To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger .or X.
If 'Pope Leo XIV' and his enforcer, 'Cardinal' Tucho Fernandez excommunicate the Society of St Pius X (SSPX) next week, how will they explain themselves? Because the SSPX has sent them their Profession of Faith and it actually sounds 'more Catholic than the Pope'. As people used to say when describing some uber-radical traditionalist - but no one uses that expression any more. For obvious reasons.
The SSPX Profession of Faith would surely would make any Catholic proud of their religion, privileged by God to be chosen for membership of His Mystical Body, and eager to persuade others less fortunate to come in from the cold of our dechristianised culture.
Leo, Tucho and their conciliar company cannot possibly deny any of the truths so precisely intoned within its 28 pages. They cannot possibly excommunicate the Society for teaching and preaching the deposit of Catholic faith. The SSPX has written a new syllabus of errors for this postconciliar age in the Church.
Leo, Tucho and Co have painted themselves into a corner. Because even the world they so assiduously woo (except for Donald Trump) will laugh them to scorn for hypocrisy in turning a blind eye to what even that world knows is evil, especially clerical sex abuse. If the SSPX is to be excluded from the Vatican's freakish, postconciliar, synodal substitution for the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church it will be - as Leo himself has spelled out - for their wholesale rejection of the Second Vatican Council, its errors and ambiguities.
Today, for the third time in less than a week, Leo met with Tucho yet again. They're poised on the horns of a dilemma and it seems the leader of the Catholic Church is leaning on a man who writes soft porn to solve the crisis.
For the hyperpapalists who are having a field day there's no solution but excommunication. The SSPX, they cry, are disobedient! For them - mostly Trad Inc types - what 'the Pope' says, goes. It seemingly matters little to them that if Vatican II and the Novus Ordo are honoured rather than Tradition and the Traditional Latin Mass, millions of souls will be lost by disobedience to the suprema lex of the Church. Strange to say, they do not call for excommunication of the bishops illegally appointed by the Chinese Communist Party. It's the SSPX and their chapels that have them tossing and turning on their pillows.
St. Robert Bellarmine: “Just as it is licit to resist a Pontiff who attacks the body, so also is it licit to resist him who attacks souls or destroys the civil order or, above all, tries to destroy the Church. I say that it is licit to resist him by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will. It is not licit, however, to judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior.”
St. Thomas Aquinas: “It is written (Acts 5:29): ‘We ought to obey God rather than men.’ Now sometimes the things commanded by a superior are against God. Therefore, superiors are not to be obeyed in all things."
And the Lord said: Simon, Simon, behold Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and thou, being once converted, confirm thy brethren." (Lk 22, 31.)
The wheat is now being sifted from the chaff. Pray for Leo. Pray for Tucho. For the extraordinary consistory of cardinals convened in Rome tomorrow, from which the prominent, conservative Cardinals Joseph Zen, Péter Erdő, and Willem Eijk will be missing, "due to health concerns".
[T]he proximity of the [SSPX] consecrations appears to have prompted the Holy See to revise its original agenda. The initial intention was reportedly to return to the two topics that received the least support at the previous meeting, among them the liturgical question.
Since the latter remains one of the obstacles—though not the principal one—in dialogue with the Lefebvrists, the Apostolic Palace preferred to steer clear of it.https://dianemontagna.substack.com/p/cardinals-zen-erdo-and-eijk-to-miss
 |
The Society of Saint Pius X sent Leo XIV and the cardinals a profession of Catholic faith on the eve of the consistory and days before the July 1 episcopal consecrations at Écône.
The document is devastating because it does not sound like a factional manifesto. It sounds like the Catholic Church.
It begins with divine revelation, the supernatural order, the Trinity, original sin, the Incarnation, Redemption, Mary, the Church, the papacy, moral law, the Social Kingship of Christ, the sacraments, the Mass, the last things, and the modern crisis.
That is precisely why Rome finds it intolerable.
The SSPX does not ask for a liturgical boutique. It does not say, “Please let us have our preferred spirituality.” It says the crisis is doctrinal.
It says modernism, indifferentism, liberalism, ecumenism, laicism, situation ethics, false religious liberty, synodalism, and liturgical anthropocentrism have invaded the life of the Church. It says the Faith must be professed whole, not trimmed into phrases suitable for United Nations speeches and interreligious photo ops.
That is the offense.
The SSPX profession names what Leo XIV and Francis endlessly blur. Christ is the sole Redeemer. Grace is necessary. False religions do not save as false religions. The Church is the one ark of salvation.
The Mass is a propitiatory sacrifice. Moral disorder cannot be blessed. Pastoral practice cannot contradict doctrine. The Church is hierarchical, not parliamentary. The Magisterium guards the deposit; it does not invent a new religion by calling it development.
Rome hears this and reaches for excommunication.
That tells Catholics everything.
The Catholic Faith Versus the Religion of Dignity
The profession’s most powerful section may be its rejection of modern religious humanism.
It says human dignity cannot be invoked against the law of God, against conversion, or against submission to revealed truth. That single line cuts through almost every speech Leo XIV has given since his election. Human dignity has become the master key of the postconciliar religion. It opens every door except the door to repentance.
Leo speaks of dignity before migrants, dignity before global agencies, dignity before interreligious delegations, dignity before modern political assemblies. Francis did the same with fraternity, accompaniment, mercy, and encounter. The pattern is familiar. Man’s natural worth becomes the center. Sin recedes. Conversion becomes impolite. The Cross becomes a symbol of solidarity more than the altar of propitiation.
The SSPX profession restores the order.
Man has dignity because God created him and calls him to a supernatural end. Sin wounds that dignity. Grace restores and elevates it. No human being is honored by being left in error, vice, false worship, or rebellion against God. A Church that refuses to call men out of darkness is not respecting their dignity. It is abandoning them.
That one contrast exposes the whole Francis-Leo system. They speak as though the Church’s mission is to accompany human dignity wherever it already stands. The SSPX speaks as though the Church’s mission is to bring fallen man to Christ, the sacraments, penance, truth, and eternal life.
One is Catholic.
The other is the chaplaincy of global liberalism.
The SSPX Profession Says What Fiducia Supplicans Tried to Evade
The SSPX profession says moral acts are good or evil according to their conformity with divine law. It rejects situation ethics and the idea that circumstances can make intrinsically evil acts good.
It rejects contraception, abortion, euthanasia, adulterous unions, unions contrary to nature, and every attempt to present public states contrary to divine law as imperfect goods or realities to be blessed.
That is Catholic doctrine spoken without the greasy layer of pastoral doubletalk.
Now compare that with Francis and Fernández.
Fiducia Supplicans told the world that couples in irregular situations and same-sex couples could receive blessings, while insisting that doctrine had not changed. That is the postconciliar trick in its purest form.
Keep the official sentence. Change the public sign. Say the union is not being blessed while everyone in the real world sees the couple presented for blessing. Call it pastoral, spontaneous, and non-liturgical. Call it mercy.
The SSPX document refuses the game. It says true mercy calls the sinner to conversion. It says pastoral practice that contradicts doctrine is not pastoral. It says charity names evil because the goal is salvation.
No wonder Rome wants this document off the table.
If the SSPX is right, then the entire Francis-Fernández moral project stands exposed as sacramentalized evasion. If the SSPX is right, the new pastoral paradigm is not mercy, but cowardice.
Fernández as Rome’s Messenger Is an Insult
Leo XIV sent Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández to deal with the SSPX.
That choice alone is almost a parody.
The Society presents a profession of faith grounded in Trent, Vatican I, Pius IX, Leo XIII, Saint Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII, the anti-modernist tradition, the Roman Mass, Catholic moral absolutes, and the Kingship of Christ.
Rome sends the man associated with Fiducia Supplicans, the great blessing-confusion document of the Francis era. Rome sends the man whose old erotic theological writings became a global embarrassment.
Rome sends the prelate whose public reputation among serious Catholics is tied less to doctrinal clarity than to the collapse of moral seriousness at the very office once charged with defending the faith.
This is the new Holy Office speaking to tradition.
Fernández.
That was a message.
Rome does not intend to be converted by Tradition. Rome intends to process Tradition through the department that made blessing moral disorder sound pastoral.
The SSPX could hardly have received a clearer sign that the problem is not misunderstanding. The problem is identity. The men running the doctrinal apparatus of the postconciliar Church do not want the old Catholic doctrine to judge them. They want their offices to judge the old doctrine.
Leo XIV Has Time for Everyone Except Tradition
Leo XIV’s Rome can meet almost anybody.
Leo met Sarah Mullally, the first female “Archbishop” of Canterbury, and prayed with her. The symbolism was grotesque. A woman occupying a pseudo-episcopal office in a communion born from schism and royal lust receives a Vatican welcome, a private meeting, and ecumenical dignity.
Her “archbishopric” is impossible by Catholic doctrine, Anglican orders are null, and female ordination is a theological absurdity. Yet Rome treats the event as an ecumenical milestone.
Leo also met Bad Bunny in Madrid. A reggaeton celebrity whose public world is light years from Catholic moral discipline can get a private encounter during a papal trip, because celebrity culture apparently belongs among the “peripheries” to be charmed.
The SSPX Superior General gets Fernández, warnings, conditions, and a Vatican II loyalty test.
This is the rotten comedy of the age.
Everyone gets dialogue until the old Catholic faith enters the room. Anglicans get prayers. Pop stars get warmth. Interreligious delegations get praise. Migrants get bowed before. Global agencies get speeches on dignity. Progressive Catholic figures get infinite patience. Sexual revolutionaries get “discernment.” The Germans get years of conversation.
The SSPX gets told: accept Vatican II, suspend the consecrations, or face consequences.
Leo’s “todos, todos, todos” has fine print. Everyone is welcome except the Catholics who remember what Rome taught before the council.
Vatican II Is the Real Dogma Now
Leo’s remarks about the SSPX named the actual issue. The SSPX refuse certain fundamental elements of the Church, beginning with several points of the Second Vatican Council.
There it is.
The four new SSPX bishops are not being threatened because they deny the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Real Presence, the Mass as sacrifice, the necessity of grace, original sin, hell, purgatory, Marian doctrine, the papacy, or the moral law.
The SSPX is being threatened because it refuses Vatican II.
That council has become the real creed of the postconciliar institution. It is the gate. It is the oath. It is the identity marker. You may say almost anything in the new church if you wrap it in accompaniment, synodality, dignity, dialogue, and pastoral concern.
You may undermine the old moral law slowly. You may turn ecumenism into religious theater. You may praise false worship with trembling reverence. You may reduce mission to humanitarian cooperation.
You may not say Vatican II is the problem.
The SSPX profession says exactly that. It identifies the modern errors penetrating the Church under the influence of Vatican II and the postconciliar reforms. It says the crisis cannot be reduced to sensibilities, liturgical preferences, or pastoral options. It says the crisis touches the foundations.
That is why Rome is angry. The SSPX refuses to play the conservative game of pretending that Vatican II must mean the opposite of what its children keep doing with it.
The Society points to the tree and judges it by its fruit.
Rome responds by threatening to cut down the men who still know what fruit is.
The Excommunication Threat Reveals the Inversion
The Vatican has warned that the July 1 consecrations would incur excommunication. Reports have also circulated that Rome may go further, branding the entire SSPX structure and possibly its priests and faithful as schismatic.
Consider the inversion.
A bishop can praise a mosque as sacred.
A cardinal can welcome an LGBT conference and invoke the Holy Spirit over its proceedings.
A pope can honor a fake female Anglican “archbishop.”
A Vatican doctrine chief can approve blessings that make moral disorder look pastorally ratified.
A celebrity culture figure can receive papal attention.
German synodal revolutionaries can spend years attacking Catholic doctrine while remaining conversation partners.
The SSPX consecrates bishops to preserve the old Mass, Confirmation, priestly ordination, traditional formation, Catholic doctrine, and sacramental life, and Rome prepares the excommunication hammer.
This is not discipline in defense of the faith. It is discipline in defense of the revolution.
The old Catholic understanding of excommunication was medicinal. It protected the flock from error and called the sinner back to truth. The postconciliar use of excommunication increasingly functions as border enforcement for Vatican II. It's used to tell traditional Catholics that survival outside the conciliar cage will not be tolerated.
Rome has no moral credibility for this performance. The men who watched the sanctuary burn, then punished the people carrying water, should not lecture anyone about ecclesial arson.
The SSPX Profession Is Stronger Than the Men Judging It
The most humiliating fact for Leo’s Rome is that the SSPX document is stronger, clearer, more Catholic, and more coherent than the ordinary public teaching coming out of the Vatican.
Read the profession on the Mass. It says the traditional Roman Mass expresses with incomparable clarity the doctrine of sacrifice, priesthood, and the Real Presence. It says the new reforms obscured the sacrificial and propitiatory character of the Mass, fostered a democratic conception of worship, and brought Catholic liturgical expression closer to Protestant conceptions.
Every honest Catholic knows this is true.
Read the SSPX profession on synodality. It rejects turning the hierarchical Church into a consultative, parliamentary, or democratic structure subject to world pressure. Every Catholic watching the synodal machine knows this is exactly what has happened.
Read the profession on moral law. It rejects the dissociation between doctrine and pastoral practice. Every Catholic watching Amoris Laetitia and Fiducia Supplicans knows this is the fracture point.
Read the profession on false ecumenism. It rejects endless dialogue with false religions and unbelievers as a replacement for magisterial teaching. Every Catholic watching the interreligious circus knows this is the new religion’s public face.
The document is not embarrassing. The Vatican response is embarrassing.
A Catholic profession of faith has been placed before Rome, and Rome’s answer is essentially: suspend your bishops and accept the council that created the crisis.
That is not Peter confirming the brethren.
It is a bureaucracy protecting its founding myth.
The Real Question
The SSPX says Tradition contains the remedies for the Church’s deepest ills.
Leo XIV says Vatican II is non-negotiable.
Those two claims cannot be reconciled by another study group.
If Tradition is the rule, Vatican II must be judged by what came before it. If Vatican II is the rule, Tradition must be reinterpreted, trimmed, apologized for, and managed until it fits the new order.
That is the whole war.
The SSPX profession has forced the issue with unusual clarity. It does not ask Leo to be nicer or for a better liturgical compromise. It does not ask to be one approved flavor inside a pluralistic conciliar menu.
It says the faith is one, the Church is one, the truth is immutable, the Mass is sacrificial, Christ is King, false religions do not save, moral disorder cannot be blessed, and the Holy Ghost does not inspire today what He condemned yesterday.
Leo’s Rome can either accept that as Catholic or condemn it as schismatic.
If it condemns it, Catholics should pay attention. The condemnation would say less about the SSPX than about the men issuing it.
Apostate systems always reveal themselves by what they cannot tolerate.
This one can tolerate almost anything except the old Catholic faith spoken without apology.https://bigmodernism.substack.com/p/the-sspx-professes-the-catholic-faith
 |
| St John the Baptist Leonardo da Vinci St John the Baptist, pray for the Church |
No comments:
Post a Comment