Scroll down for comments. If you wish to comment please use your gmail account, or if you know Bruce's email address or mine, use those - or go to Facebook. Thank you.
Going by Bishop Charles Drennan's contradictory remarks on his WYD blog at https://pndiocese.org.nz/bishops-blog/wyd-2019/
Bruce Tichbon believes his people can conclude the following:
1) that now there are no rules in the
Church
2) That there is such a thing as Church
theology (which means doctrine and ‘rules’), but some of the ‘rules’ are
wrong
3) That as ‘homosexuality’ and ‘gender
dysphoria’ are within God’s plans for humanity already, we don’t need new rules
How does Bishop Drennan’s blog lead us to
these conclusions? Let’s analyse the issues in more detail.
1) No rules in the Church:
Bishop Drennan
quotes from Pope Francis’ opening address at WYD: “Christianity is
not a collection of truths to be believed, of rules to be followed, or
of prohibitions. Seen that way it puts us off. Christianity is a person who
loved me immensely, who demands and asks for my love. Christianity is
Christ.” *
Is this a bad translation? But it seems to be the
official Vatican version. Surely Pope Francis means ‘Christianity is not
merely a collection, etc’.
So should I take the Ten Ccommandments down
from my wall?
2) Wrong theology (doctrine):
Bishop
Drennan says: "And in some areas, it’s time theology caught up with
science." Bishop Drennan is obviously saying that doctrine (he uses the
word theology, but he clearly means Church doctrine) on homosexuality is wrong,
it must change. The science you speak of Bishop, please show us, at least a
couple of web links?
3) Bishop Drennan says, "I don’t
mind putting my neck on the line for love. To pretend that homosexuality and
gender dysphoria do not exist or are somehow outside God’s plan for humanity is
a rejection not defense of truth and thus nonsensical."
He seems to be asking for new rules on
homosexuality. But the Pope says there are no rules now, just
‘love’.
If we’re having a Catholic discussion on
homosexuality, we should use Catholic terminology. Then we know whether we’re
talking about same-sex attraction, or homosexual acts. If you use the
unqualified term ‘homosexual(ity)’ the reader doesn’t know if you are referring
to one or the other, or bundling them together.
If Bishop Drennan is telling us
that homosexual acts are part of God’s plan, doesn’t Sacred Scripture tell us he
is potentially sending that person to Hell (and potentially himself too, but to
a deeper level of Hell)?
How can homosexual acts be love? Love, in the eyes of God and His Catholic Church, means doing for others what will
bring them closer to Christ and his Kingdom. By quoting the Pope’s words,
Bishop Drennan indicates that homosexual acts are love – but how can he say that?
These high-level statements are
contradictory and ambiguous. Coming from Pope Francis and our Bishop, they just don’t cut it.
They cause confusion in the Church; the Devil is here, in the detail. So please
gentlemen give us the truth – with clarification of the so-called
'science' – in a clear, consistent, statement of doctrine. It is your duty to your flock.
A final comment on our
troubled communications: it’s good that our young people at WYD had a chance for
group dialogue face to face with their bishop. We parishioners back home don’t
seem to get the same opportunity.
Without that opportunity we are forced to use
web sites to communicate, which makes some in the hierarchy uncomfortable - during
WYD, Pope
Francis said, "in some Catholic communications
media, there is no compassion. Instead, one finds
schism, condemnation, malice, fury, self-
aggrandizement (and) the denunciation of
heresy."
Francis said, "in some Catholic communications
media, there is no compassion. Instead, one finds
schism, condemnation, malice, fury, self-
aggrandizement (and) the denunciation of
heresy."
There
is a communication problem, but with due
respect, the solution lies mostly in the hands of
the hierarchy.
respect, the solution lies mostly in the hands of
the hierarchy.
Paul Collits says:
As someone far cleverer that either the Bishop or the current Pope once said, "love" contains within it both eros and agape.
It's Drennan and Francis who are hung up about the eros, not orthodox Catholics.
And eros can be either ordered (to nature) or not.
Homosexual desires are radically disordered. Homosexual acts are sinful. This has not changed, nor will it, despite what some temporary occupants of high Church office might think or say.
Their time will pass. Eternal truths, such as those taught by St Thomas Aquinas, 'the Angelic Doctor'. will not.
I reply:
Dogma has truth, it is more true even than science, and the object of dogma is above and beyond man. Likewise, sins against dogma are the most grievous of all, and errors concerning ideas are more dangerous than those concerning men.
Take away dogma and you take God away: to touch dogma is to touch God. To sin against dogma is to sin against God.
- Fr Pierre Rousselot, 'The Intellectualism of St Thomas Aquinas'.
No comments:
Post a Comment