KIDS' V*X VERY RISKY, COVID NOT AT ALL - HIGH COURT AGREES TODAY

To comment please open your gmail account - or if that's too hard, or use my email address, Facebook or Messenger. 

Ardern's Vaxxy McVaxhole Pfizer bus for kids

Today in Wellington's High Court  lawyers for both the Crown and a group of parents trying to stop the rollout of the Pfizer Covid-19 vax agreed that the risk of COVID-19 in healthy children was nil.

The parties agreed also that there were serious risks from the vaccine. The Crown admitted that there had been at least 100 severe adverse events reported in the United States since the Pediatric Vaccine roll out in November 2021.

It's reported anecdotally that excited mothers are to be seen in New Zealand's GPs' surgeries who just can't wait to inflict the Pfizer poison potion on their little children.  That's just how brainwashed they are. 

The concerned parents. whose identities are suppressed, presented their case for an interim suspension of the rollout of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine to healthy 5–11-year-olds. Affidavits from international experts were presented. 

The parents are supported by an organisation called the ‘Hood, comprising 1500 concerned parents, doctors, nurses, academics, scientists, lawyers and others.  

The applicants sought an interim decision from the judge that, instead of a mass roll-out of the vaccine to healthy children, vaccination be limited to children under the care of a doctor, were immunocompromised, and could receive the Paediatric Vaccine on prescription – as is the ordinary course with most medications.

 A spokesperson for The ‘Hood said the key points were:

• Healthy 5 to 11-year-olds are at extremely low risk from serious symptoms of Covid-19.
• The risk/benefit assessment for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine is materially different between children and adults.

Many disinterested parties seriously dispute that it is in fact a vaccine; they state that instead it is a genetic serum. 

• mRNA vaccines are causing unexpected and serious side-effects.

And one of the researchers involved in the vax's manufacture, Dr Robert Malone, is implacably opposed to its use for children.   

• The risk to otherwise healthy children from adverse vaccine events significantly outweigh any benefits conferred.
• The long-term safety of mRNA vaccines was not established by Pfizer’s clinical trials and continue to remain unknown.
• Pfizer’s vaccine does not prevent transmission.
• Although vaccination of 5 to 11-year-olds is not compulsory, vaccination is effectively mandated because of the significant restrictions placed on unvaccinated children’s activities.
• Informed consent, which requires that parents would expect to receive an explanation of the options available to them and an assessment of expected risks, side effects, and benefits does not apply if consent is given under duress.

And we all can imagine the duress caused by children's distress at being forbidden to join their friends and classmates for sports and fun activities. ("But Mum, EVERYONE'S vaccinated!") 

• Pfizer’s vaccines are experiencing waning effectiveness.
• Negative vaccine efficacy is an increasing concern.

As it should: a vaccine with negative efficacy is one that does not work and is at best a waste of time and money, at worst - as we shall see as more evidence piles up - a waste of lives.   

“At the core of the applicants’ submission was that the judge should apply the fundamental principles of ‘do no harm’ and precaution when considering the risk benefit analysis to vaccinate this age group – namely that she err on the side of caution, given there was greater unnecessary risk from the un-trialed paediatric vaccine than known risks of the disease – at least until the substantive hearing can be heard.”

Justice Rebecca Ellis

 Justice Rebecca Ellis is expected to deliver her decision on Monday.

In December, in a guest post for the BFD, Guy David Hatchard PhD wrote:

We have a small population. (Medsafe) should have sought more information on global adverse event data from Pfizer, especially when the more careful Israeli health system began to blow the whistle on adverse events and reducing vaccine effectiveness. In the event, Medsafe has taken a very lazy and unscientific approach.

They have rejected almost all of the very large number of adverse event reports they have received as either unrelated or unknowable.

Cognitive dissonance rampant. 

In late October, they listed only 1 of the 97 reported deaths proximate to vaccination as caused by vaccination. If they had had access to the April 30th Pfizer report, they could not have reached this conclusion. Without a shadow of doubt, the unprecedented large volume of CARM reports should have alerted Medsafe, Pharmac, MoH, and MBIE and the other participants in the NZ Covid-19 Strategy Task Force that something was wrong.

What caused them to turn a blind eye to the obvious? The flow-on effects from this was to create a lot of misconceived ideas among politicians and GPs, and a lot of unnecessary suffering in the wider NZ population. The subsequent efforts which concealed and/or minimised information were to be even more damaging.

 

Is the COVID Vaccine Causing Deaths of Young Persons?

Sometime in August 2021, 12-19-year-olds became eligible for vaccination. In September, a case was reported in the media of a 17-year-old Auckland female vaccine recipient who suffered blood clots and died immediately subsequent to vaccination. A question was asked at a Jacinda Ardern press conference, her reply was sharp and dismissive—it was unrelated to vaccination and it was irresponsible of journalists to ask such questions.

Classic case of prevarication ...  

She gave this answer to the press before any reliable causal medical determination could have taken place.

It now seems sure that there were more than just this one case of sudden death proximate to vaccination in this age group around this time. In fact, myocarditis is the third leading cause of death in children and young adults. The increased incidence of myocarditis among vaccinated individuals in this age cohort would have alerted Medsafe, the Ministry of Health, and Jacinda Ardern that young adults were being exposed to increased risk of illness and even sudden death.

Vehement denial of this possibility was not an acceptable option. By this time, it was clear that Jacinda Ardern was aiming for very high vaccination rates. Any contrary or cautionary narrative was not welcome, whatever the risks were.

Responding to reports of adverse events including the sudden death of the young girl, my correspondent from the Skegg Committee wrote to me:

“I think it is fair to say that the benefit to the whole population is a factor here.”

In other words, the risks to young people could be discounted because transmission in the wider population would be reduced if youth were vaccinated. This response completely ignored the by then well-known result that vaccination does little to reduce transmission. This shows just how far the narrative was detaching itself from actual science rather than the science that Jacinda Ardern was citing.

On September 30, the NZ Herald reported that Medsafe had concluded that the death of the young girl was probably due to a medication that she was taking. What the article didn’t say was that the ‘other medication’ was a very common everyday medication very widely used by a high percentage of the population. Nor was it newly prescribed. This stretched credulity too far and I took the matter further. After pressing the issue I received this reply:

“I am not saying there is zero association of clotting with Pfizer. There is certainly well documented clotting association with the vector-based vaccines.”https://thebfd.co.nz/2021/12/16/did-the-vaccine-cause-adverse-events/

 

 St Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the Church

On your feastday please pray for our children

and for Justice Rebecca Ellis.