To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).
A statue of St Peter at the Shrine of Our Lady of the Rosary of San Nicolas, Buenos Aires where Jorge Mario Bergoglio aka Pope Francis was bishop for many years, was struck by lightning, obliterating the halo and the key of St Peter and his right hand, on Bergoglio's's birthday, December 17. It preceded, by only a few hours, the publication of Fiducia Supplicans which gives the go-ahead to blessing sodomy. (As a reader notes, allowing for the 4 hours' time difference the lightning strike could have been simultaneous with the signing of FS.)
Now whatever could that mean? The halo is the symbol of St Peter's holiness. The key signifies his juridical authority. His hand means blessing.Oh, you say, it's just coincidence. Really? What about the lightning that struck St Peter's Basilica the night Pope Benedict XVI abdicated, paving the way for Bergoglio's illicit election to the papacy? What about the crows and seagulls killing the doves released by Bergoglio into St Peter's Square in 2014 as a gesture of peace for Ukraine?
Tens of thousands watched in St Peter's Square as doves released by Bergoglio in 2014 as a gesture for peace in Ukraine were mauled by a huge seagull and a crow
God will not be mocked. Especially not by an antipope who has now liberated the heresies of the German Church's 'Synodal Path' to the entire Catholic world; an antipope who has precipitated the worst crisis in the Church EVER - the effective installation of the heresy of modernism, "synthesis of all heresies" (Pius X). With God there are no coincidences.
On Sunday December 17, 2023, lightning literally pulverized the key and halo of the statue of Saint Peter, located on the facade of the Sanctuary of Our Lady of the Rosary of San Nicolas , north of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
The news was reported by the Telegram channel "The Pope's Pearls" : it seemed to be fake, given that no news could be found on the web, but the event has just been confirmed by the Reverend Father Justo Lofeudo, a priest who is certainly a Bergoglian.
A typical "Ratzinger effect", evidently, that particular phenomenon whereby the Bergoglians or the una cum, (Bergoglio's legitimist conservatives) unconsciously offer information, documents and testimonies that are very useful for the reconstruction of the Magna Quaestio. In this case it would obviously only be a "sign from Heaven" which, however, has been interpreted by many Catholics without too much difficulty.
Father Lofeudo certainly did not realize the effect that the disclosure of the photo would have.
The priests of the Sanctuary have issued a statement that rejects the symbolic interpretation of the fact, but not the fact itself: “The Sanctuary does not agree with the interpretation that has been given with respect for the damage produced in the image of the apostle Saint Peter.”
What is striking, in fact, is that the event occurred on Jorge Mario Bergoglio's birthday, the day before the publication of the "Fiducia supplicans" declaration which opens up blessings for gay couples.
This measure marked a sort of point of no return: the faithful are starting to understand that something isn't working.
Even the place where the accident occurred is rich in meaning: first of all, the Sanctuary of San Nicolas is in Argentina, homeland of the anti-pope, a few kilometers from Buenos Aires, the city of which Bergoglio was bishop for a long time.
The channel “The Pope's Pearls” reports: “Above all, it is a place of worship and veneration because inside there is the beautiful statue of the Madonna of the Rosary, which appeared for years to the visionary Gladys Quiroga de Motta, starting from early 1980s, giving her more than 1800 messages. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/33982/a-marian-apparition-has-been-approved-in-argentina-and-its-a-big-deal
In them, the Holy Virgin says she has returned to continue the Apparitions of Fatima, and many of these clearly speak of the terrible struggle between the devil and the Church."
Since February 11, 2013, various "suggestive" events have dotted the story of the usurpation of the Chair of Peter reconstructed in three documentaries in The "Ratzinger Code" investigation.
We can remember the lightning that struck the Dome the same night as Pope Benedict's "resignation"; the inexplicable blocking of the bells of Castel Gandolfo following the invalid election of Francis; the killing of the doves released by Bergoglio by crows and seagulls;
 |
| A crow gets in amongst it |
...the fire of the Bethlehem chapel a few hours after Francis' visit; the fire in the Consistory Hall of Castel Gandolfo a few months ago, in the same days in which we published this appreciated report and many other events that Catholics of just a century ago would have interpreted as unequivocal "press releases" from the Eternal Father.
Well, from a faith perspective, how to interpret the lightning that struck the statue of St. Peter on December 17th?
It seems that the time for antipope Francis is coming to an end: heaven would have symbolically destroyed his halo of sanctity and disintegrated the key, which represents the pope's authority. Strange that the statue only held one key, it seems. Symbolically, the golden key alludes to power in the kingdom of heaven and the silver key indicates the spiritual authority of the papacy on earth. The rope connecting the key eyelets alludes to the link between the two powers.
*The una cum traditional Mass is, in all cases, an implicit recognition of the Vatican II religion as the Catholic religion, and as the Conciliar Church as the Roman Catholic Church https://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=46&catname=12
It is well past time now for faithful, traditional Catholics (yes, the very ones that Bergoglio persecutes) to offer daily prayer and penance to Almighty God in reparation for his misdeeds, if only in the hope of averting the infliction of more disasters and more heresies on the Mystical Bride of Christ. It is an honour and a privilege to do so, remembering Christ on His Cross praying forgiveness for His enemies.
"But I say to you that hear: Love your enemies, do good to them that hate you. Bless them that curse you, and pray for them that calumniate you."
- Lk 6:27,28
To add to your catalogue of Bergoglian events... St Faustina in her Divine Mercy Diary reveals that on the same date, 17 December, 1936, she suffered for priests, her worst bout of suffering which she likened to the Lord's agony in the garden... which is where he was betrayed by Judas with a kiss... and that was Jorje Maria Bergoglio's actual day of birth!
ReplyDeleteTo many faithful Catholics this lightning strike will have deep significance. For the activists who are radically reforming the Church it probably means less. Most of them, I believe, have little or no faith.
ReplyDeleteEka Sira R
ReplyDeleteIt's not Bergoglio, it's Holy father to you and us all. And he's not blessing sodomy, everybody sins even the one who made this horrible post.
Fr James Martin would disagree with you.
DeleteI don't know who that is
DeleteThe Lepanto Institute had a photographer take more pictures of the statue of St. Peter in Buenos Aires. It's real and NOT photoshopped.
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/LepantoInst/status/1741529483922883032
True.
ReplyDeleteI found a picture of that church on Wikipedia and cropped it to that statue. It doesn’t seem to even have a walking stick. I think even the reference you posted is a photoshop job. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_the_Rosary_of_San_Nicolás
ReplyDeleteHe didn't exactly bless sodomy.
ReplyDeleteFrom the document in question:
ReplyDelete37. In this regard, there come to mind the following words of the Holy Father, already quoted in part: “Decisions that may be part of pastoral prudence in certain circumstances should not necessarily become a norm. That is to say, it is not appropriate for a Diocese, a Bishops’ Conference, or any other ecclesial structure to constantly and officially establish procedures or rituals for all kinds of matters […]. Canon Law should not and cannot cover everything, nor should the Episcopal Conferences claim to do so with their various documents and protocols, since the life of the Church flows through many channels besides the normative ones.”[24] Thus Pope Francis recalled that “what is part of a practical discernment in particular circumstances cannot be elevated to the level of a rule” because this “would lead to an intolerable casuistry.”[25]
38. For this reason, one should neither provide for nor promote a ritual for the blessings of couples in an irregular situation. At the same time, one should not prevent or prohibit the Church’s closeness to people in every situation in which they might seek God’s help through a simple blessing. In a brief prayer preceding this spontaneous blessing, the ordained minister could ask that the individuals have peace, health, a spirit of patience, dialogue, and mutual assistance—but also God’s light and strength to be able to fulfill his will completely.
39. In any case, precisely to avoid any form of confusion or scandal, when the prayer of blessing is requested by a couple in an irregular situation, even though it is expressed outside the rites prescribed by the liturgical books, this blessing should never be imparted in concurrence with the ceremonies of a civil union, and not even in connection with them. Nor can it be performed with any clothing, gestures, or words that are proper to a wedding. The same applies when the blessing is requested by a same-sex couple.
Bergoglio never says anything "exactly". It's never "Yes yes or no no", with him. That's his M O: ambiguity and obfuscation. But the document as you quote it clearly states "when the blessing is requested by a same-sex couple". In other words, by sodomites in a state of mortal sin. So such a blessing may, clearly, be performed - as it was the very next day by the notorious Fr Rainbow priest +James Martin SJ, for "a couple in an irregular situation", i.e. sodomites.
DeletePainful though FS and its effect on the Church is, we must face facts - which should induce us to penance and prayer for this illicitly-elected 'pope'.
Have any of you actually read Fiducia Supplicans?
ReplyDeleteIf the media is your source of news, I would recommend going straight to the Vatican document because media as usual has twisted what the Pope has written.
https://www.vatican.va/.../rc_ddf_doc_20231218_fiducia...
Not the pope's diocese.
ReplyDeleteIt's a suffragan diocese of the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires where Bergoglio was archbishop and over which he had authority.
Deletepope had jurisdiction over that diocese
DeleteHi Julia, and what are the true details surrounding the statue's halo?
ReplyDeleteAnd why has the Sanctuary itself disagreed with the facts surrounding this news scoop?
Why no communication on this matter on the Sanctuary's FB page?
The Sanctuary is keeping mum, I suppose, for the obvious reason of avoiding Bergoglio's unwelcome attentions in the form of cancellation and/or closure of a Marian shrine - which event could be a foretaste of further restrictions on traditional centres of pilgrimage in 2024.
DeletePlease see
https://juliadufresne.blogspot.com/2024/01/that-st-peters-statue-plot-thickens.html
Keeping mum out of respect? Out of fear? They released a statement saying they didn't agree with this interpretation of the facts already, but I have not been able to locate it. If you find the original statement by the brothers of the sanctuary, please tag me.
DeleteI haven't seen the statement, just the reportage but it seems logical that knowing Bergoglio's M O in such matters, the Sanctuary's reason for disagreeing with that reportage and subsequently keeping silence would indeed be caution at least, if not fear.
DeleteI have trouble with "supposing," especially when removing the single word, "couple," can fix things on paper, pretty easily. All the heat and talk of miraculous lightening strikes is going to do is compromise healthy communication, and perhaps inspire more "disciplinary" action within our country.
DeleteThere has to be a better way.
#peacemakingpease
But the word 'couple' is there, and s-s couples are being blessed. I don't see how reportage of lightning strikes - communication from God Himself - can compromise healthy communication of facts among the faithful. We cannot allow fear of punishment to silence truthful reportage even in my country which is, I may hope, small enough to escape papal scrutiny.
DeleteNot a Pope Francis fan but his election was licit.
ReplyDeleteThey did realize the halo had already been missing prior to lightning strike to the hand and key , don’t know when but photos several months ago show it(Halo)missing, just assumed after lightning hit it fell off at that moment also.
ReplyDeleteI will explain this further on my next post.
DeleteCheck! Dec 17 1936
ReplyDeleteI thought I'd included this very significant detail in one of my two posts on St Peter's statue but thank you, I checked. I have to say it must have slipped my mind, as I was fully aware of St Faustina's diary entry for the day Bergoglio was born.
Delete"December 17, [1936]. I have offered this day for priests. I have suffered more today than ever before, both interiorly and exteriorly. I did not know it was possible to suffer so much in one day. I tried to make a Holy Hour, in the course of which my spirit had a taste of the bitterness of the Garden of Gethsemane. I am fighting alone, supported by His arm, against all the difficulties that face me like unassailable walls. But I trust in the power of His name and I fear nothing.
- Diary of St. Faustina, 823
Lord, You know the many temptations and trials that priests encounter as they labor in your vineyard. Today, please accept my small suffering and unite it to Your Passion on behalf of all priests and those discerning a priestly vocation.
This Advent, remind them of Your great love for them, and grant them the grace to carry their crosses as You did."