NZ BISHOPS, ANTIPOPE, GIORGIA ON OUR MIND

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.

Italy's new Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni - a Christian. Grazie, Giorgia!

"As Italian premier Giorgia Meloni forms her new government, we need to ask some serious questions about why an Italian Catholic politician takes the lead on the traditional pro-Catholic agenda, while the Pope and our NZ bishops seem to stagger in the opposite direction."

Another anguished reader of this blog - there are a lot of them about - is calling our would-be 'world-beater' bishops to account for their heretical modernist version of the Catholic religion. He'd like to know just what's going on in their heads/hearts. He has a genuine reason for remaining anonymous. He goes on: 

Meloni campaigned on a “God, homeland and family” platform.  She has said "yes to the natural family, no to LBGT lobbyists." She openly states she is Christian. She has said “Defending Christians, wherever they may be, also means defending our identity,” .... “It means reaffirming our connection to the sanctity of life, equality between men and women, the defence of the natural family founded on marriage.”

 As our reader indicates, New Zealand's 'trailblazing' bishops are merely playing follow-the-leader, tiptoeing timidly along the broad path to you-know-where behind Antipope Francis and his heretical hierarchy. Take a butcher's at the following, from Church Militant:

Jesuit Fr. Antonio Spadaro (is) blasting Italian politics as "bipolar," calling for a more centrist and moderate approach.

Father Spadaro and his La Civiltà Cattolica, are considered the unofficial mouthpiece of the Vatican due to his proximity to Pope Francis, also a Jesuit.

... In response to the election victory, president of the Italian Bishops' Conference Cardinal Matteo Zuppi harshly warned Meloni he would promote the common good and not personal interests ... the Church would defend "inviolable rights of the person and the community," he said - mentioning immigrants but not the unborn.

        (6,171,132 Italian babies have been murdered in their mothers'                               wombs since Italy legalized abortion in 1978.) 

 

Cardinal Zuppi - need we say more?

 

Faithful Catholics should note Cardinal Zuppi has reportedly condoned homosexual unions by the Church and later lied about it when confronted by an Italian Catholic newspaper. 

 Meloni keeps her pro-family and pro-life views no secret, blasting gender ideology.

Giorgia Meloni, president, Brothers of Italy:

"Why is the family an enemy? Why is the family so frightening? There is a single answer to all these questions: Because it defines us. Because it is our identity. Because everything that defines us is now an enemy for those who would like us to no longer have an identity. I can't define myself as Italian, Christian, woman, mother, no."

But - a big 'but': 

During China virus, Meloni got behind abortion-tainted jabs and lockdowns. ttps://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bipolar-politics 

Maybe she believed the Antipope's spin on the jab - although she has said that she has "failed to understand Pope Francis". “I’m a believer and I listen to the words of His Holiness,” Meloni said in 2020, “but on a political level I don’t always share them.” What a tactful way of putting it. No wonder she got herself elected prime minister.

Many Catholics who elected Meloni are anti the Antipope. They oppose his modernism and favour the Church's traditional teachings.

In 2020 Meloni as president of Fratelli d'Italia stated: "In Europe, we care about every minority, but people don't want to see the biggest persecution of all — the global persecution of Christians." Meloni was flying the next day to attend President Trump's White House prayer breakfast.

Meloni identified "the main enemy today" as "the globalists" who "view identity in all its forms as an evil to be overcome and constantly ask to shift real power away from the people to supra-national entities headed by supposedly enlightened elites."

She was alluding to Pope Francis' call for supra-national institutions when addressing the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences in May 2019.  Today, "Pope John Paul II would be on the European Union's blacklist as a dangerous subversive" because of his patriotism, which "also enabled him to view current events in the light of Christian realism," Meloni added.  "(He) never tired of repeating that there is no Europe without Christianity."    

Rod Dreher, author of bestseller The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation, warned that audience in 2020 that the religion of social justice is "a utopian political cult" and signals the rise of a "pink police state."

How right he was. As high priests of 'the religion of social justice'  New Zealand's bishops now lead 'a utopian political cult' and Jacinda Ardern's regime is 'a pink police state'.

 

Dreher identified today's revolutionary class as "not the German volk or the international proletariat, but the 'marginalized' and 'oppressed' — the sacred victim," and noted that "Western people will surrender political power to a state and to authorities who promise to protect their therapeutic desires — especially maximizing sexual freedom."

Dreher called upon conservatives to follow the example of Pope John Paul II by reclaiming and defending cultural memory, establishing solidarity by creating bonds among small groups, strengthening the Christian faith and embracing the value of suffering.

"This strikes at the heart of the pink police state and its therapeutic totalitarianism," he exclaimed.

Viktor Orbán, who caused a media stir at the conference, lauded Pope John Paul II as "the biggest defender of Central European countries on the world stage, whatever their religious background."

Orbán explained how his "new approach" of "Christian democracy" had replaced "liberal freedom" in Hungary. He explained how Christian democracy was based on "the universal Catholic approach" - "the only one which appreciates and accepts national sovereignty," adding: "That is the reason why in Hungary, where 75% are Catholic and 25% are Calvinists, we are able to cooperate for national sovereignty on a Christian-democratic basis. ... It is very unique, nobody likes it outside Hungary, the liberal press is always attacking us, making jokes of us, but it works," he said. "And the people vote for it again and again and again. ...

French National Front leader Marion Maréchal told the audience that France, "considered for centuries as 'the eldest daughter of the Church,'" was now turned "into the backroom of Salafism" with "150 French districts in the hands of Islamists."

"Every day in France, Catholic churches and cemeteries are ransacked and the media remains indifferent," Maréchal lamented.

In the terrible fire of Notre-Dame Cathedral, "by a miracle, everything that was essential was saved: relics, statues of saints, stained glass windows," she remarked, seeing this as "a call: to rebuild this roof that protects us and this spire that connects us to Heaven."

However, establishment media, academia and left-wing Church leaders labelled the conference fascist, populist and anti-Semitic ...

Cardinal Parolin even used his pulpit while celebrating Mass at the papal archbasilica of Saint John the Lateran to attack the conference: "Rome means universality, fraternity, openness to others. No to nationalism and closure, which are reactions — fundamentally infantile — before the big global world, which seems invasive."  
For further reading:

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/a-tale-of-two-popes-nationalism-or-globalism

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/conservatives-drop-nationalism-bombshell-in-popes-globalist-backyard

 

 

So we see clearly what is the mind of the Vatican: lefty, socialist (when socialism has been definitively defined as heresy by several popes) and globalist: that is to say, determined to destroy nationhood and hoover the whole world up willy-nilly into Klaus Schwab's Fourth Industrial Revolution. At the same time, by satanic sleight of hand to transform the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church into the WEF's New World Church with Antipope Francis as the globalists' spiritual leader. 

And Giorgia Meloni is standing in the way. The Catholic Herald: “The stage is surely set for an uneasy relationship between the new government in Rome and the Holy See.”

Which takes us back to our anguished reader:

Meloni campaigned on a “God, homeland and family” platform.  She has said "yes to the natural family, no to LBGT lobbyists." She openly states she is Christian.  She has said “Defending Christians, wherever they may be, also means defending our identity,” .... “It means reaffirming our connection to the sanctity of life, equality between men and women, the defense of the natural family founded on marriage."  

How embarrassing for the Pope; his office in Rome will probably be very close to Meloni's. Imagine what it will be like when the Pope is forced to meet her publicly.  Remember when the Pope met Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, both of them pro-abort politicians, the warmth the Pope displayed was palpable, the Pope's smiles were so warm.  

 

The Antipope meets baby killer extraordinaire Biden and 'Dr Jill' - divorced and 'remarried'

The Antipope meets babykiller extraordinaire Pelosi 

But when the Pope met Donald Trump, the most pro-life US president ever, the Pope's frowning face wore the most incredible scowl.  

for the most pro-life US president ever, 'the most incredible scowl'

I imagine the Pope will be saving his most twisted scowls for Meloni; I imagine he will find her traditional pro-Catholic values intolerable, even if they are shared by the many millions of Italian Catholics who voted for her. 

Is Meloni's success the start of a global backlash against the woke feminist/gay/anti-colonial/far-left agenda? The vast  majority of people inside and outside the Catholic Church may think so, they are sick of having a small minority of church activists ram this agenda down their throats. 

The Pope and our NZ bishops need to get over the 1960s secular ideology that formed them in their youth, and start preaching real Catholicism again. Otherwise the likes of Italian premier Giorgia Meloni will make them look very silly.

"When I walk in the midst of trouble, Thou preservest my life; against the wrath of my enemies Thy hand protecteth me, Thy right hand saveth me"

 - Ps 137:7

NZ'S WORLD-BEATER BISHOPS 'ACCOMPANY' SUICIDES

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter

International notoriety: posing with the Antipope  

New Zealand's Bishops are awfully keen to be seen as world beaters. It may have escaped your notice that back in November they won international notoriety for telling our poor bedevilled priests to offer the sacraments to would-be suicides. They followed that up by urging Catholic school children to 'trans' (https://juliadufresne.blogspot.com/2022/10/anything-goes-in-catholic-schools-nz.html). 

The trouble is, the bishops have completely lost their cred. At the bidding of Antipope Francis they pushed the jab on us and even now, as that jab is killing (deliberately) untold numbers of credulous Catholics, they have not resiled from their reckless, faithless position. Who can believe anything they say?

Perhaps tomorrow they'll back polygamy. Who knows? Our bishops have evidently lost the faith. They are desperately in need of our prayer - our Rosary, our Holy Mass and Holy Communion.

Not having the stomach for much of the bishops' asininity, we quote the minimum:

(The Church) cannot turn away those who choose “assisted dying” under the new law, says Bishop of Hamilton Stephen Lowe, the vice-president of the NZ Catholic Bishops Conference.

Bishop Lowe seems to expect that Catholics who've decided to kill themselves might ask for a priest to be there for the occasion. As Catholics have been told by the Church in New Zealand for years that we're All Going To Heaven No Matter What, that's possible. What's not possible is for a priest to acquiesce. He must try to make up for lost time and explain to the would-be suicide that Hell exists and suicide will take him/her there pdq.

... ("We) find ourselves caring for people dealing with the consequences of such choices." 

Que? What does that mean??? It can only mean surely, that the clergy have to deal with the assisted suicides' grieving families. 

We do not need to deny the objective wrong of euthanasia in order to accompany, with consolation and hope, those who might feel drawn or pushed towards this type of death,” said Bishop Lowe. 

Que? The Church doesn't need to deny that euthanasia is wrong? The Church cannot deny that euthanasia is wrong. Because it is. The Church, even when represented by Bishop Stephen Lowe, cannot deny the truth. Note the weasel word 'accompany'. It's one of the wokest words in the woke lexicon. How can a priest console someone who's decided to kill him/herself? "There there, you poor thing, you'll feel better soon"? Hardly. Not when they going to feel ever so much worse soon, and for ever. 

The only 'hope' that Bishop Lowe can offer them is the slight chance of a change of mind and repentance between their fatal injection and death. Otherwise it's the certainty of Hell. Bishop Lowe left that bit out.   

Our pastoral practice is always called to be a reflection of our God, who does not abandon his people.

'Pastoral': another hint of wokeness. But no, God does not abandon his people. His people who decide to kill themselves abandon God, and break His Sacred Heart. 

Here is the story in Church Militant, last November, which seems to have given our bishops a taste for international notoriety: 

Bishops in New Zealand, who acquiesced without protest to the world's most tyrannical COVID-19 lockdown, are urging clergy to offer sacraments to Catholics who kill themselves as legalized euthanasia came into force Sunday.

In defiance of canon law and a recent Vatican ruling, the New Zealand Catholic Bishops Conference (NZCBC) cites Pope Francis on "accompaniment," asking priests "to accompany those contemplating euthanasia or assisted dying" by administering the sacraments. The bishops' statement, "Ministers of Consolation and Hope," grants that no priest should "feel obliged to do or say something that goes against their own conscience."

However, it compels the priest to "ensure that provision is made for the person to be accompanied by another."

"Accompaniment does not necessarily mean endorsement," the bishops note, calling "pastoral carers to enter into a liminal space where the Church's beliefs about euthanasia sit alongside its teaching about accompaniment and consolation."

According to the bishops, a priest may refuse sacraments only "in those very rare cases when someone seeks them in bad faith." Clergy should presume that "a person asking for the sacraments does so in good faith."

In June 2020, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) ruled that penitents who opt for euthanasia or assisted suicide can only receive confession, anointing and viaticum "when the minister discerns his or her readiness to take concrete steps that indicate he or she has modified their decision in this regard.

"Ministers "should avoid any gesture, such as remaining until the euthanasia is performed, that could be interpreted as approval of this action" and "not give scandal by behaving in a manner that makes them complicit in the termination of human life," the CDF added.

The Kiwi bishops' pastoral letter on "accompanying" medical murder also contradicts decrees from bishops in other countries or states that have legalized assisted suicide and euthanasia.

In 2019, bishop of Honolulu Clarence Silva issued a decree stressing that Catholics who sought "medically assisted suicide" after making a "fully informed" decision with "deliberate consent" were "thus likely fulfilling the requirements for mortal sin."

"If a person dies in mortal sin without contrition, such final impenitence results in 'exclusion from Christ's kingdom and the eternal death of Hell, for our freedom has the power to make choices forever, with no turning back,'" Silva warned, quoting the Catechism of the Catholic Church.  

In 2016, Catholic bishops of Alberta and the Northwest Territories of Canada issued guidelines requiring ministers to "delay" sacraments to Catholics who had opted for medical murder until they repented. Quoting Pope John Paul II's pro-life encyclical Evangelium Vitae, the bishops wrote:

Since suicide, objectively speaking, is a gravely immoral act, it follows that "to concur with the intention of another person to commit suicide and to help in carrying it out through so-called 'assisted suicide,' means to cooperate in, and at times to be the actual perpetrator of, an injustice which can never be excused."

Emphasizing the grave nature of medical murder as a mortal sin, the bishops explained how Catholics who choose euthanasia "are in an objective state of sin" even if their decision "may not have been fully free, or may not have been an informed decision."If such Catholics are "not open at least to prayerfully considering the rescinding of their request — now that they know it is a grave sin" the priest "would need to delay absolution to a later time when the person may be properly disposed," the Canadian bishops stated.

While urging priests to celebrate the sacrament of anointing "generously," the bishops nevertheless cited canon 1007: "The anointing of the sick is not to be conferred upon those who persevere obstinately in manifest grave sin.""The request for euthanasia or assisted suicide is in direct contradiction to the baptismal call of the dying believer to proclaim at all times, especially at the approach of death, that 'it is no longer I who live but Christ who lives in me' (Gal. 2:20)," the Canadian bishops warned. 

"If the person, however, remains obstinate, the anointing cannot be celebrated," they concluded.

While it selectively cites Samaritanus Bonus, the Kiwi bishops' statement does not use terms like "repentance," "contrition," "grave" or "mortal sin." It also does not name or explain the nature of the sacraments administered at the time of death. 

Instead, upholding the example of the Good Samaritan, it notes that "the introduction of euthanasia in Aotearoa New Zealand presents a renewed opportunity for the Catholic community, working in collaboration with many others, to put into practice the loving and compassionate consequences of our belief in the inviolable dignity of all human life."

Pointing out the theological vacuity of Pope Francis' buzzword "accompaniment" in his book A Pastoral Revolution: Six Talismanic Words in the Synodal Debate on the Family, Guido Vignelli observes how "in the Christian perspective, the only valid accompaniment is that which leads man back to God by following the only way of salvation, which is Jesus Christ."

The new pastoral approach, Vignelli warns, interprets accompaniment very differently, "elevating it to a therapeutic method" presupposing "the shepherd does not precede his flock as his guide, but rather follows it as a 'traveling companion.'"

"According to this thesis, one should not worry too much if the faithful have taken the wrong path," Vignelli observes.https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/new-zealand-bishops-sacralize-medical-murder

 

"BETRAYAL": VATICAN MUST STOP BACKING VAX NOW

NZ's High Court making the Vatican look bad and Ardern look sick: Christians may refuse abortion-tainted jabs, as their decision "is grounded in a core principle of the Christian religion and the objection to abortion".

 

 "After this betrayal, how will faithful Catholics be able to consider the Church’s positions as reliable and credible? 

"How will it be possible to remedy damage caused to those who have undergone a treatment that has actually compromised their health or led to premature death, for the sole reason that it was recommended to them by the Pope, or their bishop, or their parish priest, who told them that unless they were vaccinated they could not come to church, serve Mass, or sing in the choir?"

The inimitable, ever-so-brainy Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano pounces on Pfizer and  the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Luis Ladaria Ferrer, for pushing a 'vaccine' concocted from the remains of murdered infants now shown to have murdered 20 million worldwide (Dr Roger Hodkinson, T.ME.CHILDCOVIDVACCINEINJURIESUK.) 

Cardinal Luis Ladaria Ferrer - was implicated in sex abuse cover up 

The letter was also addressed to members of the Holy See, including Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State of His Holiness; Cardinal Peter Turkson, Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of the Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of the Social Sciences; and Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, President of the Pontifical Academy for Life.

You will recall that Archbishop Paglia saw fit to adorn the wall behind the high altar in his cathedral with a homo-erotic mural including his own image. Cardinal Parolin's recent speech on China as recently condemned by the embattled 90 year-old Cardinal Zen as "a series of lies".  In late September Cardinal Turkson attended a Hare Krishna devotional chant at the Church of Our Saviour, New York.

We suggest that these prelates deserve to get this letter ...

 

Your Eminence,

Last year I wrote to the president of the US Bishops’ Conference, (and) to you, expressing my very strong reservations on extremely controversial aspects of the moral legitimacy of experimental gene serums produced using mRNA technology.

In that letter, written with the help of eminent scientists and virologists, I highlighted the need to update the “Note on the morality of using some anti-COVID-19 vaccines,” due to scientific evidence that had emerged and been declared by the pharmaceutical manufacturers themselves.

Permit me, Your Eminence, to renew my appeal in the light of recent declarations by Pfizer to the European Parliament and publication of official data by the world health agencies.

 

 

I remind you that the document from the Dicastery over which you preside was promulgated on December 21, 2020, in the absence of complete data about the nature of the gene serum and without any results from the efficacy and safety trials. The Note was limited to the “moral aspects of the use of the vaccines against COVID-1-19 that have been developed from cell lines derived from tissues obtained from two fetuses that were not spontaneously aborted.”

A reader references Dr Pamela Acker, a devout Catholic and MSc (Biology), cited months ago on this page, who worked in the field of vaccine development and attests that 'hundreds' of fetuses were used for the COVID vaccine. Her book Vaccination: A Catholic Perspective is available from the Kolbe Centre.https://www.kolbecenter.org/product/vaccination-a-catholic-perspective/

As amplification for +Vigano's views on the use of fetuses in vax development:

Mors Tua Vita Mea (Your death is my life) is the title of the Italian book on the abortion-tainted coronavirus vaccines to which +Viganò has contributed a foreword:

” (T)he baby in the womb in the third month of gestation, is sacrificed and dismembered in order to extract tissue from his still palpitating body with which to produce a non-cure, a non-vaccine, which not only does not heal from the virus, but in all likelihood causes a greater percentage of death than Covid itself, especially in the elderly or those who are sick."

The Congregation reiterated: “We do not intend to judge the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, although ethically relevant and necessary, as this evaluation is the responsibility of biomedical researchers and drug agencies.”

Safety and efficacy were thus not the subject of the Note, which in expressing an opinion about the “moral aspects of the use” did not deem it appropriate to comment on the “morality of the production” of these drugs. The safety and efficacy of the individual vaccines should have been established after a period of experimentation, which normally takes several years.

But health authorities have carried out the experimentation on the entire population, departing from the normal practice of the scientific community, international regulations, and the laws of individual nations.

The results emerging from official data published in all the countries that adopted the mass vaccine campaign are incontestably disastrous: people who have been subjected to inoculation with the experimental serum not only have never been protected from contagion by the virus, nor from grave forms of illness, but they have actually been made more vulnerable to COVID-19 and its variants due to irreversible compromising of their immune systems by mRNA technology.

The data also highlights serious short- and long-term effects, such as sterility, miscarriages,  transmission of the virus through breastfeeding, serious heart conditions including myocarditis and pericarditis, return of cancerous tumors previously cured, and a whole series of other debilitating diseases.

 

It should have happened here: a prayerful protest in California 

                                         against a parish hosting a vaccine drive

The many cases of sudden deaths – until recently stubbornly considered as having no relation to inoculation with the serum – are revealing the consequence of repeated doses, even in people who are young, healthy, and physically fit.

Members of the military, rigorously controlled by health personnel for safety reasons, are showing the same incidence of adverse effects after receiving the serum. Countless studies are confirming that the serum may cause forms of acquired immunodeficiency.

Worldwide the number of deaths and grave pathologies following vaccination is increasing exponentially. These vaccines have caused more deaths than all other vaccines combined in the last thirty years. And not only this: in many nations the number who have died after vaccination is significantly higher than the number of those who died from COVID.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (now Dicastery), although not expressing an opinion on the efficacy and safety of the serums, nevertheless defined them as “vaccines,” taking for granted that they would give immunity and protect people against active and passive contagion.

But this has now been disavowed by declarations from all the world health authorities and the World Health Organization (WHO), who now say that those who are vaccinated may become infected themselves and infect other people more seriously than people who are not vaccinated, and also that their immune systems have been drastically reduced if not actually cancelled.

The drugs called “vaccines” thus do not correspond to the official definition of a vaccine, to which the Note presumably refers. A “vaccine” is defined as a preparation which induces the production of protective antibodies by an organism, conferring a specific resistance against a determined infective illness (either viral, bacterial, or protozoal).

This definition has now been modified by the WHO, because otherwise it would not have been able to include anti-COVID drugs within the definition of a vaccine, since these drugs do not induce the production of protective antibodies and do not confer a specific resistance against the infectious disease caused by Sars-CoV-2.

Your Eminence surely already knows that the use of these technologies with self-assembling graphene oxide nanostructures has also been patented in order to allow for the tracking and remote control of subjects, in particular in order to monitor the vital parameters of each patient in a way that is connected to the cloud via the Bluetooth signal emitted by these nanostructures. 

As proof that this is not the result of ruminations of conspiracy theorists, Your Eminence perhaps knows that the European Union has chosen as winners of a competition two projects dedicated to technological innovation: “The Human Brain and Graphene.” These two projects will each receive one billion euros in funding over the next ten years.

The “vaccines” against COVID-19 have been presented as the only possible alternative to a deadly disease. This was false from the very beginning, and with the perspective of two years it has also been confirmed as false: there were and are alternative treatments, but they have been methodically boycotted by the pharmaceutical companies – because they are inexpensive and not profitable for them – and discredited by scientific publications financed by Big Pharma with articles later withdrawn because they were clearly based on falsified data.

It should be pointed out that the presence of graphene oxide both in the batches of the “vaccine” as well as in the blood of those who have been inoculated has now been proven beyond any reasonable doubt, despite the fact that there is no scientific justification for its presence nor for its pharmaceutical use due to its toxicity. The devastating effects of graphene oxide are now evident, and it is likely that pharmaceutical companies will soon be held accountable.

Furthermore, COVID-19 has been revealed to be – as was known and  scientifically evident – a seasonal form of the coronavirus that is treatable and not deadly, a form of flu that causes only a minimal number of deaths among people who already have some other underlying condition. The multi-year monitoring of the coronavirus leaves no doubt and also eliminates the element of a “health emergency” used as a pretext to impose the vaccines.

International norms specify that an experimental drug cannot be authorized for distribution except in the absence of another effective alternative treatment. This is why drug agencies around the world have prevented the use of ivermectin, hyperimmune plasma, and other treatments whose effectiveness has been demonstrated. There is no need to remind Your Eminence that all of these agencies, along with the WHO, are almost entirely financed by pharmaceutical companies and foundations linked to them and that there is a grave conflict of interest at the highest levels.

In the past few days the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, had to answer to the Parliament about the PNRR (The National Recovery and Resilience Plan) funding that was obtained for the laboratories in Italy and Greece where her husband works, without forgetting that the same president refused to provide the European Court of Auditors with the text messages she exchanged with the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, about supply contracts, messages which still have not been revealed. 

 

vaccination, government by mass hypnosis 

The imposition of the experimental serum took place through a coordinated employment of methods that was unprecedented in recent history, using mass manipulation techniques that are well known to psychology experts. In this operation of media terrorism and the violation of the natural rights of individuals, accompanied by intolerable blackmail and discrimination, the Catholic hierarchy chose to take sides with the system, making itself the promoter of “vaccines,” even reaching the point of recommending them as a “moral duty.” 

The media skillfully used the spiritual authority of the Roman Pontiff and his media influence to confirm the mainstream narrative, and this was an essential element in the success of the entire vaccination campaign, convincing many of the faithful to undergo inoculation because of the trust they have placed in the Pope and his global role.

 

there's only one word for this: gross

The vaccination obligations imposed on employees of the Holy See, following the lines of protocols imposed in other nations, have confirmed the Vatican’s absolute alignment with extremely careless and reckless positions that are completely void of any scientific validity. This has exposed the Vatican City State to possible liability on the part of its officials, with a further burden on its treasury; and the possibility should not be excluded that the faithful may bring collective lawsuits against their own pastors, who have been converted into salesmen of dangerous medicines.

After more than two years, the Church has not considered it necessary to make any statement to correct the Note, which in the light of new scientific evidence is now outdated and substantially contradicted by the harsh reality of the facts. Limiting itself strictly to an evaluation of the morality of the use of the vaccines, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has not taken account of the proportionality between the benefits of the gene serum – which have been completely absent – and the short- and long-term adverse side-effects which are now before everyone’s eyes.

Since it is now evident that the drugs sold as vaccines do not give any significant benefit and on the contrary may cause a very high percentage of death or serious diseases even in people for whom COVID is not a serious threat, it is no longer possible to consider valid any attempt to demonstrate a proportionality between risks and benefits, thus eliminating one of the assumptions on which the Note was based: “The morality of vaccination depends not only on the duty to protect one’s own health, but also on the duty to pursue the common good. In the absence of other means to stop or even prevent the epidemic, the common good may recommend vaccination, especially to protect the weakest and most exposed” (n. 5).

We know well that there is no “absence of other means,” and that the serum neither stops nor prevents the epidemic: this makes the mRNA “vaccine” produced with aborted cell lines not only morally unacceptable but also absolutely dangerous for one’s health, and in the case of pregnant women also for the health of their children.

The Church, in expressing a moral evaluation of the vaccines, cannot fail to take into consideration the many elements that contribute to formulating an overall judgment. The Congregation cannot limit itself to the general theory of the moral lawfulness of the drug in itself – a lawfulness that is completely questionable given its ineffectiveness, the absence of tests of its genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and the evidence of side-effects. 

Instead, the Congregation must speak out about this fact as soon as possible: now that the complete uselessness of the serums “to stop or even prevent the epidemic” has been demonstrated, it can no longer be administered, and indeed there is a moral obligation for health authorities and drug companies to recall it as something dangerous and harmful, and for the individual faithful to refuse inoculation.

I further believe, Most Reverend Eminence, that the time has come for the Holy See to definitively distance itself from those private entities and multinational corporations that have believed that they can use the authority of the Catholic Church to endorse the neo-Malthusian project of the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 and the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset.

It is not tolerable that the voice of the Church of Christ continues to be complicit in a plan to reduce the global population based on the chronic pathologizing of humanity and the induction of sterility; and this is even more necessary in the face of the scandalous conflict of interests to which the Holy See is exposed by accepting sponsorship and funding from the architects of these criminal plans.

 

The Unholy See: making money out of human misery

 

It will not escape Your Eminence that there are very serious implications for the Holy Church as a result of her reckless support for the “psychopandemic” narrative. Taking advantage of Francis’ words and addresses to lead the faithful to submit themselves to a serum that has not only proven to be useless but actually gravely harmful has seriously compromised the authority of the Vatican, prompting it to propagate a treatment based on data that has proven to be partial and counterfeited.

This reckless and less-than-transparent behavior involved an interference by the supreme ecclesiastical authority in a field of strictly scientific concern which is instead “the responsibility of biomedical researchers and drug agencies.”

After this betrayal, how will faithful Catholics and those who look to the Church as a sure guide be able to consider the Church’s positions as reliable and credible with any amount of serenity or confidence? And how will it be possible to remedy the damage that has been caused to those who, having neither medical training nor competence, have undergone a treatment that has actually compromised their health or led to premature death, for the sole reason that it was recommended to them by the Pope, or their bishop, or their parish priest, who told them that unless they were vaccinated they could not come to church, serve Mass, or sing in the choir?

And if they objected to this kind of carry-on, having their 'Safeguarding' 'application' to play the organ or arrange the flowers declined?  

The Catholic hierarchy has experienced a decline in recent years that is directly proportional to the support it has given to the globalist ideology: its commitment to support the vaccine campaign is not an isolated case, judging by the participation of the Holy See in climate initiatives – which are also based on false assumptions that have nothing scientific about them – and trans-humanistic endeavors.

But this is not the purpose for which Our Lord placed the Church on earth: she must first and foremost proclaim the Truth, keeping herself far away from dangerous involvements with the powerful of the earth, and even more so with those among them who are notoriously hostile to the teaching of Christ and Catholic morality.

If the hierarchy does not shake itself away from this obsequious enslavement, if it does not rediscover the courage and dignity to stand up against the mentality of the world, it will be overwhelmed and will fall victim to its own inability to be a stumbling block and a sign of contradiction.

I am certain, Your Eminence, that you will want to consider the particular gravity of these themes, as well as the urgency of an enlightened intervention that is faithful to the teaching of the Gospel and the salus animarum which is and remains the suprema lex of the Church.

In Christo Rege,

 + Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America

 

Allegory on the Fall and Redemption of Mankind

                                                                  Engraving, Matthias Greuter 

 

      

"ANYTHING GOES IN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS": NZ BISHOPS

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address FB Messenger or Twitter.

wolves got up like sheep: New Zealand's Bishops

New Zealand's Catholic Bishops must resign. "Aroha and Diversity in Catholic Schools" is a downright denial of the three pillars of the Catholic faith: Scripture, Tradition and Magisterium. What the bishops  really mean is "Anything goes in Catholic Schools" - LGBTQI+, transgenderism, homosexuality and logically, polygamy. 

International accolades," Cathnews announced breathlessly today, "are pouring in for the NZ Catholic Bishops' trailblazing document on sexual diversity." 

Among the chorus of applause they cite the pro-LGBTQ New Ways Ministry, condemned by the Vatican and the US Bishops for its dissent from Church teaching.  

We can only wonder if the bishops have opened themselves, by habitual sin, to the devil.

Because they have trodden this broad path of pride which leads to destruction (Mt 7:13) for some time now. 

In defiance of canon law and a recent Vatican ruling they urged their clergy to offer sacraments to Catholics who kill themselves when legalized euthanasia came into force (Nov 2021).https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/new-zealand-bishops-sacralize-medical-murder

The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care found the Church in New Zealand had not taken sufficient steps to solve the problem (December 2021). https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/new-zealand-report

New Zealand's bishops segregated Catholics based on vaccination status, forcing the faithful to attend separate "apartheid-style" Masses (November 2021). https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/nz-bishops-impose-sacramental-segregation

The Catholic Church in New Zealand helped commemorate a pagan ritual surrounding Matariki, historically worshipped in native Maori culture in association with a wind deity, with prayer services (June 2022).https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/matariki-liturgy

Trailblazers? Mob followers more like 

"By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? (Mt 7:16).New Zealand's modernist bishops have exposed themselves as 'false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves' (Mt 7:15). They are running a new, faux church, a branch of Francis church which will usher in the New World Church of the global elite.

In this mythical country called 'Aotearoa', employing pidgin English, the bishops teach children and teenagers about 'sexual diversity'. 'Diversity' meaning a variety, they are teaching our children and teenagers in Catholic schools that there are more than two sexes. They say this is a 'complex reality'. God thinks otherwise. 

"Vulnerable rangatahi should not feel pushed or coerced to make decisions about themselves too soon," says Bishop Stephen Lowe, who seems to be the ringleader as well he might, given that he has stated that he has no difficulty with the homosexual lifestyle (does he realize what he said?). That is, the bishops imply, young people should not feel pushed or coerced too soon to make decisions about which of the 'diversity' of sexes they belong to.

Don't let this garbage get you down. There will be very significant resistance to this treachery, this betrayal of Our Lord Jesus Christ and of young Catholic New Zealanders, on the part of these false prophets. Specifically, a petition and a series of public meetings will be forthcoming. Stand by.

In the meantime, for bishops and lay people alike there are four ways of keeping habitual sin and the devil at bay.

FREQUENT THE SACRAMENTS OF CONFESSION AND EUCHARIST

CONSISTENT PRAYER LIFE

FASTING

SACRAMENTALS

https://stlucycommunity.com/news/4-ways-to-keep-the-devil-away/

Évariste Carpentier (1845–1922), The Alert (1884)
The French Counter-Revolution