Wednesday, 22 July 2026

NUNS' ABUSER RUPNIK RUMOURED ACQUITTED

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Unless you're a troll, of course.








A trial in the Vatican, secretly conducted, of the priest pervert Marko Rupnik who's accused of serially, blasphemously abusing 30 nuns, is reliably rumoured to have ended. Without a conviction. 


It sticks in the craw somewhat, but the highly regarded  @messainlatino cites “persistent & highly credible sources” saying “the criminal trial currently underway in the Vatican against Fr Marko Ivan Rupnik has reportedly concluded with a favorable outcome for him”.


The portals Messa in Latino and AdVaticanum reported that the former Slovenian Jesuit, Marko Ivan Rupnik, had been acquitted of the accusations of violence. Oh well, that's all right then. No, wait: the spiritual violence done to these nuns is surely more grievous than any physical force. And the violence allegedly involving sacred vessels in ways too grotesque and evil to describe - enough to make the gorge rise - was both spiritual and physical. 


Oh, but hold on: subsequently, Vatican sources cited by Il Messaggero claim that the trial has not concluded and maintain that the case remains ongoing. It's the classical Vatican Twoist M O: obfuscation. secrecy and ambiguity.  


Canon lawyers say there are reasons why Rupnik’s case might end without a conviction which might have little to do with his guilt or innocence. Tell that to the Marines - that's typical lawyer-speak. Would you not think the 150-page dossier detailing alleged abuse committed by Rupnik between 1985 and 2018, compiled by the Jesuits (who expelled him from the order) would provide these lawyers with an open-and-shut case?


It's also said that the court has not ruled on all allegations of sexual abuse themselves, and a further case is being prepared against Rupnik.” Marko Rupnik has been acquitted of violence but not of rape, sexual, psychological or spiritual abuse. (Why are we waiting?)


The Holy See has not confirmed or denied any of this. Cardinal Tucho Fernandez of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is keeping his 'Heal-Me-With-Your-Mouth' firmly closed. Meanwhile, Rupnik's alleged victims are “deeply disheartened and distressed” at the snail's pace and and secrecy of his trial under Church law in the Vatican.


We need to realise the IMMENSE importance of Marko Rupnik to Leo, Tucho and the postconciliar Vatican. Rupnik is their poster boy: every Catholic IN THE WORLD has had his 'art' shoved in their face. In bishops' releases, in parish bulletins, in church foyers everywhere. Not to mention plastered across the facades of iconic Catholic shrines like Lourdes.  


His ugly, depraved work expresses not only his own nature but that of the conciliar Ape of the Church. Rupnik's 'art' is visual propaganda for 'the Spirit of Vatican II'. “His sexual obsession," according to one of his alleged victims, "was not extemporaneous but deeply connected to his conception of art and his theological thought.” It pretends to be Byzantine art but is in fact a blasphemous parody. https://www.remnantnewspaper.com/who-is-marko-ivan-rupnik--why-did-the-bergoglians-shelter-him/



A Twitter furore flared up when the Italian language Vatica
n.va website and Twitter page continued to use Rupnik’s art in their public offerings. What the twitterati didn't notice was that
Natasha Govekar, a Rupnik disciple and key member of his organisation, is employed by the Dicastery for Communications as “Director of Theological-Pastoral Direction.”



Rupnik's works serve as inaesthetic, uncomfortable furniture for the post-conciliar church and landscape - ergo, their perpetrator must be protected. And inevitably,
given the Vatican's grisly history of clerical corruption, the spectre of blackmail has reared its ugly head.


Fr Rupnik was excommunicated for one of the most serious canonical delicts (canonical crimes) a priest can commit. For two weeks. Then Francis/Bergoglio unexcommunicated him. He was forgiven because, we are assured, “he repented.” 


And on July 2, a decree went forth from Fernandez, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Faith, to declare the Society of St Pius X excommunicated. It's almost a shame that the SSPX will never repent, even fallaciously, of their refusal to accept Vatican II and its concomitant scandals such as Father Marko Rupnik. But even if it did, Leo/Prevost would never un-excommunicate the 'Lefebvrists'.


Because the Society of St Pius X proclaims the Faith of our fathers, which apostate Rome has abandoned in favour of a new world religion, a spiritual front for the globalists of Davos.



Fr. Rupnik, Chaplain of the Hyperpapalist Movement.


From Lifesitenews:

 

Father Marko Ivan Rupnik has apparently been acquitted in his Vatican canonical criminal trial of all charges of “violence” related to his alleged sexual abuse, per reports from two Italian news outlets.

 

While the ruling remains unconfirmed by the Vatican, MessainLatino and AdVaticanum reported on July 20 that a five-judge panel has acquitted disgraced former Jesuit cleric and favorite of Pope Francis of all allegations of “violence” in his alleged acts of sexual abuse. Though sources indicated to these outlets that the court has not ruled on all allegations of sexual abuse themselves, and a further case is being prepared against Rupnik.

 

As extensively reported at LifeSiteNews, Rupnik has been accused of sexually, spiritually, psychologically, and physically abusing nuns as well as male victims. The credibility of the well-documented allegations of Rupnik’s serial abuse is deemed to be “very high” by his former Jesuit superiors.

 

Despite Rupnik’s case being very high-profile, canonical trials before the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) are kept under seal unless the Vatican decides otherwise. Thus, the Holy See may not disclose any details about the proceedings, which has led some to question the lack of transparency in such a high-profile case.

 

Alleged victims of the priest have attested that he raped women under his charge, that he told a former nun to get an abortion in case she became pregnant after raping her, and that Rupnik’s sexual abuse is deeply linked to his icons, which used his victims as models.

 

In 2023, Pope Francis delegated the case to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (now Dicastery). In October 2023, the DDF announced that it had appointed a panel of five judges to decide the canonical trial of Rupnik. The reported acquittal concerns charges of “violence” in his alleged acts of sexual abuse, as indicated by news outlets in July 2024.

 

READ: Vatican appoints judges to decide Rupnik sexual abuse case

 

The ex-Jesuit’s distinctive and disturbing “art,” which portrays Christ and the saints with large “black hole” eyes, had remained on display in the Vatican and several prominent churches. These include the Sanctuary of Saint Pio of Pietrelcina in Giovani Rotundo, Italy, which houses the relics of St. Padre Pio, the Saint John Paul II National Shrine in Washington, D.C., and the Basilica of Our Lady of the Rosary at the Shrine of Our Lady of Lourdes in France. Some of these pieces have since been covered or removed.

 

In addition to their deeply disturbing nature, Catholic writers and art historians such as Hillary White have written extensively on how Rupnik’s “artwork” is in fact a demonic “parody” of medieval art and traditional Byzantine iconography. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/alleged-abuser-priest-and-pope-francis-favorite-fr-rupnik-cleared-by-vatican


25 comments:

  1. Retfrancis Fontenot22 July 2026 at 15:16


    Rupnik was acquitted of violence but not of sexual abuse!
    Please help me understand?
    If Rupnik raped these former nuns how can he be acquitted of violence! Is rape not a crime of violence?
    Canon law for thee not for me! 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Retfrancis Fontenot Simply put, the Democrats are running the Vatican now! Same corruption different location!

      Delete
    2. Retfrancis Fontenot22 July 2026 at 15:18


      James Kimball I totally agree! You can take the man out of Chicago but you can’t take the Chicago out of the man!

      Delete
  2. Walter Wright ·22 July 2026 at 15:18


    Yet , there is “ no emergency to consecrate Holy Bishops of Tradition”
    Nothing to see here folks !

    ReplyDelete

  3. The former Vatican is now the "Vati-can't" It is a cesspool of lavender induced toxophosins!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Moira Murphy O Mahoney22 July 2026 at 15:20


    Exactly the type they are looking for… he’ll probably get a promotion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Retfrancis Fontenot22 July 2026 at 15:21



      Moira Murphy O Mahoney at least a cardinal!

      Delete
    2. James Kimball ·22 July 2026 at 15:22


      Moira Murphy O Mahoney Hell is hiring I hear!

      Delete
  5. Mollie Harrison22 July 2026 at 23:11


    I saw his art before I knew who it was by and was appalled by it. My son had to explain who the artist was and what he was accused of. It is time the hierarchy of the Catholic stopped protecting their friends and started protecting the faith.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brendan Malone22 July 2026 at 23:12


    ·
    https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18q7k7vHmU/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Brendan Malone thank you yes, I've seen the Catholic Herald (and doubtless many other sources) posting the Vatican's statement to the effect that the rumours of Rupnik's acquittal are unfounded and that his trial 'remains ongoing'.
      Hmmm. For how long, we wonder, will it remain ongoing?

      Delete
  7. Eleonora Babayants · · by Author All this is true. However, there were abuses SSPX which also were hushed22 July 2026 at 23:15

    All this is true. However, there were abuses SSPX which also were hushed.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Greally Brendan ·

    He'll be given a red hat and no worse than some of the ones they sent here

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. If you got expelled by the Jesuit’s you must be pretty irredeemable

      Delete


    2. Steve Bowler except no one is irredeemable. Even Judas would have been forgiven, had he repented.

      Delete
  9. Marie Theresa MacDonald · · by Author Now follow the trail of his vatican Protectors22 July 2026 at 23:32


    ·
    ·

    Now follow the trail of his vatican Protectors

    ReplyDelete

  10. In line for a dicastery perhaps? A red hat?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Barbara Georges22 July 2026 at 23:34



    If it wasn't for the eucharist, id leave the church yesterday!! Sickening abuse of nuns, excommunicating SSPX, betraying China's Christians, promoting 'dogs' (moral dogs) and courting every evil under the sun! But, this is our punishment for being lukewarm, when we start obeying our Lord, praying and fasting, perhaps, if it's not too late, things will improve???

    ReplyDelete
  12. Joana Freudenthal22 July 2026 at 23:35


    Not true.
    https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2026-07/director-of-holy-see-press-office-matteo-bruni-statement-rupnik.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Joana Freudenthal what is not true? The post stated it was a rumour, reliably reported.

      Delete
  13. Mike Blackadder23 July 2026 at 22:23


    Modern Popes say they are serious about curbing sexual abuse and that it will not be tolerated. So why was Fr. Rupnik, after having been removed from the Jesuit order and losing faculties for sexually abusing nuns, diabolically abusing the sacrament of confession in the process, why was he granted leniency from Pope Francis in the first place? Why is he being employed by the Vatican to produce his strange works of art all over Christendom? And why haven’t the nuns who were abused by him been called to give testimony in the case or been informed of progress in the trial?
    Words that are contradicted by actions is insulting to victims and the rest of the faithful. God have mercy.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Monyei Ogochukwu23 July 2026 at 22:24


    You cannot choice words,to defamed the holy father and Vatican.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ironmike Wojta23 July 2026 at 22:24


    ·
    The Synodal Way of this Church is working to oppose the teachings of Christ and His Apostles and to lead the Children of God astray, by defiling the Bride in full view of the Groom.

    ReplyDelete

  16. ·
    Cite your sources otherwise this is just another way of denigrating the Catholic Church. This sort of post is not only hostile but seeks to cause pain to the who remain faithful to the Vatican. Perhaps you should consider your motives for this kind of thing, it certainly is not anywhere near Christlike!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mike Blackadder23 July 2026 at 22:27


      Unfortunately this is an entirely accurate description of the Fr Rupnik story. I know it’s hard to deal with when you don’t want to face problems in the modern church, but you also shouldn’t accuse others of not being Christlike only because you don’t like the story.
      Do your research first and then come back and accuse people of lying if you believe they are lying.

      Delete