promulgations disqualify him from being a true pope regardless of the nature of Benedict’s resignation.
On the other hand, Bishop Athanasius Schneider has stated that “nobody has the power to judge Francis’s status as pope” because previous writings about a pope becoming a heretic, such as St. Robert Bellarmine’s, are only opinions, not doctrine, and that there is no one within the Church who has the power to declare him a heretic.
“[I]n the case of a heretical pope, the members of the Church can avoid him, resist him, refuse to obey him, all of which can be done without requiring a theory or opinion that says that a heretical pope automatically loses his office or can be deposed consequently,” Schneider wrote.
Members of the Church can avoid him, resist him, refuse to obey him, and also say that a heretical pope automatically loses his office or can be deposed consequently. Surely.
To read Fr. Faré’s full sermon in English, click here. https://youtu.be/p-cConF4qdM - highlights of Fr Faré's sermon.
For Anthony Stine's YouTube video explaining the image heading this page (on the Synod) go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDEC6f0j46o
"Surrender me not, O Lord, to the desires of the wicked; they plot against me, do not abandon me:
- Psalm 139
ReplyDeleteYes I have known about this for years and it was confirmed when the pope lined up to pretend to have the jab and encourage all catholics to have fetus injected into them
Regular attendance at the WEF
All the pedo priests cover ups
PURE EVIL
ReplyDeleteCatholicism as in Roman Catholicism may well collapse as other notable human initiated institutions have throughout history, but not the true church, "the gates of hell will not prevail".
Julia du Fresne
DeleteAuthor
All-star contributor
Kerry Campbell, Roman Catholicism is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, founded by the Son of God on the rock of Peter, the first pope. It can never collapse because as you say, "the gates of hell will not prevail against it".
What is collapsing is the counterfeit, apostate Novus Ordo sect of Jorge Bergoglio and the global elite.
Julia du Fresne Whatever!
DeleteBy the by, it's not Peter "the rock", it's the faith Peter eventually exhibited, and it (that faith) wasn't native to Peter, it was what was bestowed upon him after Jesus prayed that he not be sifted as wheat.. If you want to know what Peter was in himself - apart from Christ -he was the one denying Christ 3 times.
Kerry Campbell he also told Jesus he loved Him - 3 times. Jesus asked Peter that question 3 times in order to restore the relationship damaged by his 3 denials and to prepare Peter for his 'mission impossible' of founding his Church.
DeleteAnd it is literally Petrus, meaning rock, on whom Jesus founded His Church.
DeleteJulia du Fresne Peter wasn't the founder, Jesus was, and it goes way beyond the Roman Catholic denomination. Jesus is the Rock, Peter became rock-like in as much as Christ lived in him and through him.
"1Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; 2And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3And did all eat the same spiritual meat; 4And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ."
Kerry Campbell (sigh). Did you not read what I wrote, that "Roman Catholicism is the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, founded by the Son of God on the rock of Peter"? "thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Mt 16,18). It couldn't be plainer, nor more clear, than that. But Protestants cannot see it because they are blinded by the pride of Luther, which derives from the pride of Lucifer.
Delete
ReplyDeleteNothing would surprise me at this point
ReplyDeleteColleen Synott - so you've known for years that Bergoglio isn't the pope?
ReplyDeleteJulia du Fresne yes absolutely I have and he proved it when he falsely lined himself up pretending to have the fetus jab and encouraging all catholics around the country
When the truth comes out about the Vatican people are going to be horrified
I was a practicing staunch catholic for most of my l8fe Julia and this was very difficult for me to process but I have watched 🔐 and seen the proof
ReplyDeleteJulia du Fresne
Colleen Synott then to have discerned the evil hoax perpetrated by Bergoglio shows you to be a perspicacious woman - and courageous, to acknowledge the truth and act upon it. I believe that very many Novus Ordo Catholics must know it also but for all sorts of reasons fail to admit it and fear to leave Bergoglio's post-conciliar, synodal Novus Ordo sect.
For family reasons it was very hard for me, and is still. But thank God, He directed me to the traditional Latin Mass where I rediscovered the stupendous treasure of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
ReplyDeleteThe false prophet!
DeleteHelen Downey the fourth sign
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDEC6f0j46o
DeleteWendie Webber thank you. It slipped what I laughingly refer to as my mind, to include the link to that Anthony Stine video explaining just how the Synod plans to alter foundational Church doctrine. I've just edited the post to include it.
ReplyDeleteFull of pedophiles
That's what Satan, aided by his minions in the mainstream media, wants you to believe. The Catholic Church is not as 'full' as protestant churches and some secular institutions. Actually.
Delete
ReplyDeleteThey’re all a cult. I should know I was born one. Their religion goes against the teachings of the bible anyway. Jesus and the bible is the only way 🧡
Maria Trenter, sadly, being born Catholic is no guarantee of remaining one, or of 'knowing' anything - as you go on to prove by your ensuing statements. How do you think the Apostles got on without Jesus and the bible? They established the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church without either.
DeleteAnd even sadder is the fact that you were born Catholic but rejected that incomparable gift of God. You will have to answer for that denial of God's truth at your particular judgment, so if I were you (and but for the grace of God I could be in your shoes), I'd repent and return to the Church while you can. But return to the true Church and the Traditional Latin Mass, not Bergoglio's Novus Ordo sect.
Adriana Anna
ReplyDeleteYes...not the real pope...actually, pope Frances has been removed and the bad guys brought in a pope that serves them...and even that one was exchanged with the actor who used to play in the BONANZA series in the 70s...forgotten his name...so who knows any more who's who & what's what?! All shambles & a big shame!!! But the baddies want to destroy Christianity because they never liked it!!! They are destroying the churches & make the mockery out of it...using them as cafes and night clubs ...burning them, too...it's such a sacrelige...reember Chch EQ?! THINK...
Adriana Anna, I have to admit you lost me on the 'Pope Frances (sic) has been removed' bit. But please be assured there are plenty of holy priests and even a few bishops (like Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano) know exactly who's who and what's what.
Delete
ReplyDeleteFrom when that 'pope' brought the world a different set of 10 commandments twas clear that church is in trouble. I'd say Francis is part of leading the world into the one world religion, foretold of in the Book of Revelation, when the anti-christ is revealed, claims to be the real christ, and demands everyone bow their knee to worship him, likely death to those who won't. Tis important to know that if people do bow their knee to the fake christ, God's word states they forfeit their entry to heaven. If it's said, see he is here in the desert or there in that room, don't be deceived. When the real Christ returns to judge the living and the dead at The End of days, there will be no mistaking He's the real One, it's written He shall come in all His glory. But prior to that, there's 7 years of tribulation to get through.. though God's word states He will shorten those days, "lest no flesh survive."
ReplyDeleteThe Catholic system isn't Christian to begin with. Pope, Father, confess to a priest...
RC church now stated that Jesus won't return as he's taken a long time and is probably drunk on wine. Blasphemous cult!
False prophet
Remko Schipper et al (too many and too pathetic to publish), posting about the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church inevitably brings the Protestants out of the woodwork. Do you ever wonder why Catholics don't lurk around Protestants on the net, waiting to make illogical and downright silly sweeping ungrounded assertions? Because they're not prompted by Satan to do so.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteLove the truth Julia du Fresne . Francis and those in Synod are destroying Catholicism 😳
DeleteAmelia Aati - Kolio but they won't and can't succeed.
ReplyDeleteGosh Jua your posts make great entertainment. They are like something our of the dark medieval ages.
Russell Armitage, by 'the dark medieval ages' do you mean Christendom, the greatest civilisation in human history, established on and by the Catholic Church?
Delete
ReplyDeleteGarabandal Prophesy at the door already!
ReplyDeleteThey destroyed it 50 years ago
Michael Dennis they tried to destroy it. They're still trying. But they won't and can't succeed.
DeleteI have been Catholic since birth! For me, there is no other church that I would go to! But everything that I have been reading for the last months, have instilled in me a great fear! What I fear the most is the anger of our Lord Jesus Christ. When His anger becomes real, I hope I can find a safe place to hide! But I doubt that! May God have mercy on all of us!
ReplyDelete
DeleteToni Conan the Lord is tender and merciful, full of love to all who turn to Him in their hearts. Those who pray to Him from the heart have no need to fear. Be faithful to the Traditional Latin Mass and the sacraments and pray the Rosary.
ReplyDeleteMost Novus Ordo RCC parishes and the FSSP ICKSP will just blindly follow the dictates of the Vatican.....they never open their Bibles to EXAMINE THE INFALLIBLE WORD OF GOD.
DeleteMichael Cialone That’s not true at our Church we have Bible study every week. You people need to stop spreading lies!!!
ReplyDeleteDeeply sad, this situation of confusion. Just do our duty and have faith in the Lord, pray, pray the Rosary and Divine Mercy, participate in the sacrifice of the Mass and the Holy Eucharist, confess, follow the Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount, read, meditate on and do the work given us by Jesus in the Bible. Surrender everything to Jesus, let Him take care of everything. God will sort it out. 🙏🕊❤️📖✝️
ReplyDeleteAnd yet the church still cannot err as it is led by the Holy Spirit.
ReplyDeleteRylan Zimny the Church cannot err but her members who are in a state of mortal sin can and do err, because they are not led by the Holy Spirit.
ReplyDeleteWhy is pope Francis not a legitime pope...was his election false?...I admit very strange with 2 popes at same time. Still do not understand, that Benedict not retired long away from the Vatican, dropped the papal clothes...and ring...something got wrong.n
Why is pope Francis not a legitime pope...was his election false?...I admit very strange with 2 popes at same time. Still do not understand, that Benedict not retired long away from the Vatican, dropped the papal clothes...and ring...something got wrong.
DeleteBirgitte Aniela Maria Andreasen Please see https://juliadufresne.blogspot.com/.../once-more-with...
There is one point that Fr Giorgio Fare makes which you point to in your blog post, that I disagree with. That Benedict XVI knew it was invalid, and planned to make it invalid.
ReplyDelete"Benedict knew his resignation was invalid."
Faré further posited that Benedict planned on making his resignation invalid, which is why, in his declaratio, he wrote, “I renounce,” instead of “I declare to renounce,” and resigned from the ministerium and not the munus. The priest noted that Benedict likely took this action because he knew of the St. Gallen Mafia’s plans.
“The Pope thus found himself at a crossroads: either allow an antipope to be secretly elected upon his death or attempt a strategy to foil the enemies of the Church by issuing a declaration with no legal effect."
No: Benedict did not know his resignation was invalid, (at least not when he attempted to make it). He is on record saying it could be done back in the 1970s.
This was not a cunning plan to out-maneuver the St Gallen Mafia (a part of the progressive wing of the Modernists). Ratzinger as part of his generation of radical German theologians spent the better part of 10 Years writhing over splitting the Papacy - if it could be done, and how. An English summation of their arguments for dissolving the papacy v splitting it among multiple "popes" was published by the Gregorian University.
Pope Benedict XVI was a modernist of the conservative type (by the time he became Pope). Modernism has a dichotomy of conservative v progressive. In reality the latest generation of progressives shifts society to where they want it and then "age out" or stop progressing, after achieving positions of authority. The next generation of progressives then moves on with the agenda, becoming the new vanguard of Modernism.
Benedict XVI as Ratzinger wrote for a decade about how the papacy could be changed by expanding it to multiple popes in order to allow for the ecumenical merging of religions, mostly the Protestant churches. He would not have considered this invalid, and answered journalists' questions on whether he had resigned by saying he had. He did not say what he'd resigned and was not asked.
In his Declaratio Benedict said he would resign the ministerium, the "doing." Which Fr Giorgio Fare points out. But, as per the Miller Dissertation (1980) Ratzinger argues that this is valid. (which is his substantial error).
"The Divine Rght of the Papacy in Recent Ecumenical Theology"
by Miller, J. Michael
https://archive.org/details/divinerightofpap0218mill
1. Bergoglio is not the Pope. So what does that mean?
ReplyDelete• He's an Anti-pope, as well as being a Heretic (or Apostate).
• The Office of the Papacy is vacant. So we need to elect a new Pope to replace Benedict XVI.
• Nothing Bergoglio has done has been valid. Therefore, The Church reverts to the last known good state.
2. Francis/Bergoglio is an Anti-pope, and a Heretic (or Apostate) trying to destroy the Church and end its presence on Earth. (The Church Penitent and the Church Triumphant would both still exist. And, the enemies of Christ can’t destroy His Church). So what?
• Is this the "Apostasy from the Top" that we were warned about?
• It probably is. Given everything else that has and is currently happening inside and outside the Church over the last century.
3. How can we recognise the Anti-Church?
• It will have the outward appearance of the Church but without God. The Four Marks of Christ's Church will be removed, and it will have no Charity, (no Love of God nor of man).
•
ReplyDeleteSuch confusion...What will be the true Church that Jesus Christ founded? Do we need to turn to Russian or Greek Orthodox? There is no clean split now. There are too many "branches" claiming to be One and True ????
Bonnie Oram-Pogorzelski there is only One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. The Novus Ordo Synodal Francis church is an Ape church, a substitute church and faithful Catholics must leave it. Find a Traditional Latin Mass church if you possibly can; otherwise attend the Mass of Ages online and pray the Rosary.
Delete
ReplyDeleteJulia du Fresne There are more rights within the Catholic church then latin one. For example Greek Catholic. It is very similar to TLM, has never been changen(small one around 1500), rich in symbols and love for Theotokos.
Anna Channáh Matiová indeed, you're right - there are more 'rites' in the Catholic Church than the Latin.
Delete
ReplyDeleteThe sedes have been right and people are just starting to realize.
Michael Dennis depends whom you class as sedes.
Delete
ReplyDeleteDawn Robertson HE IS NOT THE POPE. Please see https://juliadufresne.blogspot.com/.../once-more-with...
ReplyDeleteFollow the Latin Mass , that is what Christ made for us and man is trying to destroy . Pray without ceasing
ReplyDeleteThis is exactly what I have been saying.
ReplyDeleteFrancis’s contra-clave
ReplyDeleteI personally heard that everyone is upset that thinks that they were gonna be any doctrinal changes made to the church . All the liberal ones were very disappointed from what I read. This sounds like BS
DeleteJames Davis Did you click on the link and read the whole post? Scroll down to the bottom and you'll see this: "For Anthony Stine's YouTube video explaining the image heading this page (on the Synod) go to:" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDEC6f0j46o
You'll see that sadly, it's certainly not BS.
ReplyDeleteJulia du Fresne the pope cannot change doctrine and  therefore that ability cannot be transferred. Not to worry
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteRussell Armitage
DeleteGosh Julia your posts make great entertainment. They are like something our of the dark medieval ages.
Paul Cronin
Russell Armitage shame on you, laughing at the lunatic escaped from the asylum.
Russell Armitage
Paul Cronin yes I shouldn't really but have you ever come across such a dimented nut on here.? She like a Miss Haversham
Russell Armitage
Paul Cronin I wonder what her brother thinks?
Julia du Fresne
Russell Armitage Thank you and God bless you.. "Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake: Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven" (Mt 5, 11).
ReplyDeleteI see all this stuff written and honestly do not know what is truth and what isn’t. However, I feel that it never hurts to pray for our Catholic Church- all people are always in need of prayers. So rather than concentrate on what’s true and what’s not- let’s all concentrate on daily prayers- and for our church and let God handle the rest. He knows the truth and what is needed. Lets us all pray to help Him. Thank you all 🙏🙏🙏
DeleteChiquita Reddoch yes we must 'pray always'. But we also need to research and recognise the truth. Those still attending the Mass in the post-conciliar, Novus Ordo Francis church are in danger of being misled into apostasy.
ReplyDeleteJulia du Fresne He has set up the laity with the power to change doctrine through synodality. That's my understanding. And furthermore, not only Catholic laity, but the "people of God" - the baptized including any Protestant denomination.
Mary Harrington yes that - incredibly - is what Bergoglio is trying to do. But nothing he does has any real validity as he is in fact not the pope and never has been.
Delete