Sunday, 10 December 2023

SAY SODOMY ISN'T A SIN AND YOU UNDO THE CHURCH


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). 



Francis: conniving at sodomy



Just what will it take to unseat Pope Francis from the Chair of Peter? No matter how great the uproar in the Church - and righteous indignation among Proddys - it seems only an act of God will do the trick. 

An act of God, of course, could include the action of the Holy Spirit in leading more and more cardinals, bishops, priests and laity to resist the grossly unjust, non-Catholic interventions of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, believed by so many to have been fraudulently elected. 

When a number of Episcopalian clergy converted to Catholicism because of the Church's unchanging opposition to homosexual acts, they would hardly have expected to find in her hierarchy closeted "gays" who with pontifical connivance were blessing sodomitical unions left right and centre. The thing is, say sodomy isn't sin and you undo the Church. Which to all intents and purposes is what Bergoglio and the lavender mafia want to do (but only if they can retain their stipends, their apartments and their influence).

Consider, in addition to outrages cited below, his advocacy for illegal immigration which buttresses the 'no borders' biz of One World Government, in Pope’s Special Nominee to Synod Facing Trial in Illegal Immigration Scheme (complicitclergy.com); his public panicking on 'climate change' which seeks to impose ridiculous restrictions on food producers, Pope Francis to COP28: Climate Has ‘Run Amok,’ Planet ‘Overheating’ (complicitclergy.com); his ultimatum to clerics who celebrate Mass ad orientem WATCH: Francis’ ‘Rigid’ Ruling for Those Who Practice the Traditional Syro-Malabar Rite (complicitclergy.com); and worst of all, his blessing on homosexual unions, unmasked in WATCH: Blessing Homosexual Unions a Done-Deal? (complicitclergy.com).

But - thank God for a laugh, we all need one - we can all enjoy Argentine's new president calling the pope a communist!WATCH: Argentina’s New President Calls Pope Francis a Communist (complicitclergy.com)



Pope Francis to COP28: Climate has "run amok"




In his motu proprio  (“Ad theologiam promovendam,” issued motu proprio, or on the pope’s own impulse, last week - ed), Pope Francis called for a “cultural revolution.” From the way he has taken to firing bishops and cardinals, it is clear that he is intent on a reign of terror. 

And the world has taken notice. My mother just called to say that the pope was on the front page of The Los Angeles Times. According to the bit she read, the story documents the shooting war that has erupted among the Church’s shepherds. Consider the following:

  1. Pope Francis followed up his sacking of Bishop Joseph Strickland with the stripping of Cardinal Burke’s Vatican privileges.
  2. Fr. Gerald Murray, a canon lawyer, stated that the Strickland firing violated canon law because Pope Francis denied Strickland’s due process rights by not giving Strickland recourse to appeal.
  3. Bishop Athanasius Schneider called the pope’s actions against Strickland “a huge, blatant injustice.”
  4. Bishop Robert Barron criticized the synodal final report for recommending that the Church’s sexual morality be revised in light of scientific research.
  1. Here’s what he said:
  2. A final point—and here I find myself in frank disagreement with the final synodal report—has to do with the development of moral teaching in regard to sex. The suggestion is made that advances in our scientific understanding will require a rethinking of our sexual teaching, whose categories are, apparently, inadequate to describe the complexities of human sexuality. 

    A first problem I have with this language is that it is so condescending to the richly articulate tradition of moral reflection in Catholicism, a prime example of which is the theology of the body developed by Pope St. John Paul II. To say that this multilayered, philosophically informed, theologically dense system is incapable of handling the subtleties of human sexuality is just absurd.

    But the deeper problem I have is that this manner of argumentation is based upon a category error—namely, that advances in the sciences, as such, require an evolution in moral teaching.

    If you have been following my blog and podcast show here at Patheos, then you know that I predicted that this would happen at the synod. And now we have Bishop Barron, a voting member of the Synod on Synodality, confirming that I was right. I’m not going to rehash those arguments here.

    Suffice it to say that the Pope Francis-led Synod is advancing the exact same heresy originally formulated by Charles Curran (American moral theologian, Catholic priest - ed). Pope John Paul II fired Curran for his denigration of the moral authority of the Bible. Pope Francis deserves the same for promoting this heresy.

    In Bishop Barron’s complaint about the final report, he never uses the “H” word.  He does, however, recognize that the language of the report, in its praise of science, gives a huge helping hand to the cause of the German Synodal Way. Regarding the German Synodal Way agenda, Barron concludes with these words:

    “This…must be resisted.”

    “IT’S NOW OPEN CIVIL WAR IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH”

    Barron’s words certainly point to a major conflict brewing among the Church’s shepherds. And he’s not the only prelate to admit this. I leave you with the words of Bishop Athanasius Schneider in an interview he gave to the Catholic Herald. The good bishop clearly pins all the blame on Pope Francis. My book and many articles and interviews concur in that opinion.

    Bishop Schneider added: “At the same time he (the Pope) is not removing, and in some cases is promoting, cardinals and bishops who are publicly distorting or undermining the faith … those bishops who openly promote LGBT ideology, he is not touching them.

    “It is an evident sign and demonstration that he has another intention – an intention to silence and to stop those communities and bishops in the Church who are still faithful and attached to the faith and the tradition of the Church and her liturgy.

    “It is a kind of internal persecution of faithful bishops and priests in the Church by the Pope. We have to state this. We cannot be silent about this. It would be dishonest. We have to be honest.”Catholic Herald

ABOUT JOHN GRAVINO
John Gravino is the author of The Immoral Landscape of the New Atheism, which was the topic of a health and spirituality seminar at Duke Medical School.It’s Now Open Civil War in the Catholic Church” | A CIVIL WAR HAS BROKEN OUT IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH! (patheos.com) 


St. Robert Bellarmine: “Just as it is licit to resist a Pontiff who attacks the body, so also is it licit to resist him who attacks souls or destroys the civil order or above all, tries to destroy the Church. I say that it is licit to resist him by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will. It is not licit, however, to judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior.” (De Romano Pontifice, II.29.)



St John the Baptist
Jacob Jordaens


"...Relate to John what you have seen: The blind recover their sight, the dead rise again, the poor have the gospel preached to them, alleluia”

- Gospel, Second Sunday of Advent

 

12 comments:

  1. I doth protest at your use of the word "Proddys". Someone has to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for you. For me it's a term of endearment.

      Delete
  2. Livingman-Mark House-Thompson10 December 2023 at 13:33

    Any deviation from the Creators master plan is Sin. Lucifer seeks to turn us away (“Did God REALLY say…?”) from the Divine to his “moralistic”(?) way of thinking (knowledge of good & evil) as he/it wishes to break our daily (REAL not a bit of cardboard in the mouth) communion with our Heavenly Father.
    Sodomy (in all its forms consensual or otherwise) is an esoteric symptom of the problem of one’s spiritual separation from our true Father.
    That the Church(?) now largely condones it is merely another example that the Bride of Christ has become the Whore of Babylon.
    1700 years since (Luciferian?) Constantine was installed - we have what we have today.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bottom line, sodomy offends the natural law. It is a grievous sin. We all crave love, but sodomy is not love.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If a person says "Sodomy isn't a sin" The Church won't be Undone. What would happen is that that person will have exposed themselves as a Heretic who has left the Church. If a bunch of Prelates said this then they would all be Heretics.

    This would be part of the dogma of the Ape of the Church.

    But the Bride of Christ would remain unblemished.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I mean, of course, that IF THE POPE SAYS sodomy isn’t sin. That would undo the Church insofar as officially obliterating a sin that cries to heaven for vengeance would officially obliterate sin generally. And if sin is obliterated the Gospel is obliterated, and thus consequently the Church.

      But as you observe, that official obliteration of sin would affect only the visible Church, not the Mystical, indefectible Bride of Christ.

      In that headline I obviously left too much to the reader’s imagination. Maybe I’ve been reading too much Evelyn Waugh (his bio of the brilliant moral theologian and Catholic priest, +Ronald Knox) – literally too much, too late at night. Hard to put down.

      Delete
  5. Waugh and Knox? Good heavens you are ancient. Shouldn't you at least be reading books by Felix Donnelley who Bishop Pat Dunn put on a par with Fr Meuli (both loved by their people). And the academic journal on the study of homosexuality is worth a read. Sodomy? What about Lesbianism? Is this not also homosexuality? You need to follow up on the Kiwi academic Michael W Ross, now based in the USA who examined these matters as they relate to the Catholic Church very closely. We all know there are many gay men in the priesthood. Do they act out? I rather think many do. here in Auckland a group are known to go to a gay bar on a Saturday night yet offer Mss on Sunday. One priest in particular was a close friend to Pat and has links into a certain Political Party. Nothing wrong in that I guess.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Waugh and Knox. And today I'll read John of the Cross which makes me positively prehistoric I suppose.
      Yes, lesbianism is homosexuality. yes, it's sodomy.
      No, generally I mistrust academics. "He could never have imagined equality of marriage in the 1970s" (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/117765272/professor-recognised-for-50-years-of-research-into-gay-mens-health). That tells me all I need to know about following up on Michael Ross (and the pic shown in the link bears out that conviction).
      As to the rest, I don't comment on gossip, except to say no priest should have links to any socialist 'Party'.

      Delete
  6. Eileen PlantsForu13 December 2023 at 16:53

    Um, hello,? Sodom and Gomorrah? So if sodomy isn't a son, why then did God destroy those two cities? Of course it is a sin!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rubbish. It had nothing to do with sodomy but lack of hospitality to strangers. Best u read more Lesban, black theologians from the USA. we must demythologise scripture. I was told this by a priest 30 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly, your priest's advice sounds only too familiar. Reading more lesban (sic), black theologians and demythologising scripture doesn't seem to have done you much good - and him neither, I bet. A good rule in spiritual reading is to stick to the canonised opinion of the saints.

      Delete
  8. GOD DOES NOTBLESS SIN! This pope is the devil.

    ReplyDelete