ARDERN WILL FACE THE MUSIC - IF ASKED

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.

New Zealanders salivating at the suggestion of Dame Jacinda Ardern giving evidence at the Covid-19 Inquiry had better believe it only when they see it. Because, being the meek, humble soul she is, she's waiting for the Covid Inquiry Commissioners to invite her. But of course they will. How could they not? And if they do, and she shows, would you Kiwis believe a word she said? 

She'd have to be seen to be believed, to be under oath and on film. But even then ... she was filmed taking the vax shot June 18 2021 - but did she really? Test her blood and find out. Test all the vax pushers to find if they took it themselves.

"There are people at risk," she'd said beforehand, "and I'm not one of them". A rare moment of truth from the podium: of course there are people at risk because they're old and sick. But she wasn't and neither were 90% of the population. So why the vaccine? And if it were 'safe and effective' why were a select 11,000 exempted?

Awkward questions which are now being asked or implied by by Sir Ian Taylor, Ryan Bridge, Kerre Woodham, Paddy Gower and deputy-PM David Seymour. But the most awkward questions would be asked by a man the commissioners would never think of inviting - Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano.

+Vigano says that:

"People who have been subjected to inoculation with the experimental serum not only have never been protected from contagion by the virus, nor from grave forms of illness, but they have actually been made more vulnerable to Covid-19 and its variants due to the irreversible compromising of their immune systems caused by mRNA technology."

 

 

 Archbishop Vigano has said a great deal about the 'pandemic', the globalists and the vaccine. He says it more cogently than anyone and has been excommunicated for it. He writes: 

Three years ago I was among the first – and certainly the first Bishop – to denounce pandemic and vaccination fraud. Expressed with arguments that today emerge as true and well-founded are the critical issues and immorality of an experimental gene treatment, which aborted fetuses were and are used to produce. 

 

I expressed my dismay at the silence of the bishops, priests, and parish pastors, of many religious workers involved in hospitals, and at the servile zeal with which the Catholic Hierarchy conformed to the crazy and criminal health regulations and Bergoglio’s promotion of the serum.

 

I was publicly insulted on television and in the media, while my brother bishops were silent. Faced with a crime against humanity that has continued to take place before our eyes for three years with the approval and encouragement of Bergoglio, I would have thought that many Pastors would have found the courage to raise their voices and join in my denunciation of the plan of world depopulation implemented by the Word Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the WHO, and the UN. 

 

The funds of these criminals were also given to the Vatican, transforming Bergoglio into a vaccine salesman and a supporter of climate fraud, which has now become “magisterium” with Laudate Deum and with the “Amazonian and synodal church.”

Nemo propheta in sua patria. But if today some priests surrender to the evidence and ask Catholic journalists to tell the truth about the adverse effects, I wonder with what serenity they have so far silenced their conscience, and if their silence and fearful silence – like that of the doctors, police forces, magistrates, teachers and governors – has not turned into a timid protest today just because they see the showdown approaching and fear for their own reputation more than for the health of the billions of people subjected to the inoculation of a product that was known from the beginning to be dangerous and even lethal.

 

Their silence on the pandemic fraud is identical to that on the apostasy of the Catholic Hierarchy. And the moral responsibility that weighs on them will remain as an indelible stain for which they will have to answer to God, to men, and to History.

Deputy Prime Minister and ACT Leader David Seymour says former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern should appear before the Royal Commission into New Zealand’s covid-19 response.

 

Speaking to Ryan Bridge, Seymour was unequivocal.

 

“Absolutely, she should be there,” Seymour said. “The pandemic and the government’s response to it were major events. I’d argue the most significant political and economic events of this century so far.”

 

Commissioner Illingworth's tacit consent to euthanasia's is morally compromising 

 

The Royal Commission has confirmed it wants to hear from Ardern and former Director-General of Health, Dr Ashley Bloomfield. However, because both are currently based overseas, they cannot be compelled to attend unless they are in the country.

Seymour stressed the importance of their involvement.

 

“We need to get to the bottom of what happened, not just for historical reasons, but because there will be more epidemics in our lifetime,” he said. “We literally cannot afford to respond to the next one the way we responded to the last.”

 

Whoever said crime doesn't pay?

 

Questions remain over whether Ardern intends to cooperate. She has so far refused to confirm whether she will return to New Zealand to give evidence,

She says today that she will if she's asked.  

... whether she has engaged legal representation, or what her general position is regarding the inquiry.

 

Pressed on whether the government had any insight into her plans, Seymour said, “No, we don’t. And I’ve got to stress, the Royal Commission is an independent body. We don’t direct it.”

 

However, he made his personal position clear: “She was the key decision maker. All voices should be at the table.”

 

 

The Royal Commission, which is expected to deliver its final report in early 2026, has already begun hearing from experts, public officials and citizens impacted by lockdowns, vaccine mandates and border closures.

 

 

Ardern’s absence could overshadow its legitimacy if a central figure in New Zealand’s pandemic response opts to stay silent.

 

“People may feel like we’ve moved on,” Seymour added. “But we must learn from this, and that means everyone who played a role needs to front.” https://waikanaewatch.org/2025/07/09/david-seymour-says-she-should-appear-before-the-covid-inquiry/

Archbishop Vigano calls for a global anti-globalist alliance 

 Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on us