Well, what do you know? Today the Dominion Post has tardily published a letter of mine showing the correlation between infant deaths, abortion and prematurity.
Basically, I said (see yesterday's post) that many infant deaths are caused by prematurity which is caused by abortion. Simple as that.
When the Dominion Post yesterday published not one but two silly pro-abortion letters (one about the hoary 'clump of cells' theory and the other accusing the pro-life movement of disseminating 'false information'), I was fairly disgusted. So last night I wrote them another letter (see below).
The convenient theory that a fetus is
just a clump of cells was scientifically disproved years ago, but if you repeat
a lie often enough many people will believe it. That’s the only possible
explanation for Blake Owers’ ideas (Letters, February 23).
And if, as Helen Wilson argues,
(Letters, same date) anti-abortion groups “regularly spread false information”
about the damage caused to women by abortion, how come the media don’t debunk
that ‘false information’ in the same way that they treat fake news?
For example, why doesn’t the
Dominion Post acknowledge Aberdeen University’s study, released
yesterday, of 600,000 Scottish women over 3 decades which shows aborting a first
pregnancy increases the chances of prematurity and all its associated risks,
including cerebral palsy and lung disease, by 37%?
If that’s ‘spreading false information’,
surely it’s the business of the Dominion Post to expose Professor
Siladitya Bhattacharya, whose research was published by the Telegraph
and BBC News, as a wicked fraud, and the Telegraph and
BBC News as gullible and naive.
No comments:
Post a Comment