+LEO APPOINTS ADULTERY-FRIENDLY BISHOP

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Protestant rants are not posted on this page except to elucidate Catholic doctrine.

Catholics who still turn up on Sunday to the Novus Ordo Mass are the proverbial boiled frogs. Placed in cold water in the NO pot after the Second Vatican Council, they've been gradually brought by Modernist heresy to boiling point - mass apostasy. Their Catholic faith is cooked and they haven't noticed. Neither have they noticed the transformation of Catholicism into a New World Church, a 'spiritual' front for Davos Inc. 

What passes for catechesis is so bad, and our materialistic culture consequently so pervasive, NO Catholics now see the Mystical Body of Christ and all religions as so many social clubs. Like golf clubs. You can join a Catholic golf club or a Protestant or a Muslim golf club, it's all golf. 

Are Catholics bothered about Pope Leo's gradual substitution of Petrine authority by collective, local governance (a UN 2030 goal) of bishops, women and laity? Do they care about the tsunami of heresy engulfing the Mystical Body of Christ, most recently illustrated by Leo's appointment of Capuchin Fr. Pedro Cesário Palma as bishop of Jardim, Brazil? 

Once the papacy and Catholic doctrine are destroyed, they may not even notice the arrival of the Antichrist. 

 The conciliar-synodal revolution undermines the authority of the Roman Pontiff and the authority of the Bishops as Successors of the Apostles, dissolving both into spurious entities such as Episcopal Conferences, the Synod of Bishops, and Ecclesial Conferences (recently inaugurated for the Amazonian Church but to be extended to the entire Church according to well-known practice).

Synodality definitively subverts the divine constitution of the Catholic Church and the Roman Papacy: their destruction (through transformation into something else) is the necessary premise for the establishment of the reign of the Antichrist, who requires a State church with an "honorary" papacy presiding over the Religion of Humanity.

 

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

Control will be in the hands of collegial bodies, in which a small elite will wield power - ostensibly democratic and synodal - without setting any limits: this is the ecclesial version of globalist technocracy.

The process is all too evident from the coherence of the steps that have been taken. Here are the key milestones: 1964 - Episcopal collegiality in Lumen Gentium 1964/65 - Establishment of Episcopal Conferences 1965 - Establishment of the Synod of Bishops (and related reforms of its regulations) 1966 - Retirement of Bishops at 75 1970 - Theorization of the collegial and emeritus papacy (Ratzinger and Rahner) 1995 - Reinterpretation of the papacy from an ecumenical perspective, Ut unum sint 2013 - Theorization of the emeritus papacy (Munus/Ministerium, Renunciation) 2015 - Theorization of Synodality 2020 - Creation of the Amazon Ecclesial Conference (church of the charisms versus ministerial church) 2024 - Theorization of the synodal papacy document “The Bishop of Rome” 2025 - Theorization of the "Church of Charisms"

What motivates the proponents of this "Church of Charisms," this multifaceted (polyhedric) and fluid entity, is the desire to overthrow the katechon, the only earthly (and at the same time divine) institution that can delay the coming of the Antichrist.

 

The Church must no longer be One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman, because there are precisely these Notes that make the Church truly Christ's. She must not derive her authority from Christ the King and Pontiff, but from a people that false shepherds have ensnared in Faith and Morality. And this is Luciferian ὕβρις. (hubris - Ed).https://x.com/CarloMVigano/status/1958222409753907303

 

Cardinal Jose Cobo Cano of Spain where the Church is in a state of collapse 

 

 

Act I: Madrid’s Rainbow Synod Without a Synod

Madrid’s Cardinal José Cobo warmly welcomed the Global Network of Rainbow Catholics, a coalition of New Ways Ministry, DignityUSA, and assorted activist groups. Their message was unambiguous: “LGBTI rights are human rights and any Christian should defend that.”

 

In other words, the supernatural mission of the Church is subordinated to the United Nations’ anthropology of self-invention.

One of the featured stars, Fr. James Alison, is an openly homosexual priest laicized for refusing obedience. Francis personally encouraged him in 2017, telling him he had the “power of the keys.” That single phone call has done more damage than any CDF clarification could undo.

 

Now, under Leo, the rainbow lobby doesn’t even need papal phone calls, they get episcopal red carpets.

 

The Spanish hierarchy, long a laboratory for progressivism, has transformed dissent into a form of communion. Once you “build bridges,” apparently the only direction they lead is away from Catholic doctrine.

 

Act II: Denver Parish Rebels Against the Gospel

 

In Denver, Fr. Daniel Ciucci is under siege. His crime? Preaching about sin, hell, Sunday obligation, and removing “feminist art” from a parish school. Seven hundred and fifty disgruntled parishioners signed a petition accusing him of undermining their “psychological safety.”

 

Let’s pause here. We live in an age where laity cheer LGBT activists in Madrid but revolt against a priest who warns them about judgment. The Denver Post dutifully framed this as a battle between “fire and brimstone” pre-Vatican II clericalism and the Vatican II “welcoming spirit.”

 

In truth, it’s simply a priest who still believes that souls go to Hell colliding with parishioners who believe church is group therapy with stained glass.

 

The irony is that Archbishop Aquila, no model of Tradition himself, defended the priest, revealing how far the center has shifted. A homily called “Why Hell is Welcoming” is shocking today precisely because Hell has been banished from the modernist catechism. The Denver laity are scandalized not by sin, but by its mention.

 

 Capuchin Fr Pedro Cesário Palma, +Leo's new bishop for Jardim, Brazil

 

Act III: Leo’s Bishop for the Adulterers

 

Leo XIV just appointed Capuchin Fr. Pedro Cesário Palma as bishop of Jardim, Brazil. Palma’s claim to fame is not holiness, theological brilliance, or missionary zeal. It is his decade-long “second union ministry,” where adulterous couples are welcomed, integrated, and encouraged to remain exactly where they are.

 

Long before Amoris Laetitia, Palma was hanging banners inviting adulterers to Communion without repentance. By 2011 he was running retreats for divorced and remarried couples, letting them join choirs, catechism programs, and parish councils.

 

This is no accident. Leo is signaling his episcopal strategy: bishops will not be chosen for fidelity to doctrine, but for their creative application of the Francis-Bergoglio school of pastoral realism. Palma’s rise is proof that the “field hospital” is no longer treating wounds, it’s normalizing them.

 

Act IV: Stockholm’s Ecumenical Dreamworld

 

Leo’s message to the Ecumenical Week in Stockholm may sound pious, but beneath the rhetoric lies the true engine of the postconciliar revolution: ecumenism as an end in itself. He praises Nicaea (consubstantial with the Father), but in the same breath praises Söderblom’s 1925 Protestant conference, where doctrine was explicitly downplayed in favor of “practical Christianity.”

 

That line, “service unites,” has been the mantra of the ecumenical movement ever since. The Faith no longer unites; soup kitchens do. The Cross no longer unites; social activism does. What began at Vatican II with Unitatis Redintegratio has matured into a theology of horizontal fraternity in which truth is relativized.

 

Leo’s message tells Lutherans, Anglicans, and Orthodox that “what unites us is far greater than what divides us.” This is false on its face. If the Eucharist, papal primacy, Marian dogmas, and moral law are mere “divisions,” then unity is reduced to vague good feelings.

In historic first, Leo opens Vatican doors to LGBTQ Catholics

The Thread That Binds: A Church Without a Center

 

Whether it is rainbow activists in Madrid, parishioners in Denver, adulterous couples in Brazil, or Protestants in Stockholm, the message is the same: the post-Vatican II Church no longer has the strength to say “no.” Every boundary is porous, every doctrine negotiable, every sin reframed as a “path of openness.”

 

The “loss of psychological safety” in Denver is just the mirror image of the “joy of building bridges” in Madrid. Both assume the Church exists to validate the feelings of the laity. Leo’s episcopal appointments and ecumenical diplomacy only confirm the pattern: the revolution has no brakes, because the brakes were dismantled long ago.

 

The tragedy is not that modern Catholics are divided. The tragedy is that so few can even imagine the Church as She was: a mother who teaches with authority, disciplines her children, and calls sinners to repentance, not to a committee meeting.https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/535900409437696304/170596982153260232?hl=en-GB

 

Domenico Maggiotto, “Christ Healing a Deaf and Mute Man” 

"He hath made both the deaf to hear, and the dumb to speak"

-Gospel, Eleventh Sunday after Pentecost