VIGANO FOR THE CHOP BUT NOT THE LATIN MASS

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).

 

The One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church is teetering on the brink of schism; the Catholic world is in a ferment.

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò - Antipope Francis' most pertinaceous critic and arguably the most prescient prelate in the Church - has been summoned to Rome to be charged by the Vatican with schism, excommunicated and even perhaps, defrocked. And all indications are that next month the Vatican will ban the Traditional Latin Mass from diocesan churches worldwide. 

Why has Francis waited till now to excommunicate (effectively, to silence) Archbishop +Viganò? Formerly papal nuncio to the US, he's been calling Francis to account since 2019, when he blew the whistle on the manifest sex abuse of seminarians by the notorious Cardinal McCarrick, and until now he's avoided official censure. 

But. Two weeks ago he stated on X (Twitter) that “Bergoglio himself committed the same abuses when he was Master of Novices of the Society of Jesus in Argentina, as personally confided to me by one of his former novices." 

Need we say more? And why did the Jesuits' America Magazine report that Archbishop Viganò had presented himself, as bidden, in Rome, with his lawyer?Viganò himself has explicitly denied it. He refuses to communicate with the corrupt faux church of the Jesuit Bergoglio (and who would blame him?). Doesn't it sound as if America was tipped off, expected the archbishop to comply, and now has egg all over its editorial face?

Faithful Catholics worldwide are quite rightly in an uproar. First. No pope has any power to cancel the Latin Mass anywhere. The papal bull Quo Primum (1570) granted to all priests of the Latin Rite the right to celebrate the Roman Mass in perpetuity. "If anyone should presume to attempt this" (oppose this Bull) "he must know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of his Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul"https://lms.org.uk/quo-primum 

Traditional Catholics must thwart Francis' schemes to divide and conquer

Second. Francis is not a pope. He's an antipope. He was illicitly elected by the machinations of the 'St Gallen Mafia', a group of liberal prelates acting in concert with the Obama Administration to remove Pope Benedict XVI. The Body of Christ, as represented by Benedict, was the greatest obstacle in the way of the liberals' plan to dismantle the Church from the inside - which coincided nicely with the US Democrats' ambitions for socialist, globalist domination in their New World Order.

Third. Antipope Francis - Jorge Bergoglio - has, to quote Cardinal Gerhard Müller, the Vatican's doctrinal chief replaced by the tawdry Cardinal 'Tucho' Fernandez, "uttered plenty of material heresies" (vide the Pachamama idol worship in the Vatican, same-sex (sodomitical) blessings, Communion for adulterers). Even though his heresies don't rate as "formal", what moral right has he have to excommunicate +Viganò? Without allowing him any defence or due process of law? So much for his pontificate's vaunted openness and transparency. 

Francis with his statue of arch-heretic Luther: who's the schismatic? Francis or+Viganò?

Francis had every reason to excommunicate the appalling Jesuit Fr Marko Rupnik, and he did - but then lifted the excommunication and reinstated him with extra privileges. Who could not suspect blackmail to be the reason for this egregious episode, and for ignoring or befriending (importing transvestites to the Vatican by the busload) any number of sodomites and sex abusers, while cancelling holy clerics like "America's Bishop" Joseph Strickland, and now telling this archbishop (by email - how rude) to turn up in Rome.   

In his statement on X, +Viganò went on to say,"Bergoglio does not want to oust homosexual seminarians and priests: he rather wants to complete the work of infiltration and corruption of the clergy through homosexuality and pedophilia, so that by declassifying the serious sinfulness of sodomy and corruption of minors, the door opens on the civil front to decriminalization of these crimes. 

"On the other hand, the same scurrilous terminology typical of the environments that the Argentine Jesuit deplores in words betrays his familiarity with corrupt people accustomed to speaking to him in this way." The archbishop is referring to 'Pope Francis' - the supposed head of the Catholic Church - offhandedly remarking about 'faggotry' in seminaries. 

The Vatican has cited +Viganò's public statements which have “resulted in a denial of the elements necessary to maintain communion with the Catholic Church.” But the literally disgraceful acts of this pontificate clearly demonstrate that it's Francis and his disgusting entourage who have not maintained communion with the Catholic Church, which now resides precisely in the traditional orders they have strenuously tried to eliminate. The Vatican has pointedly not cited +Viganò's foundation Exsurge Domine, his work for the Benedictine nuns of Pienza, or training new priests for the Church, and is not about to disclose any ulterior motive on their part, of cutting off support for +Viganò's venture.

The Mystical Body of Christ possesses the Truth, Jesus Christ who is Truth Itself. It follows that satan, the father of lies, hates the Church and inspires the world (especially English Protestants, for some reason) to hate the Church. The globalists wanted a pope who would win the world with his lies, and they got what they wanted in Francis and his hierarchy.

self-explanatory

The Church has been on this trajectory, heading for inevitable schism, ever since the Second Vatican Council unleashed the 'Spirit' which weaponised all the ambiguities and loopholes sewn into its fabric by an organised group of 'progressives' who outmanoeuvred the traditional faction and ushered in the heresy of false ecumenism. 

https://endtimes.video/buddhist-prayer-francis-catholic-church-prophecy/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2EqNUTpBkXmjZzXAXDXmjtJDehTdVzPTM7E0v-V62W58ehKqQgpuqwQmw_aem_koINhoIv1s9aa3o0MQ6lbw

Their most evident triumph was the Novus Ordo Missae, designed by a Freemason (+Annibale Bugnini) to dumb-down the faithful, to make them malleable, socialist - and Protestant. The plan was to replace the One, True Church with what Venerable Fulton Sheen in the '50s called an 'Ape church', which by now has morphed into the 'synodal church' of Francis and friends. They worked from the inside with Freemasonic and Communists influencers, and with Francis they have achieved their goal - it seems without arousing suspicion, much less indignation, in the pews of the Novus Ordo.

Which is why the Antipope has tried and is trying again to exterminate the Truth, Christ the King Who resides, and will always reside, in the Traditional Latin Mass and in the Church.  The Vatican must know the statistics: if the TLM continues, even in its currently restricted form, traditional Catholics will outnumber NO adherents in fewer than 50 years. We see why Francis and his heresiarchs want to get rid of the TLM! 

But traditional Catholics, priests as well as laity, have the Magisterium of the Church assuring them that the Latin Mass will continue throughout time, celebrated if necessary in private garages (like the SSPX Mass attended by a reader of this blog yesterday), in gymnasiums, in cinemas, if not on rocks in the countryside which once served as altars for priests in Ireland. But it won't be necessary, because Francis has no power to ban the Mass of Ages and any further pathetic attempts at overruling the Deposit of Faith should be ignored.

Old Mass Rock near the Iron Mountains, Ireland; it won't be needed

Catholic lay people are vital to the survival of the Traditional Latin Mass. "Hundreds of thousands of priests", to quote the commentator Father Charles Murr, "are confused" by the direction taken by this papacy, so-called. Ask a Novus Ordo parish priest how things are, and the answer is likely to be, "terrible!" Our Lady of Fatima calls the laity as well as priests to prayer, penance and sacrifice. Traditional Catholics know that, but likely not Novus Ordo-ites, whose priests are inclined to think of Fatima as pre-Vat II and just for fuddy-duddies. 

Priests aren't just confused, they're demoralised and fearful. Fr Murr and Dr Robert Moynihan, the founder and editor-in-chief of Inside the Vatican threatened for his traditional views, admit as much here:

https://www.youtube.com/live/5ZS7gPG8Pmg?si=rnYcrpO2q0jAejt-

Prelates and priests are afraid to speak out under this totalitarian diktator antipope, for fear of losing their heads - being cancelled like Bishop Strickland or excommunicated, like Archbishop Viganò. That's a scandal, right there. But nothing like the scandal of Freemasonry in the Vatican, investigated and reported to Pope John Paul I by Archbishop Edouard Gagnon in 1978, with every expectation of a full enquiry. Within hours, John Paul I was dead. 

Lay people have nothing to lose in this world by defending the Social Reign of Jesus Christ the King and his priests in this world, and everything to gain by it in the next. They need to be aware of the Vatican's hopes of dividing traditional Catholics into pro-Viganòs and anti-Viganòs - slim hopes, if social media are to be believed, with a marked dearth of antis in evidence.

Bergoglio and his affiliates have constructed "a network of lies, intrigue, espionage, mistrust and, more effective than anything, fear. Bergoglio is a person who above all knows how to generate fear." https://onepeterfive.com/francis-lower-sink/

Corroborating Archbishop Viganò's statement on X in regard to Bergoglio's sex offences with seminarians is Gene Gomulka, a retired (O6) Navy Captain/Chaplain, author, investigative reporter, and screenwriter. He also works pro bono as a sex abuse victims’ advocate. 

The protection and promotions granted to countless corrupt and perverted cardinals, bishops and priests; the busloads of transvestites invited on several occasions to the Vatican; private hearings for transsexual and homosexual couples in concubinage; the scandalous LGBTQ+ media spotlight granted to James Martin, S.J.; the shameful promotion of Tucho Fernandez to Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith; the recent appointments of two Canons of Santa Maria Maggiore who are known throughout the city of Rome as homosexuals, all confirm Bergoglio’s membership of the lobby to which he owes his nomination (and I am deliberately not calling it his ‘election’). 

While Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI covered up abuse before and after their papal elections, I found no proof or even allegations that either of them abused seminarians or had sex with other priests or bishops.

I argued for some time that Francis cannot discipline the some 150 bishops credibly accused of abusing minors and vulnerable adults because many of them know that he, Jorge Bergoglio, was reported for having sodomized novices in places like Cordoba like McCarrick abused seminarians and young priests in NJ and elsewhere.

This has been covered up for some time just like the fact that at any given moment in time less than half of all priests are practicing celibacy, and over 80% of US bishops and Vatican officials are homosexuals. 

Ann Barnhardt was right! https://juliadufresne.blogspot.com/2024/06/pridemonth-demons-in-skin-suits-antipope.html

Catholics will never learn this from the mainstream media or many Catholic publications.  I would bet my military retirement that former Jesuit Marko Rupnik is also knowledgeable of the pope’s past sex life. 

Thought for the Day: “If the pope can get away with screwing novices, why can’t Rupnik rape nuns and force them to drink his semen out of a chalice?”  P.S.  Might this have something to do with the pope being subject to blackmail? See: 

Beware of papabile who can be blackmailed

READ: Six cases where the sexual abuse scandal touches Pope Francis

In my work as a sex abuse victims’ advocate, I find that most victims report their abusers to the Church because they are deceived by prelates’ empty pledges of “transparency.” These victims come to regret ever having approached the Church with their complaints after experiencing how bishops gaslit them, ignored or whitewashed their reports, and kept credibly accused predators in ministry. In a similar way, I believe that both Viganò and I trusted our superiors (Francis and O’Brien, respectively) to act on our complaints against homosexual predators because we were not aware that they themselves were homosexuals accused of abusing their power over seminarians.

Francis’ shielding of gay priests would come to light some two months later when he responded, “Who am I to judge?” when asked not about “the sexual orientation of priests” – as incorrectly reported by the Associated Press and other news agencies – but about his sexually promiscuous gay friend, Monsignor Battista Ricca. any kind of damning discovery Viganò might produce to the Vatican in his defense (e.g. the testimony of informants who have already gone on record corroborating the abuse allegations Viganò reported against Francis) will fall upon deaf ears. https://www.complicitclergy.com/2024/06/23/vigano-francis-and-the-war-on-truth-tellers/

No Catholic worthy of the name can be in communion with this “Bergoglian church,” because it acts in clear discontinuity and rupture with all the Popes of history and with the Church of Christ. Viganò, Invoking Lefebvre, Faces the Vatican Summons - OnePeterFive

Archbishop Viganò has stood up against the destruction of the church, COVID mandates that crushed individual rights worldwide, and stolen elections. He has called out this Pope for his destructive actions against the church and others like China and the World Economic Forum. For this he is being excommunicated from the Holy Catholic Church. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/exclusive-archbishop-carlo-maria-vigano-summoned-vatican-be/?

Is this post beginning to look like a pile-on? Good. Because that's what it is. A pile-on.

A senior Archbishop is going to make an unprecedented appearance in a British court to be cross-examined over a £350m London property fraud case that saw Pope Francis authorise wire-tapping.

In previous British legal proceedings the Vatican has claimed diplomatic immunity and refused to allow officials to appear as witnesses.

But now Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, a close aide to the Pope, will make an appearance in the Vatican’s ‘trial of the century’.

At the heart of the trial is the 350-million-euro purchase of a luxury property in London which used to be a car showroom and garage for Harrod’s. https://www.complicitclergy.com/2024/06/23/vaticans-trial-of-the-century-heads-to-british-court/

 

Luca Roma SJ with one of his 100+ indigenous child victims

The Society of Jesus in Bolivia has admitted that its handling of the pedophile case of the Spanish priest Lucho Roma - who abused and photographed at least a hundred Indigenous girls and detailed his actions in writing - “were negligent, indolent and disastrous.” https://english.elpais.com/international/2024-06-18/the-jesuits-of-bolivia-call-on-prosecutors-office-to-reopen-case-into-spanish-priest-who-sexually-abused-100-victims.html

 

Today the Church celebrates the birth of St John the Baptist. No other saints are commemorated on their birthday, but as St. Augustine explains, the Baptist was freed from original sin in his mother’s womb at the greeting of Mary. 

The parallels between the fate of "the greatest saint born of woman" - his beheading by Herod Tetrarch of Galilee - and that of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò are obvious. If Antipope Francis and his Vatican want to make a martyr out of the archbishop, they're going the right way about it. 

We must pray and sacrifice for Archbishop Viganò, and for 'Pope Francis', Antipope Francis, Jorge Mario Bergoglio (or what you will). 

The Beheading of John the Baptist

But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you (Mt 5, 44).