WHEN DO WE GET TO CALL THE VAX TREASON?

 

It's not just the people of New Zealand who have been betrayed, insulted and injured by the Greatest Lie ever Told. It's also Jesus Christ, Who is Truth Itself, Who suffers with His children who took the Covid vaccine in good faith, trusting in the medical profession and the Ardern Government to keep them 'safe'. 

The story told below will be hard and humiliating for vaccine believers to accept. Especially would it be hard on New Zealand's Catholic Bishops, who falsely believed they must obey Jorge Mario Bergoglio, aka Pope Francis, and foist the jab on the faithful as 'an act of love'. But "humiliation is good for the soul" (St Teresa of Avila) and the humble acceptance of this hard truth - the untold damage wrought by the mRNA injection, an experimental gene therapy - could set this pagan country on the hard road of conversion to Christ.

But of course there are sinister forces at work here and abroad to suppress the truth of the Covid hoax. Remember Reiner Füllmich? He's the lawyer who led the Corona Investigative Committee in 'Nuremberg 2' - an international push to prosecute global elites for orchestrating the fake Covid 'pandemic. You won't be surprised to know he's in prison. In Germany. He was kidnapped by German police in Mexico, on charges of embezzlement of funds donated to the Corona cause. Updates: “The Illegal Kidnapping and Persecution of Reiner Füllmich” and “Legal Expert Panel Reveals All.” – The Expose (expose-news.com)

Mary Hobbs, writer and publisher, shares a heart-wrenching story of a vaccine-injured family, lack of informed consent and their experiences with the medical profession since.

Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it.

Robert Kennedy

On a warm day in spring 2021 Kate entered a pop-up ‘vax’ clinic in trepidation. 

Her husband John had already had two experimental gene-based therapy ‘COVID’ injections, and was concerned that if the family were not injected it would put their youngest son, Michael, a type one diabetic, in danger.

John trusted the government was telling the truth when they advised COVID was dangerous, particularly to the elderly and the immuno-compromised including diabetics, but if the families of the vulnerable took the jabs that would provide protection.

The government expressed ‘concern’ for everyone’s well-being, and kept advising that if everyone received the ‘vaccine’ – touted as ‘safe and effective’ – then all would be well.

But it wasn’t.

For some time Kate held out. She was a trained naturopath, and had signed the Hippocratic Oath – First Do No Harm. She had a suspicion of ‘vaccines’ due to bad family experiences.

One of her teenage sons had injured himself and gone to the doctor for a tetanus shot. He was invited to have a measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) shot, as well. He agreed but shortly afterwards suffered an exceptionally severe case of measles – the very thing the ‘vaccine’ was meant to protect him from.

Her grandfather had taken the flu jab and immediately contracted pneumonia. Her father strongly advised him against getting the flu jab the following year, but he did. Shortly after he contracted severe pneumonia and died.

With her knowledge of naturopathy this led Kate to seek information on the experimental treatment, which led to the inescapable conclusion that there was no advantage to the family taking this poison. It was still on trial, had had insufficient testing — if any — and no one knew the full contents of the vials. If she didn’t know what was in it, how could she determine it was safe?

Meanwhile the mainstream media stepped up their government-paid advertising, putting pressure on and shouting the ‘safe and effective’ propaganda on radio stations every 30 minutes. The messages alternated with offers of free money, free sausages, or free Lotto tickets and other useless ‘rewards’, if one took the jab. Then the mandates came in, making a mockery of the New Zealand Bill of Rights.

Many thousands suffered losing their livelihoods, their homes, and sometimes their families, unless they had ‘two shots for summer’.

Michael, their younger son, had suffered type one diabetes since he was four and struggled with fluctuating blood sugar levels. At the time of the mandates, he was to be sent to Christchurch for assessment but Kate wasn’t ‘vaccinated’ so she understood they were not able to go. They would have been turned away from Ronald McDonald House – a place for parents with children at the hospital – for the same reason.

This was when the ‘unvaccinated’ were ‘not permitted’ to go anywhere except the supermarket. Kate and John were under additional stress because access to Michael’s life-saving test-strips – which informed the parents whether he needed insulin or carbohydrates – suddenly seemed mysteriously rationed to the point there was minimal supply available to them. It was like flying blind.

Michael continued to battle with fluctuating blood sugar levels and related issues. Should Kate and their two older sons should get the jabs or not? It was a stalemate. Kate decided to have just one injection as a compromise, as she harboured deep concern that urgent products like the test-strips could otherwise be witheld.

Their two older sons were not at all keen to have it either but they separately came to the same conclusion. They would have one jab if it meant helping to  protect their little brother. It was a compromise Kate felt she could make, but she resolved to seek answers to her questions at the ‘vax’ clinic.

That spring day in 2021 Kate walked the length of the hall to find a screen erected between the two queues for the jab, but conversations on both sides could clearly be heard. As Kate questioned the nurse she heard a patient on the other side of the screen, over-hearing, say to their nurse, “Oh, you've got one of those in today – I suppose you get all sorts …” 

Yes, Kate thought, I am ‘one of those’. I need more answers. She was particularly anxious to know if it was wise to get such an experimental injection when her family had a history of heart issues.

The vaccinators replied that others with heart issues were choosing to take the ‘vaccine’ to protect themselves from COVID. She was told it was ‘safe and effective’. At no stage did Kate get any information on possible severe adverse effects. As she and her sons were never fully informed about these adverse events, they were unable to give fully informed consent. The same applied to John when he received two jabs.

Unknown to Kate and John at the time, in June '21, four months before Kate went to the ‘vax’ clinic, the highly censored and pilloried NZDSOS team of courageous doctors and other medical staff had written an Open Letter to the Director General of Health, the Health and Disability Commission, the Prime Minister and others, outlining their increasing concern about the lack of information given to patients about the serious adverse events, including death.

Without this information patients could not give fully informed consent. And while unaware of the dangerous side effects, they were also subjected to the incessant lies of the ‘safe and effective’ propaganda that continued in full swing.

Every time we turn our heads the other way . . . when we tolerate what we know to be wrong, when we close our eyes and ears to the corrupt because we are too busy or too frightened, when we fail to speak up and speak out, we strike a blow against freedom and decency and justice.

Robert Kennedy

In June 2021, Dr Emanuel Garcia also spoke out about his grave concerns with regard to the jab. By July, 2021, three months before Kate had her first injection, Medsafe’s CARM system for reporting Covid-19 vaccine adverse events was already overwhelmed with reports of serious side effects.

Lynda Wharton of The Health Forum, whose task is to support Covid vaccine-affected New Zealanders, was also reporting severe adverse events and provided factual evidence and backup. Over the past four years, the heavily censored alternative media has, undaunted, tirelessly continued to get the message out.

NZDSOS and their guest writers published many articles and wrote many Open Letters to those in power concerning the vital lack of information on the serious adverse events of this experimental jab that made it impossible for anyone to give informed consent.

NZDSOS showed what informed consent should look like — from the information they had at the time — and blew the whistle on serious violations.  The dangers of this jab are now a mind-boggling eye-opener and make nonsense of the ‘safe and effective’  lies still being told by the government.

 As a result, after four years, New Zealanders, are still unable to give a fully informed consent. At the time, doctors were threatened with losing their right to practise if they gave full information of the dangers of the jab. So were nurses and other medical staff. Tragically, most fell into line - and still do. 

The legal murder of babies by abortion which began in 1977 in New Zealand was the kiss of death to the medical profession. Legal murder by proxy via mandation of the mRNA gene serum is only a logical progression down that very slippery slope of silence which signals society's acquiescence with evil. 

If only Kate and John had been given the full information they needed (including all the possible adverse events) for informed consent. They should have been informed of reports that the likelihood of spreading infection to others is up to 251 times greater in the ‘vaccinated’, than the unvaccinated. If they had known all the facts this family, and millions of other Kiwi souls, would never have taken the jab.

Kiwis and nations all over the globe were told lies and propaganda, while those valiantly trying to get the truth out, at NZDSOS and in alternative media (as on this blog - ed), were censored and gas-lit by a totalitarian government, aided by a complicit mainstream media, compliant health professionals, and others who left their allegiance to the 1990 Bill of Rights, the Hippocratic Oath and the Nuremberg Code in tatters.

There are further valuable references in regard to fully informed consent here.

In late 2021, on the orders of a US Judge, Pfizer released nine pages of tightly worded text jam-packed with adverse events, from the jab, many of which were severe and included, but not limited to, heart ailments and potentially fatal blood clots.

It was known at the time of Kate's injection that this was an experimental gene-based therapy containing mRNA, that not all of the contents had been disclosed and it had not been given full approval by Medsafe.

One of the most damning pieces of information ever to emerge was featured on a screen shot from an FDA meeting on 22 October 2020 showing a list of possible adverse event outcomes. This was BEFORE Emergency Use Authorisation was granted to Pfizer and Moderna.

This presentation was made almost exactly one year to the day before Kate and her teenage sons had the first jab, but the information was suppressed. On 15 July 2021, when NZDSOS discovered this information, they published it on their heavily censored NZDSOS website  www.nzdsos.com  Kate and her family didn’t see it.

Neither did most people in NZ and around the world.  And despite this bombshell evidence, nothing in New Zealand, or anywhere, changed. The band, treasonously, played on.

So, lacking this information, Kate took the Pfizer injection. Her two elder sons followed.

At that point, their lives changed. 

Immediately post-jab, Kate noticed the vaccinators looking at her and her sons particularly closely. When they returned to the car, John was initially relieved as he thought Michael would now be better protected. Privately, Kate was experiencing relief that they had not suffered cardiac arrest.

Within about 24 hours, Kate experienced pain at the injection site which quickly spread to her shoulder, her chest, and neck and jaw with significant pain around her heart. She felt arrhythmias and a pounding heartbeat that she had never suffered from, pre-jab. Her chest pain was severe. The pain in her arm was with her for a further 18 months. The chest pain still hovers.

One of her sons also had chest pain immediately afterwards, like Kate’s - arrhythmia, skipping beats, rapid heart rate and pounding heart. Both sons, and Kate, from the time of the jab onwards, felt very lethargic for a good part of the day, as opposed to their normal state as healthy, energetic teenagers and a healthy, very athletic mother. 

John’s relief rapidly turned to alarm as he witnessed with horror how his beloved wife and sons were affected. He was aghast at the worsening of their symptoms over the following days, weeks and months.

He's been appalled and extremely distrustful of the government and media ever since as he's witnessed first-hand their blatant and continual lies while witnessing the truth of the serious adverse effects. He will never, ever, receive another jab. None of them will. This sentiment is echoed throughout the country.

The family feel they have been utterly betrayed by those in government whom they should have been able to trust. And they have been betrayed.

I know not what treason is, if sapping and betraying the liberties of a people be not treason. 

Cato the Younger

In addition to the cardiac issues, Kate had no period for the first three months following the jab. She took two pregnancy tests, both of which were negative. After that came two weeks of excruciating, debilitating, abdominal pain, and then blood clots with copious amounts of dark blood and skin-like tissue being expelled.

Two weeks of this were followed by a constant stream of bright red blood whenever she moved. She was confined to the house over this time.

Kate feels extremely uncomfortable in sharing such intimate and private details, but she is courageously doing it to warn others and add her voice to others who've suffered likewise post-jab. She is now aware that cardiac and menstrual issues have been frequently reported as serious adverse events and are listed on the nine pages of Pfizer‘s notorious record of serious adverse events. 

Kate has researched details of adverse events on the batch number of the Pfizer jab she and the boys had. “How Bad Is My Batch?" showed the adverse events reported from 250 vials of that particular batch. 203 suffered disabilities, 203 had other adverse events, 20 suffered life-threating illnesses, and six Kiwis died — to date.

Kate sought help within the first week and had an ECG. She went to the doctor again just over three weeks after the jab, again presenting with tightness across her chest and up into her neck,with sharp, stabbing pains. She had high blood pressure, also very unusual. She told the doctor it all started after the first jab.

The doctor seemed very abrupt and impatient  He did an ECG, took blood-pressure and pulse recordings. Then, astoundingly, she was told that it was probably an intercostal injury  What this previously very fit and healthy woman had received three weeks beforehand was an experimental gene-based therapy injection that had a known risk of cardiac and menstrual injuries, among many other adverse effects. 

Kate, who before the first Pfizer jab had hardly ever seen a doctor, presented with chest pain again the following month, but then stopped seeking help because she felt stonewalled and gas-lighted.

What was the point of paying to see doctors who falsely diagnosed intercostal injuries, stress, gastric reflux — and tried to foist on her medications for those maladies  — when she had no symptoms indicating any of those issues. She had no acid reflux, wasn’t burping, the chest pain could occur at any time, and it wasn’t connected to eating. 

Any appeasement of tyranny is treason.

William Allen White

There was one hell of an elephant in the room and it had ‘side-effects from experimental gene-based therapy jab’ written in capitals in white paint, all over its rump, with blindfolded people in white coats looking at anything but that.

Kate returned for another appointment when she experienced dramatic changes in her menstrual cycle with extremely heavy bleeding and clots, and severe pain in her abdomen. This is another post-jab adverse event listed under her specific batch number, which at no time did any of the doctors note that they had investigated. Is this why? Instead, it was alleged she had menopause, yet she had no symptoms of that either.

The female doctor on duty ordered very personal tests to be done without any causal relationship in symptoms from the patient. She noted that Kate thought it was the jab and commented that she bet Kate had a ‘whole network’ of people she could call on for help, didn’t she?

When the tests returned negative, that doctor said she wanted to repeat them. During one of those appointments the same doctor palpated her tender abdomen so hard it made Kate flinch. She never sought out the potential adverse events from the batches of the Pfizer's jab Kate and her sons had received, and never addressed the elephant in the room which by this time had expanded into a herd.

The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of convenience and comfort, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.

Martin Luther King

It worried Kate that she was not asked about any recent medical treatments, and that the history she gave post “vax” was disregarded. All of her symptoms, and her sons', were experienced post-jab. Before that they were all fit and healthy. It was left to her to seek out the adverse events that had been listed from the batch she and her sons had been given and she didn’t stumble upon this information until 2024. She felt belittled, disbelieved, and abused.

When does this sort of treatment from a ‘doctor’ become covert patient abuse?  When does the desertion of the Nuremberg Code, the Bill of Rights and the Hippocratic Oath of ‘First Do No Harm’  by the Medical Council, the Nursing Council, and the government, become a betrayal after trust? As a former NZRN, I find this treatment of a patient abhorrent and a form of psychological suppression. 

The common denominator when consulting the medical profession about the serious side effects Kate and her sons had was denial that they had anything to do with the jab. They didn’t conduct detailed cardiac tests as they should but instead conducted useless tests for illnesses Kate did not have.

Kate also discovered in her health records that at the time of the injection, as she was being told it was ‘safe and effective’ and ‘other cardiac patients were getting it to avoid COVID’,  she and her elder sons had been labelled as ‘at risk’. This was never explained and it put them under added stress. She recently discovered this phrase was used for all those who had the jab and meant ‘at risk from COVID’ - a lie, as it has been clearly proven that most were in no more danger than from an average ‘flu  particularly in their age group. And why put the immune system of the vulnerable under further strain with an experimental gene-therapy?

In fact, the risk of heart injury from the jab was far greater. Kate wants to know why her concerns about her family’s cardiac history were swept aside on the day, and why the jab was ever given to her and her sons. What was the plan, in view of their family history? A quick defibrillation if she or her sons had a cardiac arrest at the ‘vax’ clinic and then to be sent home to a lifetime of side-effects, so a box could be ticked to state the jab had been delivered and the organisers could collect the money for delivering it? 

How much? Seventy bucks a shot with the potential to destroy a life? Granted, some who gave the jabs believed what they were told by the government —  regardless of the fact that, by the spring of 2021, the escalating adverse events told a different story.  But what about those at the top, who knew and who were clearly alerted to the dangers?

 

When will the continuation of this treatment — still touted as ‘safe and effective’ by the Ministry of Health and mainstream media — yet has been proven to have so many serious adverse events, be termed treason? 

According to the Black’s Law Dictionary, one of the definitions of treason is “betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power”.

Was the previous New Zealand government, and its departments, such

administered into the arms of as many New Zealanders as possible, despite not knowing the full list of contents of the injection and; either being privy to the range of severe adverse events, but not disclosing the information to New Zealanders or; not asking about the potential severe adverse events?

Regardless, the previous government knew it was an experimental gene-based therapy that had not had sufficient time for testing, yet continued to insist it was “safe and effective”, “prevented transmission” and “lessened the likelihood of contracting COVID”,  — also here — all of which are now known to be lies.

This was compounded with lies about the PCR tests that the inventor himself said would not be able to diagnose anything; the bribing and threatening of doctors, nurses, and other medical staff — through their regulatory bodies —  to fall into line, and the sponsorship of media to tout their messages without question.

Is that not a betrayal of our country into the hands of a foreign power that wishes ill upon our people? Is that not a betrayal of our freedom, our democracy, and all that our ancestors fought for in World War 2?

The Oxford Learner’s Dictionary describes treason as betraying somebody or something. Hurting somebody who trusts you, especially by lying to them — a betrayal after trust.

Everyone who has been told the jab is safe and effective has been betrayed. It began with the government, extended to medical councils, nursing councils, doctors, nurses, and other medical staff, who were threatened with loss of their jobs and deregistration if they didn’t go along with the narrative, . All of the employees in the Ministry of Health —except for one brave soul — who is currently being threatened with jail — also went along with it.

ACC has been complicit by denying obvious treatment injuries, so that traumatised and injured Kiwis who initially trusted the government were left penniless, losing their livelihoods and their homes due to their injuries, with no access to their right to be fully compensated. How do these people in such government departments sleep at night? How do they do this to fellow Kiwis who have a right to access to ACC payments for treatment injuries?

Does that fit the definition of treason to you?

 Imagine if the employees in ACC processing these claims all stood up for their fellow New Zealanders and insisted that compensation be paid. They state they cover treatment injuries, so why isn’t this being done?

How can the public trust government departments, and medical staff, who so callously and inhumanely gaslight injured Kiwis, and the relatives of those who have died due to the jab? How can Kiwis trust what is being put in place when the contract between the pharmaceutical corporations supplying the jabs remains secret — as do the contents? 

There are some incredibly brave medical staff, and others, who remain true to their Hippocratic Oath and unfailingly stand strong, warning their patients of their concerns and urging caution, particularly with novel jabs.

If it is unsafe they say so. They remained genuinely alarmed at the turn of events and risked their livelihoods to let New Zealanders know. Many of these you’ll find at NZDSOS.COM (www.nzdsos.com). Brave souls who despite having lost their jobs, and in some cases, their homes, are now focused on helping to heal the jab-injured. Heroes, each one.

In the meantime, in New Zealand, the message still going out to the public is that these injections are safe and effective and prevent transmission. That is lying propaganda. There are posters up at pharmacies inviting pregnant women in to have these shots. Pregnant women!

The pharmacies are also paid well to deliver these toxic, dangerous shots.

A reader of this blog was bailed up in his 'consult room' by the local pharmacist and cross-examined about her mask exemption. He demanded to see it. "It just looks like a piece of paper," said he. "It is a piece of paper," said she. 

"What are your grounds for an exemption?"

"I don't have to tell you." He had to let her out and she continued to go maskless. He  was not pleased.

At least the Prime Minister of Slovakia, is has begun to raise a few questions. There are also other brave politicians like Andrew Bridgen in the UK and Senator Roberts in Australia, tirelessly speaking out, as well. 

Many who read this will know what's going on and are doing all they can to let others know, too. Thank you. If you're just beginning to realise the truth and suspect you've been injured, please seek help at The Health Forum and nzdsos.com, for these great Kiwis will help. 

 

Please don’t stay silent. Do what you can, where you can. An objection to the frightening proposals by the unelected World Health Organisation would be very helpful.

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/rep-chris-smith-warns-who-pandemic-treaty-is-the-greatest-threat-to-freedom-in-human-history/?fbclid=IwAR2H6V2Lz29Bi7sBjSmu5O7NhCvYCIKZJspVgpPb7xRKCFXE_XJpFrj9fZk

Donating to organisations like The Health Forum and nzdsos.com, and to alternative media would be gratefully received. Peacefully speak out for what is right. For what is good and true. Join with those who do — you’ll meet some amazing souls.

Each time a man stands up for an ideal or acts to improve the lot of others or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing one another from a million different centres of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.

Robert Kennedy 

 

https://thebfd.co.nz/2024/02/17/when-will-it-be-called-treason/ (Redacted.)

 

Jesus Walks on Water
Ivan Konstantinovich Alvazovsky

Have a good heart, it is I, fear ye not

                                                                                                -First Saturday of Lent