Sunday 10 November 2019

NOT A MEMORIAL MEAL BUT THE SACRIFICE OF CALVARY

To comment please open your gmail account, use my email address, Facebook Messenger or Twitter. Scroll down for other comments.


I write this for my two grandsons, who along with the rest of the congregation were told at Holy Mass this morning that the Mass is 'a memorial meal that we all celebrate together'.

Father was softening us up for the treats in store in January, when he goes on a well-earned holiday. Having 'dodged the bullet' for the 20 years that have elapsed since defeatist attitudes originated weekday 'Liturgies of the Word' in the parish, to 'get ready' for the priestless days to come, the parish now will implement them on certain Sundays. 

With 'Reflections' to match. They won't be 'preached , they'll be 'shared'. 

The Church of Nice has already fulfilled the scenario dreamed up by the Protestant reformers four hundred years ago without the average chap in the pews ever noticing, and now the hierarchy is pushing the goalposts to extremes utterly beyond the poor guy's comprehension.

In their very long-term plan to destroy the Mass, in the 1600s Bishop Cranmer and his cronies devised a 'Commemoration of the Lord's Supper'. And here's how the Mass was to be superseded:

  • The Protestant 'memorial meal' was to be celebrated in the vernacular.
  • The altar was replaced by a table.  
  • The priest was replaced by a 'presider'.
  • The 'presider' faced the people, not God. Abolition of the priest's ad orientem position was the Protestants' most important consideration. 
  • Holy Communion was given under both kinds because, the Protestants said, every meal features both food and drink.
  • Holy Communion was taken in the hand, in order to demonstrate that it was ordinary bread distributed by an ordinary man rather than a priest.
  • The silence of the Catholic Mass was replaced by a 'dialogue'.
  • The Introibo ad altare Dei (I will go to the altar of God) was abolished, to be replaced eventually with 'Good morning' and other pleasantries.
  • Prayers emphasising the sacrificial nature of the Mass were abolished.
The upshot of it all is that now, in the 21st century, Catholics (the remnant who remain) feel much more at home at an Anglican or Presbyterian service than they would at the Traditional Latin Mass, (were they blessed enough to find one.)

Let us all speak out and declare to our children and grandchildren and to the reformers of the present day that Holy Mass is "in true reality the Sacrifice of Calvary" (Pope Paul VI). Jesus Christ offered Himself to His Father as our Redeemer on Calvary, and He does exactly the same at Mass - through a priest, not an ordinary person, and not and never a priestess. 

At the risk of repeating myself and boring you all to bits, we do not attend Mass primarily to 'say thank you'. We attend Mass to:
  • Adore the Holy Trinity
  • To thank God for His goodness
  • To make reparation to God for the sins committed against the Divine Majestu.
  • To receive all the help we need to make it to Heaven.

    On Calvary, Jesus died to redeem the fallen human race. In the Mass, Jesus bestows on us all the blessings He won for us in His unimaginable suffering on the Cross. On Calvary He poured out His blood for us; if we do not bathe in that Blood in the Mass we will never be purified and can never enter Heaven.

    Does anyone else smell a large rat in these preparations for 'Liturgies of the Word', or as Father prefers to call them, 'paraliturgies' - a mysterious word meaning forms of worship that lie outside the liturgy and in some cases contradict it (you can say that again).For one thing, 'a memorial meal' can surely be put on by any lay person. You just 'commission' them. And for another, to remove the sacrificial aspect of the Mass, the unbloody re-presentation of the Sacrifice of Calvary, removes huge roadblocks along the way to the Glorious Day of the new World Church, just as the worship of pagan idols, passed off as 'inculturation', in the Vatican has done. 

7 comments:

  1. My wife and I sometimes pass an Anglican church on our morning walk. Not having been inside before, one day we entered. Beautiful inside, and surprisingly a Mass-like service was taking place inside a partially open side chapel, complete with minister and a congregation of a dozen or so. If I hadn’t known better, this could have been a daily Mass in a typical Catholic church. I didn’t like the feeling of ‘sameness’ when I left.

    Yes, so many things have been watered down when you attend a Novus Ordo Mass. I am losing count now, for example, of how many times I see a priest sitting down while lay ministers hand out Communion – mixing the distribution of Hosts with the touching of people they seem endlessly to be blessing.

    Someone was saying the other day that the many Liturgies of the Word we now have is creating Communion complacency. When you tie in this observation with the changes we’ve had since Vatican II of fasting before Communion: 24 hours before, 3 hours before, and now 1 hour before, perhaps you can understand our complacency: Are we making it too easy to receive, thus ceasing to make receiving the Blessed Sacrament a special event?

    I am off to Wanganui on 23/24 November. I will be visiting St Anthony’s SSPX while there. I’m looking forward to attending an unbloody sacrifice of the Mass there – a Mass like when I was a boy all those years ago!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the SSPX Mass is redolent with nostalgia, but oh my God (and I say that with great reverence) how very relevant it is to us benighted, starving Catholics today.

      Delete
    2. Years ago, when I first attended the Friday Mass with the parish school children attend, I couldn't understand why so few received Holy Communion. It took a while for the penny to drop: most of those children, at a 'Catholic' school, weren't baptized.
      So how can it be called a Catholic school? Wait till you get to St Anthony's. It's what a Catholic school is supposed to be.

      Delete
  2. On our newsletter it says that there will be a Liturgy of the Word if a priest is not available. That applies to one Church in the parish area.

    The trouble is you never know until you get there that there is no priest. The woman lay parish leader takes the Liturgy of the Word. I got caught once, and in that more recent experience, parts of the Mass were included and it seemed almost like a Mass but without confecting the Eucharist (of course). I object to it, even apart from the fact I have not been to Mass. For I felt like it was an occasion upon which to get me used to seeing a woman standing behind the altar looking like she was saying Mass but wasn't. I didn't want to be there and I didn't receive. I won't risk it again and we make sure we get to Mass.

    I remember Liturgy of the Word turning up quite a number of years ago as a replacement for the Vigil. It didn't last long before it was stopped. The reason given was that it did not fulfill the Sunday obligation. (I think that was in Pope Benedict's time, and what has actually changed with respect to that? No doubt nothing at all). Even so, it was a much simpler, briefer affair than this later version. Sunday Mass was also available at that time in that same Church. I think some were pushing for it in Australia at that time as well, but that experiment was also stopped.

    I won't accept it. If there is no Mass we can get to at all, within reason, then we just don't have one available. In that case, the Divine Office is just as good as the Liturgy of the Word.

    No priest means no Sunday Mass, and then I guess we act as they did at other times in history when for whatever reason none was available. For example, recusant Catholics in England and Catholics under communism. Keep the faith and go to Mass when it is available.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The instructions for conducting a Lit of the Word in our neck of the woods emphasize the celebrant using not the priest's chair but an ordinary chair, which I took care (I'm ashamed to say I was sucked into the affair) to place outside the sanctuary.
    But I too stood behind the altar, because it's impossible to conduct Holy Communion from any other position. I felt extremely uncomfortable but I thought I was doing God's will, giving His people His Body and Blood when otherwise they would be deprived of it.

    I know better now. I feel a post coming on, but not tonight Josephine. It's an enormous subject, needing prayer and reflection.

    But absolutely, if there's no Mass within a one and a quarter hours' drive, like the TLM at Ashhurst is for me, that's it. I'll stay home with the Divine Office, as you say Linda, and treat myself to the whole lot. And don't forget the Litanies - and the rest of the fantastic treasury of prayer on offer in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Julia, I don't think it was the fact that she stood behind the altar but rather as I mentioned above that combined with "Parts of the Mass were included and it seemed almost like a Mass but without confecting the Eucharist... looking like she was saying Mass but wasn't." In the version I had observed a number of years ago that wasn't the case, although, as you point out, the person taking the Liturgy of the Word also stood behind the altar.

      The point being the earlier experience of Liturgy of the Word did not seem to be an attempt to be a type of Mass, whereas the later one gave that impression.

      Delete
  4. Not for publication.

    Julia, I found this current article by Peter Kwasniewski, that might interest you, while you are on the subject of finding a proper Mass.

    it is in today's Lifesitenews in the Blogs section.

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/when-liturgy-is-not-sacred-it-becomes-a-judas-to-the-real-presence

    ReplyDelete