Wednesday, 30 July 2025

AVOID CRUELTY SAYS + LEO - SO WHAT ABOUT THE TLM?

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Protestants who find this irresistible are warned - no anti-Catholic rants are posted on this page except to explain Church doctrine.



.

What Vatican II was really all about.

 



Vatican II is a horror story to make one shudder, and Pope Leo XIV is working on the next chapter. In Latin of course, to please the Trads. The perfidy of the Conciliar Church - a grotesque counterfeit of the Catholic Church - is nothing short of preposterous. And that's the trouble. Millions of apostate Novus Ordo-ites unwittingly disenfranchised of their religion can't, or won't, believe the evidence. 


Their cognitive dissonance is such that they cannot recognise or relate the proven freefall in Massgoing and priestly/religious vocations to the Second Vatican Council. Of arguably the most significant event of the 20th century - the Marian apparitions at Fatima and its Third Secret, https://x.com/i/status/1950367782845239525  promising the entire world apocalyptic disaster for our failure to pray and do penance  - they know little or nothing, because faithless post-conciliar popes have disobeyed the Queen of Heaven and concealed the truth. Because it damns the Conciliar Church. 


Consider the terrible weight of sin and souls lost, clearly visible in queues of communicants daring to take their God in their hands while not in a state of grace (there are no pew-queues at the confessional in the Novus Ordo). But “Ignorantia juris non excusat”: ignorance of the law excuses no one, as they will eventually find out.  


The Conciliar sect has become a spiritual front for global Communism, convenient for Davos Inc's implementation (as with the Covid 'vaccine') of a New World Order. Well-meaning good Catholics-turned-useful idiots in the Novus Ordo must make their escape before the going gets bad.    



When you mirror "The Resurrection", Paul VI Hall, the Vatican. The pope sits under this "work of art," and we see what it really represents.


Pachamama worship ritual at Paul VI Hall (note prelates' Freemasonic posture)


 

 In his July 27th Angelus address, Pope Leo XIV spoke of our need to avoid cruelty to others if we want to be able call God our “Father”:

“When we recite the Our Father, in addition to celebrating the grace of being children of God, we also express our commitment to responding to this gift by loving one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.

 

"Reflecting on this, one of the Fathers of the Church wrote: ‘We must remember . . . and know that when we call God ‘our Father’ we ought to behave as children of God’ (Saint Cyprian of Carthage, De Dom. orat., 11), and another adds: ‘You cannot call the God of all kindness your Father if you preserve a cruel and inhuman heart; for in this case you no longer have in you the mark of the heavenly Father’s kindness’ (Saint John Chrysostom, De orat. Dom., 3). We cannot pray to God as ‘Father’ and then be harsh and insensitive towards others.”


 

+Leo wearing the anti-Christic Francis/Bernardin pectoral cross (below)

 

https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/02/20/swine-hellfire-and-sodo-imagery-the-bernardin-bergoglio-pectoral-cross-is-an-icon-of-the-antichrist-read-on-for-disposal-instructions/


 

As grateful as we may be to Leo XIV for this pious exhortation, we are left to wonder what the new pontiff intends to do to address one of the most wicked cruelties in the world today: the Vatican’s continued attacks on the unadulterated Catholic Faith and its persecution of those souls who want nothing more than to practice our religion as faithfully as possible.

 

Borrowing the words of St. John Chrysostom from the Angelus, can Leo XIV call God his Father if he maintains his silence about these unfathomably evil cruelties?

 


 

The real Sr Lucy of Fatima (l), and the fake Sr Lucy (r) set up by the Vatican to suppress the truth of the Third Secret 



 

To put the matter in perspective, we can consider the first questions and responses in the Baptism ceremony:

Priest: N, what do you ask of the Church of God? Response: Faith. Priest: What does Faith offer you? Response: Eternal life.”

 


For the Conciliar Church’s first “World Childrens’ Day” the Vatican presented a drag queen

 



The Faith is what souls have wanted from the Catholic Church ever since Our Lord established it. However, in his 1977 
sermon for priestly ordinations at EcĂ´ne, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre asserted that since around the time of the Second Vatican Council the Vatican has been turning souls away from the Faith:

“What was the first word the priest said to us when we were infants and could not speak for ourselves, and to which our godparents replied? ‘What do you ask of the Church of God?’ That was the question the priest put to our godparents: What do you ask of the Church of God? We ask for faith. That was what our godparents answered.

 

"And now we too ask from the Church, or from those who say they are of the Church, those occupying important posts in the Church, those responsible for that faith — we ask them: ‘Preserve the Faith for us, give us the Faith. That Catholic Faith is what we want. We want no other.’ ‘Why do you ask for Faith?’ the priest said to our godparents to gain Eternal Life? We have no other purpose here below except to gain Eternal Life; life on earth is a fleeting life, an ephemeral life-a few days, few years, a few decades.

 

"We have to choose if we want Eternal Life-Yes or No. We want Eternal Life, and for that we want the Catholic Faith. But we are compelled to state that for fifteen or twenty years those with the highest authority in the Church, the Holy See and the Vatican, have been turning away, turning us away from the Catholic Faith and have become the friends of our enemies.”

 

Was Archbishop Lefebvre accurate in his assessment that the Vatican has been turning souls away from the Faith?

 

As one indication among many, we can consider the 2025 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) study recently cited by Rorate Caeli:

 

“Using an event-study design, we find that rates of religious-service attendance in predominantly Catholic countries started to decrease relative to those of all other countries and to those of other Christian countries precisely in the aftermath of Vatican II.

 

This result holds for adult and child religious-service attendance and also holds when using the share of a country’s catholic adherents as a continuous measure of a country’s exposure. Overall, the Catholic relative attendance rate fell by four percentage points per decade between 1965 and 2015.

 

This pattern is consistent with religion modeled as a club good (Iannaccone [1992]) and with the view that Vatican II shattered the perception of an immovable, truthholding Church (Greeley [2004], MacCulloch [2010]). More generally, these results might explain why many religious authorities are reluctant to modernize their doctrine or reduce barriers to religious participation.

 

The Catholic Church  (Pope St Pius X)

The Conciliar Church (the mascot Luce)

 

This sad story of declining Mass attendance after Vatican II is familiar to many who have studied the crisis in the Church and certainly comports with Archbishop Lefebvre’s assessment. The changes that Rome has promoted in furtherance of the Vatican II revolution have robbed Catholics of the Faith, which has led predictably to the emptying of pews.

 

Another tragic development which aligns with Archbishop Lefebvre’s assertion is the reality that so many truths of the Catholic Faith are no longer accepted by many of those who identify as Catholic. Consider, for example, that many bishops, priests, and laity appear to reject one or more of the following infallible (De fide) truths, among others, from Dr. Ludwig Ott’s Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma:

  • The Sacraments of the New Covenant are necessary for the salvation of mankind.”
  • The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ are truly, really and substantially present in the Eucharist.”
  • Souls who depart this life in the state of original sin are excluded from the Beatific Vision.”
  • “Without the special help of God the justified cannot persevere to the end in justification.”
  • “God gives all the just sufficient grace for the observation of the Divine Commandments.”
  • “The Human Will remains free under the influence of efficacious grace, which is not irresistible.”
  • “There is a grace which is truly sufficient and yet remains inefficacious.”
  • “The justification of an adult is not possible without Faith.”
  • “Without special Divine Revelation no one can know with the certainty of faith if he be in the state of grace.”
  • The grace by which we are justified may be lost, and is lost by every grievous sin.”
  • Membership of the Church is necessary for all men for salvation.”

 

    Most of these truths are at least implicitly contradicted by the tenets of false ecumenism and religious liberty, which have thrived since the Council. Far from trying to rectify the erroneous beliefs prevalent among so many nominal Catholics, Rome has continuously exacerbated these evils by turning a blind eye to heresy while persecuting those Traditional Catholics who adhere to what the Church has always taught.

 

    Archbishop Lefebvre’s assessment from 1977 thus appears entirely correct: “those with the highest authority in the Church, the Holy See and the Vatican, have been turning away, turning us away from the Catholic Faith and have become the friends of our enemies.”

 

    For the sake of argument, though, let us just assume that the Vatican II revolution was correct in advancing false ecumenism and religious liberty. As we know, the progressives in Rome have used false ecumenism and religious liberty to praise, defend, and even advance all Christian denominations — Baptists, Episcopalians, Lutherans, and Methodists all have a place of honor in the ecumenical assemblies sponsored by the Vatican.

 

    How is it, then, that the only Christians dishonored and persecuted by the Vatican are those Traditional Catholics who make great sacrifices to adhere to what the Church has always taught? The phrase “diabolical disorientation” seems like an entirely accurate answer.


'Diabolical disorientation' is actually an expression used by 'Sister Lucy' of Fatima, in A Little Treatise on the Nature and Recitation of the Rosary, a collection of excerpts from her letters. published in 1973, and quoted over and over again. A paraphrase of words of Paul VI it is an apt description of the crisis in faith and morals at the time. But the 'Sr Lucy' who uttered them was a fake, installed by the progressivists in the Vatican to suppress the truth about the Third Secret of Fatima. Strange but true, and blogged about on this page more than once, and also here:  https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g29ht_Devoion_1.htm  and here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoiNOQWXuZQ  and here: youtu.be/P5hl5JURpkc



    For decades, Traditional Catholics have asked the Church for the unadulterated Faith. In response, the Vatican has effectively made itself like the evil father described by Our Lord in the Sermon on the Mount:

    Or what man is there among you, of whom if his son shall ask bread, will he reach him a stone? Or if he shall ask him a fish, will he reach him a serpent?” (Matthew 7:9-10).


 

Covid vaccine - a serpent

 


    Leo XIV has inherited this Vatican regime that cruelly offers stones to those who ask for bread, and hurls serpents at those who ask for fish. We did not expect him to reverse the Vatican II revolution overnight, but three months is long enough to at the very least speak out against the rampant heresies prevalent among his bishops and assure Traditional Catholics that they will no longer be persecuted by Rome.

 

    Every passing day of Leo XIV’s silence adds to the cruelty of the Vatican II revolution, such that he risks incurring the judgment of his own Angelus message: “We cannot pray to God as ‘Father’ and then be harsh and insensitive towards others.”

 

    We pray that he will heed his own words while he has time. Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us! 

    !https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/7870-pope-leo-xiv-and-the-cruel-reality-of-the-vatican-ii-revolutio


 





 "In her voyage across the ocean of this world, the Church is like a great ship being pounded by the waves of life’s different stresses. Our duty is not to abandon ship but to keep her on her course." - St. Boniface

Pope Leo XIII, please pray for Pope Leo XIV


14 comments:

  1. Dorothy Darveaux30 July 2025 at 14:54


    Pope Francis was not a good holy pope

    ReplyDelete

  2. I go to a parish that has both a reverent NO and the TLM. We take communion on the tongue at the rail in both versions. In both versions the priest is ad orientem. In both versions all 6 confessionals have long lines.. all.. throughout… mass. Hundreds of confessions are heard every week. Please be careful with your words. I’d hate for people to leave the Holy Catholic Church because they are scandalized by the division. Yes, undoubtedly there are many parishes that have gone wacky with the Novus ordo. But also, undoubtedly, we lay folks have zero authority to say the Magesterium is wrong or that the pope is not valid or that the NO is not valid. We have zero authority. Zero. This is also about humility and obedience. We are to be obedient in all that is not sinful. Is the Novus Ordo mass sinful?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Beth Lee yes, lay people have zero authority. But we have a brain and a conscience which God expects us to use, and a heart to love Our Lord and defend Him against abuse.
      You are extremely blessed, obviously, with holy priests who guard Him and their people but it's very painful to witness the damage done in other N O parishes, especially when it affects your own friends and family. And yes, the Novus Ordo is sinful by its omission of so many prayers and Scriptural texts, for example the Gospel in which Christ warns of wolves in shepherds' clothing (Mt 7:15). Read every year in the TLM and NEVER heard even once by Sunday Massgoers in the 3-year cycle of the N O. Now why would that Gospel have been omitted?

      Delete

  3. Um…. The Novus Ordo can already be said in Latin. I’ve been to a few and they’re usually ad orientum as well

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Laura Martin, the Latin language (although it's the official language of the Church) isn't the chief issue. Or ad orientem, even. The N O is thoroughly protestant and as such casts doubt on the validity of the celebrant's Consecration. In such tragically common cases, to say it in Latin and/or ad orientem, to put it somewhat crudely, is to put lipstick on a pig.

      Delete

    2. Julia du Fresne you said Pope Leo was putting the NO in Latin to appease the trads. I was pointing out that’s already been done. It still doesn’t please most TLMers aka that point is moot. Also, speaking of lipstick on a pig, the 3 things required for a valid consecration didn’t change so you’re really only arguing little “t” traditions

      Delete
    3. Laura Martin I said he was writing the next chapter of the Vat II horror story in Latin. It was a metaphor.
      And I believe that because of poor training and contamination, as it were, by N O theology, N O priests are far more likely than TLM celebrants to lack the right intent of confecting the Eucharist.

      Delete

  4. Beth Lee I am pleased that you have the gift of such a great Parish, however it is an exception not the rule, I go to the traditional Mass, I was quite involved in my local NO church for years, on finance committees, svdp, after covid, with the restrictions placed on the non taxed, which I was 1 of, it left me disillusioned, I still go to confession there and they over 200 on a Sunday at Mass in the last 2 years, the most I have seen at Saturday confession , is about 7 including myself, and that was 1 family, the average is usually myself and 1 or 2 others

    ReplyDelete
  5. Michael Champagne30 July 2025 at 15:41


    Is this thr same sensus fidelium as on YouTube? I think it's not and this fb group is schismatic, sspx or worse. Conciliar church? Vatican II is evil, not just the false interpretation of it being evil? You are schismatics on yoir way to damnation. Repent. I'm leaving this group.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Michael Champagne It's the Vatican II Church which is schismatic, not the SSPX (as Bishop Athanasius Schneider has officially affirmed, in defence of the Society).
      The truth hurts, I know, and N O Massgoers in my experience often don't want to hear it: conversion is painful.
      I recommend you read the works of the late, great Michael Davies on Vatican II. Specifically his 'Liturgical Revolution' trilogy, available from Angelus Press.

      Delete
  6. Valerie Anne Nation31 July 2025 at 01:43


    Whatever happened to John Paul 1 ? Reading IN GOD’S NAME at moment. Have an even bigger distrust in the Catholic religion I was brought up
    In. You can’t tell me ALL that corruption of the 70’s just ‘pooffed’ and it was gone!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Valerie Anne Nation so I take it you agree with the thrust of the post? Did you click on the link and read about the two Sister Lucys of Fatima?
      But don't mistake the Conciliar, NO, Synodal post-Bergoglian sect for the Catholic religion you were brought up in. That never changes and resides now in the Traditional Latin Mass movement.

      Delete
  7. The attack on the secular world and the attack on the Church in the 1960's was timed, synchronized. But if the leaders of the Church or the laity had successfully fought them off the attack on the world would have failed or been less effective. If Russia had been consecrated and/or the Five First Saturday Devotion promoted then the attacks would have failed.

    ReplyDelete