To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.
"How dare you?" The noxious Greta Thunberg said it famously, to the United Nations, but she couldn't have said it with more feeling than Catholics would now, to Robert Prevost, papal pretender, and his socialist, globalist fellow-travellers in Rome.
How dare 'Pope Leo XIV' say that "war is never holy"? To add as he did that "only peace is holy, because it is willed by God" doesn't improve on his foot-in-mouth blasphemy. God Himself wages war. God is the "Lord of Hosts". He is Jehovah, Who protected the armies of Israel, the God Who is Captain of the celestial army of spiritual warfare. How dare Leo say that "this is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, Who does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them”?
| June 10, 1944. Normandy. Those US soldiers were there fighting Nazi occupiers. Did God not hear their prayers |
Presumably Leo can make such a blasphemous assertion because the Crusades, the Battle of Lepanto and D Day (to name just a few wars waged) were pre-Vatican II. You know, when the Church was Militant. Before God got around to revealing His truth and His love fully, in the limp-wristed, effeminate Synodal religion which Leo now plainly tells us is shilling for communist globalism. First Jorge Bergoglio/Francis, and now Robert Prevost/Leo XIV, were and are woke activist puppets of the Globalist-Islamist-Woke Alliance (Klaus Schwab’s WEF).
How dare his Secretary General of the Synod of Bishops, Cardinal Mario Grech, say “Our Church is synodal by nature"? He's clearly referring to Leo's Ape of the Church, a new church, not the Church who is our Mother and is Catholic by nature. Grech then has the infernal cheek to add, "That means there’s room for everyone,” and, “No one should feel excluded.”
Oh, we SEE, your Eminence. So its all OUR fault then if, as traditional Catholics denied the TLM and relegated by their bishops to funeral parlours and garages to attend Mass with the Society of St Pius X (SSPX), we feel 'excluded'.
How dare Leo's synodal sect cite, in the final document of the synod, “Nihil sine consensu plebis — nothing without the consensus of the people." This entails, following the synod’s document, that when pastors reach a decision that differs from the opinion expressed by the community, they should not simply impose their will. They should explain the reasons for their decision and remain accountable to the people they serve.” https://radicalfidelity.substack.com/p/a-harsh-question-for-those-who-still
Oh, is that so, your Holiness? Priests in your synodal sect must be accountable not to Our Lord Jesus Christ but to miserable mankind. In short, to sinners. Oh well, that's all right then. Are you sure?
| “The patience of the Church people is exhausted. It is not enough to invoke synodality and at the same time to push concrete reforms to the long bench" (Austrian Catholic feminists) |
And how dare Leo XIV exclude the Roman Canon (Eucharistic Prayer 1) - the most ancient and venerable of the Roman rite, the only one of the Latin Church for fourteen centuries -from all three papal Masses during his upcoming visit to France?
Instead he's going for the anaphora composed in 1968. Oh, we get it, your Holiness. Eucharistic Prayer III is so much shorter. Quicker. More modern. Post-Vatican II. So, like the illegitimate Novus Ordo itself, it will appeal more to French Protestants, as it does to Proddies everywhere and that's why Proddies wrote it. For Proddies.
How dare Leo XIVLeo advocate for the Islamic invasion of the West under the guise of refugee settlement?
How dare he support pro abortion politicians?
How dare he suppress the Mass of Ages and continue to promote the Lavender Mafia to places of power in what he calls the Church? Faithful Catholics must pray daily for Antipope Leo's repentance, healing and reversion to the Mystical Body of Christ.
"I wrote three simple things to Leo: I asked him for an audience; I asked him to repent and to confirm me in the Faith, as Christ commanded Peter; and I asked him to tell me in what way I contradict the *Depositum Fidei*, because I would have shown it to him point by point, and I would have told him how I intend to continue.
I received no sign of a response. And the reason is neither distraction nor too much work: it is that responding would have cost him saying what the synodal church believes, and thus confessing in what way it differs from what the Catholic Church has always believed.
Silence serves him to preserve ambiguity; excommunication exempts him from refuting. But silence is itself a response, and the most eloquent one. A pope who receives James Martin and does not receive an Archbishop who asks him to be confirmed in the Faith has already said which side he is on. https://x.com/CarloMVigano/status/2102772191200698559
No comments:
Post a Comment