Wednesday, 30 July 2025

AVOID CRUELTY SAYS + LEO - SO WHAT ABOUT THE TLM?

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Protestants who find this irresistible are warned - no anti-Catholic rants are posted on this page except to explain Church doctrine.



.

What Vatican II was really all about.

 



Vatican II is a horror story to make one shudder, and Pope Leo XIV is working on the next chapter. In Latin of course, to please the Trads. The perfidy of the Conciliar Church - a grotesque counterfeit of the Catholic Church - is nothing short of preposterous. And that's the trouble. Millions of apostate Novus Ordo-ites unwittingly disenfranchised of their religion can't, or won't, believe the evidence. 


Their cognitive dissonance is such that they cannot recognise or relate the proven freefall in Massgoing and priestly/religious vocations to the Second Vatican Council. Of arguably the most significant event of the 20th century - the Marian apparitions at Fatima and its Third Secret, https://x.com/i/status/1950367782845239525  promising the entire world apocalyptic disaster for our failure to pray and do penance  - they know little or nothing, because faithless post-conciliar popes have disobeyed the Queen of Heaven and concealed the truth. Because it damns the Conciliar Church. 


Consider the terrible weight of sin and souls lost, clearly visible in queues of communicants daring to take their God in their hands while not in a state of grace (there are no pew-queues at the confessional in the Novus Ordo). But “Ignorantia juris non excusat”: ignorance of the law excuses no one, as they will eventually find out.  


The Conciliar sect has become a spiritual front for global Communism, convenient for Davos Inc's implementation (as with the Covid 'vaccine') of a New World Order. Well-meaning good Catholics-turned-useful idiots in the Novus Ordo must make their escape before the going gets bad.    



When you mirror "The Resurrection", Paul VI Hall, the Vatican. The pope sits under this "work of art," and we see what it really represents.


Pachamama worship ritual at Paul VI Hall (note prelates' Freemasonic posture)


 

 In his July 27th Angelus address, Pope Leo XIV spoke of our need to avoid cruelty to others if we want to be able call God our “Father”:

“When we recite the Our Father, in addition to celebrating the grace of being children of God, we also express our commitment to responding to this gift by loving one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.

 

"Reflecting on this, one of the Fathers of the Church wrote: ‘We must remember . . . and know that when we call God ‘our Father’ we ought to behave as children of God’ (Saint Cyprian of Carthage, De Dom. orat., 11), and another adds: ‘You cannot call the God of all kindness your Father if you preserve a cruel and inhuman heart; for in this case you no longer have in you the mark of the heavenly Father’s kindness’ (Saint John Chrysostom, De orat. Dom., 3). We cannot pray to God as ‘Father’ and then be harsh and insensitive towards others.”


 

+Leo wearing the anti-Christic Francis/Bernardin pectoral cross (below)

 

https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/02/20/swine-hellfire-and-sodo-imagery-the-bernardin-bergoglio-pectoral-cross-is-an-icon-of-the-antichrist-read-on-for-disposal-instructions/


 

As grateful as we may be to Leo XIV for this pious exhortation, we are left to wonder what the new pontiff intends to do to address one of the most wicked cruelties in the world today: the Vatican’s continued attacks on the unadulterated Catholic Faith and its persecution of those souls who want nothing more than to practice our religion as faithfully as possible.

 

Borrowing the words of St. John Chrysostom from the Angelus, can Leo XIV call God his Father if he maintains his silence about these unfathomably evil cruelties?

 


 

The real Sr Lucy of Fatima (l), and the fake Sr Lucy (r) set up by the Vatican to suppress the truth of the Third Secret 



 

To put the matter in perspective, we can consider the first questions and responses in the Baptism ceremony:

Priest: N, what do you ask of the Church of God? Response: Faith. Priest: What does Faith offer you? Response: Eternal life.”

 


For the Conciliar Church’s first “World Childrens’ Day” the Vatican presented a drag queen

 



The Faith is what souls have wanted from the Catholic Church ever since Our Lord established it. However, in his 1977 
sermon for priestly ordinations at Ecône, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre asserted that since around the time of the Second Vatican Council the Vatican has been turning souls away from the Faith:

“What was the first word the priest said to us when we were infants and could not speak for ourselves, and to which our godparents replied? ‘What do you ask of the Church of God?’ That was the question the priest put to our godparents: What do you ask of the Church of God? We ask for faith. That was what our godparents answered.

 

"And now we too ask from the Church, or from those who say they are of the Church, those occupying important posts in the Church, those responsible for that faith — we ask them: ‘Preserve the Faith for us, give us the Faith. That Catholic Faith is what we want. We want no other.’ ‘Why do you ask for Faith?’ the priest said to our godparents to gain Eternal Life? We have no other purpose here below except to gain Eternal Life; life on earth is a fleeting life, an ephemeral life-a few days, few years, a few decades.

 

"We have to choose if we want Eternal Life-Yes or No. We want Eternal Life, and for that we want the Catholic Faith. But we are compelled to state that for fifteen or twenty years those with the highest authority in the Church, the Holy See and the Vatican, have been turning away, turning us away from the Catholic Faith and have become the friends of our enemies.”

 

Was Archbishop Lefebvre accurate in his assessment that the Vatican has been turning souls away from the Faith?

 

As one indication among many, we can consider the 2025 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) study recently cited by Rorate Caeli:

 

“Using an event-study design, we find that rates of religious-service attendance in predominantly Catholic countries started to decrease relative to those of all other countries and to those of other Christian countries precisely in the aftermath of Vatican II.

 

This result holds for adult and child religious-service attendance and also holds when using the share of a country’s catholic adherents as a continuous measure of a country’s exposure. Overall, the Catholic relative attendance rate fell by four percentage points per decade between 1965 and 2015.

 

This pattern is consistent with religion modeled as a club good (Iannaccone [1992]) and with the view that Vatican II shattered the perception of an immovable, truthholding Church (Greeley [2004], MacCulloch [2010]). More generally, these results might explain why many religious authorities are reluctant to modernize their doctrine or reduce barriers to religious participation.

 

The Catholic Church  (Pope St Pius X)

The Conciliar Church (the mascot Luce)

 

This sad story of declining Mass attendance after Vatican II is familiar to many who have studied the crisis in the Church and certainly comports with Archbishop Lefebvre’s assessment. The changes that Rome has promoted in furtherance of the Vatican II revolution have robbed Catholics of the Faith, which has led predictably to the emptying of pews.

 

Another tragic development which aligns with Archbishop Lefebvre’s assertion is the reality that so many truths of the Catholic Faith are no longer accepted by many of those who identify as Catholic. Consider, for example, that many bishops, priests, and laity appear to reject one or more of the following infallible (De fide) truths, among others, from Dr. Ludwig Ott’s Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma:

  • The Sacraments of the New Covenant are necessary for the salvation of mankind.”
  • The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ are truly, really and substantially present in the Eucharist.”
  • Souls who depart this life in the state of original sin are excluded from the Beatific Vision.”
  • “Without the special help of God the justified cannot persevere to the end in justification.”
  • “God gives all the just sufficient grace for the observation of the Divine Commandments.”
  • “The Human Will remains free under the influence of efficacious grace, which is not irresistible.”
  • “There is a grace which is truly sufficient and yet remains inefficacious.”
  • “The justification of an adult is not possible without Faith.”
  • “Without special Divine Revelation no one can know with the certainty of faith if he be in the state of grace.”
  • The grace by which we are justified may be lost, and is lost by every grievous sin.”
  • Membership of the Church is necessary for all men for salvation.”

 

    Most of these truths are at least implicitly contradicted by the tenets of false ecumenism and religious liberty, which have thrived since the Council. Far from trying to rectify the erroneous beliefs prevalent among so many nominal Catholics, Rome has continuously exacerbated these evils by turning a blind eye to heresy while persecuting those Traditional Catholics who adhere to what the Church has always taught.

 

    Archbishop Lefebvre’s assessment from 1977 thus appears entirely correct: “those with the highest authority in the Church, the Holy See and the Vatican, have been turning away, turning us away from the Catholic Faith and have become the friends of our enemies.”

 

    For the sake of argument, though, let us just assume that the Vatican II revolution was correct in advancing false ecumenism and religious liberty. As we know, the progressives in Rome have used false ecumenism and religious liberty to praise, defend, and even advance all Christian denominations — Baptists, Episcopalians, Lutherans, and Methodists all have a place of honor in the ecumenical assemblies sponsored by the Vatican.

 

    How is it, then, that the only Christians dishonored and persecuted by the Vatican are those Traditional Catholics who make great sacrifices to adhere to what the Church has always taught? The phrase “diabolical disorientation” seems like an entirely accurate answer.


'Diabolical disorientation' is actually an expression used by 'Sister Lucy' of Fatima, in A Little Treatise on the Nature and Recitation of the Rosary, a collection of excerpts from her letters. published in 1973, and quoted over and over again. A paraphrase of words of Paul VI it is an apt description of the crisis in faith and morals at the time. But the 'Sr Lucy' who uttered them was a fake, installed by the progressivists in the Vatican to suppress the truth about the Third Secret of Fatima. Strange but true, and blogged about on this page more than once, and also here:  https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g29ht_Devoion_1.htm  and here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoiNOQWXuZQ  and here: youtu.be/P5hl5JURpkc



    For decades, Traditional Catholics have asked the Church for the unadulterated Faith. In response, the Vatican has effectively made itself like the evil father described by Our Lord in the Sermon on the Mount:

    Or what man is there among you, of whom if his son shall ask bread, will he reach him a stone? Or if he shall ask him a fish, will he reach him a serpent?” (Matthew 7:9-10).


 

Covid vaccine - a serpent

 


    Leo XIV has inherited this Vatican regime that cruelly offers stones to those who ask for bread, and hurls serpents at those who ask for fish. We did not expect him to reverse the Vatican II revolution overnight, but three months is long enough to at the very least speak out against the rampant heresies prevalent among his bishops and assure Traditional Catholics that they will no longer be persecuted by Rome.

 

    Every passing day of Leo XIV’s silence adds to the cruelty of the Vatican II revolution, such that he risks incurring the judgment of his own Angelus message: “We cannot pray to God as ‘Father’ and then be harsh and insensitive towards others.”

 

    We pray that he will heed his own words while he has time. Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us! 

    !https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/7870-pope-leo-xiv-and-the-cruel-reality-of-the-vatican-ii-revolutio


 





 "In her voyage across the ocean of this world, the Church is like a great ship being pounded by the waves of life’s different stresses. Our duty is not to abandon ship but to keep her on her course." - St. Boniface

Pope Leo XIII, please pray for Pope Leo XIV


Monday, 28 July 2025

OZZY 'GLAD TO GET THE SHOT' OSBOURNE IS DEAD

 

To comment pleaae open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.  




Osbourne at home 2 weeks after the birth of Jack, 1985.



"If I don’t get the shot and I get the virus, there’s a good chance I ain’t going to be here.” So the Prince of Darkness Ozzy Osbourne got the shot. And he still got the virus. Now he ain't here and where he is just doesn't bear thinking about.


Yes, Black Sabbath legend Osbourne had Parkinson's. And an addiction to alcohol, cocaine, heroin, acid, glue, cough syrup and Vicodin. But that doesn't alter the fact that a study by Sabat et al found that 41% of Parkinson’s patients experienced symptom worsening after mRNA injection - with a staggering 2,300% increased risk of deterioration. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10278957/  Osbourne was only one of many celebrities who touted the clot shot and lived to regret it - but not for long. 


He died aged only 76. The neurotoxic mRNA shot may have stolen years from Ozzy by accelerating his Parkinson’s - a risk no one warned him about. And a major new analysis says Covid 'vaccines' (experimental gene serum, actually) saved far fewer lives than the World Health Organisation claimed. Meanwhile, in New Zealand, millions of doses were doled out between April and December 2021, when the safety signal for 'vaccine'-induced myocarditis was already known. The red flags were there but the Covid Triumverate of Ardern, Hipkins and Bloomfield ignored them. So did the media, paid to keep their mouths shut.

The metal legend may be dead but his macabre influence lives on in the millions who grew up cranking & losing themselves in the sounds of Ozzy. And maybe also in the shot they took on his advice. One can only hope and pray not.



"It felt like I was being stabbed, but I'm glad I got it, you know?" https://x.com/i/status/1947743826866802772





From Michael Matt, father of eight, writing for The Remnant:


The English lead singer of the heavy metal band, Black Sabbath – John Michael "Ozzy" Osbourne – is dead. Known as the “Prince of Darkness,” Ozzy rose to fame in the 1970s as his Black Sabbath pioneered the metal genre. The rock world rewarded its Prince of Darkness with one induction into the UK Music Hall of Fame and two more into the US Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

 

Known as just “Ozzy” to his millions of minions, he built a career on playing with the occult, dancing with the Devil, photographing himself with the Cross of Christ in his mouth, allowing his adoring fans to believe he’d actually bitten the head off of a live bat during a concert, all while claiming he was not really a satanist. . . he just looked, sounded, and acted like one.

 

I can’t imagine how anyone would have gotten the idea the lead singer for BLACK SABBATH was a Satanist. After all, his album covers were always so Christian themed:   





 

One lovely collection of Ozzy tunes was even called “Black Mass.” But we mustn’t judge, right?

 




 

No wonder the pioneers of the traditional Catholic movement were just as intent on fighting the culture war and the likes of Ozzy Osbourne as they were the Novus Ordo and the likes of Annibale Bugnini in the Church. These days, we’ve “grown up” and become “sophisticated.” We know that Ozzy was just a fun-loving vaudevillian stage performer who was laughing all the way to the bank. He was just pretending to be evil!  

 

You can tell yourself that, if it makes you feel better. But I wonder how you would defend the inverse. In other words, what exactly is the great good that Ozzy Osbourne contributed to society and the lives of his fans that makes you feel so defensive of him?



Charity isn't charity unless it's done for the sake of God 

 

 

Did he make kids better adults through his macabre antics? Did he encourage them to aim higher with his libertine attitude toward sexuality? Did he bring them closer to God with his out-of-control behavior and notorious substance abuse problems?

 

Because for those of us who lived through the rise of Ozzy Osbourne, it seems that a different phenomenon is at work here. To us, it looks as if a societal/cultural transformation has taken place wherein good people have lost the ability to recognize the face of evil even when it’s laughing in their faces. It's as if the Devil has doubled down, and his greatest trick now was to convince us that evil doesn't even exist. To paraphrase Alexander Pope:

“Evil is a monster of so frightful mien
As to be hated needs but to be seen;
Yet seen too oft, familiar with her face,
We first endure, then pity, then embrace.” 


 Despite his satanic persona, Ozzy was embraced by millions of impressionable kids, many of whom found deep meaning in the macabre underworld of Ozzy Osbourne. He may have been playing the Prince of Darkness on stage, but for millions of 15-year-olds Ozzy was the high priest of darkness, preaching a powerful religion that for them was the great equalizer. His concerts were far more spiritually meaningful than anything they’d seen from Jim and Tammy Bakker on Sunday morning TV.

 


US televangelists Jim and Tammy Bakker hosted the Tv program The PTL Club 1974 -1987


For at least two generations of young men who'd been spiritually orphaned by the system, Ozzy was very real. And we’ll never know how many souls were introduced to the real Prince of Darkness by Ozzy’s poetry, his lost boys allure, his sexual vampirism, and his lifelong struggle with alcohol, cocaine, heroin, acid, glue, cough syrup, Vicodin, etc.

 

As a role model, he was a Satanist at worst and a drug addict at best. Either way, he was far from harmless. He certainly paved the way for Marilyn Manson, Lamb of God, Lady Gaga and the rest of the cultural hedonists to peddle their blasphemous product to generations of impressionable kids.

 

Just because most people today do not even understand what it was, this does not mean that the rock ‘n’ roll revolution didn’t pave the way for the chaotic debauchery in which our society finds itself incarcerated today.

 

Rock ‘n’ roll was the soundtrack of the amoral, contracepting, drugging, cutting, castrating, child abusing, baby-killing tidal wave that drowned the family, buried the Church, and left the survivors so dazed and confused they don’t even know which bathroom to use.

 

Our fathers were right about rock ‘n’ roll, in other words. Trouble is, most of their sons got tired of fighting the cultural tsunami. Most of them eventually gave up and, before long, even England’s benighted queen was out there knighting Mick Jagger. And the rest is history – countries at war, cities in chaos, drag queens in libraries, families destroyed, a hundred million babies exterminated, and God is dead. . . or so the Marxist minstrels would have us believe.  

 

My mother used to say: “If the atheists are right and there is no God – when we die, we’ll never know who was right, either way. But if I’m right and there is a God then when we die, there’s going to be hell to pay for you.”

 

The real Prince of Darkness met guys like Ozzy at the proverbial crossroads and gave them enough power and fame to corrupt most of the Children of Light. All they had to do in exchange was sell their souls.

 

But yesterday, Ozzy found out it was all a scam. We don’t get to close our eyes forever. Our eyes are finally opened when we die. Ozzy now knows the Truth. And his fans are left to ask him the same questions he famously asked Aleister Crowley back in 1980 – Mr. Osbourne, what went on in your head?

 

 

Aleister Crowley, 'The Great Beast 666', whose funeral was dubbed 'The Black Mass'



Who is “Mr. Crowley”? Aleister Crowley was an English occultist (1875-1947) who was once described in the English press as the “wickedest man in the world.” Known as “The Beast,” he founded Thelema which he based on the Luciferian principle – “Do as thou wilt shall become the whole of the law.” He also created “magick,” adding the “k” in order to distinguish his occultic sexual religion from mere stage magic.

 

Crowley’s sex “magick,” and dark arts were so nefarious that he eventually distinguished himself as the only man G. K. Chesterton flat out refused to debate. That was 1944.

 

By 1964, Crowley had become extremely popular with the rock ‘n’ rollers of the so-called British Invasion – including The Rolling Stones, The Beatles (yes, that’s Crowley on the cover the Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band album), Led Zeppelin, and, yes, Ozzy Osbourne.

 





Los Angeles, where Osbourne lived for over two decades, The Prince of Darkness' star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame



The lyrics to Ozzy’s 1980 hit song, “Mr Crowley,” seem somehow appropriate here the day after his death. Indeed, Mr Osbourne, what went on in your head? We want to know what you meant...

 

Mr Crowley

What went on in your head?
Oh, Mr Crowley
Did you talk to the dead?

Your lifestyle to me seemed so tragic
With the thrill of it all
You fooled all the people with magic
Yeah, you waited on Satan's call

Mr Charming
Did you think you were pure?
Mr Alarming
In nocturnal rapport

Uncovering things that were sacred
Manifest on this Earth
Ah, conceived in the eye of a secret
And they scattered the afterbirth

Mr Crowley
Won't you ride my white horse?
Mr Crowley
It's symbolic, of course

Approaching a time that is classic
I hear that maiden's call
Approaching a time that is drastic
Standing with their backs to the wall

Was it polemically sent?
I wanna know what you meant
I wanna know
I wanna know what you meant, yeah


https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/7858-ozzy-rip