Sunday, 8 January 2023

TEEN INVADER LOSES FINGERTIP: SHOULD KILLERS LOSE LIFE

 

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.


CHANGI, SINGAPORE. THE GALLOWS HOUSE IN CHANGI GAOL WHERE CONVICTED JAPANESE WAR CRIMINALS WERE EXECUTED BY HANGING, 1946





In self-defence, a Waikato dairy farmer cuts off a teen intruder's fingertip.

And likewise, in self-defence New Zealand must bring back the death penalty. Not for burglary or for violence, but as the ultimate deterrent.

Home invaders, ram-raiders, drug dealers, child traffickers - as the sordid, sorry consequences of our denial of God and the Church's desertion of her post in the pulpit overwhelmed society, Pope Francis saw fit to proclaim in 2018 that capital punishment is, and always has been, intrinsically evil. 


CHANGI, SINGAPORE. A CONVICTED JAPANESE WAR CRIMINAL BEING LED UP A RAMP TO THE GALLOWS IN CHANGI GAOL WHERE HE WAS TO BE EXECUTED BY HANGING, 1946

But Sacred Tradition teaches that the Catholic doctrine of the death penalty goes back to St Augustine in the 4th century. And how does Francis (and before him John Paul II, who called for its abolition) explain God's command to execute the 400 wicked priests of Baal (3 Kg 18)? Not to mention His command to put to death every single Amalekite man, woman, child and infant and all their livestock too (1 Kg 15) 

Is God "evil"? 

Or is it perhaps a tiny bit more likely that Pope Francis - in cancelling both Scripture and Church doctrine, as is his wont - is manifestly heretical? 

He should take care: for Saul's rejection of the word of the Lord, the Lord rejected Saul "from being king over Israel (1 Kg 15). In other words, Saul got the sack.    

 

Catholic Sister Gerard Fernandez: spiritual advisor, counsellor and friend to those on death row


In Singapore studies show support for the death penalty for the most serious crimes is very strong and - what do you know? Crime rates in Singapore are among the lowest in the world.

And now for the story of a quintessential Waikato dairy farmer and his encounter with an intruder into his home: 



Bill Burr, the night it happened 


Bill Burr still wakes at 1.45 am every day - (at) the time two teens broke into his home and bashed him multiple times over the head in a bid to steal his car. But he has no regrets about how that day played out, despite ending up in court after one teen’s fingertip was cut off. Six months on, Burr tells Open Justice (that) while he is unrepentant about what happened, the subsequent months haven’t been easy.

This story from Aunty Herald ('New Zealand's best journalsm") required some editing to make it readable. 

“Do you want a biscuit?” Bill Burr asks after we turn up at his home on his sprawling Piopio dairy farm. “I bought them especially for you guys,” he replies when we say “no thanks”.

William “Bill” Burr has always got a smile on his face. And, it seems, freshly bought biscuits for guests.

But eight months ago, it was more of a nervous smile as the 67-year-old sat in the dock of the High Court at Hamilton.

He and his son Shaun faced a daunting trial defending multiple charges, including wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and maiming, after chopping off the tip of a teenager’s little finger after a home invasion in October 2020.

After an eight-day trial, a jury acquitted the pair of all charges.

 

Let off and let out: Bill Burr and son Shaun 

That May afternoon he confidently strutted out of the courthouse with a grin a mile wide. Burr had always maintained his innocence, saying he was just trying to protect himself after a 17-year-old 140kg teenage boy and his girlfriend broke into his King Country home..

Burr was also charged, and this month sentenced, on three counts of unlawful possession of two firearms and ammunition.

They’re in relation to a gun his father Bruce gave him 50 years ago, and a new gun and ammunition his concerned family bought after rumours started to circulate about Burr being targeted in a revenge attack after the teen’s fingertip was cut off.

He has to wear a monitoring bracelet for the next six months as part of his community detention and is unable to leave his property between 9pm and 7am.

Burr isn’t bothered by the hours as it means he can spend time with the 700-odd stock on his beef and dairy farm which has about six staff.

‘I would have been killed’

Does Burr regret anything from the night of the invasion?

“No, you know, no, heck no,” he says. “What I had to deal with, a 140kg drugged-up teen, in a rage, with a knife coming at you, heck no.

“I didn’t shoot him, that was the main thing. Taking a life, that’s the last resort.”

It was the fourth time the teen, who (sic) he knew, had broken into his home; the previous time was just a week earlier.

His wife and daughter, who don’t want to be named (had) moved out after the second burglary (and) discovering an axe the teen left behind after he stole Burr’s car and crashed it on a bend at Mangakino, south of Raglan.

By the time the teens - who have name suppression as they were 'youths' - came (back), Burr had boarded up most of his house hoping the boy wouldn’t be able to get inside.

But he forgot about the bathroom window. The teen lifted his then 15-year-old girlfriend through and she opened the door for him.

The first Burr knew about it was at 1.45am when, in a deep sleep, he was hit over the head with a wine bottle.

It didn’t smash, so the girl hit him again. It still didn’t break. A tussle - which involved the boy smashing another bottle over his head - ensued, for about eight minutes.

“For eight minutes, I fought for my life,” Burr said.

He was hit with a broom,struck with wine bottles and suffered cuts from smashed glass.

“I got bottled, broomed, stabbed a bit and I just ran out of puff and ended up turning the light on ... he was in a rage at the end of the bed. He was gonna kill us. His eyes were just sticking out, I’ll never forget it.”

 

The teenage intruders lie on the floor at the point of Bill's shotgun 


 

He told the teen he could have his keys, that they were in the kitchen.

After the teen left (the room), Burr sat naked at the end of the bed next to the girlfriend.

The pair were both embarrassed.Burr asked if he could put on his underwear (which was) lying on the floor. The girlfriend quickly left.

He then took the opportunity to grab his shotgun from the bedroom closet.

Burr marched down the hallway and took controlby pointing (the shotgun) at the teens and getting them both (down) on the floor.

Asked what would have happened if he didn’t have his gun that night, Burr responds steadfastly.

“I would have been killed. No doubt about it.

“If I didn’t have that gun locked and loaded, I would have got killed.

“I’m convinced of it. He was coming at us to do damage and if [Shaun] hadn’t got there in time I probably would have had to shoot him.”

People told him he could have run away, but that was never an option, Burr said, as it was likely the teens had been dropped off by friends who could have been waiting outside.

Fighting back

As well as calling 111, the local constable, his son and neighbours for help, Burr took photos of the scene.

Some were shown to the jury. One of the most compelling was of his shotgun, pointing at the teenagers as they lay on the floor.

Burr doesn’t want it published for fear of people taking it the wrong way, or out of context.

“I said ‘get down’,” Burr explained.

“The first thing he did was get his phone out and he was on the phone.Then he was trying to get up all the time and every time I said, ‘Get off the phone or I’ll shoot you’.

I didn’t want to shoot him.”

As the teen continued to ignore him, he decided to threaten to shoot the girlfriend.

“I said ‘I’ll shoot the girl’, and she was terrified.”

Shaun Burr was the first to arrive on the scene.

He came so quickly Burr thought it may have been one of the friends the boy had been messaging on his phone.

“I remember him looking at me because I had blood and glass in my head and was beaten up all around.”

As the pair exchanged glances the boy got to his feet.

Burr got him back down on the floor and again told the teen to “stick both hands out”.

“He wouldn’t do it. He was always lying on his side.

Then, he wouldn’t comply, still tried to get up, so we had to debilitate him.”

Shaun grabbed a knife; Burr can’t recall what kind.

He told his son to “cut [the teen’s] hand off”.

“[I was] thinking [the teen] would give up the knife but he wouldn’t. So my son started just cutting his finger a bit, but he wouldn’t give it up.”

Burr got a piece of wood to hammer down on the knife, as the teen refused to let it go.

Instead, Burr said, the teen responded by threatening “I’m gonna f***ing stab you, I’m gonna stab you”, with what was a “big, pointed, 300mm knife”.

The tip of his finger was eventually chopped off.

Asked how long it took, Burr said, “not very long, no,” possibly “two or three minutes”.

He said the teen didn’t say a word throughout. “I think he was just that drugged out. He didn’t feel no pain about anything. He was in a rage, it was unreal.”

Burr said the teen lay still for a while but then “tried again to get up and get the knife and to knife us, so it didn’t stop him”.

Piopio constable Tony Schrafft arrived shortly afterwards, telling the teen to lie on his stomach, when the wine bottle rolled out from underneath him.

The teen still didn’t hand over the knife, Burr said. That only happened once St John paramedics arrived.

Ambulance officer Jan-Maree Pool told the jury she first saw the knife when her colleague was kneeling while treating the teen.

“I said ‘s***, that’s a knife under your knee.”

The whereabouts of that knife  remains a bone of contention for Burr. “The knife went missing and I want answers from [Police Commissioner Andrew] Coster and police because it’s totally unacceptable.”

Contacted for comment, Waikato police Detective Senior Sergeant Ross Patterson said one knife was found during the scene examination. He said that was referred to in the subsequent trial and will be returned to the owner.

“There is potentially the existence of a second knife at the scene but police did not locate another knife during the scene examination that appeared to be relevant to the investigation.

“Any suggestion of any wrongdoing around a second knife is unfounded. All evidence pertaining to this matter was disclosed appropriately and presented at trial,” Patterson said.

Protecting yourself

Burr is adamant he and his son shouldn’t have had to go through the courts. “We should never have been charged for this.

“They’re all namby pamby and ‘he’s feeling bad and doing this and that’. He needed a bit of a male role model straight up.”

Burr visited the teen’s mother and said she had been “trying her best” with him.“She’s a pearl of a mother and wants to help him.”

After the second burglary Burr’s family offered the teen work on the dairy farm and a chance to play rugby, saying he wouldn’t have to worry about reparation.But their place was hit for the third time, Burr waking to find the ranch slider door lifted off its hinges and his car gone.

Feeling an affinity with dairy owners who have faced growing ram raids and violence this year, Burr encouraged them to do what it took to protect themselves from armed robbers.

“What happened is just disgraceful with the stabbing [of Janak Patel].

“I saw a Coster cop on TV say, ‘Don’t take the law into your own hands’.

“[But] you’ve got the right to protect yourself and any jury will never convict you trying to defend yourself.”

He labelled fog cannons “just nonsense”, but is a fan of National’s proposed army boot camps for youth.

“The dairy owners, they’ve got to protect themselves because they can’t trust the police or the authorities to keep themselves safe.”


 


A Trump flag in tatters

Burr appears relieved the criminal proceedings are over and he’s happy to serve his time. He doesn’t even mind the community work. “I’m enjoying it. We cleaned up a school and I met some good fellas.

“I’m going to do some more. I couldn’t believe the way the local schools have been left to run down, because the rolls have gone down and everything. I’ve got to be home at 9pm, that’s all good, and I’m enjoying the community work so we’ll get that out of the way.”

He’s also not shy about sharing his support for former United States president Donald Trump.

His State Highway 3 property is known for the Trump flag and hoardings that have been proudly displayed for the past four years or so. When Open Justice arrives; the flag’s in tatters and the signs appear to have been shot at, or had rocks thrown at them.

“Oh I know ... I must get another one,” Burr said, explaining it had actually been torched.But his support for Trump remains staunch.

“Well, Biden, you’d have to be a moron to vote for Biden.

“There were no wars with Trump.

“Putin would never have invaded Ukraine with Trump because Biden hit the oil industry and it all went up, so Putin had a string to his bow.

“And inflation was 1 per cent with Trump, the economy was booming. People will see.”

As for domestic politics, “Oh it’s got to be a landslide to National” Burr said, adding “this lot’s got to be kicked out”.

He believes the country has been let down by Labour but also by NZ First.

“I voted for Winston Peters, I gave him the power and he should have gone with National, but he went with Labour and since then the crime has just been out of control.

“And you know, a bit of law and order and a bit of respect and get things on the right path. It’s easy,” he laughs. 

Deep scars

Underneath the bravado, his staunch right-leaning beliefs, grievances against police, his will to stay strong for his family, (after) an hour-long chat, it becomes clear that Burr remains psychologically affected by what happened.

“I tell you what, I wake up at the same time every night and I’ve got to learn not to take it to bed.

“1.45am I always wake up.

“I’m not too bad but I always used to sleep right through. But you take it to bed with you every night and you’ve got to think of something else and go to bed tired. Any little noise, the cat, she’s kicked out.”

He’s philosophical about the end result.

“Hey look, people are like, ‘you could have been stabbed, you could have been killed, could have been in a wheelchair’.

“If I wasn’t prepared, it could have been worse.”

‘I would have been killed’: Why farmer Bill Burr ordered his son to chop off the tip of a teen’s finger - NZ Herald


 

Holy Family or Doni Tondo
Michelangelo Buanarroti

O Holy Family, on your feast day we beseech your blessing

23 comments:

  1. All power to Mr Farmer & son. In fact, all farmers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Should rapists lose their balls or their cocks ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neither, of course. Only their freedom.

      Delete
    2. Mark 9:43-47

      Delete
    3. Mark 9:43-47

      Delete
    4. And murderers shouldn't lose their heads, only their freedom ?

      Delete
    5. No publishing of Comments that are difficult to answer ?

      Delete
    6. A murderer should lose his/her life only in rare instances, carefully defined by the Catholic Church.
      "Scripture clearly teaches that capital punishment is sometimes morally permissible, and the Church historically, including the Fathers of the Church unanimously, have always interpreted scripture as teaching this. Taken together, these points logically entail that the Church must regard the legitimacy in principle of capital punishment as a divinely inspired and thus infallible teaching. She cannot possibly reverse it consistent with her claim to preserve divine revelation intact."https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/11/20497/

      Delete
    7. I was away on Retreat last week, so comments during that time weren't posted.
      Mk 9: 43-47 is not meant to be taken literally, of course. Jesus is telling us here that friends and situations that prompt us to sin are to be abandoned. The Lord is clear: It is better for me to go alone in the Kingdom (without a hand, without a foot, without an eye), than to go with my friend "into hell, into unquenchable fire" (Mark 9:43; cf. Mark 9: 45,47).

      Delete
    8. I guess John 6:53-58 is not meant to be taken literally, also.

      Delete
    9. 'Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day' is certainly not to be taken literally - by Protestants. Those Jews who turned away and no longer followed Him, saying, "This is a harsh saying, and who can believe it?" were the forerunners of Luther, Calvin et al (and more recently, many of the Catholic clergy, gradually bled of the lifeblood of faith by the horrible practice of Communion in the hand.

      Delete
    10. So, Mark 9:43-47 is not to be taken literally, but John 6:53-58 is ? You might make a good Protestant.

      Delete
    11. Only a Protestant could take Mk 9:43 -47 literally. As you know, Catholics are instructed not only by the Bible but also by the Church, who in her wisdom does not advise that we lop off any parts of the body created by God and belonging to God.

      Delete
    12. Not convincing.

      Delete
    13. Not convincing.

      Delete
    14. Church teaching is not convincing? A Catholic can't pick and choose. A Catholic must believe all that the Church believes and teaches, or he/she is not a member of the Body of Christ.

      Delete
    15. Where does the Catholic Church selectively teach against Mark9:43-47 ?

      Delete
    16. Try this for size, from Catholic Culture:
      "And if your hand causes you to sin, cut it off" (Mark 9:43)."And if your foot causes you to sin, cut it off" (Mark 9:45).
      "And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out" (Mark 9:47).
      Several Holy Fathers interpret "the hand," "the foot," and "the eye" as a friend dear to our heart with which we share our life, to whom we are bound by ties of affection, harmony and solidarity. There is a limit to this relationship. Christian friendship submits to the law of God. If my friend, my companion, a person dear to me is for me an occasion of sin, a stumbling block for me in journey, I have no other choice. According to the criterion of the Lord, this relationship must be cut. Who would deny the agony of such a choice? Is this a cruel amputation? Yet the Lord is clear: It is better for me to go alone in the Kingdom (without a hand, without a foot, without an eye), than to go with my friend "into hell, into unquenchable fire" (Mark 9:43; cf. Mark 9: 45,47).

      Thus this strong image of the limbs of the body places us without much confusion in front of the mirrors of our consciences. The reference to the hand, the foot, and the eye recalls the words of the Apostle Paul in the letter to the Romans:

      "So I find it to be a law that when I want to do right, evil lies close at hand. For I delight in the law of God, in my inmost self, but I see in my members another law at war with the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of sin which dwells in my members. Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, I of myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin" (Romans 7:21-25).

      Delete
    17. The link to the piece from Catholic Culture:https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=9333

      Delete
  3. And as my post relates, God Himself ordered the execution of 400 wicked priests of Baal. And all the Amalekites. The death penalty was upheld by the Church for centuries - until Francis came along. A future pope will reinstate it, I'm sure.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Death penalty if there are multiple witnesses.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We sanction to the level of the offense (both to society & the vicitim(s).
    10+ yrs for Murder, means that so called lessor crimes get less as that is the ceiling in practice.
    It also means the Judiciary can play around to their whims, not Justice for victims or the greater good.
    That is why 3 Strikes was enacted as they weren't doing their job properly.
    Reinstating 3 Strikes but cover all crimes, plus a death penalty based on 100% provability.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I guess John 6:53-58 is not meant to be taken literally, also.

    ReplyDelete