Wednesday 7 December 2022

NZ NEEDS AN UPROAR AND A SNAP ELECTION

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.


Ardern et al put NZ in the world's spotlight again


Not only has Jacinda Ardern's Marxist regime tried to seize medical guardianship of sick baby Will, they've succeeded. 

Maybe we wouldn't mind so much if it weren't an outfit called Te Whatu Ora which has nabbed that baby for surgical purposes. We know by its name that this crowd, supposedly New Zealand's national health service, is woke and lefty. 

That's borne out by the surgeon who refused to perform sick baby Will's operation with the unvaccinated blood sourced by his parents. No, the blood had to come from the Blood Service and the Blood Service doesn't know the difference between vaxxed blood and unvaxxed and its 'service' doesn't extend to finding out. Clipboard mentality. 

Well, tyranny, more like. New Zealand should be in an uproar and demanding a snap election. First the 'Five Waters' attempt to destroy what remains of our democracy, and now this.  

If enough Kiwis are horrified as they should be at a grossly incompetent and devious government taking a sick baby away from his parents to jab him with compromised blood that could cost him his life, this could bring Ardern down. Now that would absolutely be God drawing good out of evil. 

Neither the Blood Service nor the surgeon knows, apparently, the dangers posed to children, especially boys and especially boys with a heart condition like baby Will, posed by the mRNA vaccine. They don't know and it seems they don't care enough to find out.

Starship Hospital has compromised its proud reputation by jacking up a trespass order against journalist Liz Gunn for advocating for baby Will - whose mother is breastfeeding twins,for heaven's sake! Gunn suspects Starship's "upper echelons are working for somebody else" - just as Ardern is working for somebody else.

The court admitted finally yesterday that the Pfizer vaccine contains traces of mRNA - which Pfizer itself has acknowledged causes inflammatory conditions in the human body, especially around the heart and especially in males, especially young males so one might assume, especially in baby boys. Having first denied it, yesterday the court heard the truth: not only is there mRNA in vaccinated blood, but  it stays in the blood for up to 14 days after the jab. So Te Whatu Ora through its lawyers has been lying to the court.


Protestors outside the High Court, Auckland

As a backgrounder (all 'Aunty Herald' is good for):

A High Court judge has ruled in favour of health authorities who sought court guardianship of a gravely ill baby boy after his parents refused a blood transfusion and instead wanted a court order to receive blood from exclusively unvaccinated donors.

They did NOT refuse a blood transfusion. They refused a transfusion of possibly contaminated blood. 

The court delivered its ruling just after 6pm in the landmark case of a gravely ill baby needing a blood transfusion as part of life-saving surgery.

Note the repeat of the phrase 'a gravely ill baby'. Now why, do you think? 

The potentially precedent-setting decision is expected to have wide ramifications and draw a strong reaction in the anti-vaccine movement, where the case became a cause-celebre for those opposed to the vaccine.

It is not an 'anti-vaccine movement'. It's an anti-mandated vaccine movement. 

Justice Ian Gault delivered his ruling on the contentious case after a lengthy hearing the previous day, where Health NZ and Sue Grey, representing the parents, locked horns in the High Court at Auckland as anti-vax protesters gathered outside.

Note the repeat of the phrase 'anti-vax'. If you repeat a lie often enough, most people who have no knowledge of the Truth will come to believe it. 

Justice Gault ordered the baby, who has automatic (name, they mean, not some kind of physical abuse - ed) suppression, is to be placed under the guardianship of the court “from the date of the order until completion of his surgery and post-operative recovery to address obstruction to the outflow tract of his right ventricle and at latest until 31 January 2023″.

His ruling said the baby’s parents remain his legal guardians aside from the medical matters covered in the order. The judgment requires two Starship hospital doctors to at all times keep the parents informed of their baby’s condition and treatment.

Starship hospital doctors whom the parents no longer trust. At Starship Baby Will's mother has been followed. She feels intimidated. 

Justice Gault had reserved his decision following the marathon hearing where Paul White, lawyer for Te Whatu Ora, sought an order granting the court guardianship in respect of the six-month-old boy’s medical care.

 

Big Sister at Te Whatu Ora knows more about you than you know yourself


And finally, because sometimes we really need a larf:




""Let your door stand open to receive Him, unlock your soul to Him, offer Him a welcome in your mind, and then you will see the riches of simplicity, the treasures of peace, the joy of grace. Throw wide the gate of your heart, stand before the sun of the everlasting light" - St Ambrose, Confessor and Doctor of the Church.


Study of a Head, St Ambrose
Peter Paul Rubens 


St Ambrose, on your feast day please pray for us.


1 comment:

  1. This quote I think is appropriate to this situation: "If your blood isn't boiling by now, it's probably because it's clotting."
    I used to donate to Starship. Never EVER again. Not until it's totally gutted and all the weeds pulled out by the roots and it's rebranded 'Star of Bethlehem Children's hospital' with motto: 'where we observe Christian ethics, God's law, and diligently follow the hippocratic oath as it was originally intended.'
    I'm over this diabolical hypocritical oath of theirs!!!
    As for this abortion of a government - I have no words to describe my disgust!!! OK I have, but I will keep them to myself.

    ReplyDelete