TE REO A TOOL FOR MARXIST PURPOSES

 

Top of Form

To comment please open your gmail account, or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.

 

Ardern: forcing te reo on the nation for political purposes

"We are all embracing Te Reo." So quoth a parish secretary in response to a reader of this blog who queried using the Maori honorific 'Pa' for Asian priests, and te reo in a parish circular - te reo moreover, that not even TvOne News-readers would understand.

No, we are not 'all embracing te reo': the reason being that Ardern,Mahuta,Jackson&Co are forcing it on a multicultural, English-speaking nation to advance political interests, and Marxist interests at that. Te reo is a tool for dividing Kiwis, just as Covid-19 was weaponized for the same purpose. 

What we're witnessing is the descent of a once-Christian nation into pagan tribalism. Imagine if government departments trotted out biblical texts to explain a hugely expensive, unmandated invention of new names. Would Kiwis wear that? 

Political commentator Lindsay Mitchell simply can't understand how these "developments have been accommodated by people who have no truck with Christianity - liberal atheists. The pace of change has accelerated under the woke left."

Well of course. Our Catholic parish secretary, a fervent Labourite, can't see that socialism is quite simply, a sin, condemned by successive popes. Liberal, socialist atheists, agnostics and apostates are working, whether they know it or not, for Satan who promotes paganism over Christianity, and especially over Christianity's origin, Catholicism.

An ODT opinion piece recently parodied the rapid adoption of Māori names for government departments. It drew attention to the renaming of the Earthquake Commission as Toka Tū Ake EQC which apparently "reflects the whakapapa of our nation." The name-change decision was made by the Minister and cabinet.

(It's) the mad comedy created when a rushed, shambolic, and secretive process is used to bludgeon through serious cultural changes that touch the sensitivities of everyone.

And so we endure “change by stealth” — the process now commonplace to new interpretations of the “spirit” of Waitangi.https://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/te-reo-changes-govt-entities-bureaucratic-high-comedy

'Change by stealth' is now- and not coincidentally - commonplace to new interpretations of the "spirit" of Vatican II.  

The Commission site contains a section about their new Māori name.

In the beginning, Ranginui (sky father) and Papatūānuku (earth mother) were joined in such a strong embrace it created darkness. When their sons separated them to create light, Ranginui grieved so much for Papatūānuku that his tears flooded the land. Their sons turned Papatūānuku over so their parents would not face each other and see each other’s sorrow.

Rūaumoko is the youngest, unborn son of Ranginui and Papatūānuku. He was turned toward the earth in his mother’s womb. His brothers gave him fire so he could warm himself in the darkness. Being so closely tied with his mother, Rūaumoko felt her pain at the separation. When he stirs, he expresses his anger through geothermal currents, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions. As we live alongside Rūaumoko’s rumblings and Ranginui’s tears, EQC’s role is to help make our homes stronger, ensure new homes are built on better land, and provide support when damage occurs.

Are these characters any different to Adam and Eve?

 

Michelangelo's Adam and Eve: Could Ranginui and Papatukunui have inspired this work? 

Well yes they are, Ms Mitchell - about as different as chalk and cheese. She goes on to say:

Creation myths sit at the basis of religious belief.

The difference being, of course, that Adam and Eve are no myth. Mitchell demonstrates just how far New Zealand has already descended from the Christianity which founded our nation through missionaries like Bishop Jean Baptiste Pompallier.  

Imagine then Christian biblical stories and imagery appearing on Ministry websites to explain their reason for being and values. It would not happen.

In a 2013 Otago University lecture Andrew Bradstock said:

"...there is a shared perception here that religion is principally for the private not the public domain. This was given a degree of official endorsement in July 2010 when a draft report on “Human Rights in New Zealand Today” was released by the Human Rights Commission. This carried a statement that “Matters of religion and belief are deemed to be a matter for the private, rather than the public, sphere.”

It's been a long, slow coast downhill from the separation of church and state by Henry VIII towards reversion to barbarism. But under Ardern, Robertson&Co we've gained much momentum.   

The wording was subsequently changed following complaints (though the text is still on the HRC website), but it would be hard to dispute the claim that we generally feel more comfortable if individuals or organisations, when speaking publicly, refrain from parading openly any religious convictions they may have."

Doesn't the promotion of Māori mythology fall into the domain of parading religious convictions?

And it isn't just the Earthquake Commission.

The Reserve Bank postulates,

"How Tāne Mahuta can explain our financial system. Māori oral traditions tell us that Tāne Mahuta dug his shoulders into Papatuanuku (earth mother) and used his legs to push against Ranginui (sky father), separating them and letting the light into the world. With that light, Tāne Mahuta, guardian of the forest and birds, enabled life to thrive."

The Climate Change Commission explains its Māori name, He Pou a Rangi: Ingoa Māori:

"The simplest translation of He Pou a Rangi is 'a pillar of the sky'. The concept considers our role as upholders of the sky. We are honouring the sky and in turn, have a duty to care for it. Using 'He' Pou ('a' pillar) rather than 'Te' Pou ('the' pillar) recognises that we are one of many pou or organisations working together to address climate change. Pou can uphold, provide a point of connection, protect, and provide stability. In a te ao Māori view, pou provide a two-way connection, both upholding and uplifting what is above, but also connecting and grounding with what is below. Pou connect Ranginui, the sky father, to Papatūānuku, the earth mother."

There are many more examples occurring across various government websites and in the documents they generate. Law lecturer David Griffiths refers to, "...state concessions to indigenous Māori spirituality that are now commonplace in legislation and other governmental actions." That was sixteen years ago.

Ironically, and somewhat inexplicably, the developments have been accommodated by people who have no truck with Christianity - liberal atheists. The pace of change has accelerated under the woke left.

Back in 1996 Justice Heron argued 'the courts were “secular” institutions and he declared that “involving any person in a karakia against their personal wishes” was “insensitive and unacceptable” '.

Yet a recent meeting of state-employed health professionals with no Māori people in attendance still featured the obligatory karakia delivered by a non-Māori female. When asked why, the answer received was, "Their belief in equity." Was a Christian or any other prayer offered? No. So much for equity.

Just as people balk at the imposition of mythology to explain matters of science, there will be those discomfited by the routine practise of karakia (especially given the diversity of cultures and beliefs of those working within the New Zealand health system, which is almost entirely publicly run).

A reader of this blog (another one) feels extremely uncomfortable at his place of work, a government department, when karakia are used routinely. "I look out the window and pray the Rosary under my breath," he says.

The solution is not to start offering sops to every other religious belief that exists in New Zealand. To put it crudely - two wrongs do not make a right.

Encouraged no doubt by Antipope Francis, Mitchell makes the mistake of putting all religious beliefs on the same footing. Mitchell is not to be blamed for not knowing that the Catholic Church is the one true Church founded by Christ on the "rock" of Peter because the Catholic Church, in New Zealand at least, under this Antipope's pontificate keeps very quiet about that.  

The answer is to re-establish the traditional and necessary secularism of the state.

The answer is in fact, quite the opposite: to re-establish the unity of Church and State and the Universal Kingship of Christ. It will happen. 

In the United Kingdom where awareness and objection to the problem is more acute, an organisation has formed which maintains,

"Public services that are intended for the whole community, especially those funded by public money, should be provided in a secular context, open to all, without discriminating against anyone on grounds of religion/belief – either the people who are served or employed."

The United Kingdom is down the tubes already and this well-meaning policy can't save it.  

Amen to that - or whatever the secular equivalent is.

https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/lindsay-mitchell-new-zealand-no-longer-a-secular-state?postId=e22bf277-2d94-41a1-a9dc-485daf97721c&utm_campaign=b9b582a4-ad2f-49ed-a0e9-0bbc671e622c&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&utm_content=8ff52632-c8e6-45b0-bd40-4d0990b56d48&cid=b969329e-d086-45aa-b270-75a16da84804#:~:text=Skip%20to%20Main,with%20Wix.com

You see? There is no secular equivalent to"Amen".

 St Peter Chrysologus, on your feast day please pray for us

 

Top of Form