Of course the anti-smacking law failed. Family First’s report
(Anti-smacking law failed: report, February 12) is a triumph for common
sense.
It’s hardly Family First who’s being ‘ridiculous’, as the law’s promoter
Sue Bradford claims, ‘for suggesting the law should have solved child
abuse’. Family First suggests no such thing.
Surely it’s Bradford herself who
thought the law would solve child abuse. She actually states that the law was
amended ‘to protect children from physical violence’. And in 2010 the Yes Vote
Campaign promoted the law change ‘to protect children from assault’. In other
words, to solve child abuse.
In saying John Key who voted for this nonsense should repeal it, and target
‘real child abuse’, Bob McCoskrie of Family First is right on the money. Child
abuse begins in the womb, with violence against the unborn.
That child abuse is
the root of all the rest, and that’s the child abuse we have to solve
first.
No comments:
Post a Comment