APOSTASY FROM THE TOP: SATAN RULES A FALSE CHURCH

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.

Leo XIV wearing the 'creepy' pectoral cross of the satanist Cardinal Joseph Bernardin

The new church



 

Oh joy! It's exhilarating! Yes, sarcasm is the lowest form of wit but - Cardinal Mario Grech (who claims the heterodox German ‘Synodal Way’ was inspired by the ‘Holy Spirit’ ) has issued a document on the “path of implementation of the Synod on Synodality”. And Leo XIV will personally present his 1st encyclical, "Magnifica Humanitas, on the protection of the human person in the age of artificial intelligence,”on May 25.

"Magnificent Man". Doesn't that just epitomise the ethos of Vatican II and its innovative New Mass: the unbloody re-presentation of the Sacrifice of the Son of God on Calvary, morphed into a mutual admiration society of priest and people? Christ, Who until the Consecration (which may not be valid), is often not even really and substantially present in a Novus Ordo church.

"It is Satan who has been introduced into the bosom of the Church," said St Padre Pio to the famed exorcist Fr Gabriele Amorth in the '60s, "and within a very short time he will come to rule a false church.”

The chief tools now at Satan's disposal as he puts the finishing touches to that false church are the Trojan horse of the 'New Mass', and the Synod, which opens up that beast to release mass apostasy into the Body of Christ. “In the Third Secret it is foretold, among other things, that the great apostasy in the Church will begin at the top.” Those are the words of Cardinal Mario Luigi Ciappi, personal theologian to five successive popes, in 1995. 

As St Thomas Aquinas observed, the apostate “seems to turn away from God altogether: and consequently, apostasy, simply and absolutely that whereby a man withdraws from the faith, is called ‘apostasy of perfidy.’” 'Perfidy’ because it's a betrayal of Christ Himself. 

By publicly declaring they now belong to this 'new church', most of the hierarchy have declared themselves to be Judases - as also are the bishops, priests and people who have held their false peace or worse, slandered the few who point to the lace and Latin that are the Emperor's new clothes. 

Father Albert Jacquemin, a doctor of legal history and canon law, is one of those who defected from the Society of St Pius X (SSPX) when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre consecrated the new bishops necessary for the preservation of the Faith and salvation of souls (the lex suprema of the Church). Rorate Caeli, a site sympathetic to the conciliar church, has published +Jacquemin's "The Choice of Rupture: Archbishop Lefebvre, Rome, the Consecrations, 1974–2026." 

In view of the widely acknowledged heterodoxy of Leo XIV (cited in the article below), +Jacquemin's statement that "while a "state of necessity" does exist, it can never be invoked against the explicit will of the Pope" begs the question, "but how can Leo be a Pope?"RORATE CÆLI: Fr. Albert Jacquemin, formerly of the SSPX: "The SSPX Is Explicitly Developing an Ecclesiology of Substitution Foreign to Catholic Tradition"

"When a man can be accurately described as a:

• 'James Martin-welcoming,
• Viganò-alienating,
• Blessed Virgin Mary-demoting,
• homosexual-couple-blessing,
• pedophile-promoting,
• SSPX-excommunicating,
• China-faithful-ignoring,
• communist-endorsing,
• Pachamama-adorer' ... how does one square that with recognizing Leo as the Vicar of Christ? The cognitive dissonance is crushing." (John-Henry Westen, Lifesitenews.)

"Six decades of non-infallible statements, disciplinary changes, public actions, catechetical norms, sacramental 'updates,' and encyclical letters that when taken together just so happen to contradict not just the magisterium of the Church prior to Vatican II, but radically change how the faith is understood, taught, and lived for the faithful and clergy across the world." (Stephen Kokx, Kokx News.)

 

The faithful who accept heresy and heterodoxy and slander those who don't

A guest post from a reader, Michael:

Fr. Albert Jacquemin misses the elephant in the room. We are now in the final stages of an "Apostasy from the top." Most - not all, but most - of the (former) hierarchy of the Church now publicly declare that they belong to a new church. Many of the rest consent to the Apostasy by their silence.

 

Who do the SSPX ask this time for approval to consecrate Bishops? In order to hold office inside the Catholic Church a person must be IN the Catholic Church. The Papacy is an Office of the Catholic Church.

 

With regard to Prevost/Leo, he has:

1.  Publicly worshipped a demon idol (in 1995), and remains silent about Francis doing the same back in October 2019 in the Vatican, during the Amazon Synod.

 

2.  Marched with Communists (1983), and tells Communist groups (in a prepared speech, October 2025) that he is "with them".

 

That's Robert Prevost (Leo XIV) on the right, marching with the Italian Communist Party  

https://catholiconline.news/vatican-city/young-pope-leo-xiv-seen-in-communist-organized-peace-rally-as-1983-p

 

https://www.lepantoin.org/wp/pope-leo-to-october-meeting-of-marxist-revolutionaries-i-am-here-i-am-with-you/#comment-171999

 

3.   Has worn the same (or similar) pectoral cross as that worn by the satanist Joseph Cardinal Bernardin of Chicago.

 

https://abyssum.org/2021/02/11/beware-of-this-creepy-pectoral-cross-worn-on-the-chest-of-a-bishop/

 

4.  Approved the Mass for LGBTQ++ in Rome (in the Church of the Gesu), and said nothing when they marched through the Jubilee Holy Doors.

 

And Leo said nothing

5.     He continues Francis' work to build the "new Synodal Church".

 

 

 

So is there currently a Pope? There have been gaps between Popes before. How many cardinals have spoken out against the Synodal 'Church', or warned that it denies the Apostolic Mark of the Church, thereby also denying the other three Marks? None of the cardinals as far as I'm aware.

 

The process to create a new church did not start in 2014 nor even in the 1960s. It goes back to the French Revolution. Vatican 2 just accelerated the process: it prepared the faithful to accept what is now called the "synodal process" (i.e. democracy) and the "new Synodal Church." The Modernist Heresy was well established inside the Church before Pius X wrote his encyclical, Pascendi Dominic Gregis.

 

The Apostasy from the top is the reason for scenes like this (below) at a LBGTQ++ funeral held in St Patrick's Catholic Cathedral, New York, for the Synodal Study Group Report #9.

 

They have declared a new church.  A new church that does not have the Apostolic Mark but instead has a democratic mark (Synodal).

 

 

 

 

Study Group 9 Report:

https://www.synod.va/content/dam/synod/process/implementation/10workinggroups/final-reports/sg9/SG-9_Final-Report.pdf

 

 

    https://lizyore.substack.com/p/the-obscene-reality-of-the-sin-nod

 

"Here’s the money quote in all its subtlety: “The synodal process, in reality, calls for a conversion of heart and mind as well as a transformation of practices so that we may walk with fidelity and renewed vigor.”

 

Read that again! Make no mistake - the entire synodal process is a psychological exercise to exorcise doctrine from the faith and install a new modern church comprised of the dogma of listening and dialoguing. This report, as well as the entire synodal project, is a concerted psychological operation to impose a one world religion by 2030. Change attitudes first, then dogma will follow."

 

Christ will always remain with His Church. The Church's Head does not separate from the Church's Body. The Church is in Heaven, and in Purgatory, as well as here on earth.

 

But the Church on earth is now getting very small. It is not necessarily made up only of the people who are called "Trads," but still very small.

 

 

 

Pentecost approaches 

 

"If Thou take Thy grace away, nothing pure in man will stay, All his good is turn’d to ill."