Saturday, 6 March 2021

ARDERN WON'T SAVE BABIES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION, OR THEIR MOTHERS EITHER

To comment please open your gmail account, or use my email address, fb or Messenger. Scroll down for other comments.


Sacrificing babies to the Modern Moloch of convenience 


 Let's see: what's the latest in the list of  New Zealanders' rights up for grabs by Jacinda Jackboot Ardern?

It's hard to keep up, but the most egregious  currently is the right to stand on a public footpath. If, that is, it happens to be a footpath outside an abortion facility, on days when said facility is facilitating the murder of unborn babies. 

And also, maybe, the murder of born babies who survive the murder attempt - because the 'nurses' aren't allowed to nurse them.

And before you go, oh no surely not (as readers of this blog aren't likely to do, but try that line on MSM-fed Kiwis and watch the jaws drop), it's the same in Orstrylia, where Queensland health’s clinical guidelines for abortion, for example, state that “if [during an abortion] a live birth occurs… do not provide life sustaining treatment … document the time and date of death”.

And now in Enzed, Ardern, Little&Co, Dealers in Death, have found a patsy (a more than willing one - maybe she's been promised promotion) in Louisa Wall MP, to fix what went wrong with their evil plans nearly a year ago. Last March, smuggling in the Abortion Legislation Act in the Trojan horse of Lockdown, Labour stuffed up their plan to abolish the right to prayer vigils ("Pro-Life Outreaches ece" the Proddys prefer to call them) which offer to women arriving for appointments to kill their babies love, compassion, alternative courses of action, practical advice and prayer.


A 'nice' billboard image 


It's not just free speech that Ardern, Little&Co intend to snatch, but also freedom of assembly and association, all of which we had naively assumed to be guaranteed under the NZ Bill of Rights 1990. But to a socialist, nothing's sacred except the state.

Mass Murderess Ardern calls Wall's "Abortion Safe Zone Bill" a private member's bill. She also calls it 'a conscience issue'. That's two more of the lies we've come to expect from the woman the useful idiots and smiling zombies elected to run this country. 

She'll be telling all her MPs they have to vote for this bill. Except for a few good men and women whom she'll let off, such as Damien O’Connor, Greg O’Connor, Anahila Kanongata’a-Suisuiki, Nanaia Mahuta, Adrian Rurawhe, Jenny Salesa, Jamie Strange, Rino Tirikatene, Meka Whaitiri, whose names are engraved on God's Roll of Honour for voting against their Party's bill last March. 

But she'll let off voting for 'Safe Zones' only as many as she needs to keep up the pretence that it's a private members' bill. It must be truly horrible for men and women of honour, such as those just mentioned, to find themselves stranded in a party which Michael Joseph Savage once called "Christianity in action", but from which the waters of truth, justice and right long since ebbed away.

To call an abortion facility and the public space outside it a 'Safe Zone' is agitprop, straight out of the communist playbook, an inversion of truth. What place on earth could be more deadly than an abortion facility for an unborn child in the womb of a mother who's keeping an appointment with death?

Ignoring the sham of it being a private member's bill, in the unlikely eventuality of Labour MPs (with the honorable exemption of those mentioned above) being unwilling to toe Ardern&Little's line, guess who would have the job of whipping this sorry lot into line? None other New Zealand's very own Joe Biden, Senior Whip Kieran McAnulty, MP for Wairarapa.


Kieran McAnulty (left) with his inglorious leader


McAnulty calls himself a Catholic. But at least, unlike Biden the Pious, McAnulty admits he rejected Catholic doctrine when same-sex 'marriage' came up. He's an apostate and as such is automatically under excommunication, - and of course no priest would give him Communion (we wish!). He says he's now an Easter-and-Christmas kind of Catholic - a type for whom, under McAnulty's own leader's leadership, it's a pretty dim look-out, considering Ardern's penchant for cancelling the biggest celebrations in the church year.


Kiwis with a conscience and some billboards that are not-so-nice  


As well as liberal on marriage equality, McAnulty also supported the cannabis and euthanasia referenda.
McAnulty’s view on ethical matters is more akin to Biden’s view on abortion; he is not keen to impose his personal beliefs on others.“Not everyone believes in God and society needs a structure that allows people to pursue their own personal beliefs.” 

Pardon me please, Mr McAnulty, for pointing out that if you vote for the so-called 'Safe Areas' Bill - as of course you will, because in this story, for which I am indebted to the apostate publication CathNews, you let slip that you hope for a portfolio - you are preventing people from pursuing their own personal belief in God as the Author of life, a God who is mocked by the sacrifice of unborn children to a modern-day Moloch on an altar of convenience and ambition.

“I want to keep this seat for as long as I want to do this job and I want to do a ….load for the region."

(We may suppose that going by the foul language of your inglorious leader's reaction to this week's earthquake in the Kermadecs, yours will go down well with her - if not with your electorate.)

“But I won’t be able to do that if I’m off doing ministerial …. straight away.”  

           As well as liberal on marriage equality (sic), McAnulty also supported the cannabis and            euthanasia referenda. 

https://cathnews.co.nz/2021/03/04/mcanulty-god-francis-like/

Charming. McAnulty's my MP. It's enough to make one want to run for Parliament.

Say what you like about Australia (and you may say what you like to me, especially about Victoria), it's embarrassing that Australia should be showing the way to New Zealand in terms of care for babies who survive the murderous intent of abortionists. 

Australian MP George Christensen has introduced a bill requiring attending medical practitioners to take action to save the life of a child who survives an abortion.

The bill states that if medical practitioners “do not act to save the child they will face significant financial penalty and probable deregistration as a medical practitioner”.

https://www.lifenews.com/2021/03/05/australia-bill-would-protect-babies-born-alive-after-botched-abortions/




"Unless God has raised you up for this very thing, you will be worn out by the opposition of men and devils. But if God be for you, who can be against you? Are all of them together stronger than God? O be not weary of well doing! 

"Go on, in the name of God and in the power of his might, till even American slavery (the vilest that ever saw the sun) shall vanish away before it” - John Wesley to William Wilberforce, encouraging him to continue in the battle of good against evil, and justice against tyranny. 

Come back, William Wilberforce, we need you now

14 comments:

  1. Michael Hallager says:
    Unfortunately, like most of these discourses they tend to get sidetracked into irrelevant issues like marriage equality and cannabis law reform.

    Andy Harland says:
    I believe that these are reasonable questions……..
    Why would anyone believe that a woman like Jacinda that actively promotes the killing of human babies would give a damn about the rest of humanity?………. Every natural instinct of a normal, decent human is directed at protecting the most vulnerable, namely babies and kids, most woman will fight to the death to protect their babies………what has happened to women like Jacinda that they believe it’s OK to kill defenceless babies?
    If people like Jacinda that are so lacking in basic humanity that they can’t be trusted to defend babies, the most vulnerable humans……..why would you TRUST her to care about you?

    Stewart Bennett says:
    Andy Harland true as... She is the princess of pretence..

    Bob Gill says:
    Apparently there is a legal requirement that babies born alive after a failed abortion must be given medical attention according to: https://www.health.govt.nz/.../questions-and-answers...
    Questions and answers on abortion in New Zealand
    HEALTH.GOVT.NZ
    Questions and answers on abortion in New Zealand
    Questions and answers on abortion in New Zealand

    Simon Archer says:
    Bob Gill how well understood do you think that requirement is by those practicing abortions? And if it is understood (which it ought to be), how well complied with will it be? I personally do not know the answer to these questions, but I fear that at least some born babies will end up being killed by abortionists whose actions were intended kill the that baby in utero.

    Bob Gill says:
    Yes, Simon, we know even from how the Novus Ordo Mass celebration is interpreted differently from town to town in NZ that people will have their own slant on the likes of the abortion law I quoted. I cannot see, for example, someone involved with abortion being charged with murder if he/she intentionally killed a failed abortion child – and I’d be surprised if that didn’t happen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm always stunned, but not surprised, by those Parliamentarians who profess not to want to impose their beliefs. Of course, they impose their beliefs constantly, and their beliefs only.
    I proffer the anti-smacking legislation as an example only because of its blinding illustration of that constant hypocrisy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It all started with Ted Kennedy who always voted pro abortion and got a high Mass on his death. 'I DO OPPOSE ABORTION PERSONALLY BUT CAN'T IMPOSE MY CONSCIENCE ON OTHERS.'

    ReplyDelete
  6. I say:
    Bob, prior to the passing of the Abortion Legislation Act 2020, all babies born alive were "legal people with the same rights as any other person. There (was) a requirement to provide health care in the same way as for any other baby."
    But on March 10 2020 Parliament voted 80 to 37 to defeat an amendment proposed by Simon O’Connor to the government Abortion Legislation Billproposing that a "qualified health practitioner who performed the abortion that results in the birth of a child, or any other health practitioner present at the time the child is born, has a duty to provide the child with appropriate medical care and treatment."
    My uneducated reading of this is that the Abortion Legislation Act did away with that prior requirement or duty. And the Prime Minister has refused to advise Right to Life NZ why she voted to oppose appropriate medical care being given to a child born alive in a late term abortion.
    In September 2018 Ardern stated, “If you ask me why I’m in politics, my answer will be simple: children.” She was prevaricating: she meant, obviously, wanted children only. For Ardern a child's rights are actually its parents'.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bob Gill says:
    Thanks, Julia.

    Kizza Jo says:
    This makes for harrowing listening but it gives some of the Australian stats and practices. Even IF the law says they are to be saved it won't be long until it's changed.
    I weep for these little ones. God forgive us 🥺
    https://youtu.be/Qdhaq3OlErU
    The Truth of It | Born Alive and Left to Die | Joe Biden & Kamala Harris | Ep.63

    Bob Gill says:
    Thanks for sharing, Kizza. I find the actual numbers of those born alive and left to die quite horrifying. God rest their souls.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Michael Hallager says:
    Unfortunately, like most of these discourses they tend to get sidetracked into irrelevant issues like marriage equality and cannabis law reform.

    Andy Harland says:
    I believe that these are reasonable questions……..
    Why would anyone believe that a woman like Jacinda that actively promotes the killing of human babies would give a damn about the rest of humanity?………. Every natural instinct of a normal, decent human is directed at protecting the most vulnerable, namely babies and kids, most woman will fight to the death to protect their babies………what has happened to women like Jacinda that they believe it’s OK to kill defenceless babies?
    If people like Jacinda that are so lacking in basic humanity that they can’t be trusted to defend babies, the most vulnerable humans……..why would you TRUST her to care about you?

    Bob Gill says:
    Apparently there is a legal requirement that babies born alive after a failed abortion must be given medical attention according to: https://www.health.govt.nz/.../questions-and-answers...
    Questions and answers on abortion in New Zealand

    ReplyDelete
  9. Simon Archer says:
    Bob, how well understood do you think that requirement is by those practicing abortions? And if it is understood (which it ought to be), how well complied with will it be? I personally do not know the answer to these questions, but I fear that at least some born babies will end up being killed by abortionists whose actions were intended kill the that baby in utero.
    · Reply · 10h
    Bob Gill
    Yes, Simon, we know even from how the Novus Ordo Mass celebration is interpreted differently from town to town in NZ that people will have their own slant on the likes of the abortion law I quoted. I cannot see, for example, someone involved with abortion being charged with murder if he/she intentionally killed a failed abortion child – and I’d be surprised if that didn’t happen.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I say:
    Bob, prior to the passing of the Abortion Legislation Act 2020, all babies born alive in NZ were "legal people with the same rights as any other person. There (was) a requirement to provide health care in the same way as for any other baby."
    But on March 10 2020 Parliament voted 80 to 37 to defeat an amendment proposed by Simon O’Connor to the government Abortion Legislation Bill proposing that a "qualified health practitioner who performed the abortion that results in the birth of a child, or any other health practitioner present at the time the child is born, has a duty to provide the child with appropriate medical care and treatment."
    My uneducated reading of this is that the Abortion Legislation Act did away with that prior requirement or duty. And the Prime Minister has refused to advise Right to Life NZ why she voted to oppose appropriate medical care being given to a child born alive in a late term abortion.
    In September 2018 Ardern stated, “If you ask me why I’m in politics, my answer will be simple: children.” She was prevaricating: she meant, obviously, wanted children only. For Ardern a child has no right to life, only its parents do. So she's not in politics for children - until they're old enough to vote, that is.

    Bob Gill says:
    Thanks, Julia.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Luke Selby asks:
    Bob, when was this questionaire published? I did see 2018 in the statistics

    I say:
    Luke, whenever, I believe the old law was superseded in the Abortion Legislation Act of March 2020 by Ardern&Little, Death Dealers Inc.

    Luke Selby says:
    Julia du Fresne at four in the morning under the covid lockdown level four I think!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Michael Hallager says:
    It is indeed appalling but unfortunately so is the intersectionality. The radical left has clearly learned a lot from their counterparts over at radical religion. But adoption could be an option for us. Does anyone have any good info on this?

    Kizza Jo
    Bob Gill, no problem. I agree with you. It's very hard to come to grips with.

    ReplyDelete