Sunday, 21 June 2026

LEO MAY EXCOMMUNICATE EVEN SSPX MASSGOERS

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, Fb Messenger or X. 





Rome, they say, is preparing to excommunicate holus-bolus the entire Society of St Pius X (SSPX), world-wide. That is, the new bishops due to be consecrated with or without papal mandate on July 1, its priests - and its people: the thousands of  faithful Catholics who attend the Traditional Latin Mass celebrated in its 'chapels' - the funeral parlours, garages and sitting rooms to which they've been consigned, as to latter-day Irish Mass rocks, for years, by the Vatican's conciliar, Novus Ordo, Synodal Ape of the Church.


The French newspaper Tribune Chretienne states this will come as a shock to many Catholics who assist at SSPX Masses. Actually, it wasn't even a surprise to the SSPX community gathered today in a garage in rural Hawke's Bay, New Zealand. There, where a young Australian priest called down the Son of God onto a portable altar to the accompaniment of quacking ducks and barking dogs, the mood was one of subdued excitement. 


They would be honoured, they said, to be excommunicated by such a 'pope' as Leo and such a prefect of the Dicastery of the Faith as 'Cardinal' Tucho Fernandez. Such an 'excommunication', they said, would carry no weight in the eyes of God and they'd be proud to be blackballed by a Vatican which operates now as an NGO rather than a religion, and whose CEO would be defined by any such draconian, unprecedented action as a tyrant. 


The young Australian priest preached a simple sermon on the immutability of God, His  power to do "all in heaven and upon earth" (Mt 28:18) and His unfailing help. No mention was made of the episcopal consecrations but the message was clear. On July 1, three weeks before he says his monthly Mass again in that garage, his little flock will quite likely find themselves 'excommunicated'. They will simply continue, like all SSPX Massgoers in Australia and New Zealand, to pray the Rosary every day, as often as possible, for their new bishops and the graces the Church will need to accompany them. 


Trad Inc doomsayers are prophesying the desertion of priests and people from the Society but today, as the clouds of persecution darken, it was standing room only in that garage. More attended - including young Pacifika men with a toddler in tow and the usual travellers from Wairoa - than ever before.   


They know that the Church has canon law which cannot be contradicted by a pope (not even a true pope) on a whim. They know the objections the Society has to the errors of Vatican II and they don't wish to belong to a new world religion which insists on its members adhering to error, which has no rights - least of all to souls who have been lost already by believing that error and millions more who may be lost in the future in Leo's reign of arbitrariness and ambiguity. 


SSPX Massgoers are generally - by contrast with Novus Ordo-ites - well formed by their vastly better formed priests. They suspect Leo's new religion will tell them that attending the SSPX will not fulfil their Sunday obligation, when that same religion makes no such pronouncement on the schismatic Orthodox. 


They suspect that what Leo means by "We must move forward" is that his new religion, having excluded all faithful Catholics, will soon radically include sodomites, as in "Todos, Todos, Todos!" (Everyone, Everyone, Everyone!) They know it was Francis/Bergoglio who said it and they know Leo/Prevost is the same heretic, just better-dressed and sweeter-spoken - which makes him all the more a threat to souls.
These SSPX Massgoers gathered today in a garage know that the heroic Bishop Athanasius Schneider (slated to be Stricklanded) was Apostolic Visitator for the Vatican to the SSPX for two years. He found the Society to be "fully Catholic". And they want Leo/Prevost to answer Bishop Schneider's question:

“Why is the unconditional acceptance of the texts of Vatican II presented as a conditio sine qua non for full communion with the Holy See, while no comparable requirement exists with respect to the pastoral, disciplinary, or non-definitive teachings of the preceding twenty Ecumenical Councils?”
Leo won't answer. He can't without exposing his error, and he cannot excommunicate the faithful SSPX without exposing his own rank hypocrisy in welcoming, tolerating and promoting heresy. Leo has made himself ridiculous, bowing and scraping to an Anglican 'Archbishop' and to 'Bad Bunny', while unsullying himself and his white pretender's papal robes by meeting with the Society - whose only offence is refusal to kowtow to his new religion's god, Vatican II.


Who knows? Once having 'excommunicated' the SSPX, Leo might go the whole nine yards of idiocy. The SSPX could be fêted and fawned upon at St Peter's like Dame Sarah Mullaly and the Royals, and invited as separated brethren to ecumenical prayer meetings in the Vatican. And finally, they could get to meet 'Pope Leo'!



In regard to the Vatican's predicted excommunications, in his otherwise excellent commentary (see link below) Antony Stine quotes the 'diabolical disorientation' comment of 'Sr Lucia' of Fatima. In the context of what Bishop Schneider clearly names as "a new religion" and Vatican II's intention to change the faith to adapt it to the world, the phrase is  commonly used. But the 'Sr Lucia' he quotes was a fraud, a Vatican stooge used to defuse the true Sr Lucia's revelation of the Third Secret of Fatima and its condemnation of modernist Rome.



And while the architects of the conciliar church may be characterised as 'diabolical', in no way are they 'disoriented'. They knew, and they know now, exactly what they were/are doing. As +Schneider has stated, Vatican II's intention was to change the faith to adapt it to the world.


The SSPX Massgoers at that garage in the Hawke's Bay countryside know why they're likely to be excommunicated, and why it would be an honour. 


Because they know and believe the teaching of St Paul, Apostle to the Gentiles:  "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema" (Gal 1:8).



https://x.com/RealAdVaticanum/status/2067288450072739884/photo/1


 From Radical Fidelity:


According to a June 19 report published by Tribune Chrétienne, the Vatican is reportedly preparing a document in light of the coming Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) episcopal consecrations, that will not only see its clergy and leadership being designated schismatic (and therefor excommunicated), but also potentially the faithful who regularly attend its chapels.

 

This will come as a shock for the many Catholics who assist at SSPX Masses, who expected that only the bishops involved in the consecration would be excommunicated.

 

According to sources cited by Tribune Chrétienne, discussions in apostate Rome are no longer focused solely on the Society’s leadership. The proposed document could reportedly affect the entire structure of the SSPX, including its approximately 700 priests, seminaries, apostolates, and even the faithful who regularly participate in its sacramental life.

 

If such a measure were enacted, it would represent an historic escalation in the long-running conflict between Rome and the Society founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

 

For decades, many Catholics attending SSPX chapels have considered themselves fully Catholic while seeking to preserve the traditional faith, liturgy, and sacraments. The possibility that these faithful could now be treated as participants in a schismatic body would be unprecedented.

 

The report follows recent comments by “Pope” Leo XIV regarding the SSPX’s planned priestly ordinations in July. Speaking at Castel Gandolfo, the Pope reportedly expressed concern over what he described as a refusal to accept certain teachings of the Second Vatican Council and warned of the consequences of a further rupture with Rome.

 

His remarks have been interpreted by many observers as a final “appeal” before stronger canonical measures are taken. But, some have expressed surprise that SSPX leaders have not been granted a direct audience with the “Pope” despite the seriousness of the situation and the potential significance of the upcoming ordinations.

 

The concerns raised by the report are not limited to the Society itself.

Several traditional communities that remain fully recognized by Rome are reportedly following developments with growing unease. The article points to what many perceive as inconsistent treatment of institutes attached to the traditional liturgy.

 

Some communities have faced restrictions regarding the celebration of the traditional Mass or the use of traditional ordination rites, while others have received permissions. Critics describe the situation as one marked by uncertainty and arbitrariness, making it increasingly difficult for traditional Catholics to understand Rome’s long-term intentions toward the ancient liturgical heritage of the Church.

 

The report also notes increasing firmness from Vatican officials such as “Cardinal” Arthur Roche and “Cardinal” Víctor Manuel Fernández, alongside the stance now associated with the usurper, “Pope” Leo XIV.

 

For many traditional Catholics, the most pressing question now is no longer simply the future of the SSPX, but whether Catholics who wish to preserve the traditional Roman Rite and remain faithful to the Church will continue to have a secure place within the synodal ecclesiastical structures.

 

The possibility that regular attendance at SSPX chapels could carry severe canonical consequences would mark a significant departure from previous decades of dialogue and accommodation. Such a move would affect countless families who have never regarded themselves as outside the Church and who have sought only to maintain the liturgical and spiritual traditions handed down through the centuries.

 

Should the reports prove accurate, the weeks following the SSPX ordinations in July could become a decisive turning point in the relationship between Rome and the traditionalist movement worldwide.

 

Radical Fidelity was made aware of this development by the Return to Tradition You Tube Channel.https://youtu.be/lfcC0GVvCtU

Our Lady, Co-redemptrix, pray for us…

Our Lady, Mediatrix of all Graces, pray for us…

Viva Christo Rey!  https://radicalfidelity.substack.com/p/just-in-rome-reportedly-considering?utm_source=post-email-title&p

 



















107 comments:

  1. Sharon Juenemann21 June 2026 at 15:44


    Intentionally trying to destroy the church!

    ReplyDelete

  2. All of these derogatory remarks about the Pope and the Church! Did you all forget that Jesus gave His Church the authority to loose or bind? Jesus knew that there would be changes needed as time goes by! Thats why He gave His Church that power! This organization isnt preserving anything! Theyre bringIng separation and division into the Church! The Pope(s) have been more than generous giving them time to adhere to the rules and come back to the Church! Priests take a vow of obedience! But they have been blatently defying the Church for decades! Theyve been given time and patience but now theyre stepping over the line! They dont make the rules! And theyre doing Satans work by trying to drive a wedge in between the clergy and the faithful! As far as Im concerned, good riddance! This is just like the reformation when the Church became splintered by those that thought their ideas were better! We dont need these rogue priests and bishops that think breaking the rules is for the good of the Church! Jesus promised to protect His Church, and Im sticking with the winning side!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gram Slam so you consider Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Apostolic Visitator for the Vatican to the Society who found it "fully Catholic" to be a 'rogue' bishop!
      You would do well to consider these words of Jesus: "But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?"(Lk 18:8)

      Delete

    2. Gram Slam, That you choose to follow the apostasy and heresy of Vatican II, speaks volumes!

      Delete

    3. Jacks Simon Yea, it says that I know the importance of the Mass which is the consecration of bread and wine into the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ! Jesus is there in the Novus Ordo just as much as the TLM! My loyalty is to Rome and the Vicar of Christ that the Holy Spirit has chosen, not to you whiney TLM people who get ticked off because youre not getting your way! And who the hell are you to judge me? Christ gave His Church the authority to loose or bind, and that it would be accepted in heaven, which means that the Novus Ordo is accepted in heaven! Thats your problem if youre not aware of what Jesus told His apostles! Or are you saying that Jesus was lying? Because according to scripture, the Novus Ordo, and the changes made by Vatican II, are approved by the Lord!

      Delete

    4. We are the unchanged and unchangeable Truth. The Church does not change with the whims of man.

      Delete
    5. Grand Slam is correct that the Church has the power to bind and loose. Many Catholics attend both forms of the Mass and there are many other Catholic rites that Catholics may also attend. The vast majority of Catholics who attend the TLM are faithful Catholics who do not accept what the SSPX is doing or think that they are going the right way about it. There are a number of traditional orders that prove they can offer the TLM and remain faithful to the Holy Father and the Church, while not agreeing with the liberal factions in the Church. As Pope Benedict said “The liturgy cannot be manufactured, nor can it be frozen in a particular historical form.” It is only by remaining in the Church can Catholics push back against liberal elements. The SSPX has achieved nothing by isolating themselves and now on the brink of being excommunicated once more. An ex-SSPX attendeed said when he left he was surprised to find that hardly any Catholic knew of the existence of the SSPX. They are indeed very small numbers. A number of between 4 and 20 attend in Hamilton after 30 years of coming here. There will be even less if they are excommunicated.

      Delete

  3. Gram Slam I'm afraid your stated beliefs demonstrate the Novus Ordo effect. Apostasy has crept up on NO Massgoers without their knowing it - as one myself through hunger for the Eucharist I see the evidence clearly. There's considerable doubt as to the validity of NO ordinations and their priests' intent to confect the Eucharist, which is essential to the Sacrament,.
    The Holy Spirit guides the cardinal-electors at the conclave but they are free to ignore Him and as cardinals appointed by the post-Vatican II popes, in electing Robert Prevost who has publicly worshipped a pagan idol and marched with Communists, they obviously did their own will rather than God's.
    To attribute such absolute powers as you do, to a pope (even a validly-elected pope) is the error of hyperpapalism which poor Novus Ordo catechesis has made so common in Catholics today.

    ReplyDelete

  4. Gram Slam, You Novus Ordo HERETICS can worship God YOUR way, and we TRUE CATHOLICS will worship God HIS way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jacks Simon
    V-II is the BIGGEST HERESY to occur in the Catholic Church since 1900! Those priests who offer both the TLM and the NOM are nothing more than "wolves in sheep's clothing".
    We have ONE TLM in Duluth, MN on Sunday afternoon. That priest's "day job" is "Director of Liturgy" for the Diocese of Duluth (V-II/NOM).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Jacks Simon Have you listened to Kennedy Hall's presentation on Vat II and the Charismatic movement? It's an eye opener.
      https://youtube.com/watch?v=cXvWNAOLBWY&is=i8gcPmZKw8AFTn7-

      Delete

    2. Ed Smith, WOW! I always knew the Charismaniacs were screwy. They're unhinged, too!

      Delete

    3. Jacks Simon Awesome you saw it. I've been reposting this wherever I can. Wake up some of these folks. 🤷‍♂️

      Delete
  6. Karen Metty
    You cannot be excommunicated for telling the truth, and practicing the faith, the true faith I happen to stand with those who stand with the Latin mass look at the things that this pope stands for, and Frances before him first of all, they nominated some of the very worst priest to the highest places and offices in the Catholic Church. We’re not talking good Catholic priest we’re talking Catholic priest, who are homosexuals who are perverts who hid all of the rape and bad stuff that went on in the church, the same people who promoted and moved the pedophiles into other parishes and look at what they stand for they worshiped to Pacha mama. They had the nerve to put her on the altar next to the tabernacle of our Lord Jesus Christ. They bless same-sex marriages, and then out of the other side of their mouth. They’re saying they’re not, but they are. They’re promoting the worst of the worst into the highest places so that Leo was elected. He was not chosen by the Holy Spirit. How can you say that what was practiced for almost 2000 years is wrong and now what they’re saying is no right they don’t want you to knee before the blessed sacrament just look at their fruits and if you can convince me that they have not done wrong then I will go along and believe what you’re saying, but you can’t convince me because I’ve looked at what they’ve done and what they’ve done is totally anti the Catholic Church

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Karen Metty So he wasnt chosen by the Holy Spirit., So the Holy spirit told you that. !!?? Did it..

      Delete

  7. Lots said about the SSPX doing this without the popes permission. Almost nothing about about canon law that the SSPX is leaning on.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Maetyu Sinbunim21 June 2026 at 16:37


    You do know that Archbishop Sheen was not supportive of the SSPX? As for crisis in the Church, when has there not been crisis and persecution. Hace un escándalo por unas pavada. Mejor confiar en Cristo Jesus guiando su Iglesia que en unos que se creen mas que el Maestro.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Julia du Fresne21 June 2026 at 16:39


      Maetyu Sinbunim I'm sorry to say that Ven Fulton Sheen's beatification is questionable.

      Delete
  9. Well, Julia, you have nothing to worry about as you have incurred latae sententiae excommunication for stating Pope Leo is an anti-pope and that the Catholic Church is the ape of the church. By stating that, you have denied the indefectability of the Church so have also fallen into heresy. You may declare that you are not excommunicated and laugh and joke that you will ignore any excommunication, but any priest who knows you are will have to refuse you Holy Communion if you go up to receive and so you will no doubt be restricted to attending SSPX Masses in future unless you recant your heresy.

    ReplyDelete

  10. Janet Curran to state that Leo is an antipope is not to deny the 'indefectability' (sic) of the Church. A number of men have been declared antipopes before now.
    Denial of Holy Communion would be a terrible deprivation, but Our Lord says "Blessed are the persecuted" and I know from experience that when I do His will I can rely on His almighty power to succour me.

    ReplyDelete

  11. Here we go again… Pope Leo XIV has ‘beseeched’ SSPX not to follow through to the impending consecration of their Bishops… The same thing Pope St John Paul 2 have asked SSPX founder Lefebvre not to, but have done so anyway. That lead to him being excommunicated!😏😏🤨
    That would be the given ‘direct outcome and conclusion’…So, your “Just in: Rome reportedly…” Are nothing short of spreading LIES and DIVISIONS!!!😏😏🤨

    ReplyDelete
    Replies


    1. Raymund Mira do please specify the 'LIES'in the post.
      +Lefebvre was excommunicated for his refusal to accept the error, ambiguity he saw and the heresy he foresaw at Vatican II; the SSPX today are persecuted for the same crime, of faithfulness to the Magisterium and doctrine of centuries of Church teaching before the Modernists gained the upper hand.
      Pope Leo may have 'beseeched' (sic) the SSPX but he has not acted as a father as any pope would, by meeting them.

      Delete

  12. Julia du Fresne When you claim the Catholic Church is the ape of the Church that is where you commit heresy. You are denying the indefectibility of the Church. But you are not doing His will. Splitting the Church and making the statements that you do is not His will. You are fooling yourself but you don't fool the rest of us and you will reach the stage where a priest will know what you are writing and will have to refuse you Holy Communion.

    ReplyDelete


  13. Janet Curran the Church herself is not affected by the self-evident fact of Modernists like Leo and Tucho striving to supplant her with an heretical NGO managed by sodomites and their sympathisers. The Church remains indefectible, just as she has when persecuted by the antipopes of the past.
    No priest will 'have to' refuse me Holy Communion. To act in accord with an apostate Vatican would be to exercise his own free will as an apostate himself.

    ReplyDelete

  14. Now is the time to separate the wheat from the chaff. It's happening and the fight has begun. The time of the catacombist has come.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dawn Whitney L'Italien22 June 2026 at 01:11


    Modern day persecution of the true faithful.
    They don’t bend to the passing winds and fancies of the world, but stand strong in tradition.
    Stay strong, SSPX. May God continue to be your guide.

    ReplyDelete

  16. Amen. There are different types of martyrs, this may be our time. Standing strong for the church of our Lord He gave us . Thank you for the faithfilled leaders of the fsspx, so grateful for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies



    1. Susan Walker
      One would have to accept his Legitimacy first for a EXCOMMUNUCATION to be valid!

      Delete

    2. Well I stand with the fsspx, I believe he’s the Pope, but Our Lady of LaSalette warned us, and I believe Her. Thanks be to God, the fsspx speaks and continues the true teaching of the church. I will continue to pray for the Pope and those who’ve gone astray. God told us, the gates of hell will not prevail against His church. Those who continue in His church will continue to love Him and will suffer because of their love for Him and the true church.

      Delete
    3. JoEllen McMahon22 June 2026 at 01:15


      RJ Mills Brilliant

      Delete
  17. Elaine Williams22 June 2026 at 01:15


    God knows what is in each of our hearts. That would be suicide for the Church, many faithful support the SSPX.

    ReplyDelete

  18. Elaine Williams There have been many instances like this throughout church history, the gates of hades shall not prevail… the church will stand until the end of the age.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Veronica Roque-Ortiz22 June 2026 at 01:16


    Let them, I'll will remain standing aside the SSPX

    ReplyDelete

  20. I love the SSPX

    ReplyDelete

  21. Wrong move by Leo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mary McDermott Coyle22 June 2026 at 01:18


      Marty Lynn wrong move making him pope, but that was the goal of francis.

      Delete

    2. Mary McDermott Coyle
      The goal of the globalists.

      Delete

    3. Meg Crow The globalists have no say in the matter, but are clearly forcing their will upon the Church. They need to get on their knees before God and quit harassing the Chuch.

      Delete

  22. Marty Lynn Absolutely agree. If he pushes through an "excommunication," it will be a pastoral failure. Pope Benedict XVI, in his quiet way, was mending the rift, especially considering Summorum Pontificum. Then came Francis and now Leo, and the fallen world is having a field day.

    ReplyDelete

  23. Paul Bulas that is why they wanted Pope Ratzinger out- he was too traditional and he KNEW what V2 was SUPPOSED to be -not what fiasco it is!

    ReplyDelete
  24. JoEllen McMahon22 June 2026 at 01:23


    Marty Lynn He is the Pope but he is a very bad Pope under evil influences.

    ReplyDelete

  25. Stop spreading this mess all the time.
    The fake excom” is something of the devil, that none of people of Faith cares about. It is fake, it is not happening in the realm of God.
    Pray for the L14 and the Vatican usurpers instead - for their conversion to the Catholic Faith, if you are concerned about their souls at all; and about the souls of those whom they are leading to hell (with their NWO „religion” without God).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JoEllen McMahon22 June 2026 at 01:25


      Meg Crow I totally agree with you. I would completely ignore it. In early days of the Church people would run into evil and burn at the stake. We can afford to be brave here.

      Delete
  26. RomelCan Lazaro22 June 2026 at 01:26

    RomelCan Lazaro If this is so, I am not bothered at all. God is my ultimate judge. If I am excommunicated because of my support for the church's tradition and the SSPX, help me God. Deo Gratias 🙏 #SSPX #CatholicFaith #catholictradition

    ReplyDelete
  27. Stephen M Garbacik22 June 2026 at 01:27


    Go SSPX!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Stephen M Garbacik God will prevail.

      Delete
    2. Daria Demkovich22 June 2026 at 01:28


      Stephen M Garbacik new SSPX St. Joseph’s going up in Armada, MI

      Delete

  28. The Vatican doesn’t need to start a battle that they’re not equipped nor prepared to win.

    ReplyDelete

  29. Come to Orthodox theology

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Mustafa Ali it is possible that many will flee the modernist Vatican synod religion..

      Delete

    2. Mustafa Ali That’s where most all of these schismatics like Julia will end up. It only makes sense. They’ve all made themselves popes already.

      Delete

    3. Greg Ryan You have no idea what you are about, it’s better to be quiet than to sin.

      Delete

    4. Greg Ryan was VC II pastoral or did it address dogmatic issues? Were the documents of VC II declared Infallible (Seat of Peter)? What specific elements are being denied by the SSPX? Does the CCP appoint state approved Bishops and then rubber stamped by the Vatican?? Did popes francis and Leo allow Pachamama? Did Leo allow a heretic female archbishop to offer a 'blessing' at the Tomb of St Peter? Did Francis invite Transgender hookers into the Vatican for Lunch and a photo session. Is the Church a synod democracy?? What makes the eastern church liturgies legit but the Latin Liturgy NOT legit? Questions and yet the Vatican will use the hammer to force obeyance.

      Delete
  30. Jamison Harrison22 June 2026 at 01:36


    Mustafa Ali why lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Mustafa Ali why should we? 😃 You left Jesus' teaching on one Peter and on divorce

      Delete

  31. But in the meantime, Communist China is allowed to decide who the bishops in China will be!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Jamison Harrison22 June 2026 at 01:38


    Going to be an honour to be excommunicated by a liberal commie church

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Jamison Harrison Jesus is the head of the Church. These men in the papal seat are impostors.

      Delete
    2. Jamison Harrison22 June 2026 at 01:39


      Cindy Snow rome has lost the faith the SSPX have not

      Delete
  33. Charlotte Pettit22 June 2026 at 01:40


    https://youtu.be/2Mxf1apeFsc?si=KKU-xKead_-jpWZ-
    This is a must watch… where Satan has already penetrated the Church. As Paul VI said the smoke of Satan has already entered the Church.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Kathryn Osborn22 June 2026 at 01:41


    How can you do Gods will and be Schismatic?????

    ReplyDelete
  35. Christopher Synnott22 June 2026 at 01:41


    Vivat SSPX 🌹

    ReplyDelete
  36. Maine DelPilar22 June 2026 at 01:42


    Pachamama worshippers can’t excommunicate Catholics.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Paul Bulas
    "Leo has made himself ridiculous, bowing and scraping to an Anglican female 'Archbishop' and to 'Bad Bunny' while unsullying himself and his white pretender's papal robes with the Society - whose only offence is failure to kowtow to the new religion's god of Vatican II. "
    The parable of the wheat and the tares comes to mind. The tares are getting easier to pick out from among the wheat. 🌾🎋

    ReplyDelete
  38. Comment above was made by Paul Bulas.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Joseph Ochieng22 June 2026 at 01:46


    Bye SSPX. Couldn’t have happened to a nicer bunch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Joseph Ochieng shame on you!

      Delete
    2. Joseph Ochieng22 June 2026 at 01:47


      Are you being serious right there? Honestly , fo you want me to be ashamed of saying bye to a fraternity that, day in and day out, calls the pope ‘heretic’, ‘satanic’ or the ‘devil’? The shame is yours.

      Delete

    3. Joseph Ochieng Shame on you even more for bearing false witness, dude, if that's your gender.

      Delete

    4. Joseph Ochieng I'm afraid you're exhibiting a typical error of the conciliar church; hyperpapalism. Another name for it is papalotry.

      Delete
  40. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Dale Fleischfresser22 June 2026 at 01:52


    The Great Apostasy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Dale Fleischfresser yes it is. It'll get worse, it's just starting.

      Delete

    2. Laurie Conder it started in 1959.

      Delete
  42. Ged Hutchinson22 June 2026 at 01:54


    They are showing their true colours now out in the open .

    ReplyDelete

  43. Imagine the "inclusivity" and healing benefits the church would receive if Leo gave his blessing to the new bishops. It would go a long way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shawn McFerrin22 June 2026 at 01:55


      Ed Smith He won't because the SSPX is a threat to his nwo... While Leo dismantles the Church, SSPX seeks to uphold Her

      Delete

    2. Ed Smith Exactly what should be happening. It would be a true "duc in altum" moment for him.

      Delete

    3. Ed Smith they say all ways lead to heaven, they allow Protestants and Muslims space in the Vatican. Except they treat traditional Catholics like pariahs.

      Delete
    4. JoEllen McMahon22 June 2026 at 01:58


      Cindy Snow Exactly

      Delete
  44. Ed Smith
    Cindy Snow They are indeed hypocrites. Is it wrong to say out loud what they seem to be saying over a loud speaker? I don't think so.
    I was just listening to Michael Matt from the Remnant Underground with some Current Events:
    https://www.facebook.com/share/1XbkcqCUrX/

    ReplyDelete
  45. Bernard Ange Gabriel Omtom22 June 2026 at 01:59


    No problem. Bring it on.

    ReplyDelete

  46. There is a sinister motive behind this move ..Modernists in Rome are getting desperate….AFTER THESE MOVE BY ROME. MANY FAITHFUL WILL SEE THE TRUE COLOURS OF MODERNISTS IN ROME. MODERNISTS CANNOT MOCK GOD.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Rhynard Whitwell22 June 2026 at 02:01


    Philip Kimbu the blessed lady, she teaches us to receive holy communion. With true devotion and conviction that we are receiving the body, blood soul and divinity of Christ.\n And that we should not be walking away down. The church isles with the host in our mouth. But we should consume the host fully, and why we are doing so. We should be in a state of grace.\n Receiving, and after.\n The modernness tell us that we should receive in our hands. And then we should go to the challice. If we don't, we are not receiving the fullness of Christmas faithful, we'll see much of the false teachers. But will it make any difference why these people are running the church?\n And controlling the parishes, cardinal Nichols expelled A Latin society in London\n Yet they were preaching the truth and doing the Lord's work, they were saving souls. There probably behaviour, the way they are is because they know they are on their last lakes.\n Too many people are leaving the novice order and aheaden towards those who celebrate the mass in tradition. Many eangelical.\nAre converting to the traditional Catholic Church.They're not going to the novice order as much

    ReplyDelete

  48. His words and actions are invalid

    ReplyDelete

  49. I don’t follow fake news. I’m not going to follow this page anymore. 

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The story comes from a very reliable source.

      Delete

    2. solid commentary on the state of affairs. faith as taught by Jesus vs modernist, synod Many Pathways lead by padre Bobby aka the first muslim pope.

      Delete
  50. Anthony P Stine22 June 2026 at 02:06

    Anthony P Stine
    ·
    Even if that was the pretender Lucia, the pretender accidentally told the truth. Most of the faithful are diabolically disoriented, and the Vatican occupiers largely think they're doing God's will.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony P Stine it does seem beyond doubt that Sr Lucia pre-1960 was a different woman from the post-'60 version.
      I agree that most Novus Ordo Massgoers are diabolically disoriented. I wish I could think the same of the men in the Vatican.

      Delete

  51. My casket will be in front of an SSPX priest and altar.

    ReplyDelete

  52. Its a joke the vatican give Jesus to enemies of Christ.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Bradley Terence Skelchy22 June 2026 at 02:33


    Rome has lost the faith

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. The Pope and Rome is dead wrong on this issue

      Delete

  54. They can try to amplify our fear, but they will not succeed. They are in a schism, not us.

    ReplyDelete

  55. Who cares what the brotherhood in Rome decides , they are not even catholic anymore

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jose Mariano Garces22 June 2026 at 02:38


      Linda Henye they are protestant already.

      Delete
  56. Maetyu Sinbunim22 June 2026 at 02:39


    The Church is not built only on the whims of the SSPX. It’s a broad umbrella.

    ReplyDelete

  57. Hilarious. Desperate. Deranged.

    ReplyDelete

  58. So ridiculous. If anything, should bolster the flock

    ReplyDelete

  59. More recent news on the Remnant Underground with Michael Matt
    https://www.facebook.com/share/1XbkcqCUrX/

    ReplyDelete
  60. JoEllen McMahon22 June 2026 at 02:41


    I saw where the 3rd Secret of Fatima was really about Leo and you can look it up. An American born Pope from his Order with a specific warning on Apostasy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another made up prophecy about the Third Secret of Fatima - I've heard of dozens of them.

      Delete

  61. Why even bother with Rome. They are buddies with the Chinese communist regime. They accept their consecration.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Elizabeth Lane22 June 2026 at 02:44


    The SSPX’s charism is rebellion against the Holy See in name tradition. My proof? They think that the way to protect Apostalic succession is by breaking it. I’m ashamed of every Catholic here who has already broken Canon 751 and 752 and have sealed themselves as traitors to the Church they claim to love and serve. I see you. God the Father sees you. God the Son sees you and the Holy Spirit sees you. You are not holy. You are not spotless and you will be judged for your judgment against Christ’s Church

    ReplyDelete
  63. Kenneth Adrian Emuang22 June 2026 at 02:46


    So much for Pope Leo....our Shepherd

    ReplyDelete
  64. Christine Francis22 June 2026 at 02:47


    Wow - Here we go!
    Popes are to preserve and pass on the Deposit Of Faith, they are NOT to fabricate a New Mass.
    It's called the heresy of Modernism - manifested clearly at Vatican II - 1960s with the Novus Ordo Mass = New order Mass.
    *Be faithful to what the Church has always taught from the Apostles. ❤️
    SSPV.ORG offers the True Mass and Sacraments as before Vatican II. It's called the Mass Of All Time.
    God knows the difference.
    God bless. 🙏

    ReplyDelete