Teens who attend a Labour camp being more likely than most to have
a victim mentality, (Labour gets it all wrong, March 14)
Labour’s “victim-led” approach might have got it all right.
No. The Dominion Post is right to assert that “16
year-olds are in the eyes of many, still children” and “adults should have
acknowledged their duty of care and informed the parents”.
But wait on. I can’t work this out.
A man puts his hand down a teen’s pants and it creates a furore because the
Labour Party tried to hush it up.
But when a doctor ends the life of a teen’s
unborn baby we're all okay with that, because the State says it's none of our business, and even her parents have no right to know.
Please explain?
Please explain?
No comments:
Post a Comment