FRENCH BISHOPS: 'TLM MUST GO', CHURCH LIKELY TO AGREE

 

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Except trolls. Specially trolls with ghostwriters.

The Catholic Church post-Vatican II

 

You have been warned. And forewarned, they say, is forearmed. Conservative Catholics of all colours - diocesan, FSSP, ICKSP, FSSR, et al- look like being coerced by Rome into swearing allegiance to the Second Vatican Council. That's the hoop held up for the 'excommunicated' of the Society of St Pius (SSPX) to jump through, if they bother their busy bishop with a request to be allowed back into Rome's new synodal religion. 

SSPX members who wish to return to communion with Rome are now required to sign a formal formula of adherence acknowledging obedience to the pope and to the Catholic hierarchy as well as acceptance of all Vatican II.  It's only a matter of time before the Vatican comes after all traditionalist Catholics to do likewise.

Are you willing to sign up to a regime which worships the demon goddess Pachamama, pushes sodomy and promotes the heresies of freedom of religion (Dignitatis Humanae), false ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio) and rapprochement with the Jews who crucified Christ (Nostra Aetate)? While bearing in mind that such a religion cannot possibly be that of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, nor led by Christ's Vicar on earth?  

Fr Robert Prevost (Leo XIV) kneeling before the Pachamama in Brazil, 1995

A big conciliar wheel, Italian church historian Prof Massimo Faggioli, has road-coned the Catholic motorway interchange just ahead (and predicted on this page) - the intersection which lies before us between truth and falsehood, good and evil, the Church and her Ape. Faggioli says that having already outlawed the SSPX,  Rome now has the FSSP in its sights. The FSSP, already corralled, is now 'a problem'. If the FSSP is 'a problem', how long before Rome draws a bead on the other Ecclesia Dei communities?

The target of course is the Latin Mass, which Rome has formally declared "does not fit the ecclesiology of the church post-Vatican 2." There you go. They're saying it's a new church now, and the ecclesiology of centuries past doesn't fit. But the reason why the TLM has to go is not the Mass itself, it's the truth it stands for. It's the way people new to the Latin Mass soon start to notice there's a state of necessity in the Church, and why. And they flee the Novus Ordo. And Rome won't stand for that for much longer.

The world's bishops know that in this crisis it's the Mass that defines and divides Catholics. They know the Ecclesia Dei-type priests think like the SSPX; they notice that they won't concelebrate the Novus Ordo with them. The newspaper La Croix reports a general consensus among the French bishops, at their spring plenary assembly in Lourdes, on liturgical and ecclesial unity and alignment with Vatican II. To put it bluntly, French bishops say the new Mass is the one and the old Mass has got to go.

And they propose conditions that would require traditional communities to move closer to the reformed liturgy and make real concessions in exchange for any continued accommodation. La Croix reports, specifically: communities attached to the old mass would be expected to adopt the readings and calendar of the reformed missal. Meaning the 1962 liturgical calendar goes away and the new Mass calendar is adopted by the traditional Latin Mass, which would require a whole new missal. They'd have to redo the liturgy. That is the consequence. 

Baptism, marriage and confirmation would be celebrated in the new rite, though Latin could still be used. Latin is only part of the problem. Diocesan bishops would resume direct oversight, meaning the FSSP (who, incidentally, deny to media who ask, that they're traditionalist)  would stop being independent, and priests would no longer be permitted to refuse outright to celebrate the reformed liturgy. Priests right now of the FSSP and those groups can, if they want, refuse to celebrate the new mass. That would be taken from them. 

This is the French bishop's proposal, to be given to the entire church. And it's a good bet that they will take it.   

With grateful thanks to Anthony Stine at Return to Tradition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe0CHgo4RHY and acknowledging https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/faggioli-sspx-traditionalism-vatican-ii-leo-catholic-massimo

Professor Faggioli opines that Vatican II falling over would be a disaster for the Church - for her political standing with the world. In other words Vatican II is good for business. Global business, globalist business. Faggioli  speaks of post-Vatican II 'inculturation'. What he means is secularisation. Worldliness. This is the undertow hidden beneath the Holy See which is carrying the Synodal Ape of the Church to its eventual destruction on the Rock that is Christ.  

 "Adulterers, know you not that the friendship of this world is the enemy of God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world, becometh an enemy of God." (Jas 4:4)

'Adulterers' is here taken in a figurative sense for those who love creatures more than God, the true spouse of their souls; who reflect not that the love and friendship of this world is an enemy to God, and the true manner of serving him.  

From Ann Barnhardt:

The FSSP “welcome package” to SSPX’ers. Utterly vomitous.

See? This is the diabolical disorientation and hellish chaos the comes directly from not acknowledging and correcting the invalidity of Pope Benedict’s attempted partial resignation, which then yielded the Bergoglian and now PERVostian Antipapacies.

LOOK at this bilge:

Review:

—Vatican II was a validly convoked ecumenical council, which ultimately FAILED. In the second day of the Second Vatican Council, the proceedings were hijacked by German and American followers of the Modernist “Nouvelle Theologie” group, the original schemae were scrapped, and instead a dog’s breakfast of intentionally unclear documents were foisted upon the bishops there present.

 

The immediate subsequent catastrophic collapse of the Latin Church and western civilization with it proves that Vatican II, like Lateran V and Lyons II, was a failed council, albeit far more catastrophically so.

 

—Bergoglio and PERVost were/are observably, obviously Antipopes.

 

—The Petrine See has been vacant since the death of Pope Benedict XVI, with zero indication of any desire by any legitimate authority to remedy and resolve the situation. This is the textbook definition of a state of emergency exception.

 

—No one was excommunicated from the Holy Catholic Church as a result of the episcopal consecrations in Econe, Switzerland on July 1st. The notion that either the public satan-worshipper and arch-heretic apostate PERVost, or the open pedo groomer and arch-heretic apostate Touchme Fagnandez, have even the slightest shred of genuine authority is completely laughable.

 

Sadly, the FSSP, obsessed with the goal of being eaten last by the crocodile, don’t realize that they are driving people away, towards the SSPX, by pure revulsion.

As always, I hope this helps.The FSSP “welcome package” to SSPX’ers. Utterly vomitous. | Barnhardt

 

 

It sure seems like a time for cleaving. What kind of document are you willing to sign?

 

A time to love, and a time to hate. A time for war, and a time for peace. -Eccl 3:8

 

Are you ready to sign up for the PachaPrevost sodochurch? Because Max Beans [translates as Massimo Faggioli - ed] and assorted demons are licking their chops to swallow you up.

 

Are you willing to sign a document giving your moral assent to all the errors of Vatican II? Because that is their demand in order for you to be “in communion” with demonchurch. You best get to it.

But hey, you could just declare your union with the arch laywoman witch Velma of Canterbury, or even the arch Imam Sultan of Swing, and you’re be all good!https://nonvenipacem.org/2026/07/23/it-sure-seems-like-a-time-for-cleaving-what-kind-of-document-are

Blessed Maria of the Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ, pray for the Church