TE PATI MAORI IS NZ'S HOME-GROWN HAMAS

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter). (Protestant rants will get no oxygen on this page.)   

 

This is the age of the cry-bully, a hideous hybrid of victim and victor, weeper and walloper

 

The barbarism, the hate and the treachery on display in New Zealand's House of Representatives yesterday must have inspired many decent Kiwis to wonder where the good Maori have gone. Te Pati Maori represents only a tiny 3.8% of the electorate, so why is the rest of Maoridom not howling in protest against Ngarewa-Packer, Waititi and Hana-Raiti Maipi-Clark (how they love those colonialist hyphens) and their frantic antics?

It's encouraging for Pakeha tangata whenua - who have every reason to fear Marxist rule by default in their country - to hear a Maori voice speak clearly now against the sinister cabal of Toitū te Tiriti, a creature of the Mad Hatters' Tea Party. Tommy Lee Oscar (no hyphens or Te Reo there) argues that Toitū te Tiriti is "the Kiwi version of Hamas", the militant wing of Te Pati Maori.'

 

Hamas' M O, says Oscar, includes violent armed resistance, terrorism, genocide, kidnapping, rape, and torture, and points out that historically Maori have been guilty of  the same crimes against Moriori and their own people. 

Meanwhile Don Brash of Hobson's Choice is spitting tacks on the side of right and closet Commie Chloe Swarbrick is showing her demonic side on that of the left (read on).

Toitu Te Tiriti on its way to Wellington 

Toitū te Tiriti is a 'Māori Resistance' Militant Group taking over New Zealand and currently causing widespread public disruptions as they march towards the nation's Parliament.

The movement publicly proclaims to uphold, promote and defend Te Tiriti o Waitangi (The Treaty of Waitangi).

I am Māori, and I would argue "Toitū te Tiriti" is the Kiwi version of Hamas, the militant wing of a New Zealand political party, 'Te Pati Maori'.

The only difference is that their resistance operates in New Zealand, a peaceful and democratic civilized country where we enjoy the freedoms and luxury of not only 'Peace' but 'Law and Order'. 

The Toitū te Tiriti movement and Hamas in Palestine share several thematic similarities.

 

Both movements are rooted in RESISTANCE against what they perceive as oppressive governance or policies. For Toitū te Tiriti the resistance is against New Zealand Government legislative actions and policies perceived to undermine the Treaty of Waitangi.

 

Te Pāti Māori's natural response to the government's legislative action was to PROTEST. They decided to create a movement of Māori people to push back on the government's reforms in the real world all across the motu, from the top of the North Island to the bottom of the country - and voila! the Māori-led Militant Group 'Toitū te Tiriti' was born.

 

Debbie Ngarewa-Packer 'shoots' David Seymour in Parliament

The Māori militant group came to fruition intending to uphold Māori rights and sovereignty by creating widespread disruptions, spreading misinformation and through intimidation to gain sympathy and support.

 

Similarly, Hamas' resistance is directed at Israeli occupation and policies seen as infringing on Palestinian people's rights and their right to self-determination. Both Resistance movements use their children to advance their cause.

 

 

Toitū te Tiriti and Hamas utilize grassroots activism, with Toitū te Tiriti organizing hīkoi (marches) and non-violent protests (can't exactly say peaceful when they're loud and noisy), whereas Hamas will use political and militant means to assert their cause.

 

Yesterday Labour's Māori Caucus leader and MP Willie Jackson joined the militant group's march across the Auckland Harbour bridge on its way to Parliament, saying "we're coming after this Government".

 

This type of statement by elected members of Parliament incite, threaten and INTIMIDATE, with potential to lead to political violence. That is their point and the movement's intention.

 

The two militant groups (both resistance movements) seek to solicit and engage international attention, support and sympathy. They both highlight the same issues of indigenous rights, sovereignty, and the fight against cultural and political subjugation.

 

While Toitū te Tiriti focuses on non-violent peaceful protest and advocacy, Hamas's methods include violent armed resistance, acts of terrorism, genocide, kidnapping, rape, torture, and many other barbaric atrocities marking a significant difference between the two movements, today.

 

But it should be noted once upon a time Māori indeed did do all of those things to the Moriori and their own people as is well documented in history books.

 

Another major noteworthy difference between the two movements is the entirety of the Hamas Political Party and NOT just the military wing have all been officially designated a 'terrorist entity' by the New Zealand Government on 29 February, following the Oct 7 attacks last year against innocent Israeli civilians.

 

Australia listed Hamas in its entirety in March 2022, the UK in November 2021. The United States has designated Hamas in its entirety since 1997, as has Canada since 2002, and the European Union since 2003.

 

Despite that official declaration and designation by the NZ Government, Te Pāti Māori, an elected political party in New Zealand and by affiliation the 'Toitū te Tiriti' militant group, have been staunch vocal supporters and loyal defenders of Palestine, including their elected lawless Hamas terrorist government and Hamas sympathizers.

 

As a Māori with my own independent thoughts and political views, I see Toitū te Tiriti for what it is, a threat to democracy and a political weapon, a Māori-led military wing full of Māori warriors and people using their culture and heritage to do the bid of Te Pāti Māori.

 

In my opinion it is also a platform for organisers to campaign on and build their image/brand and to get their names in the history books all at the cost of Te Ao Māori. Unfortunately, I can't just watch silently so this is my personal counter-protest against their protest where I highlight the special relationship between the organisers and members of Parliament.

 

Maori must know they're all pawns for Te Pāti Māori, Labour and the Greens, all three (3) political parties are in a coalition against the Government and sadly Māori my own people are the pawns in their political conspiracy to cause chaos for this government.

 

When did the movement start?

Toitū te Tiriti was established in December 2023. Little was known about the movement, and who was behind it. The faceless social media campaign at the time didn't reveal much about the person or people behind it, meaning the group was shrouded in complete mystery.

 

What are they protesting?

The Māori militant group is protesting the Coalition Governments legislative agenda, particularly the Act Party's "Treaty Principles Bill" brought by deputy Prime Minister in-waiting and Māori MP the Hon. David Seymour. 

 

Who is behind it?

Earlier this year, on February 6 at the Waitangi Day protest at Waitangi Eru Kapa-Kingi, alongside Kiri Tamihere-Waititi and Hohepa Thompson, revealed themselves as the founders and organizers of the 'Toitū te Tiriti' movement. So who are they?

Founders | Organisers

 

Kiri Tamihere-Waititi

 

Dr. Kiri Tamihere-Waititi A clinical psychologist with a background in kapa haka and Māori advocacy, she is a co-founder of the Toitū te Tiriti movement. Kiri is the daughter of John Tamihere, president of Te Pāti Māori and is married to Rawiri Waititi , the co-leader of Te Pāti Māori. Kiri brings a significant political and cultural influence to her activism.

 

Eru Kapa-Kingi

Eru Kapa-Kingi, 28 Is also a co-founder of the Toitū te Tiriti movement. He is deeply engaged in Māori rights advocacy, employing his legal background and position as a Professional Teaching Fellow at Auckland University to further the cause. (Not surprised he is an academic, most are usually activists brainwashing people with their bullshit narratives.) Eru's mother is Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, representative for Te Tai Tokerau, and a Te Pāti Māori MP.

Hohepa Thompson, aka 'Hori' 

 

Hohepa Thompson, 39 Also known as 'Hori', is an artist and activist who is also a founder of Toitū te Tiriti and designed the movement's symbol, an image reflecting both Māori and non-Māori elements. Although not directly affiliated with Te Pāti Māori in an official capacity, his work aligns with the party's goals of advocating for Māori rights, especially through his art which challenges both Māori and non-Māori communities. His involvement in Toitū te Tiriti underscores the group's cultural and political elements, emphasizing the importance of art in political activism.

Below is the link to the actual Treaty Principles Bill, officially the 'Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill'.

This bill will NOT repeal, replace or do away with the Treaty of Waitangi. This bill does NOT erode the rights or freedoms of Māori. Read the full "Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill"https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2024/0094/latest/whole.html?search=ts_act%40bill%40regulation%40deemedreg_Treaty+Principles+Bill_resel_25_a&p=1#LMS1003433

to fully understand firsthand rather than from what scared people are telling you.

I understand that my article comparing Toitū te Tiriti to Hamas, a terrorist entity, will upset some audiences including from my own whanau, hapu and iwi. I do not apologise for having my own independent opinion and political views. With this article it is my hope to be informative and to put a mirror in front of protesters so they can see how divisive and misinformed they appear to others, including myself, a conservative right wing Māori.  Tommy Lee Oscar.

 

Tommy Lee Oscar (on X)

 

 And now, from a thoroughly disgruntled Don Brash of 'Hobson's Choice':

 

Hana-Raiti Maipi-Clark, NZ's youngest-ever MP and she acts it

 

A picture paints a thousand words and the photograph above is a snapshot of the most disgraceful reading of a Bill I can recall in New Zealand's history.

The Treaty Principles Bill is not the first controversial and polarising Bill to have been introduced to New Zealand's Parliament. We have debated abortion, same-sex marriage, and the foreshore and seabed. Inevitably emotions have run high and sharp words have been exchanged, but the behaviour displayed yesterday fell far below the standards we expect of elected officials.

Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke instigated a haka as the vote was being tallied at the end of the speeches. She tore the Bill in half and took to the floor along with her party colleagues. She and Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer performed the haka right up to where David Seymour and ACT sat. Their actions were intimidating and aggressive, and that was the intention.

 

Speaker of the House Gerry Brownlee was left with no option but to suspend the House and empty the gallery which was full of Te Pāti Māori supporters who were also taking part in the haka. It was complete disorder.

Once everyone returned to the House - except Willie Jackson because he had been kicked out earlier for calling David Seymour a liar - Parliament voted to suspend Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke for 24 hours. The Government majority outvoted the opposition parties who all voted against the punishment.

Now, a 24-hour suspension might seem like a pointless and meagre consequence, but the act of the Speaker 'naming' an MP as Speaker Brownlee did is very significant. Maipi-Clarke will have one day of pay docked also.

However, the young MP should not have been the only MP to face consequences. Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi was disorderly in his own speech and concluded it by shouting the colloquialism "see you next Tuesday" at David Seymour. He will, of course, say that he was referring to the protest next Tuesday, but it is relatively well-known that it also refers to a certain four letter word.

 

Likewise, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer's intimidation of David Seymour was not unlike that of Julie Anne Genter toward Matt Doocey some months ago, and that resulted in a referral to the Privileges Committee. There is no excuse for aggression and intimidation in our House of Parliament no matter if it is cloaked in claims of cultural practice.

We can all stand around pointing and saying "how disgraceful," but there is action we must take on a few different matters.

1. I encourage you to send an email to the Speaker urging him to crack down on disorderly conduct and slipping standards. His email is: speakers.office@parliament.govt.nz

2. You might also like to send an email to the Government party leaders asking them to make an appeal to the Speaker for stricter policing of rules and standing orders. christopher.luxon@parliament.govt.nz david.seymour@parliament.govt.nz and winston.peters@parliament.govt.nz

3. Write to the media about the matter: a letter to the editor, or an email to decision makers about how they are reporting on the issue.

3. Get ready for the first phase of our response to the Treaty Principles Bill which will come next week. This phase is about putting pressure on the Prime Minister to respect New Zealanders and listen to our submissions.

4. Pop over to David Seymour's Facebook, Instagram, or X and give him a few words of encouragement. What he is doing takes a great deal of courage and we should make sure he knows he has the backing of many New Zealanders.

5. Chip in to our fund to make sure we keep the attention on support for the bill throughout the 6-month Treaty Principles Bill consultation period. Donate here. 

I am worried. We are at a crossroads and I fear it could go either way. Our leaders need us to strengthen their spines because they are vulnerable to the intimidation, manipulation, and coercion of the media and activists - some more vulnerable than others.

The media are firmly supportive of the activism of Te Pāti Māori and their hīkoi. In fact, one of TVNZ's most senior executives, Nevak Rogers, has taken annual leave this week to attend the hīkoi. Her social media posts and activism are directly oppositional to TVNZ's laughable claims of impartiality. How can we be expected to have faith in TVNZ's balance when their Chief Content Officer is behaving in such a partisan manner?

 

The time has come for New Zealanders to loudly express our honest opinions. This doesn't come naturally for many of us. We are generally a non-confrontational and laidback people, but too much is at stake. We need to openly state support for the Treaty Principles Bill and David Seymour's agenda for equality and clarity. Share your views with friends and family. Post on social media. Be bold.

If we do not emphatically stand up for democracy and what is right now, we will lose the ability to do so at all. New Zealand needs you.

Remember "the standard you walk past is the standard you accept."

 

Jenny Shipley: "the Treaty Principles Bill "is inciting civil war". No. TPM is inciting civil war

Here's Chloe Swarbrick, Greens' co-leader and MP for Auckland Central, who supports Gaza Gaza terrorism and Maoridom racism, speaking in Parliament and reported on X as "in full satanic mode":

Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill — First Reading 

 

CHLÖE SWARBRICK (Co-Leader—Green):

 

When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression. That is what is behind this bill. Its architect tells us that this is about equality, but we do not have equality in this country. Pick almost any statistic that you like—housing, incarceration, health, life expectancy—Māori get unfair and unequal outcomes because of unfair and unequal treatment which started with the Crown's intentional violent actions to dishonour Te Tiriti o Waitangi. 

Capitalism, an economic system with the key priority being to turn profit at almost any cost, needs colonisation. This insatiable, unsustainable economic system needs to assimilate and acquire new frontiers to exploit. It needs to turn every citizen into a consumer and to commodify our natural world. And right now, in this country, the biggest thing standing in its way is the resilience and the fire in the enduring movement from mana motuhake.

 

When Te Tiriti was signed, Māori outnumbered Pākehā by 40 to one. Can you imagine a small group of people coming to this country, signing an agreement to look after themselves in orderly cohabitation, then, instead, taking our land and our language? Well, that is the abridged history of Aotearoa New Zealand. That is what the British Crown did in establishing this Parliament and its institutions. The legacy of that violence, oppression, theft and colonisation and the breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi is represented in today's deeply unequal and unfair statistics in people's lives.

 

Pākehā mā, tauiwi mā, we have been told for almost all of our lives that Māori sovereignty is something to be afraid of. Who has been telling you that? Who benefits and who pays the price?

 

The discomfort that you feel, that I once felt, is an invitation to listen, to learn, to understand, and to honour. Te Tiriti o Waitangi is gift. It is a blueprint of an Aotearoa that respects people and planets. It is the antidote to the exhaustion and the disenfranchisement that I know profoundly is felt in communities across this country right now.

Now, some politicians will tell you that we just need a clean slate for the past. They will tell you that people today should not be held responsible for the actions of our forebears. So let's be really, really clear here: you do not need to be personally responsible for the historical dishonouring of Te Tiriti o Waitangi to actively benefit from that horrific legacy today. That is the truth. But this Parliament does benefit. All 123 members of this Parliament do benefit. The power in this place, in this Parliament, was built on a legacy of deceit, dehumanisation, and domination, and today all 123 members of Parliament will vote to either further entrench that utterly shameful legacy or to be honest and to do something about it.

 

The Prime Minister has told us that there's nothing that he likes about this divisive bill. He's told us that the National Party don't support this bill. 

And we're not going to forget it. Or allow the PM to forget it either. We'll remind him next election day. 

Any member of Parliament in this Chamber right now can call for a personal vote on this bill to vote differently from their party, to put the country above partisan politics. A leader or a whip cannot stop MPs' constitutional right to vote how they know that they need to.

 

My question to MPs is: are you here to hold on to power at any cost or are you here to do the right thing? Are you here to listen to your conscience or are you here to give it all up on one of the most significant votes in this House in our lifetime? Because if you wear the mask for a little while, it becomes your face. We are what we do.

Swarbrick's own mask slipped badly some months ago in Parliament. In a photograph taken in profile her expression clearly indicated a malevolent spirit, inadvertently captured on camera.    

If you vote for this bill, that is who you are and this is how you will be remembered. Toitū Te Tiriti.

 

 

Seville Cathedral, built over a mosque; now mosques replace churches 

Lord save us, we perish 

+WELBY RESIGNED - NEXT IT COULD BE FRANCIS

Best to comment by opening your gmail account. Or by email, Messenger of X (Twitter). Comment on FB are too many to post (except of course for exceptions).

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a heretic and an antipope. Now he's looking like a heretic, an antipope and a sadist. While supplanting the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church with the post-conciliar, Novus Ordo Synodal Bergoglian sect, he has deprived the diocese of Tyler, Texas of the Traditional Latin Mass, exactly one year after he sacked its faithful shepherd, Bishop Joseph Strickland. One can only imagine the grief 'America's Bishop' now shares with his flock. 

Just the day before Bergoglio took his revenge on his courageous critic +Strickland, Ed Condon, editor and cofounder of The Pillar commented on the Príncipi case saying, “Frankly, I am running out of innocent explanations here.”  The story of convicted priest child abuser Ariel Alberto Príncipi’getting off - and Antipope Francis' involvement - resonates with the resignation 2 days ago of 'Archbishop' Justin Welby, following a damning report into a prolific child abuser associated with the Church of England. 

If the head of the Church of England can face the music on sex abuse, so can the head of the Catholic Church. Francis is in fact not the head of the Catholic Church but as its pretender, usurper pope he can be brought to justice, in this world as he will be in the next. It's astonishing that prelates, priests and people still call him 'Pope Francis' but that can change too. The God Who ordained that Donald Trump should win three consecutive presidential elections can drive fear of the truth from Catholic hearts.

Bergoglio 'blessed' by Archlayman Justin Welby (the Anglican Church lacks valid holy orders) 

 I returned from the Martinmas festivities today to face the news that has hit American traditionalists since last Saturday. As many American Trads were still celebrating the victory of Trump, the Vatican Regime of New Iconoclasm struck the little diocese of Tyler, Texas. 

 

 

Diane Montagna on X (Twitter):

JUST IN: #Vatican cracks down on Traditional Latin Mass in Tyler,Texas, one year after Bishop Strickland’s removal. Dicastery for Divine Worship informs current apostolic administrator that celebrations according to the 1962 Missal at the Cathedral will end as of Nov 30th. (1/2)

 

 

As you may recall, the Vatican regime previously cut off the head of the diocese, Bishop Strickland, for the unpardonable crime of preaching Catholicism, all while giving “Rapenik” a parish. 

What follows is that story, published by One Peter Five exactly a year before. 

 

 "RAPENIK" GETS A PARISH, STRICKLAND GETS REMOVED

TS Flanders, November 11 2023

(It's now more than a year since the Vatican announced it would open a canonical case on 'Rapenik' - Father Marko Rupnik, the famous mosaic artist and former Jesuit accused of spiritual, psychological, and sexual abuse. Victims say they feel disappointment and betrayal at the Church’s lack of response and transparency.) 

 

News broke this morning that the stalwart man of God, Bishop Strickland of Tyler Texas was removed from his diocese.

 

The official announcement was terse:

The Holy Father has removed Bishop Joseph E. Strickland from the pastoral care of the diocese of Tyler, United States of America, and has appointed Bishop Joe Vásquez of Austin as apostolic administrator of the same diocese, rendering it sede vacante.

This is the definition of arbitrary power: the reason given is that it is the will of the Pope.

This is the definition of bishops being treated as “Vicars of the Roman Pontiff” (condemned by Lumen Gentium).

This is the definition of the spirit of Vatican I.

The Catholic Church has become a tyranny of arbitrary power, wielded by the vicar of Logos Incarnate. It is the very essence of anti-Logos: voluntarism.

What is voluntarist justice? The will of the stronger power over the weaker power.

The Pope is not bound by laws of God or laws of men – canon law, Tradition, whatever else may bind him to justice.

His will is law. His whim is decree.

The Pope says to all laws and customs and obligations to follow charity: non serviam.

The Pope says to all justice and due process: non serviam. 

The Pope says to the cries of the faithful little ones, spiritually abused by wicked clerics, heretics, and the worldwide regime of Marxist globalism: non serviam. 

The Pope says to Mercy Himself: non serviam.

Cardinal Pell of happy memory, one of the Pope’s key advisors, summed up this pontificate well when he said:

Commentators of every school, if for different reasons, with the possible exception of Father Spadaro, SJ, agree that this pontificate is a disaster in many or most respects; a catastrophe… Previously it was: “Roma locuta. Causa finita est.” Today it is: “Roma loquitur. Confusio augetur.”

 

Yes it’s a disaster. Yes it’s a catastrophe. 

 

But it’s more than confusion. It’s naked injustice.

 

The juxtaposition of “Rapenik” getting a parish and Strickland being forced out accurately sums up this pontificate’s cries to heaven for vengeance. (After years of outcry, the “Great Reformer” Pope Francis has been forced to lift the statute of limitations on Rupnik.)

 

Thanks be to God, the good bishop has been counted worthy to suffer for the Faith! And they indeed went from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were accounted worthy to suffer reproach for the name of Jesus  (Acts v. 41).

Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake: Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you (Mt. v. 11-12).

Wipe away your tears, brethren, and let us rejoice that this immense suffering has come upon this man of God. For therein are his prayers and penances given a multiplication of merit.

Almighty God will have the last laugh .“Rapenik” Gets a Parish, Strickland Gets Removed: the Francis Pontificate - OnePeterFive

A meme that went 'viral'

 

 

Thus in line with the consistency of the pontificate of our Holy Father, the Dictator Pope, while this was happening last weekend for Tyler, a potentially worse scandal even than Rupnik is brewing, according to CatholicSat: 

Catholic Sat

@CatholicSat

·

Follow

This is a massive story, and the potential to be a massive scandal for Pope Francis, far graver than Rupnik and Zanchetta combined. The faithful deserve answers in all three cases, no matter how disturbing the truth may be.

 A day before the Vatican crackdown on Tyler happened on Saturday, Ed Condon commented on the Príncipi case last Friday saying, “Frankly, I am running out of innocent explanations here.”

 

https://www.bishop-accountability.org/2024/10/why-the-principi-case-matters/ 

But let’s return to the peripheries and go back to that rural diocese of Tyler, Texas. The city of Tyler is quite small indeed, with only 105,995 souls according to the 2020 census. I myself had the great joy of hearing the then Bishop of Tyler speak last year at the CIC, shortly before he was sacked. I was amazed at the childlike courage of this man of God. I became quite convinced he was a worthy succesor of the Apostles.

Since his sacking, it seems he is trying to follow the path of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen in his later years: committing to preaching the Gospel.

In season. Or out of season.

 Thank God for this good bishop! He has not been excommunicated, like Archbishop Viganò.

2018 - and still the cardinals and bishops stay shtum

 

But what readers may not know, is that many faithful, traditional Catholics have moved to Tyler, Texas over the years to help build up Catholic culture as a part of the “great Catholic migration.” This included what The Pillar falsely maligns as “a controversial residential project”: the Veritatis Splendor Community.

 

(The community itself is Catholicism 101, build a Catholic City, like they did in St. Marys, Kansas, and literally what all our forefathers did for 2000+ years until the age of the automobile created the suburbs. So no, it’s not a “controversial residential project.”

 

What is controversial, Pillar, is that some of the Catholic leadership has been justly criticised – some individual Catholics are controversial, not their project. Two of the leaders of this community committed a public sin and were accused of financial misconduct, but the whole thing was from an anonymous tip, causing Simcha Fisher to ask “Who funded Kari Beckman’s fall from grace?”)

 

Nevertheless the community has endured, trying to do Catholicism 101, just as Bishop Strickland was trying to do Bishop 101, while the world’s bishops (with notable and happy exceptions) were struggling to be the best Vicar of the Roman Pontiff, contrary to Lumen Gentium  27. 

 

After Strickland’s sacking, the community’s (and the diocese’s) interest in the Latin Mass has no doubt been noticed, and now the latest news.     

 

The man appointed to head the diocese (the nearby bishop Vásquez) did not want to act like Bishop 101, but rather a “Vicar of the Roman Pontiff – again that thing that Lumen Gentium 27 condemns – so he asked the Vatican Regime what they wanted to do with the five Latin Mass centers. This allows him to appear like an obedient Catholic, and allows him to condemn anyone who disobeys him. But it also reveals him as a hireling, who does not care for the sheep but runs and hides when he sees the wolf.

 

 “What shall I do,” asked the Hireling, “with this tiny minority of faithful families on the peripheries?”

  “GIVE THEM THE AXE!” thundered the Wolf Regime in  Rome, who loves the margins and the peripheries, where the sheep can be scattered.

 

And so, like a good Vicar of the Roman Pontiff, the Most Reverend Joe. S. Vásquez mercilessly persecuted this tiny minority, by stripping them of all five Latin Masses in his diocese, contrary to what his own letter said: 

 

Vásquez has the gumption ...

 

Perhaps the writer means 'the gall' rather than 'the gumption' 

... to openly mock his persecuted flock by saying that

While this transition may be difficult for some, my hope is that you will open your hearts and move forward on this path with faith and trust. I pray you will experience a deepened unity with the holy Church and greater awareness of the liturgical richness of the ordinary form of the Roman liturgy.

 

Ahem, you’re still using the Ratzinger newspeak, Your Excellency. The new newspeak is “Only form of the Roman Rite.” The Latin Mass is no longer Roman, even though it uses the Roman tongue. Summorum Pontificum is down the memory hole.

 

If this is not open mockery from His Excellency, then it is unpastoral ignorance. Would he welcome a dialogue with his own flock to help inform him about what the Roman  Rite is? Seriously, why not say this to his face, with the proper Catholic reverence for a bishop?

 

But let’s compare this false and forced “deepened unity” with what Vatican II actually says about liturgical unity:

 

The Holy Catholic Church, which is the Mystical Body of Christ, is made up of the faithful who are organically united in the Holy Spirit by the same faith, the same sacraments and the same government and who, combining together into various groups which are held together by a hierarchy, form separate Churches or Rites. Between these there exists an admirable bond of union, such that the variety within the Church in no way harms its unity; rather it manifests it, for it is the mind of the Catholic Church that each individual Church or Rite should retain its traditions whole and entire and likewise that it should adapt its way of life to the different needs of time and place (emphasis added: Orientalium Ecclesiarum, 2).

But this truly Catholic statement has not been followed by Rome since the reform of the Roman Rite (excepting in all the work of Joseph Ratzinger, who alone seemed to take these words to heart).

 

The Principi case of sexual abuse against minors is also centred in Argentina

 

The Tyler Traditionalists Must Stand Firm, and Invite more SSPX Priests!

 

We should thank God for the FSSP, who are suffering for playing the long game here. By God’s Providence, their priests will now shoulder the care of all these souls who will flock to their parish in Tyler – but how far now will these souls have to drive to be Roman Catholics who have access to the ancient Roman Rite?

 

There is one SSPX chapel in the Tyler diocese, in Clayton, one hour's drive southeast of the city of Tyler. With so many Latin Mass faithful now stripped of their rights to the Rite, more SSPX priests should be invited to care for souls.

But I cannot imagine the heartbreak that some of these families are enduring – having moved across this vast American Empire to find some solace for their children in Catholic culture in the Tyler diocese, and then the Vatican cuts off the head, and mercilessly persecutes the Latin Mass minority.

 

But brethren, consider one thing: our Chinese Catholic brethren. They have suffered under perhaps the most murderously anti-Catholic regime in history, and now they have seemingly been betrayed by the Vatican, and they have kept the Faith. Some risk imprisonment or worse to have the Sacraments.

 

Let us face every new suffering with the joy of faith: Jesus, having joy set before him, endured the cross, despising the shame, and now sitteth on the right hand of the throne of God  (Heb. xii. 2).

 

This is only way to pass down the Faith to our children in this time of desolation. This holy patience will endure all things. And most importantly, let us not harden our hearts against the Holy Father, nor those Hirelings who seek to be his Vicar, contrary to their consecration as bishop. 

 

Let us be good Christians and love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us. Otherwise we are unworthy of the name of Christ.

T. S. Flanders

Editor

Pope St. Martin

All Dominican Saints https://onepeterfive.com/the-vatican-regime-goes-to-the-peripheries-to-persecute-minorities/

 

Bishop Joseph Strickland

“I have loved justice and hated iniquity. Therefore, I die in exile”

 

- dying words of Pope St. Gregory VII