GUNN & GREY OPEN DOOR TO MORE BABY WILLS

They're still coming for your kids

Billy Te Kahika in court pleading not guilty to breach of lockdown, August ''21. Talk about suave ...

Billy Te Kahika? Really? What's he doing on this blog? Who would have thunk it?

Billy TK is here because he seems to have nailed the truth about the infamous court confrontation over sick little 'Baby Will', his capture by the wicked stepmother Jacinda Ardern and his forced transfusion of blood almost certainly laced with mRNA.

And the reason why Te Kahika is on to it is, most likely, that he prays. As a practising Christian, although like all of us given to sin - and Billy's political sins have been joyously bruited abroad by a hostile secular mainstream media -  he has the inestimable advantage of access (limited of course by Protestantism) to the light of Christ. 

The other protagonists in the battle for baby Will, whose forced removal from his parents by police at Starship Hospital on Thursday nght broke not a few Kiwi hearts, are lawyer Sue Grey and ex-lawyer, ex-Tv presenter Liz Gunn, who are not overtly Christian. Baby Will's parents might be Christian, but given New Zealand's currently secular nature, it's not likely.  Te Kahika, Grey and Gunn have a back story of locking horns politically (https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/122289676/fringe-party-leader-alleges-campaign-of-harassment-by-billy-tk-supporters) but that isn't to say that Kahika isn't telling the truth here,  in his testimony (redacted).

 

It's about time that I properly put pen to paper to address the issue of Baby Will and also Baby Rosaly.

Working and researching on our “River of Lies” documentary, one of our reporters, Samantha Edwards, interviewed Doreen Rudolph and her husband about the story of their 18 month-old daughter Rosaly who has a serious heart issue requiring a life-saving operation involving blood transfusions.

Rosaly's parents were rightly concerned about the fact there was zero data about the risks Covid-19 v*ccin*ted donor blood could pose to a very sick baby.

The issue of greatest concern was the fact that myocarditis is acknowledged as a known side effect of the Covid-19 j*b. And if these mechanisms which caused myocarditis from the j*b are present in the donor blood, then it could cause a risk to a small child who is already facing heart issues. It could be lethal to baby Rosaly.

 

Rosaly and her 'tractor beam smile'

Upon first scan of this issue I thought it was about j*bbed blood versus unj*bbed blood. I wanted to expose publicly through the media the NZ Blood Service and the Government’s risky approach to dealing with a growing public interest health issue. We know by now that when the Government says something is safe you'd better check thrice.

Tiamara Williams then entered the cause along with her partner Dr Machim Maanu who runs a health clinic. They were already working in the blood service area in New Zealand, developing a directed donor blood community program called ‘Live Blood’. (www.liveblood.me).

With my commitments to the documentary, I asked Tiamara to help Doreen and little Rosaly. Without any hesitation or need for attention Tiamara threw herself into it at the expense of her own business' needs and demands.

After countless hours of conversations and getting to know the family, Tiamara was also asked to help Samantha and baby Will – which she selflessly agreed to do.

Tiamara and I then launched a deep dive into addressing and formulating a strategy to address the issues with the Government and medical establishment. We set ourselves on course for discussions with the offices of the relevant ministers and their ministries.

Tiamara performed an exemplary job of opening the door to meaningful dialogue and respectful conversation with the minister’s office and the NZ Blood Service. Both Tiamara and I attended meetings with a number of health clinicians dealing with this issue. Given the grave nature of the issue, many hard conversations were had, which were all executed with a calm and respectful tone.

The dialogue was never going to be on the basis of v*ccinated v unv*ccinated blood. Never. Not a mention.

There was a strong and clear argument that the issue was actually the Human Rights Act, NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990, Care of Children Act 2004 Section 36, Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 and the Children’s and Young Person’s Wellbeing Act 1989. This was cemented with the application of the Medical Code of ethics, especially the adage ‘Do no harm’. Other strong aspects of advocacy were the UN Convention for the Rights of the Child.

This was the basis of the fight.

Focussing the argument with the NZ Ministry of Health on j*bbed and unj*bbed blood was a dangerous and unresolvable path, fraught with real risks to the wider issue of medical sovereignty and parental rights. To argue this matter on ‘j*bbed blood issues’ was naïve and frankly very unwise.

Respectfully and circumspectly addressing the issue was the best approach.

Due to the weight of the Government's core tenets of their Covid-19 response, and the strength of their claims of the vaccines' effectiveness and safety, an admission would never be made that there could actually be something wrong with the v*ccine.

It wasn’t hard to come to the conclusion that admitting there was even a small risk to recipients of donor blood which may or may not carrying remnants of the covid-19 j*b was never going to happen.

With all of this under consideration, Tiamara continued to work very closely with Doreen and Samantha to ensure a safe route was being taken in order to get the result we all wanted.

 

Baby Will 

During discussions with the Minister’s office a few weeks ago, we received word that Liz Gunn had attended a meeting with Will’s clinical team and his parents. My heart sank as soon as I heard the news, especially after hearing a sound recording of Liz’s behavior during the meeting. 

Essentially, a very emotional Liz attempted to hold the medical team to account in a very aggressive way. This led to her telling them that she would blow the story open by going to the mainstream media if they did not give in. Threats never work.

The surgeon and clinical team members abruptly ended the meeting and left.

Hours later the medical team approached Samantha with a lawyer and served notice on her that they would begin court proceedings to uplift baby Will legally and proceed with the surgery. This was the disaster we had worked so hard to avoid.

What immediately what followed was worse.

The matter then proceeded to the New Zealand High Court, where baby Will and his parents were represented by lawyer Sue Grey, which was also of great concern to me.

Sue decided to use the ‘j*bbed versus unj*bbed blood’ approach in her submissions while being remiss in regard to the medical data required to mount this argument. Sue’s team eventually asked Tiamara Williams for the required data to further their case, which Tiamara handed over, although she had recently been effectively and rudely ‘dismissed’ from this issue as if she didn’t exist.

However, to the families' detriment, the first of two court appearances cast the dice of fate and the judge’s decision was sealed.

Interesting that a self-confessed Christian like Te Kahika would talk about 'the dice of fate'. The Christian view is that nothing is decided by fate or by chance, but by God's Providence.    

The seriousness and nature of the real issue underpinning this case of baby Will and countless others was lost sight of in the absolute frenzy which ensued via the mainstream media and the so-called ‘truth broadcasters’ - a sight that has finally cemented my low opinion of the ‘freedom alternative’ media forever.

In my view Sue handed over the higher ground to the Government by fighting on their terms, where they held all of the cards using a flawed argument that proved fatal to the defence and progression of rights for the parents.

Only when pressed, after the first court appearance, did Sue present the human rights aspect in any light but it was far too late. The claim of ‘Anti-vaxxers’ had been gleefully adopted by corrupt media and a new national anthem adopted.

Two people had weighed in on this matter woefully unresearched, with no due diligence, approaching it without the necessary supporting medical data and with a total misunderstanding of what the issue is really about.

They launched a fatally flawed case and the result is that a beautiful yet very sick baby boy has been alienated from his parents and their God-given rights.

Tragically, at 11.30 pm Thursday , police took little Will from Starship hospital into state custody. This is tyranny in action.

The consequence of this outcome is broad in reach and dangerous in effect.

I believe that the Government has used the media and judiciary to appear to have the moral high ground in this matter and this outcome may open the door to wider parental rights' abuses and development of legislation that may give powers to the Government to enact hugely distressing actions on children against their parents' wishes. Only time will tell.

And that is why I take such a deeply grim view of Liz and Sue’s approach here and why a deeply considered and calm approach was needed. No amount of media exposure will make up for these mistakes.

The next step must be to pray for this little boy’s well-being and his parents and reset to an argument that may give us a much better chance of winning what is a God-given human right for all to choose what goes into our bodies – isn’t this what this fight is all about?

I know people are going to read this and ask 'What the heck is Billy on about?”, "What's he doing?”, “What an idiot!”, “He’s just got sour grapes”.

The fact that someone might say such things and not see the important point being made is why I believe this type of issue is going to plague this freedom movement. In fact the outcome here may embolden the enemy because it was shot at from the hip.

I have always said I would be honest about myself, the issues and how I see them and that I would always speak up about what is wrong with our Government. But the same must be applied to ourselves otherwise we are as bad as they are, aren’t we?

I had someone recently wisely say to me; “Saying we are a freedom fighter does not make us a wise or good person – it just makes us a fighter for what we want”.

My catch phrase “Be cool, be calm, be factual and stand on solid ground” seems like a chant of no to little value these days and the ship of commonsense and calm has sailed away into the sunset ...

The door has been opened but let's pray that what comes through it does not end our right as parents to defend and choose for our babies and ourselves.

This is my prayer – make of it what thou wilt.

Register with https://www.liveblood.me

 https://www.riveroflies.co.nz/post/babywillandtheopendoor?fbclid=IwAR0_K9bilLE1ZHnlTzH_18u7olSF_rv6UjYC4ph5SO5nljaKKvr-m05dDOk

 A reader of this blog comments:

Billy Te Kahika in court pleading not guilty to breach of lockdown, August '21. Talk about suave. But not insincere.

 

A reader of this blog comments: 

"(Te Kahika) actually discredits (Tiamara) by supporting her, unfortunately. But I think this is true.

My son has to have surgery next year. Needless to say I’m concerned about blood, even though his surgeon assured me it’s highly unlikely.

So I just contacted Tiamara and this was her reply to me:

At this stage you have 3 options:

 

1. We can connect you with donors and you can speak to the surgeon and tell them that in the off-chance your son needs blood you want directed donor blood and have donors. (See what they say).

2. Talk with the surgeon about what other options are possible for your son (other non-blood products) that could be used in the case of needing blood.

3. Go overseas and do the op there - we can direct you if you need a recommendation. Kind Regards Tiamara Liveblood

Enter

Tessa

http://www.liveblood.me/

Liveblood

 

Under the headline Rival blood bank set up in wake of baby donor case would be 'breaking law' Stuff stuffs up yet again - with its claim that "a group has been setting up a blood bank using directed donor blood in the wake of a court ruling that a baby could receive “vaccinated” blood during open-heart surgery. 

Liveblood was set up well in advance of the baby Will case. And it is not a 'rival' blood bank; it is providing a different service from that of the NZ Blood Service. Liveblood.  Liveblood, says Stuff, "was working on having sperm and bone marrow donations and creating a “whole parallel health system that keeps you in control of the choices made about your body”." Well, bully for them!

And if as Stuff claims, a 'rival' blood bank would be breaking the law, either the NZ Blood Service or the law needs changing. Ardern,Robertson&Co, Death Dealers to the Nation, are into changing laws. By comparison with their Three Waters debacle, this would be a doddle.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300761425/rival-blood-bank-set-up-in-wake-of-baby-donor-case-would-be-breaking-law?fbclid=IwAR0PNEydtENkR8oGAyKpPO3lT3vAI6a9NfoibABV62-NKnX_B0Olcq39LWY

And to end on a positive note:

 

National’s Tama Potaka is set to be the new MP for Hamilton West.

National has taken a resounding victory in the Hamilton West by-election.

With 100% of the vote counted National’s Tama Potaka had 6629 votes compared to Labour’s Georgie Dansey with 4344, a margin of 2285.

The incumbent Dr Gaurav Sharma received 1156. Sharma said the vote showed that “there’s definitely an antigovernment sentiment” in the result.