DOYLE SCANDAL: SODOMY BLENDS WITH HYPOCRISY

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Protestant rants are not posted on this page. No more asterisked comments, either.

Doyle's introduction was per kind favour of the Burnett (formerly AIDS) Foundation 

In the interests of transparency (and exposure of evil), here's the injured-innocence piece posted on behalf of Benjamin Doyle yesterday on the Daily Blog by one Martyn Bradbury (pictured):

Martyn Bradbury

The disgusting insinuations that have been dumped upon Green Party MP Benjamin Doyle was an Alt-Right Culture War Dirty Politics drive by shooting.

The alignment of alt-Right Trolls being promoted on alt-Right culture war hate blogs to all use Internet Sleuthing to determine a young father was a child abuser was a new low for New Zealand.

Child abuse is a terrible, despicable and horrific plague on our community and we must always fight it and BECAUSE it is such a terrible, despicable and horrific crime the level of evidence must be high.

The supposed ‘evidence’ is the word ‘bussy’ and pedophilic hieroglyphics which would be hilarious if it weren’t so despicable.

The danger is that the nutters Winston, Ani O’Brien, Ian Wishart, Sean Plunkett, Cameron Slater and The Centrist appeals to will hurt Ben or his whanau. Death threats and character assassinations based on bullsh*t.

What a sad week in NZ Politics.

All of you who fuelled this Lynch mob should be deeply ashamed of yourselves. https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2025/04/07/the-character-assassination-of-benjamin-doyle-was-alt-right-culture-war-dirty-politics/

What is it about Green MP Benjamin Doyle that inspires an urge to call for the death penalty? He's not been convicted of any crime (yet) and anyway it's only taking someone else's life that warrants forfeiting one's own. But that a chap in a skirt and pearls, a sodomite who posts suggestive pix of his own son online, is paid $170,000 plus expenses to pose as a member of New Zealand's Parliament, presupposes a societal degeneracy that begs for the ultimate deterrent. Not to mention the dismal record of his Green cohort.

Evidently the Sensible Sentencing Trust empathises: they've sent Green MP Tamatha Paul up to the sky in Auckland and Wellington, on billboards the beleaguered Swarbrick and Davidson are now trying to take down. Even though Kahurangi Carter’s Copyright (Parody and Satire) Amendment Bill, currently before parliament, advocates for satire. Or maybe the Trust is equally fed up with the Green as grass proposals to defund the police and abolish prisons. One visualises other billboards: "Greens are the Goods for MAPs." "Rimutaka inmate Doyle drops the soap." Better stop there.

New Zealand's climate of moral turpitude is fostered by the MSM, who either studiously ignore the sensational Doyle scandal or, in the case of NZ Herald, defend Doyle - and then bleat about 'our kids at risk online'. Hypocrisy competes with sodomy, it seems, as the vice of the day, in 'Godzone'.

Billboards attacking Green co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick and MP Tamatha Paul are being displayed in central Auckland and central Wellington as part of an attack campaign co-ordinated by the Sensible Sentencing Trust.

 

A picture of Paul, who is also the Wellington Central MP, features in two billboards playing on a loop that can be seen from Whitmore St in the capital.

 

One displays her picture next to the words “Defund the Police” - likely a reference to Paul’s recent comments speculating whether some police functions could be taken over by other entities.

 

It also uses a “Vote Green” slogan, very similar to the party’s election campaign slogans.

 

The second is almost identical but has “Woop Woop! DEFUND DA POLICE” written on it. It’s likely this billboard is a nod to Paul’s use of Sound of da Police by rapper KRS-One during a DJ set at CubaDupa late last month.

 

Both billboards state they were authorised by Louise Parsons of the Sensible Sentencing Trust, an organisation that advocated for harsher crime policy, such as Three Strikes.

 

In a statement, Parsons confirmed similar billboards targeting Swarbrick were running in central Auckland, where Swarbrick is also the local MP.

 

Parsons believed both central cities faced “significant challenges in relation to public safety” and argued Green Party policy wouldn’t address concerns.

 

“The objective of this campaign is to highlight what and who the Green Party stand for. Because it certainly is not victims.”

 

 

NZME's newspapers, radio stations and digital platforms include NZ Herald

 

Swarbrick, in a statement, said her party advocated for “real, evidence-based debate on policy”.

 

 

 

“Are we willing to have a rational, calm discussion about how to genuinely make our communities safer, or will we stay stuck in the knee-jerk shock politics?

 

“It’s clear right-wing organisations and political parties are keen to shut down any civil discussion about where things have gone wrong and how we could improve - so much for being free speech advocates.”

 

The Act Party has noticed the billboards, pointing to them in a video posted to its social media accounts.

 

Stephen Franks, a lawyer who acted as a spokesman for the trust when it was calling for the Government to strengthen its reformed Three Strikes proposal, said he hadn’t seen the billboards but found them entertaining when described by the Herald.

Speaking from a legal perspective, Franks said it was important to determine if the billboards were a genuine attempt to win votes or an attack.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/billboards-attacking-green-mps-chloe-swarbrick-and-tamatha-paul-appear-in-auckland-

wellington/R5TXGHP56RGX3LFS25PAIL3Z2Q/

 "If any man thirst, let him come to me and drink. He that believeth in me, as the scripture saith: Out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water." 

- Gospel, Monday of Passion Week

THE CONCLAVE: SAINTLY +ZEN VS POISONOUS +PAROLIN

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Protestant rants are not published on this page. 

Beijing is intensely interested in the outcome of the next conclave

Beijing is intensely interested in the inevitable forthcoming papal conclave. And so say all of us.

The man just about everyone (for fear or favour) calls 'Pope Francis' has been wheeled away by his minders into oblivion. He can sign only with an 'F'. God -  being presumably fed up with the non-stop avalanche of motu proprios, pressers on planes and general verbal diaorrhea to the devastating detriment of His Mystical Body since 2013 - has silenced him. Francis has to learn to speak again. Oh, spare us. We'd rather not. Thank you. 

In the meantime that wily old fox Cardinal Pietro Parolin (long since characterised on this page as Machiavellian) is centre-stage at the Vatican, manoeuvering to occupy the chair of Peter - equipped, dare we say it, with information of the blackmailing kind.

Parolin is a Bilderberger. Along with such luminaries as Obama, Kissinger and King Charles. The Bilderbergers are building the New World Order, but Parolin says he was there in 2018 only to explain the Catholic faith. If you believe that, you'll believe also his stated opinion that linking clerical sex abuse to homosexuality is "a serious and scientifically untenable association".

He's right, in as much as the horrific plague of sodomy in the Church is more correctly labelled 'ephebophilia' (sodomitic attraction to teenage boys). But +Parolin is catering to the refined and delicate tastes of Chinese Communists, the "Red Troika" (+Cupich, +McElroy, and +Tobin) in the US), and Fr Martin SJ in the hope that sodomite DINKs (double income no kids ever) will enrich the financially embarrassed Vatican, to whose money troubles +Parolin himself has seriously contributed.

While on the subject of ephebophilia, of which the saintly Cardinal Pell was accused, Parolin could likely explain the mysterious transfer of $2M from the Secretariat to Australia during +Pell's trial.

Being in bed with Beijing (per kind favour of the sex fiend McCarrick) Parolin could explain also the Vatican's China policy, named by another prelate revered as a saint - Cardinal Josef Zen - as "immoral" which is entirely congruent with Parolin's mind, described by +Zen as "poisoned".

So a "poisoned mind" is "manipulating" (+Zen's word) the 'Pope', taking advantage of Bergoglio's extreme debility and perhaps amentia, or the absence of mental clarity, which is equivalent to the Pope's death and therefore constitutes grounds for the cessation of his office.  Although that absence of clarity must be “certain and continuous”,  suggesting to suspicious minds that Francis has been resuscitated, snatched from the jaws of death and preserved in a state of uncertain amentia in the interests of postponing the inevitable conclave until the globalist, leftist, not to say Marxist, Bergoglian sect is certain of victory for its candidate. 

Shades of the St Gallen Mafia ... Faithful Catholics' best hope, after and with prayer, is that +Parolin being front runner, every other papabile will run against him. We may console ourselves with the ancient Roman proverb: "He who enters the conclave as pope, leaves as a cardinal."

 Cardinal Mateo Zuppi, the moribund Francis, Cardinal Parolin

From the Remnant: "Who's Running the Church?" https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/7680-who-s-running-the-church-while-pope-francis-remains-an-enigma-european-bishops-tip-their-hats-to-brussels

And from the UK Damian Thompson at the UK Spectator:

For the first time in this pontificate power hungry curial officials are flexing their muscles behind the back of a severely weakened pope.

 

One cardinal in particular is pushing his luck: Pietro Parolin, who is both the Vatican's prime minister and foreign minister. The 70 year-old career diplomat, known for his silky charm, has spent years weaving alliances with rival factions in the Church. Given Francis' habit of defenestrating top advisors without warning, it's testimony to Parolins political skills that he's held on to his job for 12 years.

 

But it is one thing to cultivate useful friends; it's quite another to exploit the pontiff's absence to behave like a deputy pope which the Secretary of State is emphatically not. And it's most dangerous of all to behave like a pope in waiting. Yet that is what Cardinal Parolin is doing.

 

On Feb 24 when it looked like Francis was close to death, he presided over the first prayer vigil in St Peter's Square. The tearful crowds assumed that Parolin, the most powerful cardinal in the Church, was the natural choice to lead it. But precedence in the Vatican is a complicated business.

 

Parolin is outranked by Cardinal Giovanni Batista-Re, who as Dean of the College of Cardinals is responsible for summoning a  conclave when a pope dies, and preaches the funeral homily. Re is 91 and was due to step down last month. Parolin was preparing to succeed him when Francis renewed Re's tenure indefinitely.

 

In other words the Pope blocked his Secretary of State from also becoming Dean. It was a brutal snub. However it was Parolin, not Re, who led the tearful crowds in the rosary, causing some colleagues to mutter about sharp elbows.

 

Eyebrows were raised again on March 14, when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Kelensky thanked the Vatican for its support in facilitating the return of children deported by Russia. He did so in a phone conversation with Parolin rather than with the Pope's personal emissary to Ukraine, Cardinal Matteo Zuppi of Bologna, who helped negotiate the prisoner exchange. Friends of Zuppi – who is widely seen as Parolin’s rival among the Italian bishops – felt that the Secretary of State was exceeding his brief.

 

Now we learn that Parolin will preside over the mass in St Peter’s on 2 April marking the 20th anniversary of ‘the return to the House of the Father’ by St John Paul II. This, too, has put noses out of joint. John Paul’s signature achievement was his role in the collapse of Soviet communism, made possible by ditching the Church’s naive policy of Ostpolitik.

 

Cardinal Parolin, by contrast, resurrected it when he negotiated the 2018 pact with Beijing that has ceded control over the appointment of Chinese Catholic bishops to the Chinese Communist party (CCP) – a deal that could have been agreed only over John Paul’s dead body.

 

‘These instances of Parolin stealing the limelight may be unremarkable in themselves, but together they demonstrate that he’s the only papabile cardinal who is actually running as a candidate,’ says a Vatican observer. ‘And this won’t have passed unnoticed by the Holy Father, whose apparent recovery was perhaps not anticipated by Parolin.’

 

The source points out that when the Secretary of State was summoned to the Pope’s hospital bedside on 2 March he was accompanied by his Venezuelan deputy, Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, who acts as papal chief of staff. ‘Parolin doesn’t get on with Peña Parra, whom the Pope prefers to him. Coming right after Francis blocked Parolin as Dean, inviting his deputy was another snub.’

 

If Parolin can’t conceal his Machiavellian ambitions, why is he portrayed in the media as an unassuming ‘moderate’ whose supporters among the 137 cardinal electors include liberals and conservatives?

Because the media represent the world who loves Francis and want him cloned.

 

There is nothing moderate about the surrender to Beijing. And Parolin’s attitude towards the traditional Latin Mass – increasingly popular with young Catholics – can hardly be described as tolerant. He was one of the Italian bishops who pressed Pope Francis to ban the ancient liturgy.

 

In contrast, the Secretary of State has picked his way through the minefields of women’s ordination and gay blessings, the two issues that could cost him Asian and African votes. His public line is that the ban on ordained female deacons is ‘non-negotiable’, but the late Cardinal George Pell recalled that he once tried to persuade him to support the idea.

 

In some ways Parolin resembles Francis (then Cardinal Bergoglio) before the 2013 conclave – a closet liberal who tells conservatives what they want to hear.

The biggest danger is that Parolin’s Chinese allies would increase their grip on Vatican City. ‘He doesn’t give you the impression that he hates the Church,’ concedes one of Parolin’s enemies.

Of course not. When did a professional charmer ever give the impression of hating anyone?  

A Pope Parolin would sideline the experiment in ‘synodality’ – an Anglican-style talking shop for woke activists – that is trying the patience of bishops the world over. He would continue to embed liberals in the Roman curia, but would steer clear of the pro-abortion zealots and trans-rights fanatics whom Francis hosted in order to goad the traditionalists.

 

The biggest danger is that Parolin’s Chinese allies would increase their grip on Vatican City, whose computers they have already hacked: just last week Meng Anming, a Chinese biologist and CCP loyalist, was appointed to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. Catholic campaigners for human rights in China also suspect that Beijing, which owned the gay hookup app Grindr when it was installed on hundreds of clerical smartphones, has vast amounts of Kompromat to play with – a factor, perhaps, in the Vatican’s kowtowing to the CCP.

 

Cardinal Zen - heroic

 

The Beijing pact is the Secretary of State’s Achilles’ heel. In 2018 Cardinal Joseph Zen, the heroic 93-year-old former bishop of Hong Kong, accused Parolin of having ‘a poisoned mind. He is very sweet, but I have no trust in this person’. In 2020 he went further, describing his defence of the deal as sickening. ‘Parolin knows he himself is lying,’ said Zen. The Pope was being manipulated by ‘the Most Eminent Parolin and his henchmen’. For a prominent cardinal to attack a Secretary of State using such language was unprecedented. Yet it made few headlines in the secular press.

For the reason cited above. The world loves Parolin, just as it loves Bergoglio.

 

This brings us to a crucial weapon in Cardinal Parolin’s armoury: his cosy relationship with the Vatican left-leaning press corps, which has concealed Francis’s protection of Latin American sex-abusers as doggedly as White House correspondents tried to hide Joe Biden’s mental decline.

 

For more than a decade Parolin has supplied journalists with exclusives in return for their discretion. Questions about disappeared Chinese bishops have not been asked; nor is there curiosity about Parolin’s relationship with the defrocked ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick, who travelled to China to negotiate the notorious deal long after the Vatican knew he was a serial predator.

 

And what did Parolin know about Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta? This Francis protégé was jailed for four-and-a-half years for his assaults on Argentinian seminarians – but only after the Pope tried to airlift him to safety by employing him to oversee the Vatican treasury. In 2017 a horrifying account of Zanchetta’s crimes was given to Mgr Vincenzo Turturro, deputy nuncio in Buenos Aires.

 

Turturro, formerly Parolin’s private secretary, passed on the details to the Secretary of State, who said nothing while Francis covered up for Zanchetta.

Cardinal Parolin’s scandalous failures, which include catastrophic financial losses incurred by his staff in a London property scandal, transcend the question of whether he is liberal or conservative.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

But, of course, it still matters: if his feline manoeuvres succeed – if he persuades the African cardinals that he is fundamentally orthodox – then he is better placed than any of the papabili to become pope.

 

There may well be a conclave this year: there is speculation that, if Francis does move back to the Casa Santa Marta (as he has since - ed), he will receive the equivalent of hospice care. One rumour has it that he will appoint a senior official, not necessarily a cardinal, to act as his deputy. Another report suggests that he will meddle with the conclave rules to stop orthodox cardinals comparing notes.

 

Francis leaves hospital, back turned probably to hide his oxygen tube

At the moment, the conservatives don’t appear to have a candidate. The scholarly Cardinal Peter Erdo of Esztergom-Budapest is nervous and hesitant; the ex-Protestant Cardinal Anders Arborelius of Stockholm is deeply spiritual, but it doesn’t help that he is a Carmelite – having experienced a Jesuit pope, cardinals are wary of electing another member of an order.

 Ahem. Jesuits promise never to seek high office in the Church. Evidently Bergoglio and his St Gallen Mafia promoters thought nothing of breaking a promise. If anyone knows that Discalced Carmelites make a similar promise, pray tell.  

The Italian Cardinal Fernando Filoni is a diplomat who risked his life as ambassador in Baghdad – but he’s been accused of keeping quiet about McCarrick. Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, made headlines when he offered himself as a hostage in place of Israeli children. He exudes a dignified charisma and doesn’t belong to any faction but is perhaps too young at 59.

 

'Bicycling Beanpole' +Zuppi with Francis

As for the liberals, Francis loyalists are divided between the Portuguese Cardinal José Tolentino Mendonca, prefect of the Dicastery for Culture and Education and an admired poet, and the ‘bicycling beanpole’ Cardinal Zuppi, a kind-hearted socialist fond of the Latin Mass. Both men are gay-friendly,

... meaning they approve of sodomy ... 

which will make it difficult to achieve the necessary two-thirds majority. Then there is the exuberant Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines, mysteriously demoted by Francis as head of evangelisation

 

Cardinal Parolin’s scandalous failures transcend the question of whether he is liberal or conservative but now back in favour. Another liberal possibility, incredibly, is the jargonspouting Cardinal Mario Grech, the Maltese secretary general of the Synod of Bishops. He’s despised by conservatives, who call him ‘the bozo from Gozo’.

 

But none of the above can boast a contacts book, knowledge of secrets or reserves of patronage to compare with those of Cardinal Parolin. On the other hand, none has been branded a poisonous liar by a cardinal regarded by many as a living saint.

 

A great deal depends, therefore, on whether the former leader of the Catholic Church in Hong Kong can attend the pre-conclave meetings at which cardinals ineligible to vote advise the electors – assuming, of course, that the 93-year old cardinal outlives the 88-year-old pontiff. What we do know is that Zen wants to be there, and that it is in Parolin’s interests to stop him. Beijing is intensely interested in the outcome of the conclave. Will it intervene?

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-spectator/20250322/281921663832558

"Amen, amen, I say to you, before Abraham was made, I am." 

- Gospel, Passion Sunday

'BUSSY GALORE' MP DOYLE, ALL GREENS, MUST GO

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Protestant rants are not posted on this page.

 Well now. Several Members of Parliament need to be sent forth from the Debating Chamber. Forthwith, now and forever. 

The first to be urgently despatched into the outer darkness (and may there be much wailing and gnashing of teeth) is the terminally confused and confusing biblebeltbussy Green Guy (or maybe Girl) Benjamin Doyle, aka Bussy Galore. 'Dr' Doyle, he/she/they is/are not: the PhD claimed on Instagram has not been got. This 'fierce advocate' for the 'rainbow community' who wears a dress and pearls and nail polish has a partner: a woman. And a child whom he kisses on the mouth (for photographs) and tattoos and whom he allegedly is transing. 

Doyle, whom the Greens made their spokesperson on Early Childhood Education and sex education in schools, seems to all intents and purposes to be a MAP (Minor-Attracted Person, aka Paedophile). Chloe Swarbrick and Marama Davidson gave him this job and have defended him with lies, throwing the entire rainbow community under the bussy while they were at it.

You'd never have known if it weren't for X and The Centrist: Swarbrick went full 'Pope Francis' on Doyle, talking Doyle up as the victim of 'immense death threats'. (Threats made in upper case, perhaps?) They ignored the real victim, who is of course his little boy. NZ Police who are investigating said threats should get on with investigating Doyle. If Luxon, Peters and Seymour won't cast out Doyle and his Greenbackers out, the next election will. And Luxon Peters and Seymour could well be the babies thrown out with the bathwater.

Then there's Te Pati Maori: Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. But that's another story.

Doyle on the steps of Parliament ... with children

The alarmed expression on Marama Davidson’s face when Chloe Swarbrick referenced Benjamin Doyle’s “subset” of the Rainbow Community was priceless. “That’s it!” she cried, abruptly shutting down the media conference and ushering her co-leader as far away from the cameras and microphones as possible.

But why? Surely, what New Zealanders are most keen to hear from the Greens, Doyle in particular, is an explanation. If the images and text uplifted from his BibleBeltBussy Instagram site (now in “hiatus” mode) were unfairly ripped from their context, then, for God’s sake, give us the context!

If only because, by not giving us the context the suspicion is immediately raised that any explanation offered by Doyle and/or his Green Party colleagues would only have the effect of making matters worse. Which, of course, only makes matters worse.

Indeed, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that Davidson shut down the media stand up because she was pretty sure what the next question was going to be: “What subset of the Rainbow Community might that be, Chloe?” Davidson was terrified that her bright-eyed idealist of a co-leader, in the spirit of transparency and full disclosure, would feel obliged to provide the assembled journalists with a detailed answer.

But what would that answer have been?

 

Doyle with his partner (a high school teacher) and son at Parliament where they have no business to be

 

Any journalist willing to spend a few moments on Google would be confronted with at least one possible answer. Not that anyone who has taken an abiding interest in the history of the international Green movement needs Google’s help. For left-leaning politicos, active in the 1980s, the weird and wonderful story of Germany’s Die Grünen and their “Urban Indians” was most unlikely to slip from their memory.

Certainly, the German Greens have had to reconcile themselves to the fact that they will never be allowed to forget their disastrous early association with the political movement pressing for the “legalization of all affectionate sexual relations between adults and children.”

That association, a feature of Die Grünen politics from 1980 until 1987, was recalled in a 2013 article published in Spiegel International. Under the headline “Paedophile Links Haunt Green Party”, a trio of journalists, Jan Fleischhauer, Ann-Katrin Müller, and Renee Pfister detailed the electoral perils of excessive tolerance – which were, apparently, obvious from the get go:

When the Green Party was founded in 1980, paedophiles were part of the movement from the start – not at the centre of its activities, but always hovering along the periphery. At the first party convention in the southwestern German city of Karlsruhe, pacifists, feminists and opponents of nuclear energy were joined by the so-called ‘Urban Indians’, who advocated the ‘legalization of all affectionate sexual relations between adults and children.’ From then on, paedophiles, noisy and wearing colourful body paint, were often a visible part of Green Party gatherings.

 

Hoo-boy! You see the problem here? There is absolutely no evidence that Benjamin Doyle subscribes in the slightest way to the ideas of these 1980s German Greens, and I am certainly not suggesting that he does.

The difficulty he faces, however, is that, in the absence of a clear and fulsome personal explanation of the images and text lifted from BibleBeltBussy and posted on social media, Doyle’s critics will take it upon themselves to scour the internet for answers – and the Spiegel International story, or one very like it, is what they’ll find.

No matter how hard Marama Davidson might wish she and her co-leader could simply walk away from this controversy, the Greens will not be allowed to. The party and its beleaguered MP absolutely must provide the electorate with an explanation – or an electorally devastating explanation will be plastered all over social media by its socially conservative opponents.

Certainly, the tactics employed to date – deflection and misdirection – are likely to have a very short shelf life. Yes, the torrent of death threats pouring forth against Doyle is deplorable and must be condemned by all parties in the strongest terms. But it’s worth remembering that the Green List MP is not the only person under attack. The individuals responsible for publicising his life-world have also been assailed by pseudonymous keyboard cowards. It is, surely, the rankest hypocrisy to condemn the emotional violence unleashed upon Doyle, while dismissing the furious backlash against his critics with the callous observation that they ‘had it coming’.

 

And, while we’re discussing political ethics, a word or two should be devoted here to the performance of the mainstream media. If ever there was a subject that could benefit from being investigated and rendered intelligible by fearless and impartial journalism, it is the seemingly limitless permutations of human sexuality with which our society is expected to contend.

Defending everybody’s right to ‘do their own thing’ may fill journalists with a golden glow, but it is an inadequate response to the fear and loathing so often inspired by unconventional sexual expression.

How many “subsets” are there in the Rainbow Community? More or less than in the Cis Community? And what distinguishes a dangerous subset from one that is merely avant-garde?

These are the sort of questions David Lynch attempted to answer in his deeply disturbing movie Blue Velvet. He begins his story with the discovery of a severed human ear, and then guides his agitated audience towards a fuller appreciation of the world’s frightening complexity.

The Greens have never shied away from complex, or frightening, realities. It would be a shame if they were to begin now. New Zealand has questions, the Greens best, and probably their only option, is to answer them. (Chris Trotter.) 

This article was originally published on the author’s Substack. 

 https://goodoil.news/oh-please-explain/?fbclid=IwY2xjawJcTAtleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHfUoZXx5btEJFcxsizNmtes58OaLNAYJH0hUiNB9ak74tbexN587xQCr_Q_aem_hs0iUVL7b5uXyQbIkRxp5g

A CATHOLIC HERO AT A BLACK MASS IN KANSAS

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Protestant rants are not posted on this page.   

 

 

 

Before making his move                                               Consuming the Host

“Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas any more.” The thousands of Kansas Catholics who protested against a Satanic Mass in their Capitol Building must have felt the same as Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz. Especially the man who threw himself onto the ground to save the Blessed Sacrament from desecration by the chief Satanist stamping on It. He consumed the Host before he himself was trampled on and beaten up.

The practice of Holy Communion in the hand introduced by Vatican II after centuries of Communion on the tongue means that theft of the Sacred Host by Satanists (or by naughty boys, for a dare or for money) is relatively easy. Satanists have national and international networks which collect and preserve the Sacred Hosts for the celebration of Black Masses.

 

Satanists target the Eucharist. Always. Protestants should ask themselves why the devil leaves them to their own devices. Satan sees them as harmless. What he hates and fears is the Body of Christ. 

 

Assumption Church packed for prayers of reparation

 On March 28, Satanists made a bold move.

 

A group called the Satanic Grotto attempted to hold a Black Mass inside the Kansas State Capitol building. Their intention? To blaspheme the Holy Mass and the Blessed Sacrament in a symbolic state venue.

 

However, faithful Catholics threw a wrench into their malignant plans. Immediately, the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family, and Property (TFP) mobilized against this demonic affront.

 

The Power of a Petition Drive

 

The TFP launched four petition drives on its different sites, calling on Kansas Governor Laura Kelly to prevent the Black Mass from taking place inside the Capitol. These efforts gathered over 95,000 signatures, which were delivered to the governor’s office on March 27.

 

Only days after the petition drives began, Governor Kelly announced that the Satanic Grotto’s permit to hold the sacrilege inside the Capitol had been revoked. However, authorities granted them another permit to gather outside.

 

This response was still unacceptable. At 10:15 a.m., TFP members, supporters, and friends gathered at the south entrance of the Kansas State Capitol to oppose the Satanic Black Mass.

 

Face to Face with Evil

 

The Satanists were already preparing the ground for their rituals. Counter-protesters began to chant, “Christ is King,” to which the sons of darkness responded, “Christ is dead.” They cursed and blasphemed non-stop, taking every opportunity to offend the dignity of Our Lord.

 

 

Satanic leader Michael Stewart held up a Host and began to blaspheme. He then threw the Host onto the ground and began stomping on it. A man dove into the crowd and consumed the Blessed Sacrament.

 

Immediately afterwards, the man who had rescued Our Lord was arrested and taken away in handcuffs.

 

“He then threw the Host onto the ground and began stomping on it.”

About thirty minutes later the Satanists made their way to the Capitol entrance.

 

They were told that they could only enter if they agreed not to hold any religious rites. However, they immediately began to blaspheme upon arriving at the rotunda.

 

Another brave man attempted to remove the satanic ritual from Michael Stewart’s hands. The head Satanist punched him in the face before police pinned him to the ground and arrested him.

 

A Beautiful Sight to Behold

 

The contrast between the ugliness of devil worship and the beauty of the Catholic Faith was striking.

 

TFP volunteers brought their trademark red standards, signs, banners, and a magnificent statue of Our Lady of Fatima. Four TFP members in ceremonial habit carried the statue, adding solemnity to the rosary rally.

 

Hundreds of local Catholics joined the rally, along with supporters from across the country. People traveled from Missouri, Texas, Florida, California, Pennsylvania, and beyond.

 

Francis Slobodnik, a Kansas resident and TFP supporter explained how he was inspired to organize the rosary rally. Former U.S. congressman Tim Huelskamp  proclaimed, “Silence in the face of evil is evil!”

 

 

 

The crowd prayed fifteen decades of the Rosary, singing Marian and patriotic hymns between decades. Bagpipes and drums added energy and enthusiasm to the prayers. The Consecration to the Sacred Heart of Jesus was then prayed, asking God to protect Kansas from demonic influence.

 

Why Satan Lost 

 

Some might ask how the Satanists lost, given that they still carried out their blasphemy on the Capitol steps. There are three key reasons:

Firstly, the Satanists were exposed. They had hoped to pass under the radar and carry out this blasphemy. Satan’s biggest victories come when he acts in public without opposition. As a result, devil worship becomes increasingly seen as “normal” in society.

 

They faced the righteous anger of thousands of God-fearing Americans and were forced to act defensively. They faced bad publicity, which exposed their blatantly anti-Catholic behavior. Instead of coming closer to being culturally acceptable, the Satanists came across a roadblock.

Satan defeated at Kansas City Capitol

Secondly, the Satanists were booted out of the Capitol Building. Having a Black Mass underneath the Capitol’s rotunda would have been much more symbolic. It would have meant complicity on the part of officials. But after the TFP’s petition drive, Governor Kelly felt enough pressure to revoke their original permit.

 

Furthermore, were it not for the protest Michael Stewart and others would not have been arrested.

 

Finally, Satanists will be forced to think twice before taking more public action. Whenever they publicly attack God, they will have to face off with thousands of Catholics. It will become increasingly clear that America is a God-fearing country .

 

Mr. Slobodnik summed up the rally perfectly:

 

“TFP founder Professor Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira often reminded us that the devil’s head was made to be crushed by Our Lady. That is exactly what happened today. The devil reared his ugly head in Kansas, and faithful Catholics immediately crushed it. This must happen all over America. Every time Satanism appears in public, Catholics must stand up for God’s rights.”

The battle is not over, but March 28 proved once again that when Catholics take a stand, Satan always loses.

Watch the Video: LIVE Rosary of Reparation Against Satanic “Black Mass” in Kansas 

 Satan Defeated at the Kansas Capitol—Here’s How It Happened - The American TFP

 

Holy Michael, Archangel, defend us in the day of battle