CATHOLIC DOCTRINE IS 'HATE SPEECH': GOOGLE

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 

 

It's not as if we haven't been warned. And by no less a person than the Mother of God.  The conciliar, Novus Ordo Synodal sect is no longer the Catholic church as we knew it. But there's evidence of what we knew already, that the Deep State of Davos prefers the Deep Church  -  the conciliar, Novus Ordo Synodal sect installed in the Vatican - to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church founded by Christ: Catholic doctrine is now being censored.

Last week the traditional Italian Catholic blog Messa in Latino was removed by Google from its platform, Blogspot, for "hate speech". As the best source of Vatican news and leaks, it had noised abroad Jorge Mario Bergoglio's mendacious manipulation of the bishops' survey in order to suppress the Latin Mass worldwide. And about this particular leak certain parties, it's said, were simply furious.

Strange to relate, this humble rad-trad blog, which shares the same platform, nosedived as never before after reporting on that scandal too, and on +Leo XIV making yet another Lavender Mafia appointment, and wearing the satanic pectoral cross of Joseph Cardinal Bernardin. Does the Deep State of Global Technocratic Communism (so cogently described by the excommunicated Archbishop Vigano) have a vested interest in protecting the conciliar popes of the Deep Church?   

 

St Jacinta Marto of Fatima: "Russia will spread her errors throughout the world' From The Remnant Magazine: The Vatican has been caught, again, in a blatant deception, this time over the very document that declared war on the traditional Latin Mass. We now know that the bishops consulted in 2020 overwhelmingly opposed restrictions on Summorum Pontificum.

 

The “episcopal wishes” Pope Francis claimed to be honoring in Traditionis Custodes were either misrepresented or ignored outright. The real decision, it seems, came from a few unelected bureaucrats in the Congregation for Divine Worship, not from the shepherds of the Church.

 

This revelation, rightly dubbed “Vatican Watergate,” should have rocked the foundations. Instead, we get silence, or worse, calls for “patience.” The institutional machine doesn’t blink. And neither, apparently, does Cardinal Raymond Burke.

The Apostasy That Dare Not Speak Its Name

 

Burke recently preached on the Fatima message, warning of the “practical apostasy” infecting the Church: souls turning from Christ, clergy living in contradiction to the Gospel, and spiritual confusion reigning. It’s a bold phrase. But what exactly is this apostasy? Who is driving it? Burke never says. And that’s the problem.

If Leo XIV is the true pope, as Burke insists, then isn’t it his job to end the apostasy? To stop the confusion, reassert doctrine, and reverse the damage? Burke seems to sense the storm but refuses to name the captain steering the ship into it. He denounces the storm clouds but salutes the helm.

 

No Correction, No Clarity

 

When Francis refused to answer the five Dubia, questions directly asking whether his teachings contradicted Scripture and Tradition, Burke issued no formal correction. No call for renunciation. No public appeal for repentance. Only silence, followed by exile.

 

Now, under Leo, we are told that this is a new day. A man of “interiority” and “community,” an Augustinian friend of the peripheries. But nothing essential has changed. Traditionis Custodes remains in force. Bishops loyal to the Mass of the Ages are still being replaced. The “errors of Russia,” materialism, collectivism, and doctrinal relativism, continue to spread from Rome, not in opposition to it.

 

Imagine the Novus Ordo Mass in this setting

Where is Burke’s call for the Holy Father to fulfill Our Lady’s requests, not with vague gestures or ambiguous prayers, but with a clear and public consecration? Where is his demand that Leo condemn the lies of Fiducia Supplicans, the banishment of tradition, and the ongoing global synodal revolution?If the apostasy is real, and it is, why was its architect allowed to remain on the Chair of Peter?

 

The Myth of Francis the Outlier

 

Part of the psychological trick lies in the illusion that Francis was an aberration, an isolated liberal interlude. Now that Leo is here, continuity will return. But continuity with what?

 

Leo’s election was hailed as a moment of global ecclesial unity. Why? Because, we are told, he “checked all the boxes”: mission field, peripheries, collegial diplomacy. Above all, he worked closely with Francis. This is not reform, but regime consolidation. A smoother operator advancing the same program with more tact and fewer headlines.

 

And yet we’re told to wait. To trust. To see who Leo really is. As if the calendar erased what came before.

 

The Crisis Is Not Just Policy, It’s Truth

 

Burke speaks movingly of those who live contrary to the Faith, who spread confusion and embrace lies. But it is precisely official Vatican documents, from Amoris Laetitia to Traditionis Custodes to Fiducia Supplicans, that have codified those lies.

 

They have formalized confusion.

 

"Formalised confusion"

 

The Latin Mass wasn’t simply restricted. It was accused of fostering “division,” and those attached to it were accused of being “ideologically distorted.” The Mass canonized by Trent and loved by the saints is now, according to the Vatican’s highest liturgical officials, a threat to unity.

 

"A threat to unity"

 

This is not mere policy, but theological inversion. The truth has been rebranded as dangerous. And the pope remains silent, or complicit.

 

The “Supreme Law” of Sentiment

 

In a recent Angelus address, Leo XIV declared that the supreme law is to “serve life by caring for others,” even before society’s rules. Sounds noble. But where is the “supreme law” of divine worship? Of doctrinal clarity? Of saving souls?

 

Charity without truth is not love. It’s flattery. And the Church is being drowned in it.

 

Leo invokes eternity but replaces it with activism. He speaks of salvation but makes it horizontal. The Gospel is reduced to accompaniment. And yet the men charged with guarding the faith remain mute, afraid of “schism,” or of losing their pensions.

 

Conclusion: Burke’s Broken Compass

 

Cardinal Burke has spent years warning about the crisis in the Church. But warnings are no longer enough. If the apostasy is real, then the silence about its source is complicity. The faithful deserve clarity. Not euphemism. Not sentimentality. Not empty appeals to “Fatima.”

 

Our Lady did not come to request general prayers. She asked for repentance, for consecration, for a return to Catholic truth. And she warned what would happen if that call went unheeded.

 

We’re living in the aftermath. If Leo is pope, Burke should demand that he condemn the lies, repeal Traditionis Custodes, and restore the Mass. If he won’t, then he should finally issue that formal correction he threatened and never followed through on. If not, he should stop pretending that the crisis can be solved from within the walls that built it.

 

The apostasy has a name. And so does the silence that enables it.Chris Jackson from Hiraeth In Exile <bigmodernism@substack.com>

 

Raymond Cardinal Burke

 

 

 

On July 11, 2025, the blog Messa in Latino was removed without any prior notice from the Blogspot platform, owned by Google. This is truly alarming because the site was the primary source of unofficial Catholic Traditionalist news, often straight from the Vatican and the Holy See.

 

Since then, visitors are met with the blunt message: “Sorry, the blog has been removed and the address is not available for new blogs.” This development—widely covered by Italian press (see here, here, here, here, here, here) and also echoed abroad (see here)—has taken on truly alarming proportions when one considers that the site, while not a formal news outlet, was the primary source of unofficial Catholic Traditionalist news, often straight from the Vatican and the Holy See.

 

Just to illustrate: Messa in Latino recorded over one million global page views in the month of June 2025 alone, with 22,000 posts published or archived, and around 250 more already scheduled for release. Founded in 2007 following the publication of Benedict XVI’s Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, the blog became one of the most prominent critical voices against Pope Francis in Italy starting in 2013.

 

 

It has often published firsthand sources well ahead of others, concerning documents, reforms, scandals, and internal proceedings within the Leonine Walls. A blunt and uncompromising blog, no doubt—but always respectful of truth and of the Church’s hierarchy.

 

The blog was run by four Italian lay Catholics, but the most recognizable figure is undoubtedly that of entrepreneur Luigi Casalini. A longtime friend of this writer, Luigi is certainly not someone who spreads hatred or discord—rather, he is a candid individual who contributes, with the resources at his disposal, to the protection and promotion of Catholic worship.

 

During the three years I collaborated with Fede & Cultura—Italy’s most prominent Catholic publishing house in the traditionalist sphere—I frequently had the chance to organize livestreams featuring Casalini. And I consistently noticed something rather curious: YouTube, also owned by Google, regularly penalized and limited the visibility and distribution of these videos.

 

Casalini’s remarks were typically aimed at (very politely) criticizing certain decisions made by Pope Francis. Has Google suddenly become an ardent defender of the papacy? We have serious doubts about that.

 

A troublesome investigative book?

 

It remains unclear which specific post or statement triggered Google’s censorship. In recent months, Google had already taken down several particularly sensitive articles without warning—only to restore them later, after the blog's administrators requested clarification.

 

These included: an interview with Bishop Strickland opposing the admission of women to the diaconate; a scholarly piece by Professor Corrado Gnerre exploring the fraught historical relationship between the Catholic Church and Masonic obediences; a reference to official Catholic doctrine on same-sex relationships; and finally, a post dating back over ten years featuring a video of Kiko Arguello, founder of the Neocatechumenal Way, in which he expressed hope that Pope Benedict XVI would pass away.

 

 

Fr Nicola Bux: "Francis cannot abdicate his duty to teach clearly" 

More likely, however, what triggered the guillotine this time was an interview conducted by Luigi Casalini with Fr. Nicola Bux (available in Italian here). Together with well-known Catholic commentator Saverio Gaeta, Fr. Bux co-authored the book La Liturgia non è uno spettacolo (Fede & Cultura, 2025), an investigative work released in the midst of the scandal surrounding Pope Francis's Motu Proprio Traditionis Custodes. Curiously, the book was also removed from Amazon around the same time.

 

In the book, Bux and Gaeta revisit the concerns already raised several days earlier by Vatican journalist Diane Montagna, offering a deeper exploration from both historical and theological perspectives. Saverio Gaeta skillfully traces the entire history of the “liturgical war” waged over the past century by ecclesiastical Freemasonry and neomodernist theologians—from the reforms preceding 1962, to Summorum Pontificum, and ultimately Traditionis Custodes.

 

Particular emphasis is placed on the work of the Consilium established by Paul VI to clarify and implement the directives of the conciliar Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium regarding the liturgy and its reform.

 

Fr. Bux had already spoken exclusively with us at The Remnant about the importance of recovering, studying, and delving deeper into these works. Readers can find the full interview with Fr. Nicola Bux at this link.

 

 

Pro-TLM billboards in Rome featuring MiL posts 

Bux and Gaeta’s book goes on to thoroughly analyze the now-famous questionnaire on the pastoral effectiveness of Summorum Pontificum, circulated in 2020 at the behest of the then Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which had yielded positive results.

 

Those results, however, were allegedly tampered with and manipulated by Francis and his most fervent anti-Tridentine allies (Roche, Viola, Parolin—see here for details), in order to ban the free celebration of the Mass according to the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.

 

Could this be the real reason behind Google’s censorship? Accusing Francis of having “lied” (not my words—I usually prefer a moderate tone—but those of a sizable number of commentators and Vatican observers from around the globe) about the true intentions of the bishops?

This blog was't one of them. Bergoglio didn't literally lie; he just drastically manipulated the truth. As he was wont to do. As we know. 

  

This was Fr. Bux’s response to Casalini’s final question: “Whoever devised Traditionis Custodes and its related measures did not implement synodality. Not only that: they distorted the synodality expressed by the bishops in their answers to the questionnaire [emphasis ours, Ed.]. Regarding these ‘sins against synodality,’ let a mea culpa be made, and let us gradually return to the status quo ante. The entire Church will benefit from it.”

 

The implications of such censorship

Let us return for a moment to the accusation leveled by Google against the blog Messainlatino.it. Is Catholic doctrine truly a discourse that incites hatred?

 

In the meantime, after (unsuccessfully) sending Google a letter co-signed by four lawyers, highlighting the unjustified suppression of freedom of the press and expression—explicitly protected by Article 21 of the Italian Constitution—an emergency legal proceeding has been scheduled for Monday, July 14, 2025.

 

The case seeks a judicial review of the decision to de-index and obscure the blog’s content, in accordance with Article 700 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure, and requests the immediate suspension of the platform’s action and restoration of the site’s visibility, pending an ordinary ruling.

 

Italy is, supposedly, the quintessential Catholic country. But if even in Italy it is no longer permitted to publicly profess the Catholic faith in its most pure and integral form, where else will it be?

 

Where can the Traditional Mass still be defended, the Catechism quoted, theological errors denounced, and appeal made to the Church’s enduring Tradition?

 

To what extent is it reasonable to suspect that a systematically anti-Christian mindset is influencing the criteria by which global platforms decide what can or cannot be said? And to what extent can one tolerate that Christ’s doctrine—built upon the inseparable union of truth and charity—is being labeled as “hate speech”?

 

Are we not, by now, immersed in a new form of totalitarianism? A subtle, digital totalitarianism that—for the moment, at least—does not come dressed in uniforms or wielding batons, but cloaked in algorithms and opaque policies, enforced by the quiet power of automated censorship and “terms of service.”

 

A Novus Ordo church - "a new form of totalitarianism"

 

Yet it is precisely this silence that harbors its deepest danger. We no longer erase the person—we erase the word. And with it, memory. And with it, truth.

 

This censorship is not merely against a blog: it is a symptom of real hatred—the world’s hatred—directed at faith and at the freedom of Catholics.

 

We have long entered a historical moment in which fidelity to Christ and to the eternal Church is not merely poorly tolerated, but actively persecuted. A mute Church is desired: submissive, molded to fit secular mentality, the rhetoric of inclusivity, and the logic of political and media power. But is this not precisely the worldly spirit the Lord sternly warned us against? The Remnant Newspaper - BREAKING! Outrage in Italy: Google Silences Leading Voice of Catholic Tradition

 

 

“No, I say to you; but except you do penance, you shall all likewise perish” (Lk 13:5).