TRENDING: GAYS ADOPT BABIES TO SHARE WITH OTHERS FOR SEX

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). Protestant rants are enot posted on this page. 

 

 

Two sodomists pretending to be parents 

 

As nauseating as these two sodomists pretending to be parents may be, the possible future for the newborn baby in its 'mother's' arms is too awful to contemplate. This is not to suggest that these individuals (above) are pedophiles, but there is a horrifying new trend for homosexuals to adopt children for sexual exploitation and to 'share' them with other vile perverts.

O please, any rainbow-tinted readers, spare us the cries of "judge not" or the Ardernistas' "be kind". Christ Himself was not afraid to call the scribes and pharisees nasty names and neither should Catholics hesitate to call a spade a spade. In California two sodomists whose hired surrogate mother gave birth prematurely refused to pay for a baby with potential health problems, and refused medical assistance for her baby boy. Effectively, they murdered him. However, better murdered than sodomised.

Sodomy is seriously disordered and pretending to give birth and breastfeed is fetishistic. It's evil, and evil is insidious. The L A Dodgers'  Pride Night ceremonial first pitch was done by gay married couple, Olympian Tom Daley (29) and Film Writer Dustin Lance Black’s (49) son, who was purchased via surrogacy, while Tom held their baby boy also purchased through surrogacy. Sodomites are exploiting women, sometimes for unspeakable reasons.

Gay men like coloured babies. Virtue-signalling - or should that be vice-signalling? 

So, there are frightful implications for the Church and the world in Antipope Francis' LGBTQ pilgrimage to the Holy Doors of St Peter's in 2025's Holy Year Jubilee, which bills the Mystical Body of Christ as "Home for All, LGBT+ Christians and Other Existential Frontiers”. It's further proof that the apostate Bergoglian sect is no longer Catholic: Holy Mother Church is a home for celibate homosexuals, yes, but she cannot be a home for sodomites. 

They're shopping for a baby

The children who are up for adoption represent one of the most vulnerable demographics in any country, relying on the government and various bureaucratic agencies for the entirety of their welfare. The way they are treated is thus a reflection of our societal values, for it reveals our true priorities.

 

Russia has made the decision to forbid the adoption of Russian children to citizens of foreign nations if those countries allow so-called “gender transitioning.” The bill was signed into law after it passed both houses of Russia’s parliament. We can infer, then, that it had majority support among the political class—something that certainly wouldn’t be mirrored in the United States. 

 

Russia is often villainized to fantastical proportions; but on social issues, the nation so often reflects where we ought to be. Protecting all children from the evil that is mutilation is a noble goal. Yet, American news outlets condemned Russia’s new law as “anti-LGBT legislation.”

 

To be clear, Russia has denied adoptions to America since 2012, allegedly due to mishandling of child abuse cases and the scant prosecution of its offenders. Regardless, the revulsion at Russia’s latest law shows that it is no longer self-evident in America that protecting children from mutilation is obligatory. A case could be made that protecting children in America is no longer the priority that it used to be.

 

 

Increasingly, children who are up for adoption are being placed into the arms of homosexual men. Sometimes, such men purchase children outright via surrogacy. All of this we allow, and some even encourage it.

 

Christians and conservatives have long since warned about the risk of child sexual abuse in these scenarios, in addition to denying the child of a healthy family dynamic through the absence of a mother. These concerns have been dismissed and ridiculed, and we are beginning to see the results.

 

There is a horrifying new trend in which homosexual pedophiles are adopting children for the sake of sexual exploitation and then sharing them with other homosexuals.

 

Cody Richison is a teacher who was recently arrested by the FBI for child pornography, at which time it also emerged that he had raped a child. His 10-year-old victim was a friend’s foster son, and he had talked about becoming a foster parent himself. Texts between himself and fellow-pedophile Joseph Sampson revealed Sampson asking, “You really want to do the pedo family thing?” to which he replied, “Yes, I do.” Cody talked in the same text exchange about a “guy in Henryetta that has a 3-4 year old.”

 

What we’re seeing is the emergence of homosexual couples acquiring children for this explicit purpose and then “sharing” such children within organized pockets. A similar situation occurred in Georgia, when Zachary and William Zulock repeatedly sexually abused their adopted “sons” and filmed the acts to share with others. They even sold one of the children to another man so the boy could be sodomized for profit. That nightmarish situation continued for years before they were apprehended.

 

Zachary and William Zuloch with their sons 

 

Allowing gay couples to adopt children is a relatively new phenomenon, but it has already become unexceptional (or even unquestionable) to many. There was once at least a tacit understanding that children need a mother and a father; and for that reason alone, a homosexual couple would not suffice. It was also once common to admit that pedophilia is more likely by people who have disordered sexual impulses, but nowadays, that’s a verboten topic.

 

Defenders of homosexual adoption often make bold statements about how “loving gay homes” are better than being in “the system.” They do not realize that such residences exemplify the specific context to which the phrase “the system” refers disparagingly. Houses that do not provide adoptive children with loving families are “the system.” 

 

 

They're shopping for a baby

 

We should not be so quick to dismiss the woes of the foster care system as a mere heartless institutional building but, instead, as an institution that is neglectful and reckless about where it places children. From the outside, sometimes children who are placed in homes look like they are in “families,” and it is therefore easier for our sensibilities than something that looks and feels too close to a prison or a hospital. Yet, a home is not inherently better than communal housing.

 

To answer the loud objections: yes, heterosexual pedophilia exists and even sometimes takes place in adoptive homes. Evil finds many quarters. Yet, pedophilia is much less likely to be the reason for such adoption, at least because it would be statistically improbable for both mother and father to have sexual attraction to the child. 

 

While we cannot prevent every case of abuse, we should do everything possible to reduce the chances of it occurring, which includes not placing children in the homes of those with disordered sexual appetites.

               

Our reluctance to talk about these issues represents our placement of cowardice over the lives and welfare of some of the most vulnerable children. Being pro-life was never limited to ensuring children’s birth, and fighting against these injustices must be a segment of that movement. 

 

Giving children in foster care and those up for adoption the best possible chance ought to be among our highest priorities. We can accomplish this by working to remove financial barriers to adoption, encouraging married couples to have children (naturally or via adoption), and ensuring that those most likely to be a threat to children are not given custody of them. It is what we can do for the least among us. The Ugly Truth About Gay Adoption - Crisis Magazine

Author

• 
  Sarah Cain

  Sarah Cain, known as The Crusader Gal, is a political and cultural commentator who makes videos about the decline of the West, and she writes Homefront Crusade. She is the author of Failing Foundations: The Pillars of the West Are Nearing Collapse.

Jesus on the Cross, Salvador Dali (after a drawing by St John of the Cross)

The road is narrow. He who wishes to travel it more easily must cast off all things and use the cross as his cane. In other words, he must be truly resolved to suffer willingly for the love of God in all things

- St John of the Cross, Confessor and Doctor of the Church