To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.
“Synodality”. It’s a
creature of Vatican II which should by now have declared itself to
serious-minded, thinking Catholics as a (self-confessed) “new religion”. Its
talkfests amount to not much more than window-dressing for 60 years of homofication of the
One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church; a program to make synodality
irreversible and the Church defenceless against the Freemasonic globalists of
Davos Inc.
The Society of St Pius X (SSPX) threw a very large,
inconvenient spanner into the perfidious works of the Synodal Vatican by
consecrating traditional bishops at Econe on July 1 - to which the
DDF’s ridiculous Cardinal Fernandez reacted with absurd excommunications and
insane conditions stipulated for all penitent bishops and priests who wished to
crawl back in the Modernist fold.
The Vatican's exercise of conciliar 'authority' didn’t end well. Of well over 200 Society priests worldwide, Trad Inc's predicted tsunami of repentant priests amounted to a total of TWO. Rome has made itself a laughing-stock, but the egg all over its face will not deter it from inflicting synodality on the suffering spouse of Christ.
| Father Mario León Dorado, the 52-year-old Spanish Oblate whom Leo XIV has just appointed coadjutor archbishop of Rabat, Morocco |
A 60-year accretion of Modernists in the episcopacy has borne rotten fruit: uncatechised, liberal Novus Ordo Catholics who when pressed into synodal ‘listening’ and ‘discerning’ are grist to the Vatican’s Modernist mill, to an apostate Curia-turned-NGO which is changing the Church without changing dogma.
In his new book, “The Capital Schism”, Archbishop
Carlo Maria Vigano calls synodality out for what it's about: “staging a demand whose answer has
already been decided”. That is, seeding the Church with modernist bishops who
will ask for exactly what Antipope Francis envisaged and Francis 2.0 (Leo XIV) - obedient to his mentor - will deliver.
Seemingly that’s not dawned yet on the overwhelming majority
of the world's bishops. You can literally count on the fingers of one hand the faithful
clergy – the Stricklands, the Viganos and now the Dutch Auxiliary Bishop Rob Mutsaerts - who’ve not fallen through the Vatican’s
Overton window. And, knowing what happened to the first two (sacking and fake excommunication
respectively), and also that most bishops are by now Novus Ordo-born and bred, appointed by the ultimate wolf in shepherd’s
clothing (Francis/Bergoglio), that’s hardly surprising.
Driving the point of synodality home to clerical and lay
ostriches is the latest appointment to be made by Leo XIV - whose silk, satin
and gabardine is merely elegant repackaging of the Francis filth, clothed as that was in dralon. Leo's new ordinary for Metuchen
Diocese, New Jersey, is one Michael Saporito, a disciple of the infamous
Cardinal ‘Ted’ McCarrick. He founded a homosexual group, "Open Arms Ministry", in his parish. Personnel, they say, is policy: taken
together with ALL of Leo’s episcopal appointments, this is an in-your-face declaration
of the homo-heretical agenda of the Synodal religion.
| Homosexual activist Bishop Michael Saporito |
Even clerics viewed as traditional or conservative have started the never-ending story of synodal/synodomitical “listening”, “learning” and “discerning together” in their dioceses. Bishop John Adams of Palmerston North, New Zealand is one such. Bishop John is intent on his diocese “becoming more fully a synodal Church – one in which clergy and laity walk together in mission.” We may explain the portmanteau term “synodomy” (above) to describe the covert “mission” of synodality as legitimisation of the sin which cries out to heaven for vengeance”: that of Sodom (Gen 18:20-21) .
That is not to say that the very good Bishop Adams (best of the liberal NZ bunch) is even aware of Rome’s homo-heretical agenda. But the sensus fidelium is often misinterpreted by well-meaning Catholics to mean that criticism, overt or implied, must exempt the clerical state, especially the pope, whom they rush to defend as impeccable and indefectible, even when subverting Gospel truths and Church teaching, as Leo and his cohorts do.
Not even the successor of Peter can proclaim another Gospel, as Antipope Francis did in “Amoris Laetitia” (which Leo plans to entrench in a global conference next month). In his new book “The Capital Schism” Vigano asks if as Trad Inc claims, Pope Leo XIV's utterances are quite fine because they're not made ex cathedra, why should the Church pray for the pope, as she always has done, in every Mass? Vigano's brilliant intellect in fact nails Pope Leo XIV himself as "the first enemy of the papacy".
"Saint Paul says it in words that admit no reply: sed licet nos aut angelus de cœlo evangelizet vobis præterquam quod evangelizavimus vobis, anathema sit (Gal 1,8-9). Not even an angel, not even an Apostle, not even the Successor of the Apostle Peter may proclaim another gospel. The Pope is the custodian of the Depositum, not its owner; and he who, from custodian, makes himself owner, betrays the very reason for which Our Lord Jesus Christ instituted the Papacy in vicarial form."ttps://www.exsurgedomine.org/en/blog/interview-by-gaetano-masciullo-for-lifesitenews
A reader of this blog remarks:
"If a person is knowingly and willfully attacking the Catholic Faith and trying to make a new church then they, by their own choice and actions, have left the Church. A person can't belong to Christ and at the same time be against Him.
Meanwhile the 10 bishops currently
in Rome at the Jesuit General Curia for Italy’s first conference devoted to “pastoral
ministry for sodomites and transgenders “will escape the laity’s public scrutiny and likely will get these revolting men archbishoprics from the faithless men who have taken charge
of the faith.
Auxiliary Bishop Rob Mutsaerts of ‘s-Hertogenbosch has become the latest prelate to criticise synodality. He echoes Cardinals Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun, Raymond Burke, Walter Brandmüller, Robert Sarah, Juan Sandoval Íñiguez, Gerhard Müller, and the late George Pell. Outspoken episcopal critics have included Bishop Joseph Strickland, Auxiliary Bishop Athanasius Schneider and retired Auxiliary Bishop Marian Eleganti. https://edwardpentin.substack.com/p/the-world-is-not-waiting-for-a-synodal
Bishop Mutsaerts is a rarity to be treasured - a brave bishop. He implies the truth: that the Synodal Emperor has no clothes, revealing Synodality to be a disfiguring excrescence on the Body of Christ. At the risk of sounding dreadfully pre-Vat II, should Catholics not be asking whether synodality is positively willed by God? Or is it an expression of His permissive will - divine chastisement for sins, especially of the flesh, committed especially by the clergy, especially since the Second Vatican Council?
Synodality exists to change a Church which cannot be changed, by means of meetings, coffee and conversation. But the conversation Catholics need is not with one another so much as with Jesus Christ, their Lord and Saviour. And the food and drink they need is not sammies and savouries but His Body and Blood. One single Mass - even 'a reverent Novus Ordo' (except there's no such thing), just one Mass in its astonishing Reality of Calvary and the redemption of mankind, will achieve what a million meetings cannot.
As Bishop Mutsaerts asserts, "the Church possesses something extraordinary. It possesses the Gospel. The sacraments. The Eucharist. Confession. Two thousand years of wisdom. Scripture. The Church Fathers. Thomas Aquinas. Augustine. The mystics. The saints. An unrivalled tradition of art, music, philosophy, morality and spirituality. And above all: Jesus Christ."
What good reason can Leo XIV possibly have for summoning Synodality to change God's priceless gift to the world of the Catholic religion? What the Church and the world needs now, more than ever before, is not Synodality. It's saints. And we won't have saints until we have the Mass.
| Vision of Divine Love Hildegard of Bingen St Hildegard, please pray for restoration of the Traditional Latin Mass |
Saints Cornelius and Cyprian, Martyr Bishops, please pray for our bishops
No comments:
Post a Comment