Sunday 19 March 2023

HUMPTY DUMPTY LUXON MAY FALL OFF THE WALL

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or Twitter.





 



If a humble blog can help push Humpty Dumpty Luxon off the wall, we'll go for it. And if the same entity can help propel a man like Shane Reti into the National Party leadership, here goes.

The essential difference between the two men is their standpoint on the issue of life. Luxon's record on the protection of the unborn child is as bad as it could be, and aggravated by his disingenuousness in calling himself "pro-life". Reti unashamedly defends the right to life.

If a politician cannot be trusted with the precious lives of our unborn citizens he cannot be trusted in anything. And if he has the courage to stand against the culture of death that threatens to engulf our country, he can be trusted to defend it. 


There isn’t yet an active move against Christopher Luxon, but there are murmurings, and where there are murmurings, there are people starting to count heads. Shane Te Pou, back from a sojourn writing his political prognostications has written about the malaise that has beset the Luxon leadership.


One thing’s clear: Luxon’s not going to step down as leader voluntarily. He wants one thing out of politics – to be prime minister. And he’s chasing that goal with unwavering self-belief.

No, if Luxon goes, it’ll be because he was pushed. And Nicola Willis would be the one leading the shoving.

A rapid riser and unashamedly ambitious, Willis may well think she can save National from the defeat Luxon is sleepwalking towards. She certainly took the opportunity of Luxon’s Covid isolation to be front and centre in media and parliament this week.



 

https://thebfd.co.nz/2022/09/12/nicola-willis-lists-policy-changes/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nicola-willis-lists-policy-changes

Problem is, the last time Willis convinced the caucus to roll an established leader in an election year gamble, it resulted in Todd Muller’s ill-fated 53 days at the top, followed by the disaster of Judith Collins. National collapsed from leading the polls at the start of 2020 to laughing-stock territory by election day. They won’t want to repeat the exercise.

Willis’ colleagues, some of whom still harbour resentment over the way she led the Muller coup and dislike her cut-throat style, will be wary of taking a punt like that again. Especially if she’s the candidate.

Maybe they’ll look for a different option. Pickings are slim, but I reckon there are two choices:
NZ Herald

 

The main problem with Nicola Willis is that she has all the demeanour, the sound and fury, of a scold. She showed that nasty streak in her unabashed attack on Maureen Pugh.

 

Nicola Willis - "a scold" and pro-death


She is also of the same mould as Jordan Williams and Chris Bishop: so convinced of their own brilliance, supported by careers as university debaters, that they’ll continue to berate you as to error of your ways, steadfast in their belief that if they just keep at you for another 15 minutes you will be swayed by the flawed points they are making.

It is arrogant and tone deaf, but such are those at the top of the National Party now.

Then Te Pou punts a speculator out there with suggestions as to who should lead. Now bear in mind this is a hardcore leftist who likes to kick Tory dogs. Nonetheless, there is talk, and these two names keep coming up.


 

Dr Shane Reti


Shane Reti.
 https://thebfd.co.nz/2021/04/20/dr-shane-reti-gagging-of-dhb-members-should-not-be-tolerated/
He led with quiet dignity during the short interregnum after Collins was dethroned. He wouldn’t bring the same energetic negativity that has characterised Luxon’s leadership, but he might bring reasons to vote for National, rather than just against Labour. And it’s worth noting the last time National polled consistently over 40 per cent was with a Maori leader.

Erica Stanford. Another quick riser, Stanford hasn’t put as many noses out of joint in National’s caucus as Willis and seems more genuine, less of a political machine. In her immigration portfolio, Stanford has been able to stand up for people who have been screwed over by the remorseless machinery of government. That could be a basis for more hopeful, positive leadership.
If National does bite the bullet, whoever replaces Luxon is going to have to find a positive message and a compelling set of policies. They’ll have their work cut out for them. When Jacinda Ardern became Labour leader seven weeks from the 2017 election, she inherited a full policy programme and overlaid it with her infectious optimism. But a new National leader would have to build the party’s platform from the ground up, and would have mere months to do it. Let me finish by telling you this: tax cuts for folks at the big end of town isn’t the election winner National thinks it is.
NZ Herald

Clearly, Te Pou is not up on the current rumours swirling around about Erica Stanford, who successfully kept her head down and her lips buttoned during another scandal in the lead-up to the 2020 election.

Reti, I rate. But there simply isn’t any move happening just yet, just disgruntled chancers softening everyone up with loose talk designed to quietly debilitate a flat-lining leader.

Luxon has huge issues and we are only just seeing the tip of the iceberg on those. But the major one is that no leader of an opposition party has ever won with negative net favourables since Jim Bolger trounced a distinctly loathed Labour Party in 1990. His favourables were mitigated by the fact that voters hated Labour more than they disliked Bolger.

Surely this Labour Government is more 'distinctly loathed ' than any in the history of this country. An elephant wearing a blue ribbon should be able to trounce Labour in this election - but ever since Cyclone Gabrielle, bearing in her wake a hero's platform for Hipkins, with your good old Kiwi all for getting in behind the recovery effort, I've had that sickening presentiment of a Labour victory and all the hideous calamity that would entail.  


At this stage of the election cycle, just six months out from a general election, Luxon should be way in front, but he’s not and neither is National. And that’s the nub of the issue.

It’s an issue that could have been fixed when he became leader, but is altogether too late to attempt to fix it now. When National lost in 2002, the biggest issue identified in the Joyce review of the debacle was a lack of polling information – that would have countered the group think inside the English leadership. Back then Joyce recommended that National spend big on polling, to gauge reality rather than wishful thinking. That decision was continued under John Key for the duration of his leadership.

Since 2017 and especially after 2020, that reality gauging has fallen by the wayside, leaving the blissful idiocracy of Luxon, Willis and Bishop to just guess what voters think. Until and unless they change that they will continue to fail to fire; running the risk of an embarrassing loss and the destruction of Luxon’s leadership..https://breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/2023/03/cam-slater-for-whom-bell-tolls-quietly.html

As Cam Slater notes, Dr Shane Reti has a quiet dignity which puts one in mind of yesterday's saint.

St Joseph's feast day fell yesterday, March 19 and was swallowed up of course by the Fourth Sunday of Lent would approve (except in a certain Novus Ordo parish which rejoices in his patronage, where disregarding the Lenten ban on flowers large artificial floral arrangements were wheeled out of the flower room to bedeck the sanctuary). 

 

 

St Joseph by Jusepe de Ribera

 

St Joseph, please pray for New Zealand

20 comments:

  1. Ho, ho,ho, Julia. What fine, upstanding member of the Nats is going to introduce a private member's bill to change any of our abortion laws? Null. Similarly with ACT the free market, no morals party. If you don't like abortion, don't have one seems the attitude of the lot of them. Our only hope is more pro-life messaging and witnessing. Does the church in NZ have a pro-life Sunday? Or a special hour of prayer. By golly, these modernist clergy can't even give us 10 minutes for thanksgiving after communion.....or five. And Jimmy Bolger told untruths to the old people. He very bad boy. A Maori Upper House. That's not partnership. That's dictatorship. That Bolger a funny fella.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunately, Shane Reti's statements on abortion are no different from Luxon's. Shane Reti has stated that: Despite remaining ‘pro-life’, national health spokesperson, Shane Reti reaffirmed the National caucus commitment that the law won’t be changed under a National government. Luxon has stated that he is pro-life and when asked by Newshub if he believed that abortion was murder he stated that is what a pro-life stance is. Luxon is languishing in the polls precisely because he is pro-life. Any change of leadership in the National Party now will definitely see Labour being re-elected. The problem with National is that they have failed to get in behind any one leader, whereas Labour remains tight and backs the current leader they have. None of the Catholic MPs ever took a stand on abortion, even though they were pro-life and voted against abortion. Shane Reti would do the same. Unfortunately, that is politics these days. If you want a Labour government then keep undermining Luxon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The only way to win this election is to get in behind and support Luxon because at this stage of the game it is absolutely far too late to change the leader of the National Party, although Labour are working very hard to do so, as are elements of the National Party. At least Luxon is a Christian. At least he is pro-life. National and National supporters have fallen into the trap set by Labour of constantly undermining the National leader. The very opposite of what Labour has done. While Labour has failed in every area of policy they have been a cohesive team and supported one another. I like Shane Reti very much but it is too late for him to step into the role and win from just a few months out from the election. Also, the media would make mincemeat of him, probably do more of a hatchet job on him than they have done on Luxon. The worst possible thing for this country is if Labour gets in for another term. Freedom of speech will be lost. We will have co-governance and much worse. Everyone needs to work hard to get rid of this government and worry about the leadership of the National Party after the election if Luxon doesn't measure up. In that regard I find your post here of more assistance to Labour, which is unfortunate. We need to make everything count and you could put your blog to good use by highlight why we need to get rid of Labour. I am certainly no great fan of National but, whether we like it or not, they are the only chance we have of getting rid of this Labour Government. As I recall, Cam Slater undermined Simon Bridges in favour of Judith Collins - the pro-abortionist - and if Simon had been left alone National would no doubt be in a far better position in the polls than they are now so Cam Slater hasn't done us any favours either.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Apart from the juvenile heading of this post, who in their right mind would quote Shane Te Pou Shane Te Pou a former candidate, campaign manager and executive member of the Labour Party, and a former union official. You've lost all credibility, I'm afraid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shane Te Pou could be 2 IC to Satan but if his views were relevant to the issue in hand they might still be published on this page..

      Delete
    2. A lot of comments made by individuals may be relevant but to choose to post the comments from someone of Te Pou's ilk beggars belief. Surely, discernment is needed but unfortunately it seems that some people don't have that ability to discern whether what they choose to post will make things better or worse. As long as it backs up their view of how things should be that's okay whether they're 2 IC to satan as Te Pou might as well be.

      Delete
    3. Shane Te Pou might as well be 2IC to satan so his comments are irrelevant to those of us who do not have any truck with satan.

      Delete
  5. I knew Shane when he worked for the Service Workers Union. He was before the court due to missing money.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is political attack fantasy from the radical left. Who dreams up this untrue garbage?
    Luxon and National in collaboration with Seymour and ACT are New Zealand's only hope to bring recovery from the wretched tide of woke evil currently being forced on citizens around the democratic western world.
    Luxon is the very best and most capable candidate as leader.
    Of course the leftists attack the opposition leader with their lies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Same snake (policies) different head.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's the first time ever that I've been called a leftist. Radical yes, but never a lefty.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If you had absolutely no choice today who would you choose Maori caucus controlled Communist Labour or Luxon?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The choice is obvious to most but unfortunately there are some who have their heads buried in the sand and because of that will no doubt help to elect a third term Labour Government. Then blogs such as this will be shut down as no free speech will be allowed. It's getting difficult enough now to post anything that doesn't go along with Labour's world view.

      Delete
  11. It's been pointed out to me that Dr Reti administered the vax unfortunately. The trouble is any decent, good politician really only gets the chance to express their views during a conscience vote in Parliament, which is rare, otherwise they are bound by the party vote. With a Labour controlled media any National leader has an uphill battle. Labour and their media arm have been successful in getting rid of successive National leaders and giving the idea that National is disorganised and incapable of governing the country. Labour are working hard to get rid of Luxon because that's their best chance at this stage of getting re-elected. Unfortunately, many on the right are helping to undermine Luxon rather than sticking with him and putting pressure on him after the election to change policies that don't align with what we want. Many on the right wouldn't vote for National because Judith Collins was pro-abortion. However, as a result of their choice, we lost many National MPs who were pro-life and elected another Labour government and now have a government that has far fewer pro-life MPs than before. I don't see that as a win. It was a complete loss and some of the blame must go to those who made that choice. They achieved nothing and lost a lot more ground than before the election. Judith Collins if she had been elected PM would probably have been rolled by now anyway and we may not have lost so many good pro-life MPs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely one must be guided by one's conscience rather than pragmatism.

      Delete
    2. I wonder how anyone in good conscience could deprecate and publicly undermine a leader of a party who is morally superior to the incumbent government and would likely lead this country out of its present morass. The point of conscience is that it needs to be an informed conscience and when one is casting their vote they need to look at the consequences of their vote.

      Delete
    3. We lost many pro-life National MPs at the last election. We now have the most pro-abortion Parliament in history and there is little to no chance of changing the most liberal abortion Act in Parliament via the ballot box. The fight now is to change the hearts and minds of New Zealanders. While people in New Zealand continue to want abortions and euthanasia we will not be able to change those law. Why Catholics voted against pro-life MPs at the last election I have no idea.

      Delete
  12. It's most unlikely that National could lead this country out of the present morass which is global, and given the fast one pulled over American voters and very likely New Zealanders too, at the last elections, who can possibly predict the consequences of their vote?Yes, one's conscience must be well-informed. But the way to inform it best is by prayer, fasting and sacrifice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But Labour would lead us further into the morass for sure. Should there not be a fast one pulled at this election and should National be voted in, they can at least roll back Three Waters and preserve free speech and are less likely to close the churches as happened under Labour. Plus the SSPX says that we can vote for the lesser of two evils. The FSSP and other conservative Catholic writers state the same. The FSSP also wrote [in reference to the last US election] that, given the serious situation facing the US, it was also worth considering whether a circumstance existed in some places that should make Catholics think carefully before voting for a third party. Prayer, fasting and sacrifice is most definitely needed to overcome the situation facing the Church, this country and the world generally, but dissing Luxon at this stage of the game is just increasing the chance of another Labour Government. However, I do wonder if a lot of Catholics are former Labour voters who, in reality, just can't bring themselves to vote National. There has to be some reason for this type of post which would gladden the hearts of many a left wing voter.

      Delete