WILL WALL'S 'LUCKY TOUCH' OR WHATEVER GET THOSE 'SAFE AREAS' IN PLACE SOON?

To comment, please open your gmail account, use my email address, Facebook, Messenger or Twitter. Scroll down for other comments.


Evil - aka this Labour Coalition Government - is obviously a hydra-headed monster. 

While unborn babies up to full term can now be wheeled into theatre in our so-called 'hospitals' to be murdered by so-called 'health professionals', Labour MP Louisa Wall is trying to shore up her Party's ghoulish legislation by setting up 'safe zones' outside so no one can offer these desperate women any help.

Labour MP Louisa Wall who has 'a lucky touch' with her bills (e.g. Gay Marriage)   

Wall's Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion (Safe Areas) Amendment Bill would allow the creation of "safe areas around specific abortion facilities, on a case-by-case basis".

"Safe areas." Don't make me laugh - or cry, perhaps. The unconscious irony of the term 'safe areas' betrays a total lack of conscience on the part of these feminists. 'Safe' for whom? Not for the baby who will be killed off in the womb designed by God to be the safest place on earth, and deprived of the God-given life that the baby's murderers enjoy. 

Not 'safe' for baby's mother either. Quite the opposite. Without His power to heal, she who may have been coerced into murdering her child by the father, or reduced to desperation by lack of support, will certainly suffer mental, physical and spiritual consequences for the rest of her life on earth and if she dies without repenting, for eternity in that place which no one, even the Catholic Church, likes to mention now because it's not nice.

However, the term 'safe area' is reserved to hazard areas so in that sense at least, it's logical.

"No other group is subjected to protest simply for going to their doctor, nor should these people be," Wall's bill states. 

There's a tiny difficulty with this seemingly ingenuous statement.  No other group, Ms Wall, goes to their doctor to procure the death of another person, no matter how legal Labour (with help from feminists, male and female, from other parties) has made the act of murder. 

"The area would be 150 metres around an abortion facility banning "intimidating, interfering with, or obstructing a protected person" in a manner that could cause emotional distress. 

Prayer vigils or pro-life outreach - whatever you like to call witness to the sanctity of life outside hospitals - never 'interfere with, or obstruct a protected person'. Of course Ms Wall would never have taken any part in such activities; for Ms Wall and her cabal, ignorance is obviously bliss. As for 'intimidate', the effect of a peaceful vigil, even a protest, on others is purely subjective. Lots of people are intimidated by the presence of patched gang members in the street, but thank God they're still allowed to strut their stuff.

Abortion was removed from the Crimes Act earlier this year. During the process, MPs made changes which saw the provision for safe zones scrapped, after a confused vote in Parliament." 

(Very likely, after the timely intervention of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Warrior Queen).

More unconscious irony is revealed by the term 'hospital', the place where this state-sanctioned massacre of the innocents takes place. The word "hospital" comes from the Latin hospes, meaning a stranger, hence a guest. Another word, hospitium came to signify hospitality.

Fine hospitality, indeed, is offered by the hospital  performing abortions which kill one guest and leave the other maimed for life. 

Wall has what's been called 'a lucky touch' with getting her private member's bills out of the 'biscuit tin' ballot. I say there's no such thing as good luck, only divine providence, so I have to call it something else. I call it demonic, because "Satan has no power over human beings unless they allow it, by for example consenting to radical evil" (St Thomas Aquinas).

What can be more radically evil than Wall's same-sex marriage, if not Wall's defence of babykilling?

"All New Zealanders deserve to have the right to access health services with their safety, privacy, and dignity protected.

Yes, Ms Wall; it's agreed surely by any decent Kiwi that the 'safety, privacy and dignity' of the unborn - the most vulnerable, most innocent of this nation's citizens - should be protected most of all, and most of all by their mothers.

"Many people have spoken about their experiences accessing abortion services where they have not been afforded that protection...."

If the unborn could speak "about their experience of accessing abortion services, what do you think, Ms Wall, they would say? In trying to prevent their mothers' changing their mind and giving them life, you're an accessory after the fact of their murder. In your heart of hearts are you not afraid that one day you will hear what they have to say, at your particular judgment?

And, Ms Wall, nearly 23,000 people spoke about their opposition to the Abortion Legislation Act - to be precise, 91.6% of 25,000 submissions  - and your Government ignored them. I have no doubt that those 23,000 will speak about their experience of being ignored by your Government at the ballot box on September 19. 

"Right to Life wrote to the Prime Minister on 13th March and asked her ... why she voted against the amendment of Agnes Loheni MP, that sought to provide pain relief to babies being killed post 20 weeks. There has been no response.

"The Prime Minister stated in 2018 that she was going to lead the most transparent and accountable government that we had ever seen. Prime Minister, why then are you refusing to tell the people of New Zealand why you voted to oppose these pro-life amendments? We live in a democracy not a dictatorship, we have an absolute right to know. For a doctor to withhold treatment and care or to deliberately kill the child born in an abortion is the serious and heinous crime of Infanticide. The charge could be homicide which on conviction could result in life imprisonment. https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2004/S00171/does-jacinda-ardern-support-infanticide.htm

Prime Minister Ardern and her partner, Clarke Gayford react to the question, "Do you know the date your baby was conceived?" 

Yesterday in an item revealing Radio NZ's leftist, feminist leftist bias Injustice Minister Andrew Little is reported as saying, "There's no such thing as full-term abortion."

"... (A)nd he is calling out MPs who are claiming there is. National MP Harete Hipango has come under fire for a Facebook post accusing Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern of supporting abortion up to full-term.

National leader Judith Collins voted in favour of reform and said MPs were allowed their own views. Little said Hipango's comments were "silly".

"If Judith Collins is happy to have a bunch of radical, anti-abortion extremists running the show on social media, that's a matter for her. If she wants to rein them in she should do, if she's happy to let them go then no doubt she'll do that."

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/422216/national-mps-full-term-abortion-claims-silly-andrew-little?fbclid=IwAR2jVKf6P7Pt9Ger7jwNM3-no-aLhGFN8a37pIBIwrVHbIIa5hxjq8nwdsU

National MP for Whanganui Harete Hipango 

The Abortion Legislation Act sets no gestational time limit on abortions. There's nothing to stop a baby being killed at nine months' gestation; that way it can conveniently be called an abortion instead of murder, for which the penalty is mandatory: a sentence of life imprisonment with a non-parole period of at least 10 years.  The crime of killing a full-term baby by abortion could hardly be called infanticide (3 years maximum), as the mother would have to show she was temporarily deranged by childbirth or breast-feeding. So who does the Dishonorable Andrew Little think he's kidding?

We can be assured that Wall has total support from her leader, the 'Honorable' Jacinda Ardern. She tried to save the government's face on their failure, in March, to remove safe zones from the bill.

"I would have preferred that those safe zones were in place ... but that hasn't been the result of the House in this debate and that's democracy."

But the architect of the infamous Abortion Legislation Act, 'Justice' Minister Andrew Little, admitted at the time it could be a waste of time trying to put safe zones in place.

"Well you've got to be sure to go through the procedural hoops to get there that you've got the numbers to do that and I'm not sure that they're there," said the Dishonorable Andrew. 

Those procedural hoops include three readings and a couple of Select Committee hearings. But after Labour's sleight-of-hand in getting the Abortion Legislation Act through Parliament in the week before lockdown, would we put it past them to push Wall's bill through somehow before Parliament rises and the election brings, we hope and pray, a resounding defeat for this gang of crooks?

And fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body in hell (Mt 10:29).