WILL THE REAL SISTER LUCIA OF FATIMA PLEASE STAND UP - AND TELL US THE TRUTH

To comment, please open your gmail account, use my email address, fb Messenger or Twitter. Scroll down for other comments.



Believe it or not ...



Readers of this blog will remember 'Sr Lucia' from the July 5 post, 'WELCOM' IS 'DIABOLICALLY DISORIENTATED' BY BLACK LIVES MATTER, where an image was identified as Sister Lucia (or Lucy), one of the seers of Fatima. I am now deleting that unlovely image, as curiously, Facebook insisted on reproducing it every time I posted a link to this blog, almost as if fb saw it as a turn-off to potential readers (which it would have been). 

It seems that 'Sister Lucia' was a fake. An impostor. 



Well-informed Fatimanistas will be going, "tell us something we don't know". The rest of you are likely saying, "nah, pull the other one." 

Left, Sr Lucia showing the teeth she was born with. Right, the teeth she somehow acquired later in life - as a cloistered Carmelite nun?

Call me a sceptic, but when a friend informed me that Sister Lucia, seer of Fatima, had died in 1965 in Coimbra, Portugal and been replaced by the Vatican with a phony, to discredit the embarrassing third secret of Fatima or what the real Sr Lucia might disclose of what Our Lady had told her about the secret, I took it with a grain of rock salt. 

When I saw the image of 'Sr Lucia' with the smile and the teeth (and don't tell me they're false, no dentures could be that bad) however, I had to reconsider. Because in light of what we've learned from Vaticanistas in the last 10 years in regard to the locals' dastardly deeds - embezzlement, druggy homosexual orgies, even homicide - what would once have been incredible is no longer so. Fact has indeed become stranger than fiction.

Our Lord said that in the last days the deception will be so profound that even the elect would be deceived if that were possible (Matthew 24), and an impostor Lucy was crucial to the Devil’s plan of deceiving the world on Fatima).

 Every traditionalist who doesn’t accept the Vatican’s version of the third secret of Fatima (released in the year 2000) already believes that there was an impostor Sr. Lucy, but simply hasn’t figured it out yet, or isn’t honest or logical enough to admit it. It is undeniable that the Vatican’s “Sr. Lucy” fully endorsed its version of the third secret, and its accompanying interpretation that it refers to John Paul II. This fact is not known from a letter that can be forged, but from undeniable video evidence of "Sr. Lucy” at Fatima in 2000 for the Beatifications of Jacinta and Francisco.https://novusordowatch.org/2019/03/real-false-sister-lucy-of-

 Sister Lucia I, in her early 40s               'Sister Lucia' in her 40s or early 50s

Qui bono? [Who benefits?] – the answer emerges. The retirement of Sister Lucy I and introduction of Sister Lucy II before 1960, the year the secret was to have been revealed, would prevent the true witness from telling the world the full content of the Third Secret. This could only have been to the benefit of the progressivist wing that is dominating the Church in our days. 

The greatest difficulty of this whole problem is that Sister Lucy said one thing up until the 1960s and then changed her thinking years later. What could be the reason for this?

If Our Lord and Our Lady continued to appear to her, why did she say nothing about Vatican II and the so-called reforms that came from it, such as the Novus Ordo Mass, other liturgical novelties, and the loss of religious vocations? On the contrary, Sister Lucy II appeared completely adapted to these novelties.

If she expressed such serious concern about the importance that the Third Secret be revealed in 1960, why was she silent about it for the next 40 years? Contradicting what she had previously stated, how could she confirm the supposed secret that was unveiled by the Vatican in 2000, along with an “official interpretation” by Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone who then declared the Fatima episode closed, “a part of the past” ?

These, and many other questions, could be explained by the fact that there was a different Sister Lucy being presented to the public after 1960. I have pointed out the differences not only between the faces of Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II, but also in their spirits and attitudes. I present them to my readers with the honest concern to expose the truth so that Catholics may judge whether they are being fooled or not. https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g11htTwoSisterLucys_Horvat.htm

Sr Lucy (Lucia) prior to 1960

Sr Lucy post-1960: a new woman?

The clincher - on receiving Communion from JP II, the Seer of Fatima, 'Sister Lucy' seizes his hand to kiss it

https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g12htArt2_TwoSisterLucys.htm

And now, a sedevacantist's opinon:

Q. So what do you think happened to the real Sr. Lucy?

A. They clearly eliminated her at some point. Whenever that may have occurred, there is no doubt that the woman playing the part of “Sr. Lucy” since Vatican II was not the real one.
A few years back we received a very disturbing letter from a woman (a traditional Catholic convert) whose family was involved in the higher-echelons of the Illuminati and Freemasonry. We also spoke to this woman both before and after she sent it.
There was much more in the letter and in the telephone conversations that added context and creditability to her claim.

“Dear Brothers of Holy Family Monastery… I have some very dark relatives…[a world famous Freemason] is the brother of [x] who was married to my Grand Aunt. All of my relatives on my mother’s side were 33rd degree Illuminati Freemasons. 

My Grandparents were in Eastern Star… I know I must sound like a screaming weirdo by now. I am not… When I was five my Mother hosted a gathering. There are many things that went on that are too gruesome to put in print about these gatherings. They are basically sacrificing to satan to put it briefly. 

I had a new baby brother named [x]… My mother didn’t know ahead of time [that x] was to be part of the ‘ceremonies’. They were going to put him in what looked like a large brass wok [and torture him] in order to tell the future. …[thankfully, this didn’t happen because of intervening events]… [But] one of the things that was said that awful day was they had just killed sister Lucy. I thought they were talking about a sister I didn’t know I had that they had killed).

 When I asked they said ‘No stupid…she’s a nun’ It only made sense years later what this meant. It was 1958, late Oct when this happened. [I remember because my brother had just been born]. I know that I sound like a mad woman but it is the truth…”

We have spoken with this woman at length; she is a traditional Catholic convert, and we believe that she is telling the truth. But regardless of whether one accepts this testimony or not, the fact is that there was an impostor Sr. Lucy. There is no doubt about this; the evidence is undeniable. The Vatican conveniently kept her alive until 97 years old, until it had revealed the phony third secret and she had finished playing her part, then a few years later she “died” and her cell was ordered sealed by “Cardinal” Ratzinger.

In his luminous book, Christus Vincit, Bishop Athanasius Schneider says: 

Sr Lucia's biography contains an expression which says that Our Lady told her that she had to write down the text of the secret, but not what she explained to her about the secret. These are two different things.  ... there could still be some explanations Our Lady gave to her that have not been revealed.

It could be that this explanation has been written down and that it was very uncomfortable in view of the current crisis in the Church. ... Maybe this is a plausible hypothesis. But we do not need a text from Our Lady to demonstrate that this is happening. ... The enormity of the crisis in the Church that we are now witnessing is evident.

...We have to maintain a somewhat sober attitude and concentrate on the message of Fatima, which is penance; to stop sinning because God is already too offended; to make reparation and expiation for the sins against God, against the Most Holy Eucharist, and against the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  ... To pray the Rosary for the conversion of sinners, to make the Five First Saturdays, to consecrate ourselves and our families, our countries, Russia and the world to the Immaculate Heart. It is so beautiful, so rich. 

And from the text of the Secret of Fatima:

A little further above, an angel with a fiery sword upon his left hand; as he sparkles, he departs with flames that seemed to set the world aflame; but that disappeared in contact with the right hand that hurried* Our Lady to it: The angel pointing to the earth, with a strong voice said: Penitence, penitence, penitence! And we saw in the immense light that is God: “something similar to how people see themselves in a mirror.

*Expedia: Can mean to hurry/do quickly, but also has a specific religious connotation.

When we went past him, a Bishop dressed in White, “we had a feeling* it was the holy Father**”, many other Bishops, priests***, religious men and women climbed a lapidarian mountain, on top of which a large Cross made of rough**** tree trunks as if it were the bark of cork oaks; the Holy Priest, before arriving there, went through a large city in ruins, half trembling with a hesitant gait, scowling with pain and pity, praying for the souls of (each)

*Pressentimento: feeling or premonition/foresight

**Holy Father as in Holy Priest, not as in God himself ***Sacerdotes: All encompassing term for all churchmen

*****Toscos: Literally means that they were grotesque/rough but in the same way they would naturally be, not through damage

Seeing corpses along the way; reaching the top of the hill, *he was killed on his knees by the big Cross by a group of soldiers who shot many bullets and darts at him, and like that died the Bishops and Churchmen, one after the other**, alongside religious men and women and many secular people, sirs and madams of many social classes and standings. Atop the 2 arms of the cross were 2 Angels, each with their crystal watering can in hand, in them they collected the blood of the Martys, and with it they watered the souls that got near God.

*Would literally be “Prostrate on his knees” but it’s a much more casual term in Portuguese **Order of the sentence is changed to make more sense. 

http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2020/07/want-to-know-what-third-secret-released.html

Bishop Schneider's interpretation of the Secret:

"It shows we are moving towards an era of martyrdom inside the Church. It shows us the scene of the divine wrath against sin. There is no trivialization of sin, unlike what we see to be fashionable today in the Church with the new so-called pastoral approach of "mercy", which ultimately says:"You may continue to sin without offending God." ...

This is contrary to the message of Fatima ... in which God shows the Angel with the sword, calling for "Penance, Penance, Penance, for sins committed.... As the Angel annnounces the coming wrath of God, fire from his sword reaches Our Lady's hands and is transformed into rays of mercy and conversion. Our Lady is the refuge of all sinners. This is very consoling. ...rich and serious. ...We need to preach again about the seriousness and the peril of sin.

The text then speaks about martyrdom: we need to prepare ourselves to be attacked by the world. The third part of the secret contradicts the mentality that we have been living since the Second Vatican Council, even since the pontificate of Pope John XXIII. Such a mentality claims that ... we have to make friends with the world and in some way to cede to the demands of the world. To think in this way is quite ingenuous and unrealistic. Fyodor Dostoyevsky said: "If one distorts faith in Christ by uniting it with the goals of this world, the whole meaning of Christianity will at once also be destroyed and the mind will necessarily fall prey to unbelief."

The representatives of the Church have demonstrated in our own day a clear inferiority complex towards the ubelieving and un-Christian world.

...The spiritual situation of the Church is in ruins - the consequence of a spiritual demolition in doctrine, liturgy and the moral life. ... The Church is half-destroyed by heresies and doctrinal confusion, by chaos in the liturgy, by the chaos of immorality.  ... No one can reasonably deny it.

The pope (is) passing by the corpses of priests ... spiritual priestly corpses strewn across the Church. We are witnessing a tremendous crisis among the clergy ...the episcopacy and the cardinalate for half a century ... morally deplorable episcopal and cardinalatial candidates oftentimes lost the faith and betrayed their Master, Jesus Christ, owed their promotion to favoritism. ...a sort of Masonic clerical old-boy network.

The spiritual corpses of pedophile, sodomite and plainly heretical bishops and cardinals have been exposed for the whole world to see.... One can have the impression that a particular bishop or cardinal is not so far away from being an atheist. The demanding and crystal-clear truths of Christ disturb these bishops and cardinals in their work of abolishing the divine commandments. 

They say to the world,"Sin does not exist. The first and sixth Commandments are not feasible for people today. In our day, the merciful Christ positively allows the living out of a diversity of sexual orientations because of the dignity of 'LGBT' people, and He allows also the living out of the diversity of religions for the sake of global human fraternity."

Perhaps Our Lady gave an explanation to Sister Lucia; and if it does indeed exist, perhaps it will be revealed in the future. But I do believe that there could not be a worse situation in the life of the Church than the one we are now witnessing.

Jacinta, Lucia, and Francisco
the three seers of Fatima