Wednesday, 19 March 2025

NZ SCHOOLS' PRIDE WEEK IS A CRYING SHAME

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). Protestant rants will not be published on this page.





  





"Our churches have given up." Yes. 


Rodney Hide is right over target: the shameless sexual grooming of children by New Zealand's Ministry of Education. Now, although the Coalition dragged its feet, it's had to bin Labour's Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE). And oh, the anguish of the lefties, whose career prospects in the Mental Health Foundation and outfits like Sexual Wellbeing Aotearoa are drastically dimmed by the likely loss of disoriented, disturbed patients and clients. 


However. With InsideOUT opening registrations for 'Schools Pride Week Aotearoa' their supply of demonically derailed boys and girls should improve. Especially if the NZ Catholic Bishops live up to the reputation they gained in 2022, with 'Aroha and Diversity in Catholic Schools', of encouraging their younger flock in sexual deviancy.


Rodney Hide reckons paedophilia is the next sexual taboo up for breaking but pederasty might not be so popular as the taxpayer-funded broadcaster Radio New Zealand's promotion: polygamy and polymory.https://familyfirst.org.nz/2021/06/03/state-broadcaster-rnz-does-sales-pitch-on-polygamy-polyamory/


It's not only schools robbing children of childhood, but also libraries and local councils. And when fake Bishop Brian Tamaki's troops wade in to the kids' defence they're arrested - by a Muslim in a hijab - while the real, Catholic, bishops prefer to prattle about the footling but fiendish Synod on Synodality. Archbishop sees new Synod pathway for local churches | CathNews New Zealand 



No comment ...


 

Former ACT Party leader Rodney Hide lets loose:


Warning: If you are likely to be upset by exposure to material available to your children and grandchildren, do not proceed.


I fear that in 20 years time the age of consent will be gone. Middle aged men will be bragging about sex with pubescent girls, P will be added to the LGBTQI+ alphabet and pedophiles will parade their Pride.

 

It’s the next sexual taboo to fall.

 

It’s difficult to see a defence being mounted. Our traditional institutions such as schools and Parliament are the problem. Our churches have given up. Our moral lines have eroded.


Our schools teach underage children how to have sex.


The Ministry recommended “Navigating the Journey” curriculum inflicts graphic and detailed sexual content on our children without parental knowledge or consent.

 

I have covered that here.



Feel free to enlarge this image - but you're warned 

 

But this week I re-read the curriculum with an eye on the age of consent. It’s shocking.


I focussed on Year 9 which is 13 years old. The message should be: Don’t! It’s against the law.

 


Instead we get this:

If someone reports under age sex, the police have to investigate it. The police will look into how old both people are, if there was consent, and if anyone was harmed. If there is a big age gap between both people, for example, 14 and 20 years old, the police take it very seriously and are likely to charge the older person. It is the older person’s responsibility to be sure that the other person is at least 16 years old. If one or both people are very young, or there is harm happening,

... If one or both people are very young, there IS harm happening ... 

Oranga Tamariki may also get involved. This is to ensure that the young people having sex are safe and protected.

Young people having sex are always UNSAFE and UNPROTECTED.


The message should be DON'T. But the message reads instead as just a warning: it is only a problem if someone reports it and the police won’t treat it seriously unless there’s a big age gap. And it is only the older person who is in trouble. You will be okay.


That’s the message from our schools. The law can be safely ignored.

 

Dwell also on the conclusion to the paragraph: “This is to ensure that the young people having sex are safe and protected.” Quite what the “this” is referring to is unclear: is it the Oranga Tamariki intervention or the entire paragraph including the law and the police?

 

Either way the purpose of Oranga Tamariki, the law and the police is not to ensure young people are safe and protected: the purpose is to ensure people under 16 don’t have sex. The law is not to ensure safe sex: its purpose is to protect children.


 

Further down the page we have this paragraph:


However, sometimes people under 16 still want to have sex, even though they know the law. It is important that both people consent and contraceptives are used carefully to prevent an unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmissible infections (STIs). Young people can legally access sexual health care at any age, including contraceptive and abortion advice, as per the Sterilisation, and Abortion Amendment Act 1990.

 





 Remember: this is the Ministry-recommended curriculum for 13 year olds: Here’s the law, but not to worry, use a condom, and you can always have an abortion. That’s what our schools are teaching 13 year olds. It is unbelievable to me.

 

The paedophiles must love our schools.

 

Wander into your library and take a look at the youth section. The youth section is for 13 years and up. It’s next to the children’s section. I did. I was deeply disturbed.


It has books like Diary of a Wimpy Kid. Precocious ten year olds are reading there. On display is a brightly coloured book: "Welcome to Sex".

 

 

"It's fine", says the Classification Office - for kindy children. https://youtu.be/pj40kE6pM48

 

Here’s a starter for ten: what sort of person welcomes 13 year olds to sex? Our libraries are doing the paedophiles work for them!


I know technically pedophiles are defined as those attracted to under 13 year olds but my point is made and pedophile is the word I prefer over “minor-attracted”. The term “minor-attracted” is used to disguise pedophilia as just another sexual orientation to add to the long list.

 


“Welcome to Sex” is disgustingly graphic. It is on display as a recommended book. It is one of many of that genre in the Youth Section.

 

 

'Fun fur and fabulousness' at Ponsonby's Gay Dog Day


That libraries and councils allow and promote this is unbelievable to me. That mothers take their children along is beyond my comprehension.

 


I am a free speech absolutist. I support the Free Speech Union one hundred percent. Free Speech Union Jonathan Ayling is brilliant and way smarter than me.


But on Drag Story Hour he is wrong. He sees it as a Free Speech issue. It is not.


My free speech absolutism stops at the kids. Why? Because we have a God-given duty to protect them. Not just your own kids but all kids. They need a childhood. They need to grow and mature. They need to be safe and protected.


We succeed as a society by the successful raising of children.


In the normal course of events the Police and the Courts would shut down Drag Story Hour. But that shows how our traditional defences for the protection of children have collapsed.


The police arrest those attempting to protect the children.
Maybe it’s not 20 years. Maybe it’s just 10. RODNEY HIDE: The End of Childhood



 

St Joseph and the Child
Jose de Ribera

Joseph most chaste, pray for us


5 comments:

  1. "Our churches have given up" you say. No, worse than that, too often they are complicit. Especially the Catholic Church, which deliberately shut parents out of even commenting when the Catholic Church recently formulated its ghastly policy document on the 'modern' way to handle (encourage?) LGBT in Catholic schools. The incidence of stated LGBT inclination amongst school children has skyrocketed about 10 fold, from about 3% a generation ago to approaching 30% today. Our kids are left utterly vulnerable, and parents are shut out of what goes on in schools to make sure they cant defend their children's right to be normal. But don't ask the Catholic bishops about this because they won't even discuss it.

    Our bishops are so synodal, always listening (I'm being sarcastic now).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually, the Synodal 'listening' is neither synodal nor listening. The Bishops should withdraw their consent to this depraved content . Signed, Jonah.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well look at this demonic poster See what happens when general society does not speak up In fact they denigrate those who do Even you with your fake Bishop insult Tamaki speaks up when other pastors and priests with weak limp wrists go with the seemingly popular LBg etc flow

    ReplyDelete

  4. 'Apostle' Brian is the real deal, great article apart from smearing him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Erika Anker it should be obvious from this and previous posts that I admire Tamaki. However he's not a bishop and I emphasise that to stress how he shows up the actual, Catholic, bishops who leave it to Tamaki to do their job for them.

      Delete