I hate to say this, but someone has to.
Autism researcher Dr Hilary Stace doesn’t believe there are more autistic
children now than formerly. In the ‘60s in the US, the autism rate was 1 in
10,000. By 2009 the rate was one in 110. Abortion was legalised in the 70s and
took off at a similar rate.
At least three studies show that a previous abortion raises the risk of a
child developing autism by 30 per cent and the pre-conditions for autism are
prematurity and raised maternal age.
The older the mother, the more likely are
previous abortions. Prior abortions boost the chance of extremely prem babies in
later pregnancies, and their chance of autism is 25 times higher than at
full-term.
And although I'm reluctant also to raise the bogey of vaccinations, there’s the question of use of aborted fetal cell lines in
vaccines and its correlation with the rise in autism.
Are pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of women in elective
abortions, by commandeering their child’s body parts for manufacture of vaccines
which research indicates are implicated in causing autism? Are hospital boards
colluding with the pharmaceuticals?
Women are not told about these risks. Very powerful vested interests are
denying women their right to be informed.
No comments:
Post a Comment