MAHUTA THE LOOTER - AND LIAR

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.

 

It looks like a snarl. But surely not!

Christopher Hipkins, Christopher Luxon. It's highly ironic that the leaders of New Zealand's two major political parties are called 'Christ bearers'. Do they even know the meaning of their Christian name? Could any moniker be more 'Christian' than Christopher?

But Christian they are not. Going by his voting on the Abortion Law Act, Hipkins is as fervent a babykiller as its architect, Jacinda Ardern and Luxon, who calls himself pro-life, has ruled out making any change to that infamous legislation should he win the election. 

For Luxon. politics means having a bob each way

He didn't even show up to vote on the dangerous, amoral Conversion Therapy Ban. When the Roe v Wade abortion law was overturned he told Tova O'Brien he "did not think it was a good day". Quite the contrary, he thought it was shocking and distressing news.

So Hipkins and Luxon are quite clearly - in spite of Luxon's transparent attempt at disguise as a conservative - citizens and leaders of what Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò calls the civitas diaboli (literally, city of the devil) where "all power is exercised on the basis of force and every authority is devoid of any limit, not having to conform to any moral precept and not being exercised in the name of God but of the Adversary. Chaos, disorder, infernal confusion reigns, so to speak, which is summed up in the Luciferian cry of Non serviam and in the Satanic precept of Do what thou wilt."

Archbishop Viganò's civitas diaboli is vividly illustrated by this Labour Government, whose family members' collective record for Do what thou wilt must be unrivalled in government anywhere else in the world. Except maybe the United States. 

Beverley Anne Sepuloni,  mother of our new deputy prime minister, Carmel Sepuloni, was convicted in 2015 on benefit fraud charges, ordered to pay $15,000 reparation and given home detention.

Finance Minister Grant Robertson's father, an accountant, was arrested in 1991 for theft as a servant after stealing $120,000 from a law firm. 

Kiri Allan, New Zealand's Minister of JUSTICE, has a half-brother, Eric Mete, doing time for murder in 2019, in Whanganui.

And then there's Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta, whose partner William Gannin Ormsby was convicted in 2003 of assaulting a female. Mahuta has been caught out - as reported by the intrepid Cam Slater for the BFD - for lying in her teeth. 

Jacinda Ardern claimed that her Labour Government would be the most open and transparent government ever. That was the slogan; reality turned out to be nothing less than an orchestrated litany of lies, cover ups and flannel. They had zero commitment to openness and transparency, and total commitment to deceiving the public

The latest example is the cover-up and lies over Three Waters’ entrenchment. Remember they claimed at the time it was all just a horrible mistake and they were fixing it?

The truth is out now.

Documents going back to November 2021 show Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta was repeatedly warned by officials against entrenching parts of the Three Waters reforms.

The documents, released to the Herald under the Official Information Act, show Mahuta began considering the second (and initially successful) bid to entrench part of the bill as early as September 29, more than a month before a select committee report revealed to the public and Labour’s wider caucus that the Greens were likely to try to entrench part of the legislation.

An email shows Mahuta’s officials provided feedback on the Green Party SOP (proposed amendment) that ultimately entrenched part of the bill.

The documents also reveal a meeting with Green MP Eugenie Sage about the entrenchment provision that Mahuta did not disclose in her ministerial diary. National says Mahuta needs to front up about why the meeting was not published in the diary and the government needs to come clean about what led to Labour’s decision to vote for entrenchment in the first place.

A spokesperson for Mahuta said she had “already noted that a mistake was made, and the government has now fixed it”.

They were plotting it for months before they did it, then they hid meetings and ignored officials. When busted they tried flannel and obfuscation. That was all a sham too.

Labour MPs, including some senior MPs, appeared to be completely blindsided by what they had voted on including the now-prime minister, Hipkins, who only became aware of exactly what had been passed after the fact.

Head Prefect Hipkins - should that now be Principal Hipkins? - seems a little slow on the uptake: 

Prime Minister elect and outgoing Education Minister Chris Hipkins has been stumped on the articles of te Tiriti, at his first press conference as the country’s leader.

Having been formerly elected by the Labour caucus yesterday, Hipkins was asked to recall the three treaty articles.

“We have Kawanatanga, Tino Rangatiratanga, and, actually no, I can’t remember the other, sorry,” Hipkins said.

Hipkins was right on the first two, but failed on the third, where the crown guarantees Māori the benefits of royal protection and full citizenship.https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/outgoing-education-minister-chris-hipkins-gets-a-c-for-te-tiriti-articles/4DRDVENSMRCOTBWR2J2BQ3JFNM/

 

The timeline showed Mahuta should have been more explicit about her intentions to caucus far earlier, given the idea of trying to entrench the provision was raised by September 25, two months before the vote, and was clear by October 25, one month before the vote. But this did not happen.

The select committee published its report on November 11, making clear the Greens’ intention to pursue entrenchment.

On November 22, an email between officials at DIA and Mahuta’s office shows officials were providing feedback on the Green Party SOP (proposed amendment) that ultimately entrenched part of the bill.

The documents also reveal a meeting with Green MP Eugenie Sage about the entrenchment provision that Mahuta did not disclose in her ministerial diary. National says Mahuta needs to front up about why the meeting was not published in the diary and the government needs to come clean about what led to Labour’s decision to vote for entrenchment in the first place.

A spokesperson for Mahuta said she had “already noted that a mistake was made, and the government has now fixed it”.

NZ Herald

They were plotting it for months before they did it, then they hid meetings and ignored officials. When busted they tried flannel and obfuscation. That was all a sham too.

 

 

Labour MPs, including some senior MPs, appeared to be completely blindsided by what they had voted on including the now-prime minister, Hipkins, who only became aware of exactly what had been passed after the fact.

Watts said that the timeline showed Mahuta should have been more explicit about her intentions to caucus far earlier, given the idea of trying to entrench the provision was raised by September 25, two months before the vote, and was clear by October 25, one month before the vote. But this did not happen.

The select committee published its report on November 11, making clear the Greens’ intention to pursue entrenchment.

On November 22, an email between officials at DIA (Department of Internal Affairs - ed) and Mahuta’s office shows officials were providing feedback on the Green Party’s SOP.

Comments suggest there was an openness on the part of officials and the Government for some back and forth with the Greens to get the SOP right.

“[I]f this doesn’t achieve what the Green party want, welcome to come back to us,” the email said.

The decision to vote for entrenchment was made so late it did not even make it into Mahuta’s speaking notes for the committee stage, where it was voted on.

NZ Herald

They are disingenuous and dishonest, and everything they’ve said about the issue is a clear-cut case of disinformation.

The only thing you can trust Labour to do is lie. Labour have become arrogant, doctrinaire and out of touch. 

Time for a change. 

 

We can transform this civitas diaboli in what was once known as Godzone by promoting in its stead "the social kingship of Christ according to the model of the Civitas Dei (the city of God) and in conformity with the order willed by the Lord; and to fight the globalist Revolution, the last phalanx of the civitas diaboli, with actions of formation, denunciation (which this post like many on this page, is all about - ed) and boycott" - + Viganò. 

 

 

https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/01/30/open-and-transparent-not-so-much-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=open-and-transparent-not-so-much-2&fbclid=IwAR1Q0PA0-mBnD9NxXWMFEuC9YkOgy8inc69WorOcC41FoUC5CYgMzoEQ38A