HALF THE US THINKS THE J*B IS A 'KILLER'

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address FB Messenger or Twitter.

 

It's a very touchy subject. If you're not v*xxed yourself (and you know how fond you are of yourself), you almost certainly know someone else that you're very fond of, who's v*xxed. 

No one wants to dwell on the frightening figures disclosed below, but we have to face facts, if only because they should send us down on our knees in prayer. 

Here's one you'll memorise very quickly, which seems to get results (of course all prayer from the heart gets results, only we don't necessarily get to know the results - or even like them).

  

A new poll has found that 28% of Americans know someone “personally” whose death they believe may have been caused by the COVID j*b.

Rasmussen Reports called it the “biggest poll ever” in its 26-year history.

“We can’t directly infer how many people died from the v*ccine, but clearly the underlying number is large enough so that well over a quarter of Americans think the v*ccine is a killer,” noted Mark Mitchell, head pollster of Rasmussen Reports.

“That’s absolutely astonishing,” Mitchell said of the finding.

Mitchell pointed out that, interestingly, significantly more Democrats than Republicans said they knew someone who they think may have died from the COVID shot (33% vs. 26%).

Among the v*ccinated respondents, 22% said they knew someone who may have died from the j*b, and a sizable 38% were “not sure.” By contrast, among the unv*ccinated polled, 45% responded in the affirmative, and 12% said they were unsure.

Seventy-one percent of the poll’s respondents said they had received at least one COVID injection, and 28% said they had not.

Remarkably, the poll also found that 28% of Americans believe it is “very likely,” and 21% believe it is “somewhat likely,” that COVID injections have caused “a significant number of unexplained deaths.”

Thus, about half of Americans believe it is at least somewhat likely that the COVID shot is, as Mitchell put it, a “killer.”

Echoing the poll findings noted above, 48% of respondents indicated they think there are “legitimate reasons to be concerned about the safety of COVID-19 v*ccines,” and 37% said it was closer to their belief that those who “worry about v*ccine safety are spreading conspiracy theories,” and 15% said they were “not sure” either way.

Mitchell has decried the lack of coverage of this topic from other pollsters. “Five billion people took an experimental v*ccine,” Mitchell told Emerald Robinson on Tuesday.

“And I’m old enough to remember when journalistic integrity would have driven people to dig at that and fight back and get information out there. And how public opinion would have played into that is if they couldn’t get the data they wanted, they would have used public opinion as a wedge, journalistically, to figure out what’s going on here and answer these questions,” Mitchell continued.

“People’s questions are not being answered. And it takes somebody like us to do it,” he added.

Almost identical percentages of Republicans (32%) and Democrats (31%) believed this to be “very likely.”

“Of all the polls I’ve seen, this is about the least partisan ever,” Rasmussen Reports replied in response to one commentator’s musing. “Wouldn’t it be something if this j*b is what ended up uniting the country again?”

A recent survey by Rasmussen Reports found that 34% of Americans who received a COVID shot said they experienced minor side effects from the j*b, and an astounding 7% reported major side effects from the j*b.https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/28-of-americans-say-they-know-someone-who-may-have-died-from-covid-shot-new-poll/?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=catholic&fbclid=IwAR3ZFsQsK-L9JOXbyf9K_c0pAUEPYvK_nj-GttK3_okWFAwda3ey8Glovvs

Back home in New Zealand the doughty Dr Guy Hatchard has a word or two to say on the subject: 

It is surprising what tripe you read in the newspapers, and more surprising—the government is funding it.

Tripe is what this government trades in. 

Te Punaha Matatini hosts the government’s Disinformation Project, which is hitting the headlines again. According to Principal Investigator Kate Hannah (MA in history), the government should be allowed to dictate to high street stationer Whitcoulls which magazines it can sell to the public. Correct me if I am wrong but isn’t this a bit close to book burning?

Hannah is concerned that the magazine New Dawn has questioned the efficacy of the Covid v8ccines (we're going for '8' here, it's quicker than an asterisk - ed). I don’t read New Dawn, but if there is one thing that the public has figured out, it is the lack of efficacy of Covid v8ccines. They don’t seem to prevent transmission, hospitalisation, or death.

During the last few weeks a number of papers have been published in journals outlining some of the many reasons why this is the case. A paper entitled “Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA v8ccination” reports that after three mRNA injections B cells critical to antiviral immune protection switched to an IgG4 function. The immune system switches to an IgG4 function when it decides it wants to tolerate an allergen rather than fight it. Covid, however, is not an allergen; it is a replicating pathogen. Such tolerance explains why busted (you get the pun? - ed) people are slowest to clear Covid infections and can become subject to repeat infections. Read Q & A about it here.

Hannah is undeterred by such findings or concerns. Framed by a dramatic black background in a Stuff Newspaper video appended to an article, she explains to the public why we should only follow the government website Unite Against Covid-19. Her reasoning reveals the kind of anti-science New Zealand our government is planning. She advises against reading publications which:

• Have lots of links and scientific references (like most science journals)
• Come from a variety of sources from all over the world

Incredibly Hannah says even referenced data from the WHO and CDC should be treated with suspicion here in New Zealand. Instead, ask the government or talk to your GP. The government doesn’t just fund one link to information. Go to https://www.karawhiua.nz/frequently-asked-questions/ for example where in a mixture of Maori and English 16 year olds are urged to get a buster if they want to enjoy summer and everyone is advised to cease worrying if they get reinfected after taking Paxlovid.

In contrast, the Danish government advises the under 50s to avoid mRNA injections. Current research shows the risk of mRNA v8ccine-induced myocarditis exceeds the risks of Covid-19 infection, but as Hannah says: avoid overseas information. She feels this would constitute cherry picking (only citing findings favourable to your viewpoint).

The standard scientific way around cherry picking is to review all the available published articles on a topic. A paper published 28th December 2022 in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation entitled COVID-19 v8ccine induced myocarditis in young males: A systematic review does just this. It concludes conservatively:

“..males younger than 40 receiving a second dose of an mRNA v8ccine are at greatest risk [of myocarditis]”.

The paper also shows how some researchers hid the risks of myocarditis by averaging the data of 20 year old males with 80 year old women—a form of medical fraud motivated by pro-v8ccine myopia and big pharma funding.

In another example, government website Unite Against Covid-19 advises:

“You can get the Pfizer v8ccine at any stage of your pregnancy.”

If you steer away from the narrow boundaries of Kate Hannah, government websites, and The Disinformation Project, you might come across this journal paper published 30th December 2022:

“COVID-19 V8ccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function” reports COVID-19 v8ccines, when compared to the Influenza v8ccines, are associated with a significant increase in Adverse Events including:

• menstrual abnormalities
• miscarriage
• fetal chromosomal abnormalities
• fetal malformation
• fetal cystic hygroma
• fetal cardiac disorders
• fetal arrhythmias
• fetal cardiac arrest
• fetal vascular malperfusion
• fetal growth abnormalities
• fetal abnormal surveillance
• fetal placental thrombosis
• low amniotic fluid
• preeclampsia
• premature delivery
• preterm premature rupture of membrane
• fetal death/stillbirth
• and premature baby death

(all p values were much smaller than 0.05). The paper concluded:

“When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or persons-received, all COVID-19 v8ccine adverse events far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds…A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 v8ccines in pregnancy is advised.”

And take a gander at this graph:  

 

https://thebfd.co.nz/2022/10/29/alarming-safety-signals-emerge-about-the-vax/

 

Curiously, Kate Hannah (MA in History), as well as rejecting out of hand the scientific references cited by those asking questions about mRNA v8ccine safety, is not offering any references of her own, nor do experts like Michael Baker (oh spare us! - ed) in their public pronouncements. Content to pontificate that their unseen references are better than yours, but I don’t have to show you mine because you are not worthy of seeing them (possibly because they don’t stand up to scrutiny, you might infer). A sort of school playground spat where you had better watch out because my father is bigger than yours.

Hannah applies some truly wonderful logic to her case. An article reporting the concerns of frontline hospital workers in the USA is dismissed because the author is not specifically qualified to write about frontline health workers. Can you get such a qualification? Presumably, Hannah has sufficient qualifications (an MA in history) to tell everybody what to do. As such, she appears to fit right into the current Labour government mould.

Probably you, like me, are tempted to laugh at Kate Hannah. Her depiction of proto-terrorists is fair-haired people who wear braids, grow vegetables, knit, and eschew Covid vaccines. So why is the government funding Kate Hannah (MA in History) to tell us what to think about Covid when we could be relying on published research in reputable scientific journals?

They are desperate. There is an election coming up. They are engaged in a last ditch stand to rally their remaining supporters around the fading and tattered mRNA banner that Ardern unfurled with trumpets and mandates back in 2021. They are ignoring the accumulating safety signals and throwing money at anyone who will stick with their failed Covid policies and experimental injections. Given the risks of serious injury and death, which increase with each successive v8ccination, it is a kamikaze approach. Send your most fanatical followers to the front line, knowing they are risking all for a lost cause.

Don’t stop asking questions. If you have studied history (like Kate Hannah), you should be aware that whenever governments become your sole source of truth, things can go horribly wrong.https://hatchardreport.com/the-ardern-government-is-throwing-money-at-the-media-and-the-fake-science-brigade/?fbclid=IwAR2QYZU-KAcM8F8-pEwxibXc50TE_0DtLQxdcTujPmLYtZcYPNCwk7k4CZs

And poor old Aunty Herald is bemused by all these young people dying (or lying critically ill in ICU following cardiac arrest, like American footballer Damar Hamlin).

A pic for people who think NZ is 'more spiritual' than the US: prayer for Hamlin on the field 

Oh my goodness, what can it be? Oh, we know: let's call it Sads (Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome) and it'll go away.   https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/what-is-sads-healthy-young-people-dying-from-sudden-adult-death-syndrome/TIOAK4SYPF5LFSKP5QZCVG23IM/?fbclid=IwAR3CGLM0P3S2hC-1DiW3CWaKeK4Rr_TI7HMHa4qwMm26gEa99bGxUow0ERI#Echobox=1671930653

 St John Neumann, on your feast day please pray for us